Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Distribution of Relaxation Times analysis of evolution of Oxygen Reduction Pathways for ionic conductor infiltration on MIEC cathode

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Samaria-doped ceria infiltration into an STF cathode moves the rate-limiting step of the oxygen reduction reaction from surface exchange to electron transfer and cuts polarization resistance to $0.04\,\Omega\,\mathrm{cm}^2$ at 800 °C.

desk verdict A useful DRT dataset on SDC-infiltrated STF cathodes with a plausible but under-validated process map; worth peer review, but the peak assignments need independent testing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08767 v1 pith:5SKRGH6H submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Rakhi Saha , Preethi Sudarsan , Manju Kumari , Hee Jung Park , Abdelkrim Mekki , Khalil Harrabi , Somaditya Sen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords DistributionofRelaxationTimesOxygenReductionReactionCathodeinfiltrationPolarizationresistanceImpedancespectroscopySolidoxidefuelcellSamaria-dopedceriaMixedionic-electronicconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that infiltrating ionic samaria-doped ceria (SDC) into a mixed ionic–electronic $\mathrm{SrFe_{0.9}Ti_{0.1}O_{3-\delta}}$ (STF) cathode changes which step of the oxygen reduction reaction is slowest, and that the change can be tracked by decomposing impedance spectra into relaxation-time peaks. Using distribution of relaxation times (DRT) analysis, the authors resolve eight processes and assign them to surface exchange, activation and charge transfer, oxide-ion incorporation, and ohmic response. They find that SDC preferentially accelerates the slow surface-exchange and activation steps, so in infiltrated cells the dominant resistive contribution shifts to electron transfer to adsorbed oxygen (peak P5), and total polarization resistance falls to $0.04\,\Omega\,\mathrm{cm}^2$ at 800 °C. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a quantitative, mechanistic reason for how much ionic conductor to add and why performance saturates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the distribution of relaxation times (DRT) spectrum, obtained by transforming temperature-dependent electrochemical impedance data into the relaxation-time domain and fitting it with eight Gaussian peaks, P1 through P8. Each peak is assigned a physical step: P1–P2 to surface oxygen exchange, P3–P5 to oxygen activation and near-surface charge transfer, P6–P7 to oxide-ion incorporation and transport, and P8 to the cell's ohmic response. The argument is carried by tracking each peak's area (its resistive contribution) and center frequency as a function of temperature and infiltration cycle; the shift of the dominant peak from P2/P3 to P5 is the evidence that the rate-limiting step has moved.

What would settle it

Repeat the impedance measurements while varying the oxygen partial pressure over several orders of magnitude and compare the DRT peak responses: if P5 is electron transfer to adsorbed oxygen, its resistance should follow a characteristic pO2 dependence (roughly a 1/4-power law for charge transfer), while a pure oxide-ion incorporation peak should be nearly pO2-independent. An 18O2 isotope-exchange experiment would independently label the surface-exchange peaks. If the pO2 responses do not match the stated assignments, the claimed bottleneck shift is an artefact of the fitting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that successive SDC infiltration into an STF cathode does not simply lower the total resistance; it systematically redistributes the individual oxygen reduction subprocesses. In pristine STF above 700 °C the largest resistive contributions are the low/medium-frequency peaks P2 and P3, assigned to surface oxygen exchange and activation. After infiltration those peaks shrink dramatically, and the dominant contribution becomes P5, assigned to electron transfer from the STF surface to adsorbed oxygen. The authors report polarization resistance falling from $3.94\,\Omega\,\mathrm{cm}^2$ at 650 °C for pristine STF to $0.04\,\Omega\,\mathrm{cm}^2$ at 800 °C for the fourth infiltration (IF4), with the optimal loading lying between IF3 and IF4, roughly 25–33 wt.% SDC; beyond that, a weak low-frequency peak near $10^{-1}$ Hz signals gas diffusion and concentration polarization from pore blockage.

Load-bearing premise

The entire interpretation depends on the DRT spectra being truly decomposable into exactly eight Gaussian peaks and on each peak corresponding to the named physical step; no independent experimental handle, such as oxygen partial-pressure variation, isotope exchange, or a reference electrode, is used to verify that assignment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the DRT assignments are right, infiltration of an ionic conductor into an MIEC cathode can be used deliberately to move the rate-limiting step to surface electron transfer, making that process the next target for catalyst design.
  • The identified 25–33 wt.% window gives a quantitative infiltration target: less SDC leaves surface exchange slow, and more SDC starts to block gas diffusion, so gains beyond IF4 should be marginal.
  • At 800 °C the infiltrated cathode reaches area-specific resistances around $0.02$–$0.025\,\Omega\,\mathrm{cm}^2$, which is in the range needed for intermediate-temperature SOFC operation; the paper's comparison table positions it favourably against other SFO-derived cathodes.
  • Because the P6/P7 resistances saturate once a connected ionic network forms, the results predict a ceiling on how much oxide-ion transport can be improved by simply adding more ionic phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test this, but the same peak-tracking protocol could be applied to other MIEC cathodes with an electronically conducting or catalytically active infiltrant to see whether the direction of the bottleneck shift depends on whether the infiltrant is ionic, electronic, or electrocatalytic.
  • The authors imply, without stating it, that the appearance of a ~0.1 Hz gas-diffusion peak at the highest loading could serve as an early diagnostic for over-infiltration; checking this under load or in a longer-term test would give an operational warning threshold.
  • An untested corollary is that the optimal loading should shift with electrode thickness and porosity, since gas-diffusion limitations set in when the pore network is occluded; the 25–33 wt.% window is therefore specific to this ~30 μm, ~370 nm-particle scaffold.
  • The eight-Gaussian choice is a modelling decision; re-fitting the published spectra with a different number of peaks or a non-Gaussian shape would test whether the conclusion that P5 dominates is robust.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) study of symmetric cells with SrFe0.9Ti0.1O3-δ (STF) cathodes infiltrated with Sm0.2Ce0.8O2-δ (SDC) in successive cycles. The authors fit the impedance with a two-arc equivalent circuit and then use Distribution of Relaxation Times (DRT) analysis to resolve eight relaxation processes, P1–P8. They conclude that SDC infiltration preferentially accelerates surface oxygen exchange and activation processes, shifting the dominant kinetic bottleneck from P2/P3 in pristine STF to P5 (assigned to electron transfer to adsorbed oxygen) in infiltrated cells, and that the polarization resistance drops to as low as 0.04 Ω·cm² at 800°C. The optimal SDC loading is placed between IF3 and IF4, approximately 25–33 wt%.

Significance. If the mechanistic assignment holds, the paper offers useful practical guidance for cathode design and demonstrates DRT as a tool for following ORR subprocesses as a function of infiltration. The experimental backbone is solid: a systematic infiltration series with structural characterization, consistent monotonic reduction of polarization resistance with SDC loading, and a carefully measured set of EIS spectra. However, the central mechanistic claim—that the rate-limiting step shifts to P5—depends entirely on a model-dependent DRT decomposition whose peak count, line shape, and peak-to-process assignments are not independently validated. Because the significance of the paper rests on this assignment, the missing uncertainty quantification and the circularity in the peak-identification argument are load-bearing issues that need to be addressed before the conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [DRT section, Figure 10] The DRT analysis is presented without any quantification of the fitting uncertainty or validation of the chosen Gaussian decomposition. The text states that eight relaxation processes P1–P8 were resolved, but it does not report the regularization method, hyperparameters, residuals, or confidence intervals, nor does it compare alternative peak counts or line shapes. This matters because the central claim that P5 becomes the dominant resistive contribution above 700°C depends on splitting the medium-frequency region into P3, P4, and P5, including a feature that merges with P4 and an additional Padd at 800°C. Without such validation, the apparent dominance of P5 may be an artifact of the decomposition rather than a property of the data.
  2. [DRT peak assignment paragraph] The physical assignments of P1–P8 are taken from literature and then said to be 'further supported by the infiltration results,' but those infiltration results are precisely the effects the assignments are used to explain, making the validation circular. No independent experimental handle—such as oxygen partial pressure variation, isotope exchange, or a reference-electrode measurement—is used to tie P5 to electron transfer to adsorbed oxygen as opposed to oxide-ion incorporation or gas diffusion. Consequently, the mechanistic conclusion that SDC removes the surface-kinetics bottleneck and leaves P5 as the principal rate-limiting step is not established.
  3. [EIS equivalent circuit vs. DRT section] The manuscript uses only two equivalent circuit elements (R0-(R1||CPE1)-(R2||CPE2)) to describe the same impedance data that are deconvoluted into eight Gaussian peaks, and the relationship between these two descriptions is not discussed. Since the DRT peaks are extracted from the same EIS data that are later used to infer process resistances, the paper should justify how eight resolved peaks emerge from a two-arc spectrum and should show that the integrated DRT peak areas are quantitatively consistent with the equivalent-circuit resistances R1 and R2. Without such a consistency check, the eight-peak decomposition remains a strong, untested modeling assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Ea paragraph after Figure 8] In the activation-energy paragraph, the values '1.31 eV (IF4), and 0.61 (IF4)' appear to contain a typo; one of the IF4 entries should presumably refer to IF3, since the preceding list already includes IF1 and IF2.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract states that the optimal loading is 'approximately 25 to 33 weight percent,' while the conclusion states 'approximately 25–30 wt%;' the measured loadings are 24.6% for IF3 and 32.8% for IF4, so the two statements should be reconciled.
  3. [Temperature dependence of RP, Table 2] The text says pristine STF resistance decreases 'from 4.05 Ω·cm² to 0.18 Ω·cm² (~26 times less),' but Table 2 lists RP values of 3.94 and 0.16 Ω·cm² at 650 and 800°C, a factor of about 24.6; please correct the numbers.
  4. [Capacitance notation, Figure 9] The notation for the CPE-derived capacitance is introduced as C1/C2, but Figure 9 uses CPE1/CPE2 and C1/C2 interchangeably; please unify the notation for clarity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

DRT peak assignments are partly validated by the very infiltration-driven peak shifts they are used to interpret, making the P5 bottleneck shift partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Results and discussion, DRT section (paragraph following Figure 10)]
    "The proposed assignments are further supported by the infiltration results. Since SDC is known to have high VO concentration,[44] relative changes in DRT peaks following infiltration provide insight into the extent to which the corresponding processes are coupled to surface defect density."

    The paper first assigns P1-P2 to surface oxygen exchange, P3-P5 to activation/charge transfer, P6-P7 to oxide-ion incorporation, and P8 to ohmic response. It then cites 'relative changes in DRT peaks following infiltration' as support for these assignments. But those relative changes (e.g., P2/P3 shrinking, P5 becoming dominant) are only meaningful in process terms after the assignments are assumed; the same data cannot independently confirm the labels. No oxygen-partial-pressure series, isotope exchange, or reference-electrode measurement is used to tie P5 to electron transfer to adsorbed oxygen, so the central claim that infiltration shifts the bottleneck to P5 rests in part on a self-referential validation.

full rationale

The resistance values and their reduction with infiltration are self-contained EIS results and are not circular. The circularity enters at the level of physical interpretation: the DRT spectra are decomposed into eight fixed Gaussians and labeled by process, and then the infiltration-induced changes in those labeled peaks are said to support the labels. Since the labels are what make the changes interpretable, this is a circular validation. However, the peak-to-frequency assignments are also taken from prior literature (refs. 4, 41-43), so the paper does not derive them entirely from its own data. The measured ASR decrease to 0.04 ohm-cm2 at 800 C stands on the EIS fitting rather than on the DRT assignments. The central mechanistic claim about P5 is partially circular and also under-validated, but not forced by a self-citation chain. Hence a moderate score of 4 rather than a higher one.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on four assumptions: the validity of the DRT inversion, the chosen equivalent circuit, the identity of the two symmetric electrodes, and the literature-based assignment of DRT peaks to ORR subprocesses. The first two are standard in impedance analysis; the last is the most fragile because it is not independently tested. No new physical entities are introduced, aside from an extra DRT peak called Padd, which is an analytical artifact rather than an entity.

free parameters (4)
  • Equivalent circuit resistances R1 and R2 = Varies with cell and temperature; RP ranges from 3.94 to 0.04 ohm.cm2
    Obtained from CNLS fitting of EIS spectra. These are the basis for RP, ASR, and activation energy calculations.
  • CPE parameters (Q, n) for CPE1 and CPE2 = Not tabulated for all conditions; used to compute C1, C2, and characteristic frequencies
    Constant phase elements are fitted to account for nonideal capacitive behavior; the capacitance values are derived from Q and n.
  • DRT Gaussian peak parameters = Eight peaks per spectrum, with position, amplitude, and width fitted
    The DRT spectra are deconvoluted using Gaussian functions, and the number of peaks is chosen by the analyst. These fitted parameters determine the resistance assigned to each ORR subprocess.
  • Activation energies Ea = Examples: 1.72 eV (STF LF), 0.61 eV (IF4 HF)
    Derived from the slope of log(ASR) versus 1000/T. Used to infer whether a process is rate-limiting and to suggest that gas diffusion is absent.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The DRT transform of the measured impedance is well-posed and unique under the chosen regularization, and Gaussian peak fitting accurately represents the underlying distribution.
    DRT requires solving an inverse problem from limited frequency data. The paper does not report the regularization parameter or any validation of the Gaussian decomposition.
  • domain assumption The equivalent circuit R0-(R1||CPE1)-(R2||CPE2) captures the electrode response.
    The two semicircular arcs in the Nyquist plots justify this circuit, but other equivalent circuits could fit the data equally well.
  • domain assumption Both electrodes of the symmetric cell are identical, so ASR equals RP divided by 2.
    The factor of 1/2 is used to report ASR values, assuming the two STF electrodes are identical.
  • domain assumption The ORR proceeds through the sequence O2,g -> O2,ads -> 2Oads -> Oads- -> O2- and the frequency regimes correspond to the named steps.
    Peak assignments are borrowed from prior DRT studies (references 18, 37, 40, 41) and are not independently verified here. This is the load-bearing premise for the mechanistic conclusions.
  • domain assumption SDC infiltration does not chemically alter the bulk STF, so changes in DRT peaks are due to surface modification.
    Based on XRD showing unchanged STF peak position and FWHM. XPS was only performed on pristine STF, not on infiltrated cells, so surface chemistry changes are not directly confirmed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distribution of Relaxation Times analysis of evolution of Oxygen Reduction Pathways for ionic conductor infiltration on MIEC cathode." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5SKRGH6H

@misc{pith2026260808767,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distribution of Relaxation Times analysis of evolution of Oxygen Reduction Pathways for ionic conductor infiltration on MIEC cathode},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5SKRGH6H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08767}
}
read the original abstract

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are promising electrochemical energy conversion devices; however, the sluggish cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) remains a major limitation for intermediate-temperature operation. ORR subprocesses can be modified by infiltrating ionic Sm0.2Ce0.8O2-delta (SDC) on mixed ionic electronic SrFe0.9Ti0.1O3-delta (STF). However, the processes are indistinguishable in most cases and poorly understood using conventional equivalent circuits. Distribution of Relaxation Times (DRT) analysis distinguishes these processes to identify the dynamics with temperature and surface reconstruction. Such analysis is being reported, revealing the connection between increase of active sites, temperature, and polarization resistance (RP). SDC infiltration preferentially accelerates oxygen surface exchange and activation processes over the relatively high frequency charge transfer process related to cathode surface at elevated temperatures for the infiltrated cells. RP was reduced substantially with the systematic redistribution of each process to as low as 0.04 ohm.cm2 at 800 degC. This work underlines the deconvolution of the processes using DRT as a tool, and SDC infiltrated STF as a model cathode system to provide a mechanistic insight of understanding ORR kinetics and design a rationale for developing high-performance SOFC air electrodes

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y. Yang, J. Lei, X. Huang, Z. Liao, Y. Liu, Z. Tu, Recent Development in Reversible Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Theory, Integration and Prospective, ChemElectroChem 11 (2024) e202300593. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202300593

    work page doi:10.1002/celc.202300593 2024

  2. [2]

    C. Duan, R. Kee, H. Zhu, N. Sullivan, L. Zhu, L. Bian, D. Jennings, R. O’Hayre, Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production, Nat Energy 4 (2019) 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2 2019

  3. [3]

    Stambouli, E

    A.B. Stambouli, E. Traversa, Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): a review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 6 (2002) 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00014-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s1364-0321(02)00014-x 2002

  4. [4]

    S. Dey, R. Saravanan, A. Sethurajaperumal, R. Bal, G.C. Mather, G. Ganesh, E. Varrla, A. Puranik, K. Nowicki, M. Mukhopadhyay, A.R. Allu, J. Mukhopadhyay, Bi-Functional Oxygen Electrocatalysts for Reversible Solid Oxide Cells: The Influence of A-Site Non- stoichiometry on the System (La or Ba) 0.6– x Sr0.4 Co0.8 Fe0.2 O3−δ, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 8 (2025...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaem.5c00803 2025

  5. [5]

    Boldrin, N.P

    P. Boldrin, N.P. Brandon, Progress and outlook for solid oxide fuel cells for transportation applications, Nat Catal 2 (2019) 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0310-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0310-y 2019

  6. [6]

    F. Liu, H. Deng, D. Diercks, P. Kumar, M.H.A. Jabbar, C. Gumeci, Y. Furuya, N. Dale, T. Oku, M. Usuda, P. Kazempoor, L. Fang, D. Chen, B. Liu, C. Duan, Lowering the operating temperature of protonic ceramic electrochemical cells to <450 °C, Nat Energy 8 (2023) 1145–1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01350-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01350-4 2023

  7. [7]

    Ndubuisi, S

    A. Ndubuisi, S. Abouali, K. Singh, V. Thangadurai, Recent advances, practical challenges, and perspectives of intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell cathodes, J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 2196–2227. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta08475e

    work page doi:10.1039/d1ta08475e 2022

  8. [9]

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/er.4907 (accessed July 3, 2026)

    A review of solid oxide fuel cell component fabrication methods toward lowering temperature - Zakaria - 2020 - International Journal of Energy Research - Wiley Online Library, (n.d.). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/er.4907 (accessed July 3, 2026)

    work page doi:10.1002/er.4907 2020

Show all 48 references
  1. [10]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. Ricote, P.V. Hendriksen, Y. Chen, Advanced Materials for Thin‐Film Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Recent Progress and Challenges in Boosting the Device Performance at Low Temperatures, Adv Funct Materials 32 (2022) 2111205. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202111205

    2022 doi

  2. [11]

    Y. Li, N. Mushtaq, Y. Chen, W. Ye, Z. Zhuang, M. Singh, Y. Jing, L. Fan, Revisiting Mo‐ Doped SrFeO3‐δ Perovskite: The Origination of Cathodic Activity and Longevity for Intermediate‐Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Adv Funct Materials 35 (2025) 2411025. https://doi.org/10....

    2025 doi

  3. [12]

    Dhongde, S

    V. Dhongde, S. Basu, Tailoring Sr2 CoNbO6−δ –Sm0.2 Ce0.8 O1.9 Composite Cathode to Enhance Oxygen Reduction Reaction and CO2 Tolerance for the Application in Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 8 (2025) 790–

    2025

  4. [13]

    Nielsen, J

    J. Nielsen, J. Hjelm, Impedance of SOFC electrodes: A review and a comprehensive case study on the impedance of LSM:YSZ cathodes, Electrochimica Acta 115 (2014) 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.053

    2014 doi

  5. [14]

    Boukamp, Distribution (function) of relaxation times, successor to complex nonlinear least squares analysis of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy?, J

    B.A. Boukamp, Distribution (function) of relaxation times, successor to complex nonlinear least squares analysis of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy?, J. Phys. Energy 2 (2020) 042001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/aba9e0

    2020 doi

  6. [15]

    Dierickx, A

    S. Dierickx, A. Weber, E. Ivers-Tiffée, How the distribution of relaxation times enhances complex equivalent circuit models for fuel cells, Electrochimica Acta 355 (2020) 136764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136764

    2020

  7. [16]

    Osinkin, An approach to the analysis of the impedance spectra of solid oxide fuel cell using the DRT technique, Electrochimica Acta 372 (2021) 137858

    D.A. Osinkin, An approach to the analysis of the impedance spectra of solid oxide fuel cell using the DRT technique, Electrochimica Acta 372 (2021) 137858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137858

    2021

  8. [17]

    M. Nohl, G. Raut, S.E. Wolf, T. Duyster, L. Dittrich, I.C. Vinke, R.-A. Eichel, L.G.J.D. Haart, Analysis of the DRT as Evaluation Tool for EIS Data Analysis, ECS Trans. 103 (2021) 1403. https://doi.org/10.1149/10301.1403ecst

    2021

  9. [18]

    Ghamarinia, A

    M. Ghamarinia, A. Babaei, C. Zamani, H. Aslannejad, Application of the distribution of relaxation time method in electrochemical analysis of the air electrodes in the SOFC/SOEC devices: A review, Chemical Engineering Journal Advances 15 (2023) 100503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j...

    2023

  10. [19]

    Hassan, S.U

    M.H. Hassan, S.U. Rehman, S.Y. Batool, R.-H. Song, T.-H. Lim, J.-E. Hong, D.-W. Joh, S.-J. Park, H.-S. Kim, S.-B. Lee, Nanoengineering of a Commercial-Scale Cathode Undergoing Highly Active Oxygen Dissociation via a Synergistic Effect of Sm0.5 Sr0.5 CoO3 /Ce0.8 Sm0.2 O2 Compos...

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021- 24255-w (accessed July 3, 2026)

    Nanoengineering of cathode layers for solid oxide fuel cells to achieve superior power densities | Nature Communications, (n.d.). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021- 24255-w (accessed July 3, 2026)

    2026

  12. [21]

    D. Ding, X. Li, S. Yuxiu Lai, K. Gerdes, M. Liu, Enhancing SOFC cathode performance by surface modification through infiltration, Energy & Environmental Science 7 (2014) 552–

    2014

  13. [22]

    Javed, D

    A. Javed, D. Sikstrom, Y. Furuya, N. Dale, A.M. Hussain, V. Thangadurai, Enhancing the Performance of Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells via Infiltration with an Aqueous Solution of Metal Nitrate Salts, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17 (2025) 9305–9314. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2025 doi

  14. [23]

    Ghamarinia, A

    M. Ghamarinia, A. Babaei, C. Zamani, Electrochemical characterization of La2NiO4- infiltrated La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ by analysis of distribution of relaxation times, Electrochimica Acta 353 (2020) 136520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136520

    2020

  15. [24]

    Falcón, J.A

    H. Falcón, J.A. Barbero, J.A. Alonso, M.J. Martínez-Lope, J.L.G. Fierro, SrFeO3-δ Perovskite Oxides: Chemical Features and Performance for Methane Combustion, Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 2325–2333. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm011292l

    2002 doi

  16. [25]

    Saha, K.S

    R. Saha, K.S. Samantaray, P. Maneesha, S. Chandra Baral, S.N. Sarangi, R. Urkude, B. Ghosh, R. Mittal, M.K. Gupta, A. Mekki, K. Harrabi, S. Sen, Effect of V5+/V4+ substitution on structural and magnetic orderings of SrFeO3-δ, Ceramics International 51 (2025) 39855–39865. https...

    2025 doi

  17. [26]

    Kumar, A

    S. Kumar, A. Das, S. Omar, Electrochemical Performance of SrFeO 3− δ for Application as a Symmetric Electrode in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 6 (2023) 2049–2062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c04034

    2023 doi

  18. [27]

    Kumar, D.N

    S. Kumar, D.N. Chhatrodiya, S. Omar, Probing the Electrochemical Performance of SrFe0.9 Ti0.1 O3−δ for the Symmetric Electrode in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 7 (2024) 2153–2166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c02793

    2024 doi

  19. [28]

    G. Yang, C. Su, Y. Chen, F. Dong, M.O. Tade, Z. Shao, Cobalt-free SrFe0.9Ti0.1O3−δ as a high-performance electrode material for oxygen reduction reaction on doped ceria electrolyte with favorable CO2 tolerance, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 35 (2015) 2531–2539. https...

    2015 doi

  20. [29]

    http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML

    S. Roh, Oxygen vacancy induced structural evolution of <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><msub><mi>SrFeO</mi><mrow><mn >3</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></math> epitaxial thin film from brownmillerite to perovskite, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018). https://doi.org...

    2018 doi

  21. [30]

    T.-H. Lee, L. Fan, C.-C. Yu, F.E. Wiria, P.-C. Su, A high-performance SDC-infiltrated nanoporous silver cathode with superior thermal stability for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 7357–7363. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA01104D

    2018 doi

  22. [31]

    J. Liu, L. Wang, Z. Fei, X. Chen, J. Tang, M. Cui, X. Qiao, Structure and properties of amorphous CeO2@TiO2 catalyst and its performance in the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3, Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 44 (2016) 954–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/S18...

    2016 doi

  23. [32]

    Reddy, A

    B.M. Reddy, A. Khan, Y. Yamada, T. Kobayashi, S. Loridant, J.-C. Volta, Structural Characterization of CeO2 −TiO2 and V2 O5 /CeO2 −TiO2 Catalysts by Raman and XPS Techniques, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 5162–5167. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0344601

    2003 doi

  24. [34]

    Maneesha, K.S

    P. Maneesha, K.S. Samantaray, S.C. Baral, R. Mittal, M.K. Gupta, S. Sen, Defect/disorder correlated modification of transport properties from hopping to tunneling processes in BaTiO3–LaFeO3 solid solution, Journal of Applied Physics 135 (2024) 194102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0195109

    2024 doi

  25. [35]

    Bagus, C.J

    P.S. Bagus, C.J. Nelin, C.R. Brundle, S.A. Chambers, A New Mechanism For XPS Line Broadening: The 2p-XPS of Ti(IV), J. Phys. Chem. C 123 (2019) 7705–7716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05576

    2019 doi

  26. [36]

    Ghaffari, M

    M. Ghaffari, M. Shannon, H. Hui, O.K. Tan, A. Irannejad, Preparation, surface state and band structure studies of SrTi(1 − x)Fe(x)O(3 − δ) (x = 0–1) perovskite-type nano structure by X-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, Surface Science 606 (2012) 670–677. https://...

    2012 doi

  27. [37]

    A. Zare, H. Salari, A. Babaei, H. Abdoli, H. Aslannejad, Electrochemical evaluation of Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6-δ/Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 cathode of SOFCs by EIS and DRT analysis, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 936 (2023) 117376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117376

    2023

  28. [38]

    Zhang, Z

    M. Zhang, Z. Du, Z. Sun, H. Zhao, Unraveling the promotional role of BaCO3 in the electrode reaction kinetics of an SmBaFe2O5+δ air electrode of reversible solid oxide cells, J. Mater. Chem. A 11 (2023) 21645–21654. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta04776h

    2023 doi

  29. [39]

    Aravind, J.P

    P.V. Aravind, J.P. Ouweltjes, J. Schoonman, Diffusion Impedance on Nickel/Gadolinia- Doped Ceria Anodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (2009) B1417. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3231490

    2009 doi

  30. [40]

    Im, M.-B

    H.-N. Im, M.-B. Choi, B. Singh, D.-K. Lim, S.-J. Song, Investigation of Oxygen Reduction Reaction on La0.1 Sr0.9 Co0.8 Fe0.2 O3-δ Electrode by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 (2015) F728–F735. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0581507jes

    2015 doi

  31. [41]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Shen, Y. Wang, Z. Du, B. Zhang, F. Ciucci, H. Zhao, Enhanced oxygen reduction kinetics of IT-SOFC cathode with PrBaCo2 O 5+ δ /Gd0.1 Ce1.9 O 2− δ coherent interface, J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 3495–3505. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA09615J

    2022 doi

  32. [42]

    Sudarsan, C.-J

    P. Sudarsan, C.-J. Choi, H.J. Park, Exceptional cathodic performance of nanostructured La– Sr–Co–Fe–O highly dispersed in porous yttria-stabilized zirconia frameworks for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 198 (2026) 15259...

    2026

  33. [43]

    Ghosh, B.K

    S. Ghosh, B.K. Kakati, G. Jhaa, T.S. Dabodiya, S. Basu, Bifunctional Strontium‐Iron Doped Neodymium Cobaltite: A Promising Electrocatalyst for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and CO2 Electrolyzer, Small 21 (2025) 2408963. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202408963

    2025 doi

  34. [44]

    S.M. Yang, S. Lee, J. Jian, W. Zhang, P. Lu, Q. Jia, H. Wang, T. Won Noh, S.V. Kalinin, J.L. MacManus‐Driscoll, Strongly enhanced oxygen ion transport through samarium-doped CeO2 nanopillars in nanocomposite films, Nat Commun 6 (2015) 8588. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9588

    2015 doi

  35. [45]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, F. Chen, In-situ quantification of solid oxide fuel cell electrode microstructure by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Journal of Power Sources 277 (2015) 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.123

    2015 doi

  36. [46]

    Ananyev, N.M

    M.V. Ananyev, N.M. Porotnikova, V.A. Eremin, E.Kh. Kurumchin, Interaction of O2 with LSM–YSZ Composite Materials and Oxygen Spillover Effect, ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 4247–

    2021

  37. [47]

    Yin, W.-P

    Z.-H. Yin, W.-P. Zhang, W. Luo, H. Liu, J.-J. Wang, Oxygen Spillover: Revolutionizing Catalytic Performance and Disrupting Mechanistic Paradigms in Sustainable Chemistry, Advanced Materials 37 (2025) e11007. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202511007

    2025 doi

  38. [575]

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE42926A

    doi

  39. [800]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c02232

    doi

  40. [4262]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c04558

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.