Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 95 references

White dwarf-neutron star matter transition and the effect of light elements

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single relativistic mean-field Lagrangian produces one cold equation of state from white-dwarf to neutron-star densities, with every transition pressure set by a unique Maxwell crossing.

desk verdict Solid, honest framework with public code, but the 'unified EoS' headline overstates a construction whose final junction is an acknowledged proxy for the missing inner crust. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08824 v1 pith:KO5XATUA submitted 2026-08-09 nucl-th

Yao Ma , Yong-Liang Ma , Ruo-Xi Wu , Yue-Liang Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-th
keywords whitedwarfsneutronstarsrelativisticmean-fieldtheoryWigner-SeitzcellsneutronizationMaxwellconstructionmass-radiusrelationlight-elementenvelopes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that one relativistic mean-field Lagrangian can describe white dwarfs, neutron stars, and the matter between them as a single zero-temperature equation of state. The low-density side is built from self-consistently solved Wigner-Seitz cells—a nucleus plus its electron gas—and the high-density side from uniform nuclear matter with the same interaction. Along fixed-composition neutronization paths seeded by helium, carbon, and oxygen, sub-states are joined at unique Maxwell equilibrium points, with no free parameter in the transition pressures. If correct, the model gives common mass-radius curves for both classes of star and a ready-made input for studies of white-dwarf–neutron-star mergers and related gravitational-wave sources. The authors state plainly that the last junction is a proxy for the omitted inner-crust physics, so the claim of a fully continuous EoS stands or falls with that approximation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the relativistic mean-field Lagrangian itself, used in two modes: finite Wigner-Seitz cells with full electromagnetic Maxwell equations for white-dwarf matter, and uniform pure-neutron matter for the neutron-star branch. The mechanism that carries the argument is the p(\mu_B) Maxwell construction: each neutronization sub-state is a curve of pressure against baryon chemical potential, the stable ground state is the upper envelope, and every first-order transition is fixed uniquely by the crossing point of two curves, which enforces mechanical and chemical equilibrium with no free parameter. The resulting piecewise equation of state is then integrated through the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations to produce mass-radius relations, with the light-element composition of the outer envelope retained as a physical degree of freedom.

What would settle it

Compute the inner-crust equation of state for the same RMF Lagrangian, including clusters plus dripped neutrons and pasta phases, and compare its free energy to the proxy crossing: if it stays below the extrapolated uniform branch over a finite pressure interval, the paper's unique Maxwell junction is not the physical transition and the low-mass neutron-star radii will shift. Observationally, a radius measurement of a ~1.4 solar-mass neutron star below the model's 13.4–13.6 km band, or a carbon-core white dwarf above ~1.0 solar masses, would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single Walecka-type Lagrangian, solved differently in two density regimes, yields one cold equation of state and mass-radius sequence spanning white-dwarf and neutron-star densities. In a white dwarf, matter is organized into Wigner-Seitz cells; as pressure grows, each fixed-A sequence neutronizes through discrete sub-states (N_n,N_p) to (N_n+1,N_p-1), selected at each pressure by minimum Gibbs free energy per baryon, with transitions placed at crossings of p(\mu_B) curves where pressure and chemical potential match. The helium-seeded sequence reaches about 1.4 solar masses, the carbon-seeded sequence about 1.0 solar masses (because neutronization lowers Y_e before the Chandrasekhar limit is reached), and the oxygen sequence has no pure 16O ground branch at all. On the neutron-star side, keeping the light-element envelope as a surface layer changes radii by about 0.2 km at 1.4 solar masses, at the percent level. The paper labels the final junction onto uniform matter a proxy for the missing inner-crust regime rather than a genuine transition, and leaves a self-consistent inner-crust calculation to future work.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the assumption that the abrupt crossing between the bound-cell branches and the extrapolated uniform-matter curve can proxy for the real inner crust, which is actually a region of nuclear clusters, dripped neutrons, and pasta phases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • White-dwarf and neutron-star mass-radius curves now come from one parameter-free transition prescription, so the same EoS table can be dropped into WD-NS merger simulations and decihertz gravitational-wave event modeling.
  • Carbon-seeded white dwarfs should cap near 1.0 solar masses rather than the classical 1.4 solar-mass Chandrasekhar limit, because neutronization to the (7,5) sub-state reduces the electron fraction before maximum mass is reached.
  • An intermediate- or low-mass neutron star's radius carries a 0.2–0.3 km composition signature, so a precise radius measurement could distinguish helium, carbon, or oxygen envelope histories.
  • No pure 16O white-dwarf branch is predicted: the A=16 sequence begins on the neutron-richer (9,7) sub-state because the (8,8) cell never minimizes the Gibbs free energy.
  • The zero-temperature cold equilibrium family, with its unstable interval between the WD and NS branches, provides a baseline for accretion-induced-collapse studies, though not a dynamical collapse path.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the full inner crust is added self-consistently, the final junction will likely move; the ~0.2 km low-mass radius signature and the location of the WD-NS transition are the natural observables to test the proxy.
  • The same electron-fraction suppression that caps carbon white dwarfs near 1.0 solar masses may apply to other neutronization-sensitive compositions, implying that observed white dwarfs near the classical Chandrasekhar limit constrain the in-medium isobar energetics used here.
  • Because the core EoS is common across envelope compositions, a single high-precision radius measurement at 1.4 solar masses cannot cleanly separate core EoS from envelope composition; joint inference with tidal deformability would be needed.
  • A finite-temperature extension of this unified EoS would let the same framework predict electromagnetic and gravitational-wave signatures of WD-NS mergers, connecting the disrupted white dwarf's composition to the envelope physics studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a relativistic mean-field (RMF) framework intended to describe white-dwarf matter and neutron-star matter with the same Lagrangian. White-dwarf matter is modeled as a sequence of self-consistently solved Wigner-Seitz cells with full electromagnetic interaction, while the high-density branch is uniform nuclear matter computed from the same Lagrangian. The authors follow fixed-A neutronization paths for 4He, 12C, and nominal 16O seeds, join adjacent sub-states by Maxwell constructions in the p–μ_B plane, and solve the TOV equations to obtain mass-radius relations for white dwarfs, neutron stars, and the intervening unstable branch. The main quantitative claims are helium- and carbon-seeded white-dwarf maximum masses of about 1.4 and 1.0 solar masses, a common neutron-star branch with maximum mass 2.20 solar masses, and a light-element envelope effect on neutron-star radii of about 0.2 km at 1.4 solar masses. The authors explicitly state that the inner crust is not modeled and that the final junction to the uniform branch is a proxy, and that the uniform branch is pure neutron matter with beta-equilibrium proton fraction neglected.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, a single EoS spanning white-dwarf to neutron-star densities would be a useful common basis for WD-NS merger studies, accretion-induced-collapse simulations, and decihertz gravitational-wave source modeling. The paper has clear strengths: the Wigner-Seitz cell treatment with self-consistent electromagnetic fields goes beyond the standard point-nucleus descriptions of white-dwarf matter; the Maxwell-construction procedure for the fixed-A restricted sequences is parameter-free once the cell EoSs are given; the finite-nucleus validation of the NN1 parameter set against A=16 isobars is informative; and the code and parameter sets are openly provided. However, the advertised 'consistent zero-temperature equation of state from white-dwarf to neutron-star densities' is not actually constructed, because the inner crust is missing and the neutron-star branch is pure neutron matter. As a result, the quantitative neutron-star predictions, including the quoted 0.2 km envelope effect, rest on a proxy junction and on an approximation to beta-equilibrated matter.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, last paragraph and Table I] The final junction of each sequence is explicitly described as 'a proxy for the onset of this missing inner-crust physics rather than as a genuine transition to uniform matter.' The abstract and Sec. I nevertheless advertise 'exact Maxwell junctions' and 'a consistent zero-temperature equation of state from white-dwarf to neutron-star densities.' Because the physical inner crust, with nuclear clusters plus dripped neutrons and pasta phases, would lower the free energy over a broad pressure interval and persist up to n_cc ~ 0.076 fm^-3, whereas the proxy crossings occur at n_+ ~ 5e-4 fm^-3 (Table I), the constructed object is not the claimed unified EoS. This directly affects the location of the WD-NS transition, the low-density part of the neutron-star branch, and hence the derived radii and maximum mass.
  2. [Sec. II, uniform-matter paragraph and Eq. (3)] The uniform neutron-star branch is evaluated as pure neutron matter, so the beta-equilibrium condition of Eq. (3), mu_n = mu_p + mu_e, is not defined for that phase. The final crossing is therefore a geometric p(mu_B) intersection between the bound-cell branch and an extrapolated uniform branch that does not satisfy the same chemical-equilibrium conditions. The authors note that this stiffens the core EoS by a few tenths of MeV per baryon and defer a self-consistent npe-mu rerun to future work. Since the neutron-star mass-radius relations and the NICER comparison in Sec. IV D depend on this branch, the central neutron-star predictions are provisional.
  3. [Sec. IV A and Fig. 4(b)] The NN1 and NN2 parameter sets are fit using 'constraints from nuclear physics and NS measurements' (Ref. [52]). The comparison of the predicted neutron-star radii to NICER and GW170817 constraints in Fig. 4(b) is therefore partly in-sample rather than an independent test of the model. The paper should quantify how much of the radius agreement is driven by the inclusion of neutron-star data in the parameter estimation, for example by showing the predicted radii with and without the NS constraints, or by relying primarily on the independent TM2 comparison for validation.
  4. [Sec. IV B, Fig. 5] The 'complete equilibrium sequence' is assessed only via the empirical turning-point criterion, and the authors correctly note that a full radial-pulsation analysis with explicit junction conditions is needed. The minimum of the core-bearing branch appears at M ~ 0.02-0.04 solar masses with R ~ 10^2-2e3 km, far below the standard catalyzed-matter benchmarks, and the authors acknowledge that this value is not established as a dynamically stable minimum. If the paper is repositioned as a restricted fixed-A equilibrium baseline, this caveat must be reflected in the abstract and conclusions; as written, the abstract's 'consistent zero-temperature equation of state' conveys more than the calculation supports.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 4 caption] The abstract describes sequences 'seeded by 16O,' but the paper states that no pure-16O segment appears and that the lowest-pressure stable branch is already the (9,7) 16N-like sub-state. The wording 'nominal 16O' should be used consistently throughout.
  2. [Sec. II, last paragraph] The sentence 'This issue will be clarifies in the future' contains a grammatical error and should read 'This issue will be clarified in the future.'
  3. [Sec. IV C] The sentence beginning 'These maxima lie below the classical Chandrasekhar limit' contains a typo ('is because that our framework') and should be rephrased.
  4. [Eq. (2)] The covariant derivative for the rho field, D_mu rho_nu = partial_mu rho_nu + i A_mu [Q, rho_nu], is unusual because A_mu is the photon field and Q is the charge matrix; the action of Q on the isovector rho field should be defined explicitly to avoid confusion.
  5. [Fig. 2] The caption uses 'p–epsilon' notation; for consistency with the text, the same symbol for pressure and energy density should be used in all captions.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

NS-radius agreement is in-sample because NN1 was fit with NS measurements, and the final WD-NS junction is a self-defined proxy, making the unified-EoS claim partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV A (Model parameters and validation) and Sec. IV D (NS M-R), Fig. 4(b)]
    "The first two sets are the parameters estimated by using the neural network (NN) with the constraints from nuclear physics and NS measurements [52] ... The model curves overlap the displayed marginal intervals of J0030 and J0740 and the upper part of the GW170817 region, and are consistent with the broad J0437 interval."

    NN1 is not an independent first-principles parameter set: it is fitted with `NS measurements` from Ref. [52], a prior paper with overlapping authorship. The NS radii and maximum mass presented in Sec. IV D are therefore compared with NICER/GW170817 constraints that were already used in the fit, so the agreement is in-sample rather than a standalone prediction. The core EoS that fixes M_max = 2.20 M_sun and R(1.4 M_sun) ~ 13.4-13.6 km is the same fitted input, so the central NS-branch results inherit the fit instead of testing it.

  2. other [Abstract; Sec. III, final paragraph; Table I caption]
    "The final junction of each sequence is a proxy connection to the extrapolated uniform branch (see text). ... The junction should therefore be regarded as a proxy for the onset of this missing inner-crust physics rather than as a genuine transition to uniform matter; a self-consistent inner-crust calculation is deferred to future work."

    The abstract's headline claim of `exact Maxwell junctions` and `a consistent zero-temperature equation of state from white-dwarf to neutron-star densities` is carried by the final junction, but the paper itself defines that junction as a proxy for the omitted inner crust. The uniform branch is evaluated as pure neutron matter with the beta-equilibrium proton fraction neglected, so the beta-equilibrium condition of Eq. (3) is not actually satisfied by the incoming phase; the Maxwell crossing is a geometric p(mu_B) crossing between thermodynamically incompatible branches. The predicted final transition pressure is therefore a construction choice of the restricted model, not an equilibrium derived from the Lagrangian, so the unified-EoS claim reduces to the chosen concatenation.

full rationale

The fixed-A neutronization paths and the intermediate Maxwell crossings (for example the (6,6)->(7,5)->(8,4)->(9,3) sequence for 12C) are genuine constructions: the Gibbs minimization and p(mu_B) crossings are parameter-free once the NN1 couplings are given, and the resulting WD maximum masses (~1.4 and ~1.0 M_sun) are not fitted to WD observations. That part of the derivation is not circular. The circularity is concentrated in the NS-branch claims. NN1/NN2 come from Ref. [52], which was fit with NS measurements; the TOV radii and maximum mass are then presented as predictions and compared with NICER/GW170817, but this is an in-sample check, not an independent test. In addition, the final WD-NS junction, which is the load-bearing joint of the `consistent zero-temperature EoS from WD to NS densities` claim, is explicitly described by the authors as a proxy for missing inner-crust physics, and the uniform branch is pure neutron matter rather than beta-equilibrated npe-mu matter. The `exact Maxwell junction` language in the abstract therefore overstates what is constructed: the final transition pressure is a defined concatenation point, not a derived first-order equilibrium. The self-citations to Refs. [36], [51], and [52] are not disqualifying by themselves; the issue is that the NS constraints used to fit NN1 are the same data later used for validation. These two issues warrant score 6: partial circularity in the NS-radius prediction and a self-defined final junction, while the WD branch retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard relativistic mean-field theory with three published parameter sets, on modeling choices for Wigner-Seitz cells and fixed-A neutronization, on the pure-neutron-matter approximation, and on a proxy junction to uniform matter because the inner crust is not modeled. No new particles or interactions are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • RMF coupling constants, NN1 set = From neural-network fit to nuclear physics and neutron star measurements in Ref. [52]
    These couplings set the nuclear binding energies and the uniform-matter equation of state; the neutron star radius claims inherit this fit.
  • RMF coupling constants, NN2 set = From neural-network fit with m_n = m_p in Ref. [52]
    Used for validation of A = 16 isobars; not the main set for the central results.
  • RMF coupling constants, TM2 set = From Sugahara and Toki 1994, Ref. [26]
    Used as a standard comparison; produces a stiffer core and a higher neutron star maximum mass.
  • Stellar surface pressure p_surf = 1e-17 MeV/fm3
    Numerical cutoff for TOV integration; authors verified white dwarf radii converge for p_surf below about 1e-16 MeV/fm3 and neutron star radii are insensitive.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The Walecka-type mean-field Lagrangian (Eq. 1) accurately represents the strong interaction in finite nuclei and dense matter.
    Basis of both the Wigner-Seitz nucleus solver and the uniform-matter equation of state; the model is not derived from QCD and depends on fitted couplings.
  • domain assumption White dwarf matter can be represented by identical spherical Wigner-Seitz cells with a uniform electron gas and full electromagnetic interaction.
    Sec. II; standard approximation that ignores non-spherical geometry, spin, thermal, and crystallization effects, which the authors list as future refinements.
  • domain assumption Neutronization follows a restricted fixed-A path inherited from the progenitor, not the cold-catalyzed Baym-Pethick-Sutherland ground state.
    Sec. III, first paragraph; this is central to the light-element effects and is explicitly distinguished from the cold-catalyzed composition.
  • domain assumption The high-density neutron star branch can be approximated as pure neutron matter with the small beta-equilibrium proton fraction neglected.
    Sec. II, high-density branch paragraph; the authors note this stiffens the equation of state by a few tenths of an MeV per baryon and defer an npe-mu rerun.
  • standard math First-order transitions between sub-states are joined by Maxwell construction in the p-mu_B plane, uniquely fixing each transition pressure.
    Sec. III; this avoids the non-convex energy density and enforces mechanical and chemical equilibrium simultaneously.
  • domain assumption The missing inner crust, with clusters, dripped neutrons, and pasta phases, can be replaced by a direct junction to uniform matter as a proxy.
    Sec. III, last paragraph; the authors state this junction is not a genuine transition and that a self-consistent inner crust is deferred.
  • domain assumption The turning-point criterion is a valid necessary indicator of radial stability for these cold equilibrium sequences.
    Sec. IV B and Sec. V; the authors state it is empirical, not sufficient, and that a radial-pulsation analysis with junction conditions is needed.
  • standard math TOV equations describe hydrostatic equilibrium of nonrotating, spherically symmetric compact stars.
    Standard general-relativistic stellar structure used throughout Sec. IV.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of White dwarf-neutron star matter transition and the effect of light elements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KO5XATUA

@misc{pith2026260808824,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: White dwarf-neutron star matter transition and the effect of light elements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KO5XATUA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08824}
}
abstract

White dwarfs and neutron stars are unique laboratories for dense nuclear matter physics. We develop a single relativistic mean-field framework that treats both classes of compact star, and the transition between them, on the same footing: the nuclei of white-dwarf matter are solved self-consistently as Wigner-Seitz cells with the full electromagnetic interaction, while the same Lagrangian yields the uniform nuclear matter of the neutron-star interior. Within this unified description we compute light-element white dwarfs seeded by $^4$He, $^{12}$C, and $^{16}$O, following each fixed-$A$ sequence along its neutronization path and connecting it to the neutron-star branch through exact Maxwell junctions, from which the corresponding mass-radius relations are derived. The helium- and carbon-seeded white-dwarf sequences attain maximum masses of ${\sim}1.4\,M_\odot$ and ${\sim}1.0\,M_\odot$, respectively. On the neutron-star branch, the retained light-element envelope changes the predicted radii only at the percent level---by approximately $0.2~$km at $1.4\,M_\odot$, within current observational uncertainties. Providing a consistent zero-temperature equation of state from white-dwarf to neutron-star densities, this unified framework offers a natural starting point for studies of white-dwarf--neutron-star binary mergers, progenitor-star evolution, decihertz gravitational-wave sources, and related multimessenger phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08824 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Maxwell construction for the neutronization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Connected EoSs with every junction at its unique equilibrium pressure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Mass-radius relations for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Mass-radius relations with all junctions at the unique equilibrium pressures, for sequences seeded by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Complete mass-radius relations of the unified EoSs for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [52]

    Guo, J.-Y

    L.-J. Guo, J.-Y. Xiong, Y. Ma, and Y.-L. Ma, In- sights into Neutron Star Equation of State by Machine Learning, Astrophys. J.965, 47 (2024), arXiv:2309.11227 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Tremblay, N

    P.-E. Tremblay, N. Gentile-Fusillo, R. Raddi, S. Jor- dan, C. Besson, B. G¨ ansicke, S. Parsons, D. Koester, T. Marsh, R. Bohlin,et al., The gaia dr1 mass-radius relation for white dwarfs, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , stw2854 (2016)

    2016

  3. [2]

    D. J. Reardon, M. Bailes, R. M. Shannon, C. Flynn, J. Askew, N. D. R. Bhat, Z.-C. Chen, M. Curyl lo, Y. Feng, G. B. Hobbs, A. Kapur, M. Kerr, X. Liu, R. N. Manchester, R. Mandow, S. Mishra, C. J. Russell, M. Shamohammadi, L. Zhang, and A. Zic, The neutron star mass, distance, and inclination from precision timing of the brilliant millisecond pulsar J0437-...

    arXiv 2024

  4. [3]

    Choudhuryet al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437-4715, Astro- phys

    D. Choudhuryet al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437-4715, Astro- phys. J. Lett.971, L20 (2024), arXiv:2407.06789

    arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    M. C. Milleret al., The Radius of PSR J0437-4715 from NICER Data, Astrophys. J. Lett.1000, L48 (2026), arXiv:2512.08790

    arXiv 2026

  6. [5]

    S. De, D. Finstad, J. M. Lattimer, D. A. Brown, E. Berger, and C. M. Biwer, Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 091102 (2018), arXiv:1804.08583 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Chandrasekhar, The density of white dwarf stars, Philosophical Magazine11, 592 (1931)

    S. Chandrasekhar, The density of white dwarf stars, Philosophical Magazine11, 592 (1931)

    1931

  8. [7]

    Chandrasekhar, The maximum mass of ideal white dwarfs, Astrophys

    S. Chandrasekhar, The maximum mass of ideal white dwarfs, Astrophys. J.74, 81 (1931)

    1931

Show all 95 references
  1. [8]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of stars, Phys. Z. Sowjetu- nion1, 285 (1932)

    1932

  2. [9]

    R. P. Feynman, N. Metropolis, and E. Teller, Equations of State of Elements Based on the Generalized Fermi- Thomas Theory, Phys. Rev.75, 1561 (1949)

    1949

  3. [10]

    Rotondo, J

    M. Rotondo, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, and S. S. Xue, On the relativistic Thomas-Fermi treatment of com- pressed atoms and compressed nuclear matter cores of stellar dimensions, Phys. Rev. C83, 045805 (2011), arXiv:0911.4622 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Rotondo, J

    M. Rotondo, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, and S.-S. Xue, The Relativistic Feynman-Metropolis-Teller theory for white dwarfs in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D84, 084007 (2011), arXiv:1012.0154 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [12]

    E. E. Salpeter, Energy and Pressure of a Zero- Temperature Plasma, Astrophys. J.134, 669 (1961)

    1961

  6. [13]

    Hamada and E

    T. Hamada and E. E. Salpeter, Models for Zero- Temperature Stars., Astrophys. J.134, 683 (1961)

    1961

  7. [14]

    D. E. Winget, Seismological Investigations of Compact Stars, inAdvances in Helio- and Asteroseismology, IAU Symposium, Vol. 123, edited by J. Christensen-Dalsgaard and S. Frandsen (1988) p. 305

    1988

  8. [15]

    S. O. Kepler and P. A. Bradley, Structure and Evolution of White Dwarfs, Baltic Astronomy4, 166 (1995)

    1995

  9. [16]

    Paxton, L

    B. Paxton, L. Bildsten, A. Dotter, F. Herwig, P. Lesaffre, and F. Timmes (MESA), Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA), Astrophys. J. Suppl.192, 3 (2011), arXiv:1009.1622 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [17]

    L. G. Althaus, E. Garc ´ ıa-Berro, J. Isern, and A. H. C´ orsico, Mass-radius relations for massive white dwarf stars, Astron. Astrophys.441, 689 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0507559

    2005

  11. [18]

    L. G. Althaus, A. H. C´ orsico, J. Isern, and E. Garc ´ ıa- Berro, Evolutionary and pulsational properties of white dwarf stars, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.18, 471 (2010), arXiv:1007.2659 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Renedo, L

    I. Renedo, L. G. Althaus, M. M. Miller Bertolami, A. D. Romero, A. H. C´ orsico, R. D. Rohrmann, and E. Garc ´ ıa- Berro, New cooling sequences for old white dwarfs, Astro- phys. J.717, 183 (2010), arXiv:1005.2170 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  13. [20]

    A. D. Romero, F. Campos, and S. O. Kepler, The age- metallicity dependence for white dwarf stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450, 3708 (2015), arXiv:1504.03945 [astro-ph.SR]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [21]

    B. K. Agrawal, S. K. Dhiman, and R. Kumar, Exploring the extended density-dependent Skyrme effective forces for normal and isospin-rich nuclei to neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C73, 034319 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0604045

    2006 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Lesinski, K

    T. Lesinski, K. Bennaceur, T. Duguet, and J. Meyer, Isovector splitting of nucleon effective masses, ab-initio benchmarks and extended stability criteria for Skyrme energy functionals, Phys. Rev. C74, 044315 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0607065

    2006 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Z. W. Zuo, J. C. Pei, X. Y. Xiong, and Y. Zhu, Global analysis of Skyrme forces with higher-order den- sity dependencies, Chin. Phys. C42, 064106 (2018), arXiv:1709.00802 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Reinhard, M

    P.-G. Reinhard, M. Rufa, J. Maruhn, W. Greiner, and J. Friedrich, Nuclear ground-state properties in a rel- ativistic meson-field theory, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Atomic Nuclei323, 13 (1986)

    1986

  18. [25]

    E. E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Baryon chiral pertur- bation theory using a heavy fermion Lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B255, 558 (1991)

    1991

  19. [26]

    Sugahara and H

    Y. Sugahara and H. Toki, Relativistic mean field the- ory for unstable nuclei with nonlinear sigma and omega terms, Nucl. Phys. A579, 557 (1994)

    1994

  20. [27]

    G. A. Lalazissis, J. Konig, and P. Ring, A New parametrization for the Lagrangian density of relativis- tic mean field theory, Phys. Rev. C55, 540 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9607039

    1997 arXiv

  21. [28]

    B. G. Todd-Rutel and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron-Rich Nu- clei and Neutron Stars: A New Accurately Calibrated Interaction for the Study of Neutron-Rich Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 122501 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0504034

    2005 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bernard, Chiral Perturbation Theory and Baryon Properties, Prog

    V. Bernard, Chiral Perturbation Theory and Baryon Properties, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.60, 82 (2008), arXiv:0706.0312 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Scherer, Chiral Perturbation Theory: Introduction and Recent Results in the One-Nucleon Sector, Prog

    S. Scherer, Chiral Perturbation Theory: Introduction and Recent Results in the One-Nucleon Sector, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.64, 1 (2010), arXiv:0908.3425 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [31]

    J. M. Lattimer and Y. Lim, Constraining the Symme- try Parameters of the Nuclear Interaction, Astrophys. J. 771, 51 (2013), arXiv:1203.4286 [nucl-th]. 12

    2013 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Li, B.-J

    F. Li, B.-J. Cai, Y. Zhou, W.-Z. Jiang, and L.-W. Chen, Effects of Isoscalar- and Isovector-scalar Meson Mix- ing on Neutron Star Structure, Astrophys. J.929, 183 (2022), arXiv:2202.08705 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Zhang, Y

    L.-Q. Zhang, Y. Ma, and Y.-L. Ma, Peak of sound veloc- ity, scale symmetry, and nuclear force in baryonic mat- ter, Phys. Rev. C112, L031001 (2025), arXiv:2410.04142 [nucl-th]

    2025

  27. [34]

    Ma and Y.-L

    Y. Ma and Y.-L. Ma, Quark structure of isoscalar- and isovector-scalar mesons and nuclear matter prop- erty, Phys. Rev. D109, 074022 (2024), arXiv:2311.07899 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Ma, Y.-L

    Y. Ma, Y.-L. Ma, and J.-Y. Xiong, Hadronic descrip- tion of nuclear matter and neutron star properties (2026), arXiv:2603.01933 [nucl-th]

    2026

  29. [36]

    L.-J. Guo, Y. Ma, Y.-L. Ma, R.-X. Wu, and Y.-L. Wu, White dwarf structure and binary inspiral gravitational waves from quantum hadrodynamics, Commun. Theor. Phys.77, 125301 (2025), arXiv:2410.06088 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Y. Kang, C. Liu, J.-P. Zhu, Y. Gao, L. Shao, B. Zhang, H. Sun, Y.-H. I. Yin, and B.-B. Zhang, Prospects for de- tecting neutron star–white dwarf mergers with decihertz gravitational-wave observatories, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, 5309 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Liu, H.-J

    X.-X. Liu, H.-J. L¨ u, Q.-H. Chen, Z.-W. Du, and E.-W. Liang, Neutron Star–White Dwarf Merger as One Pos- sible Optional Source of Kilonova-like Emission: Impli- cations for GRB 211211A, Astrophys. J. Lett.988, L46 (2025), arXiv:2507.04318 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Du, H.-J

    Z.-W. Du, H.-J. L¨ u, Y. Yuan, X. Yang, and E.-W. Liang, The Progenitor and Central Engine of a Pecu- liar GRB 230307A, Astrophys. J. Lett.962, L27 (2024), arXiv:2402.10587 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [40]

    X. I. Wang, Y.-W. Yu, J. Ren, J. Yang, Z.-C. Zou, and J.-P. Zhu, What Powered the Kilonova-Like Emis- sion After GRB 230307A in the Framework of a Neutron Star–White Dwarf Merger?, Astrophys. J. Lett.964, L9 (2024), arXiv:2402.11304 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu, and K. Sumiyoshi, Rel- ativistic equation of state of nuclear matter for super- nova and neutron star, Nucl. Phys. A637, 435 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9805035

    1998 arXiv

  35. [42]

    N. K. Glendenning,Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics, and General Relativity, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2000)

    2000

  36. [43]

    G. Baym, C. Pethick, and P. Sutherland, The Ground state of matter at high densities: equation of state and stellar models, Astrophys. J.170, 299 (1971)

    1971

  37. [44]

    Haensel and B

    P. Haensel and B. Pichon, Experimental nuclear masses and the ground state of cold dense matter, Astron. As- trophys.283, 313 (1994), arXiv:nucl-th/9310003

    1994 arXiv

  38. [45]

    J. H. Kelley, J. E. Purcell, and C. G. Sheu, Energy levels of light nucleiA= 12, Nucl. Phys. A968, 71 (2017)

    2017

  39. [46]

    F. G. Kondev, M. Wang, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi, and G. Audi, The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties, Chin. Phys. C45, 030001 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    Aksyutina, H

    Y. Aksyutina, H. T. Johansson, P. Adrich,et al., Lithium isotopes beyond the drip line, Phys. Lett. B666, 430 (2008)

    2008

  41. [48]

    C. C. Hall, E. M. Lunderberg, P. A. DeYoung,et al., First observation of excited states in 12Li, Phys. Rev. C 81, 021302 (2010)

    2010

  42. [49]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astron. As- trophys.380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092

    2001 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Chamel and P

    N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Physics of Neutron Star Crusts, Living Rev. Rel.11, 10 (2008), arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Ma, Y.-L

    Y. Ma, Y.-L. Ma, and J.-Y. Xiong, NNStar: An end-to- end AI agent for nuclear matter and neutron star physics, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2607.13930 [nucl-th]

    2026 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Kanungoet al., Proton Distribution Radii of 12−19C Illuminate Features of Neutron Halos, Phys

    R. Kanungoet al., Proton Distribution Radii of 12−19C Illuminate Features of Neutron Halos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 102501 (2016), arXiv:1608.08697 [nucl-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kauret al., Proton distribution radii of 16−24O: signa- tures of new shell closures and neutron skin, Phys

    S. Kauret al., Proton distribution radii of 16−24O: signa- tures of new shell closures and neutron skin, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 142502 (2022), arXiv:2209.00722 [nucl-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    National Nuclear Data Center, Nudat database,https: //www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat/(2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Kiniet al., Updated NICER mass-radius inference of PSR J0030+0451 (2026), preprint, arXiv:2602.23743

    Y. Kiniet al., Updated NICER mass-radius inference of PSR J0030+0451 (2026), preprint, arXiv:2602.23743

    2026

  49. [57]

    Salmiet al., The Radius of the High-mass Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data, Astrophys

    T. Salmiet al., The Radius of the High-mass Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data, Astrophys. J. 974, 294 (2024), arXiv:2406.14466

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952-0607: The Fastest and Heav- iest Known Galactic Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    R. W. Romani, M. Beleznay, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952-0607: Tighten- ing a Record-High Neutron Star Mass, Astrophys. J. 10.3847/1538-4357/ae28c5 (2025), arXiv:2512.05099

    2025

  53. [61]

    B. K. Harrison, K. S. Thorne, M. Wakano, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation Theory and Gravitational Collapse (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965)

    1965

  54. [62]

    J. B. Hartle and K. S. Thorne, Slowly Rotating Relativis- tic Stars. II. Models for Neutron Stars and Supermassive Stars, Astrophys. J.153, 807 (1968)

    1968

  55. [63]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Ob- jects(Wiley, New York, 1983)

    1983

  56. [64]

    Chandrasekhar, The Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity, Astrophys

    S. Chandrasekhar, The Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity, Astrophys. J.140, 417 (1964), [Erratum: As- trophys. J. 140, 1342 (1964)]

    1964

  57. [65]

    D. W. Meltzer and K. S. Thorne, Normal Modes of Radial Pulsation of Stars at the End Point of Thermonuclear Evolution, Astrophys. J.145, 514 (1966)

    1966

  58. [66]

    R. D. Sorkin, A Criterion for the Onset of Instability at a Turning Point, Astrophys. J.249, 254 (1981)

    1981

  59. [67]

    Z. F. Seidov, The Stability of a Star with a Phase Change in General Relativity Theory, Soviet Astron.15, 347 (1971)

    1971

  60. [68]

    M. G. Alford, S. Han, and M. Prakash, Generic Condi- tions for Stable Hybrid Stars, Phys. Rev. D88, 083013 (2013), arXiv:1302.4732 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Haensel, J

    P. Haensel, J. L. Zdunik, and F. Douchin, Equation of state of dense matter and the minimum mass of cold neutron stars, Astron. Astrophys.385, 301 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201434. 13

    2002 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Y. Suwa, T. Yoshida, M. Shibata, H. Umeda, and K. Takahashi, On the minimum mass of neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.481, 3305 (2018), arXiv:1808.02328

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Nomoto and Y

    K. Nomoto and Y. Kondo, Conditions for accretion- induced collapse of white dwarfs, Astrophys. J. Lett.367, L19 (1991)

    1991

  64. [72]

    Chanmugam, Radial Oscillations of Zero-Temperature White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars Below Nuclear Densi- ties, Astrophys

    G. Chanmugam, Radial Oscillations of Zero-Temperature White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars Below Nuclear Densi- ties, Astrophys. J.217, 799 (1977)

    1977

  65. [73]

    Haensel, K

    P. Haensel, K. P. Levenfish, and D. G. Yakovlev, Adia- batic Index of Dense Matter and Damping of Neutron Star Pulsations, Astron. Astrophys.394, 213 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0208078

    2002 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Colpi, S

    M. Colpi, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, A hydro- dynamical model for the explosion of a neutron star just below the minimum mass, Astrophys. J.414, 717 (1993)

    1993

  67. [75]

    Haensel, J

    P. Haensel, J. L. Zdunik, and R. Schaeffer, Phase Transi- tions in Dense Matter and Radial Pulsations of Neutron Stars, Astron. Astrophys.217, 137 (1989)

    1989

  68. [76]

    J. P. Pereira, C. V. Flores, and G. Lugones, Phase Transition Effects on the Dynamical Stability of Hy- brid Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J.860, 12 (2018), arXiv:1706.09371 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    M. Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references, Chin. Phys. C45, 030003 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, and G. Rupak, Ab Initio Calculation of the Spectrum and Structure of 16O, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 102501 (2014), arXiv:1312.7703 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    C. . J. Halcrow and N. . S. Manton, Tetrahedral intrin- sic structure of Oxygen-16 revisited, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1643, 012136 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    Fonsecaet al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measure- ments of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys

    E. Fonsecaet al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measure- ments of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L12 (2021), arXiv:2104.00880 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Ritossa, E

    C. Ritossa, E. Garcia-Berro, and I. Iben, Jr., On the Evolution of Stars That Form Electron-degenerate Cores Processed by Carbon Burning. II. Isotope Abundances and Thermal Pulses in a 10 M sun Model with an ONe Core and Applications to Long-Period Variables, Clas- sical Novae...

    1996

  74. [82]

    Herwig, Evolution of asymptotic giant branch stars, Ann

    F. Herwig, Evolution of asymptotic giant branch stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.43, 435 (2005)

    2005

  75. [83]

    L. G. Althaus, F. De Ger´ onimo, A. C´ orsico, S. Tor- res, and E. Garc ´ ıa-Berro, The evolution of white dwarfs resulting from helium-enhanced, low-metallicity pro- genitor stars, Astron. Astrophys.597, A67 (2017), arXiv:1611.06191 [astro-ph.SR]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    D. E. Winget and S. O. Kepler, Pulsating White Dwarf Stars and Precision Asteroseismology, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.46, 157 (2008), arXiv:0806.2573 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  77. [85]

    S. O. Kepler and A. D. Romero, Pulsating white dwarfs, inEuropean Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Eu- ropean Physical Journal Web of Conferences, Vol. 152 (2017) p. 01011, arXiv:1706.07020 [astro-ph.SR]

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    P. W. Anderson and N. Itoh, Pulsar glitches and restless- ness as a hard superfluidity phenomenon, Nature256, 25 (1975)

    1975

  79. [87]

    D. G. Yakovlev and C. J. Pethick, Neutron Star Cool- ing, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.42, 169 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402143 [astro-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  80. [88]

    L. O. McNeill, R. A. Mardling, and B. M¨ uller, Gravi- tational waves from dynamical tides in white dwarf bi- naries, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.491, 3000 (2020), arXiv:1901.09045 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Perot and N

    L. Perot and N. Chamel, Tidal deformability of crystal- lized white dwarfs in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023012 (2022)

    2022

  82. [90]

    D. G. Ravenhall, C. J. Pethick, and J. R. Wilson, Nuclear Ground State at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2066 (1983)

    1983

  83. [91]

    Alcock, E

    C. Alcock, E. Farhi, and A. Olinto, Strange stars, Astro- phys. J.310, 261 (1986)

    1986

  84. [92]

    Alcock and A

    C. Alcock and A. Olinto, Exotic Phases of Hadronic Mat- ter and their Astrophysical Application, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.38, 161 (1988)

    1988

  85. [93]

    Madsen, Physics and astrophysics of strange quark matter, Lect

    J. Madsen, Physics and astrophysics of strange quark matter, Lect. Notes Phys.516, 162 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9809032

    1999

  86. [94]

    O. G. Benvenuto, White dwarf stars as strange quark matter detectors, J. Phys. G31, L13 (2005)

    2005

  87. [95]

    Weber, Strange quark matter and compact stars, Prog

    F. Weber, Strange quark matter and compact stars, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.54, 193 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0407155

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.