Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 36 references

Self-induced crystalline fluctuation spin-glass state in Mn7C3 binary compounds

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that Mn7C3, a well-ordered binary carbide, becomes a bulk crystalline spin glass at 37.4 K, and that the spin-glass frustration is driven not by atomic disorder but by carbon triangles that randomly 'snatch' electrons…

desk verdict The spin-glass phenomenology in Mn7C3 looks plausible, but the paper's own Bader numbers contradict its central electron-sharing mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09065 v1 pith:7Z4PJ7EB submitted 2026-08-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zekun Yu , Chao Zhou , Kuo Bao , Xiaofeng Wang , Zhaoqing Wang , Jinming Zhu , Enxuan Li , Andong Yao
show 7 more authors
Yuhan Meng Yufei Ge Xingbin Zhao Shuailing Ma Pinwen Zhu Qiang Tao Tian Cui
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.50.Lk75.10.Hk
keywords Mn7C3spinglasscrystallineIsingfrustrationtriangularlatticeelectronlocalizationfunctionhigh-pressuresynthesismagnetic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the binary carbide Mn7C3, synthesized at high temperature and pressure, is a crystalline spin glass with a freezing temperature of 37.4 K. Unlike conventional spin glasses, which rely on atomic disorder, Mn7C3 keeps a well-ordered Pnma crystal structure built from triangular Mn units. The paper argues that the triangular geometry itself is magnetically frustrated, and that carbon atoms sitting between Mn triangles randomly steal electrons, creating a fluctuating electronic environment that freezes the spins. If this picture holds, it establishes a new family of spin glasses in which structural order, rather than disorder, generates glassy behavior. A reader would care because such materials are easier to model and could serve as reliable hardware for neural-network-style computing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the triangular C unit: three carbon atoms between two Mn triangles that together accommodate one shared electron in a three-pronged electron cloud. The paper treats this electron as a 'snatcher' that is randomly captured from a nearby Mn triangle, producing an unequal loss of d-electrons and therefore a fluctuating magnetic environment. Surrounding this is the standard triangular Ising frustration motif, in which three antiferromagnetically coupled spins on a triangle cannot all be satisfied, leaving a highly degenerate set of configurations that the electron snatching ultimately resolves.

What would settle it

A careful integration of the electron localization function over the three-pronged region of a carbon triangle: if it yields a value far from one electron, the paper's mechanism for magnetic frustration collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Mn7C3 exhibits a 'self-induced' crystalline spin-glass state. The structure contains medial triangular units of Mn atoms whose antiferromagnetic Ising interactions are geometrically frustrated, and lateral honeycomb-like units that communicate through 'messenger' Mn atoms and polarized carbon atoms. According to the authors, each triangular group of three carbon atoms shares a single electron in a three-pronged electron cloud, and that shared electron is randomly acquired from one of the neighboring Mn triangles. The randomness makes the electron loss of the Mn atoms unequal, so the frustrated spins cannot order and instead freeze into a spin glass at 37.4 K. Experimental support includes a frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peak fitted to the slowing-down model with $z\nu=5$, and DFT calculations showing that many magnetic configurations have nearly the same energy.

Load-bearing premise

The central mechanism depends on the premise that each triangular group of carbon atoms holds exactly one shared electron that is randomly captured from a neighboring manganese triangle; if a careful charge-density measurement shows a different electron count, the proposed frustration mechanism collapses even if the spin-glass state itself is real.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mn7C3 provides a bulk, mass-producible spin-glass material with a high density of triangular Ising units and a freezing temperature of 37.4 K, higher than many known spin glasses.
  • Because the triangular units are an intrinsic structural feature, the spin-glass state is expected to be stable rather than sensitive to dilute disorder, and the many nearly degenerate magnetic states could be manipulated by weak external fields.
  • The material is a good conductor (resistivity above $2.81\times 10^{-3}\, \Omega\cdot\text{m}$), so its spin-glass behavior can be coupled to electrical readout, a useful feature for hardware implementations of neural networks.
  • The proposed mechanism implies that other ordered magnetic compounds containing triangular Mn units with antiferromagnetic coupling could also be spin glasses, expanding the search space beyond this specific carbide.
  • The frequency dependence of the freezing temperature, fitted with $\tau_0 = 1.69\times 10^{12}$ s and $z\nu=5$, places Mn7C3 dynamically close to transition-metal solute spin glasses, suggesting a common origin in metallic conduction and frustrated exchange.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if electron snatching is the operative mechanism, then subtly varying the carbon stoichiometry or substituting another p-block element should move the freezing temperature in a predictable direction, providing a quantitative test.
  • Beyond the paper: neutron scattering on a single crystal should show no magnetic Bragg peaks below 37.4 K, only broad diffuse magnetic scattering, confirming that the frozen state is spin-glass-like rather than a hidden ordered phase.
  • Beyond the paper: the same geometric-frustration logic could be used as a screening criterion to identify other ordered carbides, nitrides, or pnictides with triangular magnetic units, potentially producing a whole family of self-induced spin glasses.
  • Beyond the paper: the claim that the frustration is electronic in origin implies that the freezing temperature should be largely independent of synthesis pressure and cooling rate as long as the Pnma structure is preserved, a testable prediction for future synthesis runs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the high-pressure synthesis of bulk Mn7C3 and its characterization as a crystalline spin glass with freezing temperature 37.4 K, based on DC/AC susceptibility and a slowing-down analysis. The authors further propose a microscopic mechanism in which triangular C units share one electron that is randomly captured from neighboring Mn triangles, creating electronic disorder and frustration among triangular Mn units. The paper claims that this constitutes a new family of spin glasses with ordered microgeometries.

Significance. If the spin-glass identification is correct, Mn7C3 is a useful addition to the small family of structurally ordered spin glasses, and its relatively high freezing temperature is of interest. The experimental AC/DC signatures are standard and appear to support spin-glass behavior. However, the proposed frustration mechanism is not quantitatively established: the Bader charge analysis as reported contradicts the one-electron-per-triangle claim, the ELF integration is not described, and the degeneracy inference is based on only four spin configurations. The central novelty of the paper therefore rests on unsupported theoretical assertions. The work is potentially significant but requires substantial additional evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and discussion, Fig. 4A/B and Bader analysis] The claim that each C triangle contains approximately one electron is contradicted by the quoted Bader numbers. The text states each C atom gains about 1.3 e-, so three C atoms gain about 3.9 e-, not one spare electron; the global charge balance (28 Mn atoms losing 0.6 e- each and 12 C atoms gaining 1.3 e- each) leaves 1.2 e- unaccounted, not one electron per C triangle. The 'summing the electron density' sentence gives no integration volume, isosurface criterion, or numerical result, and SI Table S4 is not provided. This is load-bearing because the proposed 'electron snatching' frustration mechanism depends on this one-electron-per-triangle picture.
  2. [Results and discussion, Fig. 3A] The conclusion of 'high degeneracy' and 'infinite degenerate magnetic phases' is drawn from only four manually selected spin configurations out of 2^14 possible states. The energy spread of 0.05 eV over these four states does not sample the configuration space, and no statistical measure or exploration of the 2^14 manifold is presented. The statement that this 'proves' infinite degenerate phases is not justified. Since the frustrated-degeneracy argument is used to support the spin-glass mechanism, this inference needs to be either replaced by proper sampling or removed.
  3. [Results and discussion, 'This electron is randomly acquired from one of the nearby Mn triangles'] The randomness of electron acquisition is asserted without any supporting calculation or measurement. None of the four DFT calculations models disorder in C-triangle occupancy; the spin-density maps are ground-state configurations. The mechanism therefore lacks a quantitative basis. If the randomness is an essential ingredient of the proposed novel competition mechanism, it must be demonstrated, e.g., by explicit supercell calculations with different C-triangle occupancies or by a statistical treatment.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] There is a typo 'fond' for 'found' in the Introduction, and 'Isin g' has a stray space that should be corrected.
  2. [Introduction] The formula 'C 1-xMnx' should be 'Cu1-xMnx' to match the cited CuMn spin-glass literature.
  3. [Reference [22] and text] The text refers to 'YbMgGaO4' but the referenced paper is about 'YbZnGaO4'; please correct the compound formula.
  4. [Results and discussion, imaginary part of AC susceptibility] The phrasing 'the imaginary parts of all frequencies were zero across the entire temperature range, except at 25-42 K' is self-contradictory; it should be rephrased to say that the imaginary part is nonzero only in that range.
  5. [Theoretical Calculation and Simulation] The wavefunction notations |χ1⟩ and |χ2⟩ are not defined as tensor-product or superposition states, and their normalization is unclear; please define the product/sum structure explicitly.
  6. [Theoretical Calculation and Simulation] The phrase 'time inversion symmetry' in the Results section should be 'time-reversal symmetry.'
  7. [Supporting Information] The main text cites SI Tables S1-S4, but the provided supplementary material contains only figures; all cited tables must be included for the quantitative claims to be auditable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-glass identification rests on independent AC/DC susceptibility measurements and external slowing-down-model fitting, while the electron-sharing frustration mechanism is an interpretive DFT-based model rather than a fitted restatement of the same data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The spin-glass assignment is made from independent experimental observables: ZFC/FC bifurcation and lambda-shaped peaks, frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peaks, suppression by small DC background fields, and a slowing-down-model fit with TSG = 37.4 K and zν = 5. None of these quantities is defined in terms of the proposed electron-sharing mechanism, and the fit is presented as a fit, not as a prediction. The DFT calculations provide energies and magnetic moments for a set of selected spin configurations; the near-degeneracy of these configurations is a computed result, not an input assumption, and the frustration conclusion is then connected to the standard triangular Ising picture. The one-electron-per-C-triangle mechanism is advanced as an interpretation of ELF isosurfaces and Bader charge analysis. Although this mechanism is numerically under-supported and the quoted Bader numbers appear internally inconsistent with the 'one spare electron' conclusion, that is an evidentiary or correctness flaw, not a circular derivation: the mechanism is not fitted to the susceptibility data, is not justified by a self-citation chain, and is not used to define the spin-glass transition temperature. The paper also cites previous spin-glass literature as external context rather than as load-bearing proof of its own novelty. It should be noted that the cited SI Table S4 and the quantitative details of the ELF integration are missing from the provided supplementary material, and the random-capture step is asserted rather than derived; these are serious support gaps but do not constitute circularity. The central spin-glass phenomenology would remain meaningful even if the electron-sharing model were abandoned, so no load-bearing step reduces the paper's conclusions to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central experimental identification rests on standard spin-glass phenomenology. The proposed mechanism imports several unproven assumptions: that the four DFT configurations are representative, that the ELF electron content maps to one shared electron per C triangle, and that PBE-GGA is adequate. The free parameters are the dynamic fit quantities. The invented electron-cloud and messenger entities have no independent falsifiable handle in the paper.

free parameters (3)
  • zν = 5
    Dynamic exponent fitted to the slowing-down model; no uncertainty given; used to claim similarity to transition-metal solute spin glasses.
  • τ0 = 1.69×10^12 s (as printed; likely meant 10^-12 s)
    Characteristic relaxation time fitted together with zν; the printed value is unphysical for a spin glass, suggesting a missing minus sign in the exponent.
  • TSG = 37.4 K
    Freezing temperature used as the zero-frequency reference in the slowing-down fit; taken from the DC susceptibility cusp.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Triangular arrangements of Mn atoms with antiferromagnetic Ising interactions are frustrated.
    Invoked via ref [16]; textbook result, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT with PAW pseudopotentials adequately captures the magnetic ground state of Mn7C3.
    Used in VASP calculations; no benchmark against higher-level methods or experimental magnetic moments is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The four selected spin configurations are representative of the full 2^14 configuration space.
    The paper selects random, parallel, antiparallel zero/nonzero moment states and infers high degeneracy from their energy spread.
  • domain assumption Slowing-down model τ=τ0[(Tf-TSG)/TSG]^(-zν) applies to this material.
    Standard spin-glass phenomenology, used to fit dynamic data.
  • ad hoc to paper ELF iso-surface electron content corresponds to one shared electron per C triangle.
    Underlies the electron-snatching mechanism; not independently validated and difficult to reconcile with the stated Bader charges.
invented entities (2)
  • Triangular C three-pronged electron cloud (one shared electron per C triangle)
    purpose: Proposed source of unequal electron loss and magnetic frustration in adjacent Mn triangles.
    Inferred from ELF images and Bader charges; the stated Bader numbers (C gains ~1.3 e- each) do not obviously sum to one shared electron, and no external measurement is proposed.
  • Spin-polarized C messenger states
    purpose: Bridging magnetic exchange between triangular Mn units and forming the 3D frustrated network.
    Interpretive label on spin-density maps; no independent probe of C-site polarization is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-induced crystalline fluctuation spin-glass state in Mn7C3 binary compounds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7Z4PJ7EB

@misc{pith2026260809065,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-induced crystalline fluctuation spin-glass state in Mn7C3 binary compounds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7Z4PJ7EB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09065}
}
read the original abstract

Crystalline spin glasses are attractive compounds owing to their unique nature and applications. Here, we synthesised a bulk Pnma-type Mn7C3 spin glass by a high-temperature, high-pressure method. Experimental characterisation including X-ray diffraction and magnetic susceptibility measurements demonstrated that the compound has a triangular Ising-model-based structure, high freezing temperature of 37.4 K, and novel competition mechanism. Theoretical calculations and simulations revealed that the triangular Mn units are spontaneously frustrated and bridge neighbouring Mn units via polarised C atoms and messenger Mn atoms. Triangular C units each share one electron within a three-pronged electron cloud. This electron is the direct cause of frustration and competition in Mn7C3. The competition within the triangular Mn units suggests that the possible magnetic configurations are highly degenerate and that the Mn7C3 spin glass has high robustness. This work introduces a new family of spin glasses with ordered microgeometries that drive electronic structure disorder, and an application-friendly spin-glass material for use in fields like high-efficiency hardware and algorithm design in artificial intelligence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09065 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structure and typical micro-sub-units of Mn7C3. (A) Rietveld refinement pattern from X-ray diffraction data; (B) Crystalline structure along the a-axis of Mn7C3; (C) Lateral Mn hexagonal units; (D) Medial Mn triangular units. The pink and orange balls are zig-zag and vertex Mn atoms, respectively, in the honeycomb hexagonal units; the blue and purple balls are Mn atoms in the medial triangular units, where different… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hopfield, J. J. Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1982, 79, 2554–2558

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    An Introduction to the Theory of Spin Glasses and Neural Networks; World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics; World Scientific: Singapore, 1995; V ol

    Dotsenko, V . An Introduction to the Theory of Spin Glasses and Neural Networks; World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics; World Scientific: Singapore, 1995; V ol. 54

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Computing with Neural Networks

    Palm, G. Computing with Neural Networks. Science 1987, 235, 1227–1228

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    Learning of Correlated Patterns in Spin -Glass Networks by Local Learning Rules

    Diederich, S.; Opper, M. Learning of Correlated Patterns in Spin -Glass Networks by Local Learning Rules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 949–952

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    M.; Chubukov, A

    Fernandes, R. M.; Chubukov, A. V .; Schmalian, J. What Drives Nematic Order in Iron-Based Superconductors? Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 97–104

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    I.; Wegner, D.; Eriksson, O.; Khajetoorians, A

    Kamber, U.; Bergman, A.; Eich, A.; Iuşan, D.; Steinbrecher, M.; Hauptmann, N.; Nordström, L.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Wegner, D.; Eriksson, O.; Khajetoorians, A. A. Self-Induced Spin Glass State in Elemental and Crystalline Neodymium. Science 2020, 368, eaay6757

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    A.; Darago, L

    Murphy, R. A.; Darago, L. E.; Ziebel, M. E.; Peterson, E. A.; Zaia, E. W.; Mara, M. W.; Lussier, D.; Velasquez, E. O.; Shuh, D. K.; Urban, J. J.; Neaton, J. B.; Long, J. R. Exchange Bias in a Layered Metal–Organic Topological Spin Glass. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 1317–1326

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    B.; Zhou, J.; Yao, S.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y

    Pang, B.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y . B.; Zhou, J.; Yao, S.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y . Spin- Glass-Like Behavior and Topological Hall Effect in SrRuO3/SrIrO3 Superlattices for Oxide Spintronics Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3201–3207

    work page 2017

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Topological Spin Glass in Diluted Spin Ice

    Sen, A.; Moessner, R. Topological Spin Glass in Diluted Spin Ice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 247207

    2015

  2. [10]

    Mydosh, J. A. Spin Glasses: An Experimental Introduction; Taylor & Francis: London, 1993

    1993

  3. [11]

    Dynamics of the Relaxation-Time Spectrum in a CuMn Spin-Glass

    Lundgren, L.; Svedlindh , P.; Nordblad, P.; Beckman, O. Dynamics of the Relaxation-Time Spectrum in a CuMn Spin-Glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 911–914

    1983

  4. [12]

    M.; Shtrikman, S.; Wanklyn, B

    Atzmony, U.; Gurewitz, E.; Melamud, M.; Pinto, H.; Shaked, H.; Gorodetsky, G.; Hermon, E.; Hornreich, R. M.; Shtrikman, S.; Wanklyn, B. Anisotropic Spin-Glass Behavior in Fe2TiO5. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1979, 43, 782–785

    1979

  5. [13]

    Thygesen, P. M. M.; Paddison, J. A. M.; Zhang, R.; Beyer, K. A.; Chapman, K. W.; Playford, H. Y .; Tucker, M. G.; Keen, D. A.; Hayward, M. A.; Goodwin, A. L. Orbital Dimer Model for the Spin-Glass State in Y2Mo2O7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 067201

    2017

  6. [14]

    H.; Parchenko, S.; Arava, H.; Luo, Z.; Kleibert, A.; Derlet, P

    Hofhuis, K.; Skjærvø, S. H.; Parchenko, S.; Arava, H.; Luo, Z.; Kleibert, A.; Derlet, P. M.; Heyderman, L. J. Real -Space Imaging of Phase Transitions in Bridged Artificial Kagome Spin Ice. Nat. Phys. 2022, 18, 699–705

    2022

  7. [15]

    A.; Dhuey, S.; Kleibert, A.; van Dijken, S.; Nisoli, C.; Farhan, A

    Saccone, M.; Caravelli, F.; Hofhuis, K.; Parchenko, S.; Birkhölzer, Y . A.; Dhuey, S.; Kleibert, A.; van Dijken, S.; Nisoli, C.; Farhan, A. Direct Observation of a Dynamical Glass Transition in a Nanomagnetic Artificial Hopfield Network. Nat. Phys. 2022, 18, 517–521

    2022

  8. [16]

    E.; Freericks, J

    Kim, K.; Chang, M.-S.; Korenblit, S.; Islam, R.; Edwards, E. E.; Freericks, J. K.; Lin, G.-D.; Duan, L.-M.; Monroe, C. Quantum Simulation of Frustrated Ising Spins with Trapped Ions. Nature 2010, 465, 590–593

    2010

  9. [17]

    G.; Orbach, R.; Wood, G

    Joh, Y . G.; Orbach, R.; Wood, G. G.; Hammann, J.; Vincent, E. Extraction of the Spin Glass Correlation Length. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 438–441

    1999

  10. [18]

    Binder, K.; Young, A. P. Spin Glasses: Experimental Facts, Theoretical Concepts, and Open Questions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1986, 58, 801–976

    1986

  11. [19]

    J.; Yamazaki, T.; Harshman, D

    Uemura, Y . J.; Yamazaki, T.; Harshman, D. R.; Senba, M.; Ansaldo, E. J. Muon-Spin Relaxation in AuFe and CuMn Spin Glasses. Phys. Rev. B 1985, 31, 546– 563

    1985

  12. [20]

    A.; Senoussi, S.; Varret, F.; Teillet , J.; Hamzić, A

    Campbell, I. A.; Senoussi, S.; Varret, F.; Teillet , J.; Hamzić, A. Competing Ferromagnetic and Spin-Glass Order in a AuFe Alloy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 50, 1615– 1618

    1983

  13. [21]

    H.; Harrison, H

    Nagata, S.; Keesom, P. H.; Harrison, H. R. Low -DC-Field Susceptibility of CuMn Spin Glass. Phys. Rev. B 1979, 19, 1633–1638

    1979

  14. [22]

    S.; Lu, X.; Yu, S.-L.; Liu, J.-M.; Li, S.; Li, J.-X.; Wen, J

    Ma, Z.; Wang, J.; Dong, Z.-Y .; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zheng, S.-H.; Yu, Y .; Wang, W.; Che, L.; Ran, K.; Bao, S.; Cai, Z.; Čermák, P.; Schneidewind, A.; Yano, S.; Gardner, J. S.; Lu, X.; Yu, S.-L.; Liu, J.-M.; Li, S.; Li, J.-X.; Wen, J. Spin-Glass Ground State in a Triangular-Lat...

    2018

  15. [23]

    A.; Haley, S

    Maniv, E.; Murphy, R. A.; Haley, S. C.; Doyle, S.; John, C.; Maniv, A.; Ramakrishna, S. K.; Tang, Y .-L.; Ercius, P.; Ramesh, R.; Reyes, A. P.; Long, J. R.; Analytis, J. G. Exchange Bias due to Coupling between Coexisting Antiferromagnetic and Spin-Glass Orders. Nat. Phys. 202...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Theoretical Perspective on the Glass Transition and Amorphous Materials

    Berthier, L.; Biroli, G. Theoretical Perspective on the Glass Transition and Amorphous Materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011, 83, 587–636

    2011

  17. [25]

    K.; Ji, X.; Zhao, Y .; Kim, B

    Okawachi, Y .; Yu, M.; Jang, J. K.; Ji, X.; Zhao, Y .; Kim, B. Y .; Lipson, M.; Gaeta, A. L. Demonstration of Chip -Based Coupled Degenerate Optical Parametric Oscillators for Realizing a Nanophotonic Spin-Glass. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4119

    2020

  18. [26]

    What Is This?

    Matsumoto, T.; Yamano, A.; Sato, T.; Ferrara, J. D.; White, F. J.; Meyer, M. “What Is This?” A Structure Analysis Tool for Rapid and Automated Solution of Small Molecule Structures. J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2021, 51, 438–450

    2021

  19. [27]

    Toby, B. H. EXPGUI, a Graphical User Interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 210–213

    2001

  20. [28]

    PPMS Hardware Manual ; Quantum Design, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2004

    Quantum Design. PPMS Hardware Manual ; Quantum Design, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2004

    2004

  21. [29]

    SQUID VSM User’ s Manual; Quantum Design, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2009

    Quantum Design. SQUID VSM User’ s Manual; Quantum Design, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2009

    2009

  22. [30]

    Spin Glasses with p -Spin Interactions

    Gardner, E. Spin Glasses with p -Spin Interactions. Nucl. Phys. B 1985, 257, 747–765

    1985

  23. [31]

    ZView: A Software Program for IES Analysis, Version 2.8 ; Scribner Associates: Southern Pines, NC, 2002

    Johnson, D. ZView: A Software Program for IES Analysis, Version 2.8 ; Scribner Associates: Southern Pines, NC, 2002

    2002

  24. [32]

    Conceptual Density Functional Theory

    Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F.; Langenaeker, W. Conceptual Density Functional Theory. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1793–1874

    2003

  25. [33]

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector Augmented -Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953–17979

    1994

  26. [34]

    Ab -Initio Simulations of Materials Using V ASP: Density Functional Theory and Beyond

    Hafner, J. Ab -Initio Simulations of Materials Using V ASP: Density Functional Theory and Beyond. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 2044–2078

    2008

  27. [35]

    P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868

    1996

  28. [36]

    VESTA 3 for Three -Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, V olumetric and Morphology Data

    Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for Three -Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, V olumetric and Morphology Data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. Supporting Information for Self-induced crystalline fluctuation spin-glass state in Mn7C3 binary compounds Zekun Yu1,2, Cha...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.