Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Heterogeneous Distributed Architecture for Quantum Simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.09215 v1 pith:T6WSRK54 submitted 2026-08-10 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords architecturedistributedfermi-hubbardnon-localpauliquantumsystemtimes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Architectural specialization and distribution can help scale fault-tolerant quantum computers, but may also introduce substantial overheads from communication, routing, and resource duplication. We introduce a heterogeneous distributed architecture in which a magic core is connected to an extensible storage system composed of one-dimensional lanes of specialized cold-storage nodes. The storage system supports parallel random access to Pauli string parities. This organization is particularly well suited to fermionic quantum simulation, enabling parallel execution of the highly non-local Pauli strings arising from these systems. We evaluate the architecture on fault-tolerant simulations of the dynamics of the Fermi-Hubbard and sparse Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) models on systems of up to 450 logical qubits. These workloads exhibit complementary communication structures: Fermi-Hubbard produces a spectrum of interactions from local to non-local shaped by lattice geometry, whereas sparse SYK produces highly non-local and overlapping Pauli operators. For a Trotter step of a 450-logical-qubit Fermi-Hubbard workload, a six-lane system with 30 T-state factories is within approximately $1.4\times$ the wall-clock time of a homogeneous distributed architecture with 4 times as many T-state factories and substantially greater connectivity and sites for injecting magic. For matched T-factory counts, our architecture is $\sim 2\times$ faster.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools