Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Birefringent Biomineral Microcarriers Stabilise Multimodal Nanodiamond Quantum Sensing in Liquids

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A vaterite–nanodiamond microcarrier stabilises multimodal quantum sensing in liquids.

desk verdict A genuinely promising hybrid-carrier platform for NV sensing in liquids, with honest limitations; the proton-transduction mechanism is underdetermined but the paper says so itself. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09434 v1 pith:YUJPBXMB submitted 2026-08-10 quant-ph

T.Amro , M.Attrash , A.Droby , A.Ushkov , R.Malkinson , P.Penshin , A.Hen , V.Bobrovs
show 3 more authors
P. Ginzburg H.Barhum N.Bar-Gill
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersnanodiamondquantumsensingvateritemicrocarriersopticaltrappingODMRmagnetometryT1relaxometrychargeregulationproton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a micrometer-scale vaterite sphere—a porous, birefringent calcium-carbonate biomineral—decorated with 40-nm nitrogen-vacancy nanodiamonds can act as an orientation-stabilised, multimodal quantum sensor in liquids. The carrier supplies an optically addressable body frame through birefringent torque, redirects surface-dipole emission, and exposes the nanodiamonds to a proton-active carbonate interface. Under 976-nm optical trapping the hybrid keeps its spin resonances and longitudinal relaxation, resolves magnetic fields from 0 to 0.8 mT via Zeeman-split ODMR, and shortens $T_1$ sharply when a nominal proton-equivalent dose is added to buffered cell-culture medium. Because the measured bulk pH barely moves, the authors conclude that the $T_1$ response is amplified medium-dependent interfacial transduction—charge regulation at the carbonate surface—rather than direct proton-spin resonance or a bulk-pH-only response.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vaterite–nanodiamond microcarrier: a 3–5 $\mu$m porous vaterite microspherulite decorated at its surface with 40-nm NV nanodiamonds, with a polyelectrolyte (PSS) layer at the junction. Its birefringence produces an optical torque in a linearly polarised 976-nm trap that biases the particle's orientation against Brownian rotation; the same anisotropy redirects surface-dipole emission, with a simulated Purcell factor near 0.30 relative to water, so collection is angularly redistributed rather than rate-enhanced. The chemical channel is carried by equations (3)–(6): a grand-canonical charge-regulation model in which proton bulk activity maps to a local surface potential $\psi_0$, occupation fractions $f_s$ follow a two-state form, and the longitudinal relaxation rate $\Gamma_{1,\mathrm{eff}}$ receives an occupation-gated fast term and an occupation-switching term, each filtered by a Lorentzian spectral window at the NV transition. The model’s key quantitative output is the constraint $\omega_0 \tau_e \approx 1$, giving $\tau_e \approx 55$ ps for a downstream relaxation-active fluctuator at 2.87 GHz.

What would settle it

A matched acid–base cycle would settle it: titrate DMEM back to the original pH with base and check whether $T_1$ returns to about 23 microseconds; if it does not, or if a matched buffer without carbonate shows the same shortening, the proton-specific charge-regulation mechanism is not the dominant cause.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that assembling a 40-nm nitrogen-vacancy nanodiamond layer on porous, birefringent vaterite microspherulites creates a single liquid-accessible hybrid that stabilises NV quantum sensing during optical trapping and adds a chemical-relaxometry channel. In this architecture the vaterite body provides the orienting frame, the surface-bound nanodiamonds provide the quantum transducer, and the vaterite/PSS/nanodiamond junction provides a charge-regulated proton-active interface. The evidence: ODMR contrast varies by less than 7 percent and the resonance centre shifts by about 1 MHz when the 976-nm trap is turned on at 0.8 W; Zeeman-split resonances resolve fields of 0 to 0.8 mT with a source-reported response metric of 78–144 $\mu$T/$\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$; and in DMEM a 10.7 $\mu$M nominal proton-equivalent dose shortens $T_1$ from 23.4 $\pm$ 2.3 $\mu$s to 9.0 $\pm$ 1.2 $\mu$s, a 2.60 $\pm$ 0.43-fold rise in relaxation rate that is far larger than the 0.69-percentage-point occupation change allowed by the measured 0.012-unit bulk-pH shift at fixed surface potential. The authors therefore conclude that the response is amplified medium-dependent interfacial transduction, supported by a grand-canonical charge-regulation model coupling proton chemical potential to occupation statistics and interfacial switching kinetics within the NV spectral window.

Load-bearing premise

The proton-transduction interpretation of the DMEM $T_1$ shortening assumes the measured bulk-pH shift from 8.100 to 8.088 is the relevant thermodynamic drive at the diamond surface, with the surface electrical potential and other ionic activities unchanged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the platform works as claimed, a single optically trapped hybrid in liquid can simultaneously serve as a magnetic-field probe (0–0.8 mT range) and a chemical-relaxometry probe, removing the need to immobilise or isolate the sensor.
  • Orientation stabilisation by the birefringent carrier should suppress Brownian-rotation noise, making reproducible ODMR and $T_1$ readings possible under 976-nm trapping.
  • The DMEM result implies the sensor reports local interfacial proton activity amplified by charge regulation rather than bulk pH, allowing detection of small proton-equivalent perturbations in buffered biological media.
  • The ethanol control suggests transduction gain is medium-specific, so the same carrier could be tuned by solvent or buffer composition.
  • Retaining ODMR and $T_1$ under 976-nm trapping allows measurement sequences that combine trapping, microwave driving, and optical readout on one moving particle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If charge regulation at the vaterite interface is the operative mechanism, the carrier should respond to other species that alter surface potential or site occupation; matched-buffer and ion-substitution experiments would test whether the response is proton-specific.
  • The 55-ps spectral constraint points to a downstream electronic or paramagnetic fluctuator whose population is regulated by protonation; varying ionic strength, dissolved oxygen, or paramagnetic ion concentration at fixed pH would test that channel.
  • Because the carrier defines a body frame, adding independent angular tracking would convert the orientation-stabilised platform into a vector magnetometer, able to report field direction rather than a single axial projection.
  • The model’s reliance on an unresolved medium-dependent mapping suggests a direct test: a solvent series with controlled water content in ethanol should monotonically tune the transduction gain if hydration and buffer capacity are the controlling variables.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper assembles 40-nm NV nanodiamonds onto 3-5 µm vaterite microspherulites and characterizes the resulting hybrids in optical traps. It reports polarisation-dependent photoluminescence attributed to the birefringent carrier, retention of ODMR with less than 7% contrast variation under 976-nm trapping, Zeeman-split resonances for field sensing, and T1 shortening in DMEM under a 10.7 µM nominal proton-equivalent dose. A grand-canonical charge-regulation model is introduced to connect bulk proton chemical potential to interfacial occupation, switching kinetics, and NV longitudinal relaxation. The manuscript is unusually explicit about its limitations, stating that orientation is not independently tracked, that the sensitivity metrics are fit-derived and not noise-normalised, that the model is not globally fitted, and that selectivity for H+ over phthalate, potassium, ionic strength, or carrier dissolution is not established.

Significance. If the full multimodal claim could be supported, the platform would be a useful contribution to liquid-phase nanodiamond sensing: the combination of a birefringent, chemically active carrier with an NV quantum layer is a plausible route to orientation-stabilised, chemically responsive sensors. The paper's strengths include extensive supplementary data, raw T1 decays, clearly separated empirical fits from the thermodynamic model, and an honest discussion of what the measurements cannot establish. The empirical observations—ODMR retention, Zeeman splitting, and dose-dependent T1 changes—are internally consistent and presented with fit uncertainties. However, the central chemical-sensing claim is underdetermined by the current controls, and the sensitivity numbers in the abstract go beyond what the noise analysis supports. Because the title and abstract foreground 'proton-active' and 'proton-responsive' sensing, these gaps are load-bearing for the paper's main message.

major comments (4)
  1. [V (DMEM/ethanol contrast)] The nominal-dose comparison in Section V cannot separate proton activity from phthalate, potassium, ionic strength, or vaterite dissolution effects, as the text itself concedes after Eq. (6). The 0.69% bound on ideal-site occupation at fixed ψ0 rules out only a fixed-potential bulk-pH-only model; it does not test whether the 2.60±0.43-fold ΔΓ1,eff increase arises from non-proton channels. Because the abstract and Section VI present 'proton-responsive sensing' and 'proton-active thermodynamic interface' as established, this underdetermination is load-bearing for the chemical-sensing half of the central claim. Matched-buffer controls (e.g., phthalate/K+ at constant pH, ionic-strength-matched additions), an acid-base reversibility test, and post-titration morphology or Ca2+ measurements are required before the claim can be accepted as stated.
  2. [Eqs. (3)-(6) and Supp. C2.9] The charge-regulation model is not constrained by the data: ψ0 and the effective pKa coordinates are free, and the dashed curves in Fig. 6 are empirical Hill-like projections rather than global fits of Eqs. (3)-(6). The model is therefore consistent with the measured trends but cannot provide unique support for the 'amplified interfacial proton transduction' interpretation. The 2.60-fold Γ1,eff increase is a real measured effect, but its attribution to charge-regulated proton noise requires either independent measurement of ψ0 (or zeta potential) with ionic-strength controls, or a model comparison against a dissolution/ionic-strength channel. Without this, the phrase 'support amplified medium-dependent interfacial transduction' overstates the evidence.
  3. [Abstract, Section IV, Table III] The abstract reports 78-144 µT Hz^-1/2, 6.46 µM Hz^-1/2, and 6.54 mpH Hz^-1/2 as sensitivities, but Supplementary Table III states that these are source-reported fit-derived metrics for which 'independent noise normalisation is unavailable' (acquisition time, measurement variance, and particle-to-particle dispersion are missing). In addition, Fig. 4(f) gives a magnetic sensitivity of 171.7 µT/√Hz for a trapped hybrid while the text cites 78-144 µT/√Hz. These values should be labelled as response metrics, the noise-model caveat should appear wherever they are quoted, and the numerical discrepancy should be resolved.
  4. [III] The claim of 'orientation stabilisation' is not directly measured. Section III states that 'the particle angle was not independently tracked' and that the state is 'orientation-stabilised rather than quantitatively orientation-locked.' The polarisation-dependent PL in Fig. 3(d) demonstrates reproducible polarisation-dependent collection but does not by itself show that Brownian rotation is suppressed or that the body axis is stabilised in the trap. Since orientation stabilisation is one of the three pillars of the multimodal platform, an independent angle-tracking measurement (or at least a quantitative bound on angular diffusion) is needed to support the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supp. C2.13.2] The caption of Fig. C2.13.2 says the decays are for 'ethanol' although the text and data refer to the DMEM series; this is a typo.
  2. [Supp. B1] In the caption of Fig. B1.2, 'Far -Fireld' should be 'Far-Field'.
  3. [II] The text calls the junction 'vaterite/poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate)(PSS)/nanodiamond'; the abstract's repeated emphasis on a 'carbonate-rich interface' should more consistently acknowledge the PSS contribution in the main text, as the Methods do.
  4. [V] The phrase 'concentration and pH sensitivities' in the abstract should be qualified as 'nominal-dose response metrics' to match the caveats in Supp. C2.9 and Table III.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the empirical claims rest on independent measurements, and the model is explicitly not fitted to the dose-response data.

full rationale

The paper's central results are experimental: ODMR contrast, Zeeman splitting, T1 relaxometry, and polarization-dependent PL are directly measured observables, not outputs of the model. The grand-canonical charge-regulation model (Eqs. 3-6) is explicitly presented as an organizing framework rather than a fitted predictive engine: 'Dashed curves are empirical regional or Hill-like projections, not global fits of equations 3-6.' The key inference against a bulk-pH-only response is a genuine null-hypothesis test: at fixed psi0 the 0.012-unit pH shift changes any ideal binary-site occupation by at most 0.69%, whereas the measured Delta_Gamma_1,eff is 2.60 +/- 0.43-fold. This is a quantitative contradiction of the null model, not a prediction equivalent to its input. The paper also explicitly disclaims the stronger mechanistic claim: 'These measurements establish a dose-dependent response in the measured particle series. They do not establish selectivity for H+ over changes in phthalate, potassium, ionic strength or carrier dissolution.' Self-citations to prior vaterite work (refs 15, 16, 18) supply material parameters for simulations and context, but the birefringence and optical response are independently measured here, and no uniqueness theorem or fitted parameter is imported from those citations. The model's underdetermination is acknowledged as a limitation ('it is not a uniquely identified microscopic fit'), which is a correctness/interpretation risk, not circularity. The empirical fits and response metrics are clearly labeled as fit-derived, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The empirical fits to dose-response data are descriptive Hill-like projections and are not used as a first-principles derivation; the charge-regulation model contains free parameters (psi0, effective pKa, correlation times, coupling amplitudes) that are not fitted, so the model is a framework rather than a validated prediction. The paper is explicit about these limitations, which lowers the circularity burden but also limits the strength of the causal claim.

free parameters (6)
  • DMEM Hill fit u50 = 10.0 µM nominal dose
    Empirical scale parameter in the restricted Hill-like projection T1(u)=T0/(1+(u/u50)^m) fitted to five DMEM dose points; not a pKa or binding constant (Supplementary Table II).
  • DMEM Hill fit m = 6.91
    Shape parameter in the same DMEM Hill fit; the paper states it is not evidence of molecular cooperativity (Supplementary Table II).
  • Ethanol Hill fit u50 = 6.23e3 µM nominal dose
    Empirical scale for the ethanol nominal-dose series; the three-point fit has zero residual degrees of freedom (Supplementary C2.9).
  • Ethanol Hill fit m = 3.13
    Shape parameter for the ethanol fit (Supplementary Table II).
  • NaOH/HCl regional fit parameters (Gamma0, S, K, m) = Region 1: 0.0131, 0.0267, 186.3, 5.4; Region 2: 0.0194, 0.058, 515, 6.86
    Empirical regional parameters for the NaOH/HCl titration, used to report pH response metrics; they are descriptive and do not prove a mechanistic crossover (Supplementary Table IV).
  • Interfacial surface potential psi0 = not determined (left free)
    Surface potential in the grand-canonical charge-regulation model; the sign and magnitude are left free because vaterite, PSS, nanodiamond coverage, ionic strength and adsorbates all contribute (Section V, Eq. (3)).
assumptions (8)
  • standard math NV- ground-state spin Hamiltonian with Zeeman, strain and hyperfine terms (Eq. 1)
    Standard spin Hamiltonian for NV centers, cited to Ref. 17.
  • domain assumption Bloch-Redfield transverse relaxation expression with angular-frequency PSD convention (Eq. 2)
    The paper adopts a specific ensemble-averaged convention for Gamma1,eff and notes that microscopic rate additivity is exact only for exponential Markovian relaxation (Supplementary C2.2).
  • domain assumption Grand-canonical equilibrium at the solid-liquid interface (Eq. 3)
    The paper explicitly states: 'Strict equilibrium is therefore a modelling assumption.' Equilibration time, temperature and reversibility were not measured (Section V).
  • ad hoc to paper Two-state Markov occupation switching with Lorentzian noise spectrum (Eq. 6 and Supplementary C2.7)
    Introduced as a minimal closure to connect occupation fluctuations to NV spectral density; not independently validated.
  • domain assumption Optical torque U(theta) approximately -Delta_alpha |E|^2 cos^2(theta)/4 for a birefringent particle in a linearly polarized trap
    Standard result for optical trapping of anisotropic particles, cited to Refs. 22 and 23.
  • domain assumption FDTD continuum-sphere representation of porous vaterite spherulites
    The simulation replaces the real porous/rough particle with an effective anisotropic continuum sphere; the paper states it does not reproduce pore-scale scattering or the exact collection geometry (Supplementary Note B1).
  • standard math Aqueous carbonate pKa2 = 10.33 used as a bulk coordinate
    Used only as an aqueous reference for the carbonate-pair ratio, not as a surface-site acidity (Supplementary C2.4).
  • domain assumption Bulk pH measurement represents the thermodynamic drive at the NV interface
    The DMEM argument that the 0.012-unit bulk-pH shift is too small to explain T1 changes assumes bulk pH tracks interfacial proton activity at fixed psi0; the paper acknowledges this mapping is unresolved (Section V and Supplementary C2.3).
invented entities (2)
  • Fast downstream fluctuator with tau_e approximately 55 ps
    purpose: Provides the Lorentzian spectral weight at the 2.87-GHz NV transition that protonation-state changes are proposed to regulate, bridging slow chemical kinetics to fast NV relaxation.
    The paper states the 55-ps timescale is a constraint on a downstream electronic, paramagnetic or defect-state fluctuator, not a measured entity, and that it is 'neither a measured proton-exchange time nor evidence of direct proton nuclear-spin noise' (Section V).
  • Effective proton-active site classes (Ss/SsH) with effective pKa
    purpose: Coarse-grained thermodynamic states used in the grand-canonical charge-regulation model to produce occupation fluctuations that modulate NV relaxation.
    The paper groups vaterite, PSS and nanodiamond surface groups into effective site classes and states the model does not identify a unique chemical site (Supplementary C2.1 and C2.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Birefringent Biomineral Microcarriers Stabilise Multimodal Nanodiamond Quantum Sensing in Liquids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YUJPBXMB

@misc{pith2026260809434,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Birefringent Biomineral Microcarriers Stabilise Multimodal Nanodiamond Quantum Sensing in Liquids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YUJPBXMB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09434}
}
read the original abstract

Mobile nanodiamond quantum sensors in liquids are limited by Brownian rotation, variable photon collection, and perturbations introduced by optical trapping. Here, we assemble 40-nm nitrogen-vacancy nanodiamonds at the surface of porous, birefringent vaterite microspherulites. This carbonate biomineral provides a polarization-addressable body frame, anisotropic emission redistribution, and a proton-active thermodynamic interface. Under 976-nm optical trapping, the hybrids retain their spin resonance and longitudinal relaxation, with the resonance contrast varying by less than 7 percent and the resonance centre shifting by approximately 1 MHz at 0.8 W. Zeeman-split resonances enable magnetic-field sensing from 0 to 0.8 mT, with a response metric of 78-144 microT per square root Hz. In buffered cell-culture medium, a 10.7 microM nominal proton-equivalent dose shortens T1 from 23.4 +/- 2.3 to 9.0 +/- 1.2 microseconds, corresponding to concentration and pH sensitivities of 6.46 microM per square root Hz and 6.54 mpH per square root Hz, respectively, in DMEM. By contrast, a 500-fold higher proton dose in ethanol produces a substantially weaker spin response, highlighting the role of the carbonate-rich interface. We develop a grand-canonical charge-regulation model coupling proton chemical potential to interfacial switching kinetics within the NV spectral window, capturing medium-dependent dynamic proton transduction. By integrating orientation stabilisation, optical manipulation, magnetic sensing, and interfacial chemical response, this carbonate-rich hybrid platform establishes a versatile approach to multimodal quantum sensing in complex biological liquids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09434 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Fujisaku et al

    author author T. Fujisaku et al. ,\ title title pH nanosensor using electronic spins in diamond , \ 10.1021/acsnano.9b05342 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 13 ,\ pages 11726--11732 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b05342 2019

  2. [3]

    Mzyk , author A

    author author A. Mzyk , author A. Sigaeva , \ and\ author R. Schirhagl ,\ title title Relaxometry with nitrogen vacancy ( NV ) centers in diamond , \ 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00520 journal journal Accounts of Chemical Research \ volume 55 ,\ pages 3572--3580 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00520

  3. [4]

    Romach et al

    author author Y. Romach et al. ,\ title title Spectroscopy of surface-induced noise using shallow spins in diamond , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.017601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 114 ,\ pages 017601 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.017601

  4. [5]

    Benedi c i c et al

    author author I. Benedi c i c et al. ,\ title title Spin-lattice relaxation of NV centers in nanodiamonds adsorbed on conducting and nonconducting surfaces , \ 10.1103/1s53-5wls journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 111 ,\ pages 235421 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/1s53-5wls

  5. [6]

    Rosskopf et al

    author author T. Rosskopf et al. ,\ title title Investigation of surface magnetic noise by shallow spins in diamond , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.147602 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 112 ,\ pages 147602 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.147602

  6. [7]

    author author G. P. \ Conangla , author A. W. \ Schell , author R. A. \ Rica , \ and\ author R. Quidant ,\ title title Motion control and optical interrogation of a levitating single nitrogen vacancy in vacuum , \ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01414 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 18 ,\ pages 3956--3961 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01414

  7. [8]

    Delord , author L

    author author T. Delord , author L. Nicolas , author L. Schwab , \ and\ author G. H\' e tet ,\ title title Electron spin resonance from NV centers in diamonds levitating in an ion trap , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/aa659c journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 19 ,\ pages 033031 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa659c

  8. [9]

    author author L. W. \ Russell , author S. G. \ Ralph , author K. Wittick , author J.-P. \ Tetienne , author D. A. \ Simpson , \ and\ author P. J. \ Reece ,\ title title Manipulating the quantum coherence of optically trapped nanodiamonds , \ 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00946 journal journal ACS Photonics \ volume 5 ,\ pages 4491--4496 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00946

Show all 61 references
  1. [10]

    Dervillez , author F

    author author A. Dervillez , author F. Kalantarifard , author L. Troise , author A. Huck , \ and\ author K. Berg-S rensen ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2501.07263 title Sensing with near-infrared laser trapped fluorescent nanodiamonds , \ ( year 2025 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07263 ar...

    doi arXiv

  2. [12]

    Rivi\` e re et al

    author author F. Rivi\` e re et al. ,\ title title Hot Brownian motion of optically levitated nanodiamonds , \ 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01642 journal journal ACS Photonics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 420--425 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  3. [13]

    author author L. W. \ Russell , author E. C. \ Dossetor , author A. A. \ Wood , author D. A. \ Simpson , \ and\ author P. J. \ Reece ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2101.08941 title Optimising optical tweezers experiments for magnetic resonance sensing with nanodiamonds , \ ( year 2021 ),\ ...

    doi arXiv

  4. [14]

    Roy et al

    author author S. Roy et al. ,\ title title Comparison of optical trapping wavelengths for nanoscopic diamonds containing nitrogen-vacancy centers , \ 10.1088/2399-6528/ad48d4 journal journal Journal of Physics Communications \ volume 8 ,\ pages 055001 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [15]

    author author R. E. \ Noskov et al. ,\ title title Golden vaterite as a mesoscopic metamaterial for biophotonic applications , \ 10.1002/adma.202008484 journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 33 ,\ pages 2008484 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [16]

    Ushkov et al

    author author A. Ushkov et al. ,\ title title Nanojet visualization and dark-field imaging of optically trapped vaterite capsules with endoscopic illumination , \ 10.1038/s41378-025-00951-1 journal journal Microsystems & Nanoengineering \ volume 11 ,\ pages 91 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [17]

    author author M. W. \ Doherty et al. ,\ title title Theory of the ground-state spin of the NV ^ - center in diamond , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205203 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 85 ,\ pages 205203 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  8. [18]

    author author R. E. \ Noskov , author I. I. \ Shishkin , author H. Barhom , \ and\ author P. Ginzburg ,\ title title Non- Mie optical resonances in anisotropic biomineral nanoparticles , \ 10.1039/C8NR07561A journal journal Nanoscale \ volume 10 ,\ pages 21031--21040 ( year 20...

    doi

  9. [19]

    Vogt , author J

    author author N. Vogt , author J. Jeske , \ and\ author J. H. \ Cole ,\ title title Stochastic Bloch-Redfield theory: Quantum jumps in a solid-state environment , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.174514 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 174514 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [22]

    Ashkin ,\ @noop title Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Particles Using Lasers \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

    author author A. Ashkin ,\ @noop title Optical Trapping and Manipulation of Neutral Particles Using Lasers \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  11. [23]

    author author K. C. \ Neuman \ and\ author S. M. \ Block ,\ title title Optical trapping , \ 10.1063/1.1785844 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 75 ,\ pages 2787--2809 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  12. [24]

    Lukosz ,\ title title Light emission by magnetic and electric dipoles close to a plane dielectric interface

    author author W. Lukosz ,\ title title Light emission by magnetic and electric dipoles close to a plane dielectric interface. iii. radiation patterns of dipoles with arbitrary orientation , \ 10.1364/JOSA.69.001495 journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 1495--15...

    doi

  13. [25]

    author author V. R. \ Horowitz , author B. J. \ Alem \'a n , author D. J. \ Christle , author A. N. \ Cleland , \ and\ author D. D. \ Awschalom ,\ title title Electron spin resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in optically trapped nanodiamonds , \ 10.1073/pnas.1211311109 jour...

    doi

  14. [26]

    \ Chen et al

    author author X.-D. \ Chen et al. ,\ title title High-contrast quantum imaging with time-gated fluorescence detection , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064024 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 11 ,\ pages 064024 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [27]

    Boehm et al

    author author F. Boehm et al. ,\ title title Temporal filtered quantum sensing with the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond , \ 10.48550/ARXIV.2511.02369 \ ( year 2025 ),\ 10.48550/ARXIV.2511.02369 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02369 arXiv:2511.02369 NoStop

    2025 doi

  16. [28]

    author author R. De Sousa ,\ title title Electron spin as a spectrometer of nuclear-spin noise and other fluctuations , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-540-79365-6_10 booktitle Electron Spin Resonance and Related Phenomena in Low-Dimensional Structures ,\ series Topics in Applied Physics ...

    doi

  17. [29]

    Cheng , author Y

    author author H. Cheng , author Y. Luo , author X. Luo , author C. Xue , author Y. Li , author G. Liu , author L. Chen , author Z. Chen , \ and\ author Y. Chen ,\ title title All-fiber quantum relaxometry for biochemical sensing based on diamond nv centers , \ 10.1364/OE.52540...

    doi

  18. [35]

    Li , author D

    author author Y. Li , author D. Zheng , author Z. Liu , author H. Wang , author Y. Liu , author C. Hou , author H. Guo , author Z. Li , author Y. Sugawara , author J. Tang , author Z. Ma , \ and\ author J. Liu ,\ title title Noise suppression of nitrogen-vacancy magnetometer i...

    doi

  19. [36]

    Horowitz, V. R. and Alem\'. Electron spin resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in optically trapped nanodiamonds , journal =. 2012 , month = aug, doi =

    2012

  20. [37]

    and others , title =

    Fujisaku, T. and others , title =. ACS Nano , volume =. 2019 , month = oct, doi =

    2019

  21. [38]

    and Sigaeva, A

    Mzyk, A. and Sigaeva, A. and Schirhagl, R. , title =. Accounts of Chemical Research , volume =. 2022 , month = dec, doi =

    2022

  22. [39]

    and others , title =

    Romach, Y. and others , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2015 , month = jan, doi =

    2015

  23. [40]

    Spin-lattice relaxation of

    Benedi. Spin-lattice relaxation of. Physical Review B , volume =. 2025 , month = jun, doi =

    2025

  24. [41]

    and others , title =

    Rosskopf, T. and others , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2014 , month = apr, doi =

    2014

  25. [42]

    Conangla, G. P. and Schell, A. W. and Rica, R. A. and Quidant, R. , title =. Nano Letters , volume =. 2018 , month = jun, doi =

    2018

  26. [43]

    and Nicolas, L

    Delord, T. and Nicolas, L. and Schwab, L. and H\'. Electron spin resonance from. New Journal of Physics , volume =. 2017 , month = mar, doi =

    2017

  27. [44]

    Russell, L. W. and Ralph, S. G. and Wittick, K. and Tetienne, J.-P. and Simpson, D. A. and Reece, P. J. , title =. ACS Photonics , volume =. 2018 , month = nov, doi =

    2018

  28. [45]

    and Kalantarifard, F

    Dervillez, A. and Kalantarifard, F. and Troise, L. and Huck, A. and Berg-S. Sensing with near-infrared laser trapped fluorescent nanodiamonds , year =. 2501.07263 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  29. [46]

    and others , title =

    Iyer, S. and others , title =. Physical Review Applied , volume =. 2024 , month = dec, doi =

    2024

  30. [47]

    Rivi\`. Hot. ACS Photonics , volume =. 2022 , month = feb, doi =

    2022

  31. [48]

    Russell, L. W. and Dossetor, E. C. and Wood, A. A. and Simpson, D. A. and Reece, P. J. , title =. 2021 , eprint =

    2021

  32. [49]

    and others , title =

    Roy, S. and others , title =. Journal of Physics Communications , volume =. 2024 , month = may, doi =

    2024

  33. [50]

    Noskov, R. E. and others , title =. Advanced Materials , volume =. 2021 , month = jun, doi =

    2021

  34. [51]

    and others , title =

    Ushkov, A. and others , title =. Microsystems & Nanoengineering , volume =. 2025 , month = may, doi =

    2025

  35. [52]

    Doherty, M. W. and others , title =. Physical Review B , volume =. 2012 , month = may, doi =

    2012

  36. [53]

    Noskov, R. E. and Shishkin, I. I. and Barhom, H. and Ginzburg, P. , title =. Nanoscale , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  37. [54]

    and Jeske, J

    Vogt, N. and Jeske, J. and Cole, J. H. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =. 2013 , month = nov, doi =

    2013

  38. [55]

    and others , title =

    Li, Y. and others , title =. Micromachines , volume =. 2023 , month = sep, doi =

    2023

  39. [56]

    McGuinness, L. P. and others , title =. Nature Nanotechnology , volume =. 2011 , month = jun, doi =

    2011

  40. [57]

    Horowitz, V. R. and Alem. Electron spin resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in optically trapped nanodiamonds , journal =. 2012 , month = aug, doi =

    2012

  41. [58]

    and others , title =

    Chen, X.-D. and others , title =. Physical Review Applied , volume =. 2019 , month = jun, doi =

    2019

  42. [59]

    and others , title =

    Boehm, F. and others , title =. 2025 , eprint =

    2025

  43. [60]

    , title =

    De Sousa, R. , title =. Electron Spin Resonance and Related Phenomena in Low-Dimensional Structures , editor =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  44. [61]

    All-fiber quantum relaxometry for biochemical sensing based on diamond NV centers , volume =

    Hongda Cheng and Yunhan Luo and Xiaoling Luo and Chen Xue and Yuxin Li and Guishi Liu and Lei Chen and Zhe Chen and Yaofei Chen , journal =. All-fiber quantum relaxometry for biochemical sensing based on diamond NV centers , volume =. 2024 , url =

    2024

  45. [62]

    Optically-trapped-nanodiamond relaxometric detection of nanomolar paramagnetic spins in aqueous environments , author =. Phys. Rev. Appl. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.064076 , url =

    2024 doi

  46. [63]

    Sensing with near-infrared laser trapped fluorescent nanodiamonds , volume=

    Dervillez, Arthur and Kalantarifard, Fatemeh and Troise, Luca and Huck, Alexander and Berg-Sørensen, Kirstine , year=. Sensing with near-infrared laser trapped fluorescent nanodiamonds , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2026.113749 , journal=

    2026

  47. [64]

    L. P. McGuinness and Y. Yan and A. Stacey and D. A. Simpson and L. T. Hall and D. Maclaurin and S. Prawer and P. Mulvaney and J. Wrachtrup and F. Caruso and R. E. Scholten and L. C. L. Hollenberg , title =. Nature Nanotechnology , year =. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.64 , url =

    doi

  48. [65]

    Classical statistical mechanics in the grand canonical ensemble , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014117 , url =

    2021 doi

  49. [66]

    Journal of Modern Physics , year =

    Luis Felipe del Castillo and Paula Vera-Cruz , title =. Journal of Modern Physics , year =. doi:10.4236/jmp.2011.25047 , url =

    2011

  50. [67]

    Micromachines , VOLUME =

    Li, Yang and Zheng, Doudou and Liu, Zhenhua and Wang, Hui and Liu, Yankang and Hou, Chenyu and Guo, Hao and Li, Zhonghao and Sugawara, Yashuhiro and Tang, Jun and Ma, Zongmin and Liu, Jun , TITLE =. Micromachines , VOLUME =. 2023 , NUMBER =

    2023

  51. [68]

    Ashkin, Arthur , title =

  52. [69]

    and Block, Steven M

    Neuman, Keir C. and Block, Steven M. , title =. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  53. [70]

    Lukosz , journal =

    W. Lukosz , journal =. Light emission by magnetic and electric dipoles close to a plane dielectric interface. III. Radiation patterns of dipoles with arbitrary orientation , volume =. 1979 , url =

    1979

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.