Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Probing Non-equilibrium baths: Frequency-Resolved Thermometry and Quantum Heat Current Turnover

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A frequency-resolved thermometer protocol shows that the turnover of the steady-state heat current is caused by the bath spectrum flattening to its initial temperature at strong coupling.

desk verdict A useful new probe for non-equilibrium baths, with a striking observation that deserves careful numerical verification before the turnover explanation is taken as established. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09461 v1 pith:JMOYYJCS submitted 2026-08-10 quant-ph

Akhil Bhartiya , Tobias Kramer , David Gelbwaser-Klimovsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumheattransportturnovereffecteffectivetemperaturefrequency-resolvedthermometryhierarchicalequationsofmotionnon-equilibriumsteadystatespin-bosonmodelstrongcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a way to 'see inside' a heat bath that drives a quantum system, by attaching a tunable two-level thermometer and reading its steady-state population ratio at each probe frequency. That ratio defines a frequency-resolved effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}(\omega)$: flat in equilibrium, dispersive when the bath is out of equilibrium. Applied to a spin coupled to two reservoirs and to two coupled spins each in its own reservoir, the protocol attributes the heat-current turnover to the bath's own thermal state. At weak coupling the effective temperature peaks at the system's resonant frequencies; at intermediate coupling the peaks broaden and the spectrum spreads widest; at strong coupling every probe frequency reports the original bath temperature, meaning system and bath have effectively decoupled. The paper concludes this decoupling, read off the bath spectrum itself, is what suppresses the steady-state heat current.

What carries the argument

The central object is the frequency-resolved effective temperature spectrum $T_{\rm eff}(\omega)$, extracted from a weakly coupled two-level probe through the detailed-balance relation $P_e/P_g=\exp(-\hbar\omega/k_B T_{\rm eff}(\omega))$. The protocol is platform-agnostic: the steady-state populations come from a numerically exact simulation, here the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) with Padé decomposition of the Drude-Lorentz bath correlation functions. The probe coupling $\eta$ is kept much smaller than the system-bath coupling $\lambda$ so the measurement is minimally invasive, and the heat current is evaluated from first-tier auxiliary density operators. The spectral dispersion — the variation of $T_{\rm eff}$ across probe frequencies — is the diagnostic that carries the argument: flatness signals equilibrium, dispersion signals non-equilibrium, and the collapse to a flat spectrum at the initial bath temperature signals the decoupling that produces the turnover.

What would settle it

Recompute the strong-coupling steady states with progressively larger HEOM hierarchy tiers and Padé orders and check whether $T_{\rm eff}(\omega)$ still flattens to the initial bath temperature; if the flattening recedes or shifts as the truncation is tightened, the decoupling signature is numerical rather than physical. In parallel, a tunable-coupling experiment could measure the probe's population ratio together with the heat current and look for the simultaneous return of the equilibrium ratio and suppression of current.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the turnover effect in non-equilibrium quantum heat transport can be explained by how the bath's local thermal state evolves with system-bath coupling strength, witnessed by a frequency-selective thermometer. A weakly coupled two-level probe with transition frequency $\omega$ defines $T_{\rm eff}(\omega)=\hbar\omega/[k_B\ln(P_g/P_e)]$ from its steady-state populations, and scanning $\omega$ gives a spectrum. For both the non-equilibrium spin-boson model and the two-qubit model, the spectrum shows three regimes: at weak coupling, deviations from the initial bath temperature concentrate near the bare system transitions; at intermediate coupling, the resonances broaden and shift while the spectral dispersion is maximal; at strong coupling, $T_{\rm eff}(\omega)$ collapses to the initial bath temperature at every frequency. The authors interpret that collapse as effective decoupling between the system and its baths, which is the physical origin of the declining branch of the turnover curve.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the hierarchical-equations-of-motion calculation being numerically converged at every coupling strength studied; if the finite hierarchy depth and Padé order are too shallow at large $\lambda$, the reported flattening of $T_{\rm eff}$ toward the initial bath temperature could be a truncation artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The frequency dispersion of $T_{\rm eff}$ can serve as a quantitative, probe-based measure of how far a bath is from equilibrium in any non-equilibrium steady state.
  • In the intermediate-coupling regime, where dispersion is largest, the bath state differs markedly from its initial thermal state, so methods that freeze the bath state will misestimate transport there.
  • The strong-coupling collapse of $T_{\rm eff}$ to the initial bath temperature indicates that the turnover's declining branch is a decoupling effect that a weak-coupling or frozen-bath theory cannot capture.
  • Because the protocol only requires the steady-state population of a weakly coupled probe, it can be attached to any exact solver, not just HEOM.
  • The three identified regimes — resonant, non-resonant, and decoupled — give a concrete map of the coupling ranges where common approximations such as Redfield or the non-interacting-blip approximation can be trusted.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to probe the bath with a multi-level or harmonic thermometer, which would yield a fuller effective spectral function and could reveal whether the strong-coupling flattening is exact or only asymptotic in $\lambda$.
  • The framework suggests that the critical coupling of the turnover is set by the coupling where the bath-state deviation is maximal, so the peak location should be predictable from the growth and then shrinkage of the spectral dispersion alone.
  • The same population-ratio thermometer could be applied to fermionic or phononic junctions, where an equivalent energy-resolved probe would test whether the decoupling picture generalizes beyond bosonic baths.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a frequency-resolved thermometry protocol for characterizing non-equilibrium baths in quantum heat transport. A tunable two-level probe is weakly coupled to each bath, and the steady-state probe population ratio is converted into a frequency-dependent effective temperature T_eff(ω) via a detailed-balance relation. The protocol is applied with the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) to two models: a spin-boson system coupled to two baths and a two-qubit system with independent baths, both with Drude-Lorentz spectral densities. The authors compute the steady-state heat current using the Kato-Tanimura expression and observe the familiar turnover as a function of system-bath coupling λ. Their central physical claim is that the turnover is explained by the bath state itself: at strong coupling, T_eff(ω,λ) becomes nearly frequency-independent and approaches the initial bath temperature, indicating that the baths effectively decouple from the system and hence the current is suppressed. The protocol is presented as platform-agnostic, with HEOM used as the demonstration tool.

Significance. If the numerical results are reliable, the paper offers a genuinely operational diagnostic for non-equilibrium bath states and a new, physically intuitive explanation for the heat-current turnover: rather than being a purely system-side effect, the turnover is accompanied by a return of the bath's local thermal state toward its initial equilibrium. This could be a useful complement to existing explanations based on the quantum Zeno effect or system-bath hybridization. The strengths are the use of a standard, well-documented HEOM framework, a thermodynamically consistent heat-current definition, and a clear two-model demonstration. The main weaknesses are that the entire evidence is numerical, with no convergence data, error bars, or code/data provided, and that a key methodological assumption—single-probe simulation being equivalent to two-probe simulation—is asserted without proof or numerical verification. Because the central mechanism is inferred from small deviations in T_eff at strong coupling, the absence of convergence and uncertainty quantification is load-bearing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II A and Figs. 2–3] The central evidence for the proposed mechanism is the flattening of T_eff(ω,λ) toward the initial bath temperature at strong coupling. This evidence is entirely numerical, yet the manuscript does not report the hierarchy truncation tier N, the convergence of the results with N, or the convergence with respect to the Padé order J_k (J_k=1 for Model I and J_k=2 for Model II). The statement in Sec. II A that 'the convergence of this truncation is verified by systematically increasing N until the dynamics stabilizes' is not backed by any data. At large λ, where system-bath correlations are strongest, an insufficient hierarchy depth could artificially suppress correlations and produce exactly the observed collapse of T_eff to T_in. Please provide convergence plots (or tables) for representative λ values across the full range shown in Fig. 2, including the largest λ, with N and J_k varied, and report estimated error bars on T_eff and Q_ss. Without this, the strong-coupling flattening cannot be distinguished from a truncation artifact.
  2. [Sec. II B, near Eq. (14)] The manuscript states that 'we simulate the system with a single probe attached at a time; this approach yields identical results to a full two-probe simulation.' This is a substantive methodological claim: the protocol requires that probes on different baths do not affect each other or the system-bath steady state, and that the presence of one probe does not alter the bath state measured by another. No proof or numerical comparison is given. Please demonstrate the equivalence explicitly, for both models, by comparing a full two-probe simulation with sequential single-probe simulations over the relevant λ and ω ranges, and by checking invariance of the extracted T_eff as the probe coupling η is varied (including values above and below η=10^-8). If the equivalence only holds asymptotically in η, state the asymptotic regime and quantify the residual error.
  3. [Sec. II C, 'Minimal Invasiveness'] The protocol's validity rests on the probe being minimally invasive, and the paper states that this 'is verified by confirming that bare system observables and inter-reservoir heat currents remain invariant within numerical tolerance as probe-bath coupling (η) is varied.' However, no such verification is shown. Please provide numerical evidence: for a representative set of ω and λ, plot system observables and Q_ss versus η, and show that the variations are below the numerical tolerance and below the observed T_eff changes. This is particularly important because η=10^-8 creates a very slow probe relaxation channel, and it is not obvious that the steady-state null-space computation is well conditioned at that scale.
  4. [Sec. III and Sec. IV] The paper interprets the convergence of T_eff(ω,λ) to T_in at strong coupling as evidence of 'effective decoupling' and uses this to explain the turnover. As presented, this is a correlation between two computed quantities (T_eff and Q_ss), not a demonstrated causal mechanism. Moreover, the observed deviations in Fig. 3 are very small (of order 0.1–1%), and without error bars it is unclear whether the trend is significant. Please provide a quantitative connection: for example, show that the frequency dispersion of T_eff, defined by a suitable measure such as max_ω |T_eff(ω)-T_in| or the variance across ω, peaks at the same λ as the heat current and decays on the same scale as the current suppression. Alternatively, state explicitly what test would distinguish the proposed bath-return mechanism from the quantum Zeno or hybridization explanations mentioned in Sec. IV. As written, the explanatory claim is stronger than the evidence supports.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Abstract] The title contains a typo: 'T urnover' should be 'Turnover'. Also, in Sec. I the phrase 'are are presented' should be 'are presented'.
  2. [Fig. 2 labels] The axis labels in Fig. 2 appear as 'W eak', 'Intermediate', 'Strong'; these spacing artifacts should be corrected for readability.
  3. [Eq. (18)] The definition of B_k,k' as (i/ħ)^2 [[V_k, V_k'], V_k] is asymmetric; please clarify whether the intended object is [[V_k,V_k'],V_k'] or a symmetrized version, since the last terms involve commutators with V_k'.
  4. [Appendix A] The Padé decomposition formulas are standard but the notation for the matrix Λ and the eigenvalues λ_i conflicts with the system-bath coupling strength λ_k used in the main text; this is a minor but potentially confusing notational clash.
  5. [Sec. II D] The heat current expression in Eq. (18) is stated to follow from Kato and Tanimura, but the intermediate steps are not shown; a brief derivation or reference to the specific equation in Ref. 41 would help readers verify the terminator contributions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective temperature spectrum and heat current are computed from the same HEOM steady state but independently evaluated, and the turnover explanation is an interpretation of the computed spectra, not an input.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities are defined independently: Teff(omega) is extracted from the probe steady-state population ratio via Eqs. (15)-(16), while the heat current is evaluated from first-tier auxiliary density operators via Eq. (18); neither is fitted to the other, and the same HEOM steady state is used only as a common data source. The claimed explanation of the turnover—that Teff approaches the initial bath temperature in the strong-coupling limit—is a numerical observation reported in Sec. III and interpreted in Sec. IV, not an assumed input. The frequency-selective probe concept is attributed to refs. [21,22], one of which is a prior work by an author, but the probe is a measurement tool and the central derivation does not reduce to that citation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The only substantive caveat is the unshown convergence of the HEOM truncation, which is a numerical reliability concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard open-quantum-system machinery (HEOM, Drude-Lorentz baths, detailed-balance thermometry) plus the ad hoc assumption of single-probe equivalence and the asserted but undocumented convergence of HEOM. The model parameters are chosen for demonstration, not fitted to the target result, and no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • System-bath coupling strength λ = λ hot = λ cold = λ, scanned from 1e-3 to 1 (Fig. 2)
    Central control parameter; the turnover position depends on it. Chosen by hand, not fitted to data.
  • Bath cutoff frequency γ = γ hot = γ cold = 1 (Model I) and 5 (Model II)
    Drude-Lorentz cutoff, chosen for the two demonstrations.
  • Initial bath temperatures = T hot = 3, T cold = 2 (units ħ = k_B = 1)
    Temperature bias chosen by hand to maintain a heat current.
  • Probe coupling strength η = 1e-8
    Chosen to be weak and minimally invasive; the validity of the thermometry depends on this.
  • System parameters ω0, J12 = ω0 = 1; J12 = 0.1
    Model I spin frequency and Model II inter-qubit coupling, chosen for computational demonstration.
  • Padé order J_k = J_k = 1 (Model I), J_k = 2 (Model II)
    Truncation order in the exponential decomposition of bath correlations; convergence is asserted but not shown.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The bath correlation function (Eq. 5) is exact for non-interacting harmonic baths with bilinear coupling and thermal initial states.
    Standard influence-functional result; used to derive the HEOM equations.
  • domain assumption The truncated HEOM hierarchy, with terminator correction, faithfully represents the exact dynamics at all coupling strengths considered.
    The paper relies on HEOM as numerically exact; convergence is stated but not demonstrated with data.
  • domain assumption The steady-state population ratio of a weakly coupled probe defines a meaningful local effective temperature via Eq. (15).
    Operational definition in Sec. II C; assumes negligible coherences and that T_eff(ω) reflects the local bath state.
  • domain assumption The Kato-Tanimura expression (Eq. 18) is the correct thermodynamic heat current from each bath.
    Adopted without re-derivation; standard in HEOM thermodynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Probing one bath at a time is equivalent to probing both baths simultaneously.
    Assumed for computational efficiency; no evidence provided, yet Fig. 2 shows simultaneous hot and cold spectra.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Non-equilibrium baths: Frequency-Resolved Thermometry and Quantum Heat Current Turnover." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JMOYYJCS

@misc{pith2026260809461,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Non-equilibrium baths: Frequency-Resolved Thermometry and Quantum Heat Current Turnover},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JMOYYJCS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09461}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum heat transport for non-equilibrium steady state (NESS) exhibits a characteristic turnover effect, where the heat current reaches a maximum and subsequently declines as system-bath coupling increases. Although numerically exact methods can simulate this non-monotonic behavior, they offer limited information on the thermal state of the heat baths. Here, we introduce a frequency-selective thermometric protocol to probe the baths sustaining an NESS. By extracting a frequency-resolved effective temperature spectrum using a tunable two-level probe, we demonstrate that spectral dispersion serves as a direct witness for the non-equilibrium state of the heat baths. To demonstrate the protocol, we applied the hierarchical equations of motion to spin-boson and two-qubit models, though any exact method can be used. For both models, the turnover effect can be explained by how the thermal state of the heat baths evolves as the system-bath coupling strength increases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09461 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of (I) the non-equilibrium spin-boson model and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Units [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Effective temperature as a function of coupling strength ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author D. G. \ Cahill , author W. K. \ Ford , author K. E. \ Goodson , author G. D. \ Mahan , author A. Majumdar , author H. J. \ Maris , author R. Merlin , \ and\ author S. R. \ Phillpot ,\ title title Nanoscale thermal transport , \ 10.1063/1.1524305 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 93 ,\ pages 793--818 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.1524305

  2. [2]

    Segal , author A

    author author D. Segal , author A. Nitzan , \ and\ author P. H \"a nggi ,\ title title Thermal conductance through molecular wires , \ 10.1063/1.1603211 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 119 ,\ pages 6840--6855 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.1603211

  3. [3]

    Dubi \ and\ author M

    author author Y. Dubi \ and\ author M. Di Ventra ,\ title title Colloquium : Heat flow and thermoelectricity in atomic and molecular junctions , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.131 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 83 ,\ pages 131--155 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.131

  4. [4]

    Nicolin \ and\ author D

    author author L. Nicolin \ and\ author D. Segal ,\ title title Non-equilibrium spin-boson model: Counting statistics and the heat exchange fluctuation theorem , \ 10.1063/1.3655674 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 135 ,\ pages 164106 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.3655674

  5. [5]

    author author D. Segal ,\ title title Heat transfer in the spin-boson model: A comparative study in the incoherent tunneling regime , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012148 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 90 ,\ pages 012148 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.012148

  6. [6]

    author author K. A. \ Velizhanin , author M. Thoss , \ and\ author H. Wang ,\ title title Meir-- Wingreen formula for heat transport in a spin-boson nanojunction model , \ 10.1063/1.3483127 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 133 ,\ pages 084503 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3483127

  7. [7]

    Yang \ and\ author C.-Q

    author author Y. Yang \ and\ author C.-Q. \ Wu ,\ title title Quantum heat transport in a spin-boson nanojunction: Coherent and incoherent mechanisms , \ 10.1209/0295-5075/107/30003 journal journal EPL (Europhysics Letters) \ volume 107 ,\ pages 30003 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/107/30003

  8. [8]

    Gelbwaser-Klimovsky \ and\ author A

    author author D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky \ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ title title Strongly Coupled Quantum Heat Machines , \ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01404 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 6 ,\ pages 3477--3482 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01404

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Wang , author J

    author author C. Wang , author J. Ren , \ and\ author J. Cao ,\ title title Nonequilibrium Energy Transfer at Nanoscale : A Unified Theory from Weak to Strong Coupling , \ 10.1038/srep11787 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 5 ,\ pages 11787 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Wang , author J

    author author C. Wang , author J. Ren , \ and\ author J. Cao ,\ title title Unifying quantum heat transfer in a nonequilibrium spin-boson model with full counting statistics , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.023610 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 95 ,\ pages 023610 ( year 201...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Anto-Sztrikacs , author F

    author author N. Anto-Sztrikacs , author F. Ivander , \ and\ author D. Segal ,\ title title Quantum thermal transport beyond second order with the reaction coordinate mapping , \ 10.1063/5.0091133 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 156 ,\ pages 214107 ( y...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Anto-Sztrikacs , author A

    author author N. Anto-Sztrikacs , author A. Nazir , \ and\ author D. Segal ,\ title title Effective- Hamiltonian Theory of Open Quantum Systems at Strong Coupling , \ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020307 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 020307 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author K. A. \ Velizhanin , author H. Wang , \ and\ author M. Thoss ,\ title title Heat transport through model molecular junctions: A multilayer multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree approach , \ 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.05.065 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Boudjada \ and\ author D

    author author N. Boudjada \ and\ author D. Segal ,\ title title From Dissipative Dynamics to Studies of Heat Transfer at the Nanoscale : Analysis of the Spin-Boson Model , \ 10.1021/jp5091685 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 118 ,\ pages 11323--1133...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Saito \ and\ author T

    author author K. Saito \ and\ author T. Kato ,\ title title Kondo Signature in Heat Transfer via a Local Two-State System , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.214301 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 111 ,\ pages 214301 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  8. [16]

    Kato \ and\ author Y

    author author A. Kato \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ title title Quantum heat transport of a two-qubit system: Interplay between system-bath coherence and qubit-qubit coherence , \ 10.1063/1.4928192 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 143 ,\ pages 064107 ( y...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Song \ and\ author Q

    author author L. Song \ and\ author Q. Shi ,\ title title Hierarchical equations of motion method applied to nonequilibrium heat transport in model molecular junctions: Transient heat current and high-order moments of the current operator , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.064308 journal...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Pleasance \ and\ author F

    author author G. Pleasance \ and\ author F. Petruccione ,\ title title Nonequilibrium quantum heat transport between structured environments , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/ad5bfb journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 26 ,\ pages 073025 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  11. [19]

    \ Breuer \ and\ author F

    author author H.-P. \ Breuer \ and\ author F. Petruccione ,\ @noop title The Theory of Open Quantum Systems \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ address Oxford ; New York ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  12. [20]

    Segal \ and\ author A

    author author D. Segal \ and\ author A. Nitzan ,\ title title Spin- Boson Thermal Rectifier , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.034301 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 94 ,\ pages 034301 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    Alicki \ and\ author D

    author author R. Alicki \ and\ author D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky ,\ title title Non-equilibrium quantum heat machines , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/115012 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 17 ,\ pages 115012 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Pawutinan , author T

    author author S. Pawutinan , author T. Deesuwan , author K. Tivakornsasithorn , \ and\ author S. Suwanna ,\ title title Equilibration of apparent temperature in non-equilibrium steady state of Lindblad dynamics , \ 10.1116/5.0278128 journal journal AVS Quantum Science \ volume...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Weiss ,\ @noop title Quantum Dissipative Systems ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.,\ series Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics \ No

    author author U. Weiss ,\ @noop title Quantum Dissipative Systems ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.,\ series Series in Modern Condensed Matter Physics \ No. number 10 \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  16. [24]

    May \ and\ author O

    author author V. May \ and\ author O. K \"u hn ,\ @noop title Charge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher Wiley-VCH ,\ address Weinheim ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  17. [25]

    Anto-Sztrikacs \ and\ author D

    author author N. Anto-Sztrikacs \ and\ author D. Segal ,\ title title Strong coupling effects in quantum thermal transport with the reaction coordinate method , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/ac02df journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 23 ,\ pages 063036 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Tanimura \ and\ author R

    author author Y. Tanimura \ and\ author R. Kubo ,\ title title Time Evolution of a Quantum System in Contact with a Nearly Gaussian-Markoffian Noise Bath , \ 10.1143/JPSJ.58.101 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 58 ,\ pages 101--114 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Jin , author X

    author author J. Jin , author X. Zheng , \ and\ author Y. Yan ,\ title title Exact dynamics of dissipative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hierarchical equations of motion approach , \ 10.1063/1.2938087 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 128 ,\ ...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author Y. Tanimura ,\ title title Numerically ``exact'' approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of motion ( HEOM ) , \ 10.1063/5.0011599 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 153 ,\ pages 020901 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  21. [29]

    Lambert , author T

    author author N. Lambert , author T. Raheja , author S. Cross , author P. Menczel , author S. Ahmed , author A. Pitchford , author D. Burgarth , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title QuTiP-BoFiN : A bosonic and fermionic numerical hierarchical-equations-of-motion library with a...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Ishizaki \ and\ author Y

    author author A. Ishizaki \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ title title Quantum Dynamics of System Strongly Coupled to Low-Temperature Colored Noise Bath : Reduced Hierarchy Equations Approach , \ 10.1143/JPSJ.74.3131 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volum...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Ikeda \ and\ author G

    author author T. Ikeda \ and\ author G. D. \ Scholes ,\ title title Generalization of the hierarchical equations of motion theory for efficient calculations with arbitrary correlation functions , \ 10.1063/5.0007327 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 152 ...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Kreisbeck , author T

    author author C. Kreisbeck , author T. Kramer , author M. Rodr \'i guez , \ and\ author B. Hein ,\ title title High- Performance Solution of Hierarchical Equations of Motion for Studying Energy Transfer in Light-Harvesting Complexes , \ 10.1021/ct200126d journal journal Journa...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Str \"u mpfer \ and\ author K

    author author J. Str \"u mpfer \ and\ author K. Schulten ,\ title title Open Quantum Dynamics Calculations with the Hierarchy Equations of Motion on Parallel Computers , \ 10.1021/ct3003833 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2808--28...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Noack , author A

    author author M. Noack , author A. Reinefeld , author T. Kramer , \ and\ author T. Steinke ,\ title title DM-HEOM : A Portable and Scalable Solver-Framework for the Hierarchical Equations of Motion , \ 10.1109/IPDPSW.2018.00149 journal journal 2018 IEEE International Parallel ...

    2018

  27. [35]

    Kramer , author M

    author author T. Kramer , author M. Noack , author A. Reinefeld , author M. Rodr \'i guez , \ and\ author Y. Zelinskyy ,\ title title Efficient calculation of open quantum system dynamics and time-resolved spectroscopy with distributed memory HEOM ( DM-HEOM ) , \ 10.1002/jcc.2...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author J. R. \ Johansson , author P. D. \ Nation , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title QuTiP : An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems , \ 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.02.021 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 183 ,\ pages 1...

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    author author J. R. \ Johansson , author P. D. \ Nation , \ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems , \ 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.11.019 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 184 ,\ pages 1234--1240 ( ...

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Lambert , author E

    author author N. Lambert , author E. Gigu \`e re , author P. Menczel , author B. Li , author P. Hopf , author G. Su \'a rez , author M. Gali , author J. Lishman , author R. Gadhvi , author R. Agarwal , author A. Galicia , author N. Shammah , author P. Nation , author J. R. \ J...

    doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ritschel \ and\ author A

    author author G. Ritschel \ and\ author A. Eisfeld ,\ title title Analytic representations of bath correlation functions for ohmic and superohmic spectral densities using simple poles , \ 10.1063/1.4893931 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 141 ,\ pages 0...

    doi

  32. [40]

    Kato \ and\ author Y

    author author A. Kato \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ title title Hierarchical Equations of Motion Approach to Quantum Thermodynamics , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-319-99046-0_24 booktitle Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime ,\ Vol.\ volume 195 ,\ editor edited by\ editor F. Binder , ed...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Kato \ and\ author Y

    author author A. Kato \ and\ author Y. Tanimura ,\ title title Quantum heat current under non-perturbative and non- Markovian conditions: Applications to heat machines , \ 10.1063/1.4971370 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 145 ,\ pages 224105 ( year 201...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author D. Segal ,\ title title Heat flow in nonlinear molecular junctions: Master equation analysis , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205415 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 73 ,\ pages 205415 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  35. [43]

    Oehrl , author B

    author author P. Oehrl , author B. P. \ Gonz \'a lez , author A. Dunaev , author M. Althammer , author T. S. \ Parvini , author F. Piazza , author M. Benito , \ and\ author H. Huebl ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2608.05765 title Multi-cavity strong coupling to an electron spin ensemble: S...

    doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hu , author R.-X

    author author J. Hu , author R.-X. \ Xu , \ and\ author Y. Yan ,\ title title Communication: Pad\'e spectrum decomposition of Fermi function and Bose function , \ 10.1063/1.3484491 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 133 ,\ pages 101106 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  37. [45]

    Hu , author M

    author author J. Hu , author M. Luo , author F. Jiang , author R.-X. \ Xu , \ and\ author Y. Yan ,\ title title Pad\'e spectrum decompositions of quantum distribution functions and optimal hierarchical equations of motion construction for quantum open systems , \ 10.1063/1.360...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Shi , author L

    author author Q. Shi , author L. Chen , author G. Nan , author R.-X. \ Xu , \ and\ author Y. Yan ,\ title title Efficient hierarchical Liouville space propagator to quantum dissipative dynamics , \ 10.1063/1.3077918 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 130 ...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Fruchtman , author N

    author author A. Fruchtman , author N. Lambert , \ and\ author E. M. \ Gauger ,\ title title When do perturbative approaches accurately capture the dynamics of complex quantum systems? \ 10.1038/srep28204 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 6 ,\ pages 28204 ( year 2016...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.