Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 35 references

Buried germanium quantum well proximitised by magnetic field-resilient superconducting platinum iridium germanosilicide

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Annealing a Pt/Ir stack into platinum iridium germanosilicide yields a superconductor that tolerates 1.9 T out-of-plane and induces superconductivity in a buried germanium quantum well without degrading its mobility.

desk verdict A solid experimental demonstration of a new high-field superconductor integrated with a buried Ge quantum well; the proximity claim is well supported, with the missing gap measurement openly flagged. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09611 v1 pith:WO2WJBV5 submitted 2026-08-10 cond-mat.mes-hall

Praveen Viswanathan , Erik Lemmens Sjöstrand , Davide Costa , Marinus Fischer , Athique Ahmed , Sara Martí-Sánchez , Lucas E. A. Stehouwer , Jordi Arbiol
show 3 more authors
Anasua Chatterjee Giordano Scappucci Karina L. Hudson
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords platinumiridiumgermanosilicidegermaniumquantumwellJosephsonjunctionSQUIDproximityeffectholegasmobilitycriticalmagneticfieldsuperconductinghybriddevice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a new lithography-friendly superconductor for germanium quantum devices: platinum iridium germanosilicide (PtIrSiGe), produced by annealing a 2 nm platinum / 8 nm iridium stack on a Ge/SiGe heterostructure at about $500\,^\circ\mathrm{C}$. The thin film superconducts up to an out-of-plane magnetic field of $B_{\perp,\mathrm{c}} = 1.9\,\mathrm{T}$ at 84 mK, with a critical temperature near $T_\mathrm{c}\sim1.85\,\mathrm{K}$, and remains superconducting at 400 mK in an in-plane field of 1 T. A Hall bar made with PtIrSiGe contacts keeps a hole mobility of $\mu=1.3\times10^{6}\,\mathrm{cm^2\,V^{-1}\,s^{-1}}$, showing the anneal preserves the buried quantum well. In a gate-defined SQUID, the authors observe gate-tunable switching currents and Fraunhofer-like oscillations, which they interpret as proximity-induced supercurrent through the quantum well. If correct, the result would make high-critical-field hybrid devices—spin qubits at fields above 1 T, gatemons, Andreev spin qubits, and Kitaev chains—accessible with standard top-down fabrication.

What carries the argument

The central object is the PtIrSiGe alloy formed by solid-phase reaction of a thin Pt/Ir bilayer with the SiGe barrier during rapid thermal annealing at $500\,^\circ\mathrm{C}$. It does two jobs at once: it is the superconducting material, and it is the contact that reaches the quantum well without an etch step. The load-bearing detail is the platinum interlayer: iridium alone reacts by outward silicon and germanium migration, creating voids and damaging the heterostructure, while the 2 nm Pt layer mediates inward diffusion so that the alloy contacts the quantum well in some regions, with the contact depth varying laterally. That variation is what the authors use to explain the non-ideal Fraunhofer patterns, and the alloy's high critical field is what allows the SQUID to operate in out-of-plane fields up to the tesla range.

What would settle it

Measure the local density of states in the quantum well under a Josephson junction by tunneling spectroscopy: if no induced superconducting gap appears while the switching current persists, or if a fully depleted well still conducts supercurrent, the proximitisation claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that PtIrSiGe is a superconductor with critical temperature $T_\mathrm{c}\sim1.85\,\mathrm{K}$ and out-of-plane critical field $B_{\perp,\mathrm{c}}$ up to $1.9\,\mathrm{T}$ (with a second film reaching $1.7\,\mathrm{T}$), and that the same alloy can be used as the superconducting contact to a $25\,\mathrm{nm}$-deep germanium quantum well. The platinum underlayer is decisive: without it, iridium pulls germanium and silicon out of the heterostructure and leaves voids, whereas with it the alloy diffuses downward in places, contacting the well while the quantum well remains structurally pristine after the $500\,^\circ\mathrm{C}$ anneal. Transport on a Hall bar yields a peak hole mobility of $\mu=1.3\times10^{6}\,\mathrm{cm^2\,V^{-1}\,s^{-1}}$ at density $p=4.3\times10^{11}\,\mathrm{cm^{-2}}$, comparable to values reported for quantum wells contacted by normal metals. In a SQUID with two gate-tunable Josephson junctions, the critical current responds to top-gate voltage, shows Fraunhofer-like oscillations in out-of-plane field, and the SQUID interference pattern fits an asymmetric-junction model with a loop area near the designed $10\,\mu\mathrm{m}^2$. The authors therefore claim a proof-of-principle proximitisation of a buried, high-mobility germanium quantum well by a high-critical-field, top-down-lithography-compatible superconductor.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the supercurrent observed in the SQUID flows through the buried germanium quantum well, not through an unintended superconducting or metallic path created by the uneven PtIrSiGe diffusion, since the STEM images show contact to the well only in some regions and no induced gap has yet been measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Germanium spin-qubit devices could operate at out-of-plane fields above 1 T while the contacts remain superconducting, easing spin-blockade readout and exploiting the larger out-of-plane $g$-factor.
  • Hybrid germanium architectures such as gatemons, Andreev spin qubits, and Kitaev chains could be fabricated with the same top-down lithography flow used for ohmic contacts, without etching or ultra-shallow wells.
  • Because the $500\,^\circ\mathrm{C}$ anneal is comparable to the strained germanium epitaxy temperature, the contact step does not by itself impose a mobility ceiling on deep, low-disorder quantum wells.
  • The laterally varying diffusion depth must be included in quantitative device models, since it directly produces the irregular Fraunhofer pattern and an effectively position-dependent junction length.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-metal recipe may be a general materials design rule: for any metal that reacts with a semiconductor by outward diffusion and tends to form voids, a thin inner layer that diffuses inward could suppress voiding and enable contacts to deep quantum wells.
  • If the high out-of-plane critical field is partly a thin-film or interface effect, narrowing the PtIrSiGe leads—a strategy already noted for PtSiGe—could push the critical field beyond the 1.9 T reported here.
  • A natural next experiment is to embed the same junction in a gatemon or transmon circuit, testing whether the proximitised well supports coherent superconducting qubits rather than only d.c. supercurrent.
  • Systematically varying the Pt:Ir ratio would reveal whether the trade-off between field resilience and interface uniformity is tunable, potentially giving a reproducible contact while retaining most of the $1.9\,\mathrm{T}$ ceiling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper reports a lithographically defined superconducting contact material, PtIrSiGe, formed by annealing Pt/Ir on a Ge/SiGe heterostructure, and its use in a gate-defined Josephson junction and SQUID on a buried Ge quantum well. Thin-film four-terminal measurements on two samples give T_c about 1.85 K and out-of-plane critical fields of 1.7 T and 1.9 T at base temperature. A Hall bar with PtIrSiGe contacts shows a hole mobility of 1.3e6 cm2/Vs at 4.3e11 cm-2, indicating that the 500 C anneal does not destroy the quantum well. HAADF-STEM and EDX show a PtIrSiGe alloy that diffuses unevenly into the heterostructure and contacts the well in places. In the SQUID, the switching currents of two independently gated junctions are tunable, and SQUID oscillations fit Eq. (1) with a loop area of 10.47-10.48 um2 against a lithographic area of 10 um2. The authors explicitly acknowledge that the interface is not uniform and that the induced superconducting gap has not yet been characterized.

Significance. The result is significant for Ge-based hybrid quantum devices because it combines a superconductor with out-of-plane critical field approaching 2 T and T_c near 1.85 K with a fabrication process that is compatible with standard ohmic-contact lithography and preserves a high-mobility buried Ge well. The main claims rest on direct measurements: thin-film superconductivity is reproduced in two independent samples, mobility retention is quantified on a Hall bar, and gate-tunable supercurrent plus SQUID interference provide functional evidence of proximitisation. The fit to Eq. (1) is a consistency check rather than a fitted conclusion, since the extracted loop area agrees with the lithographic value. The acknowledged limitations--non-uniform PtIrSiGe diffusion and the absence of an induced-gap measurement--moderate the strength of the proximity claim for qubit applications but do not contradict the demonstrated Josephson supercurrent.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Fig. 3(d) and Section IV] The gate voltage for junction 2 is given as -1.9 mV in the text and caption, but the corresponding measurement and the stated asymmetry I_c2 about 2 I_c1 imply -1.9 V; please correct the unit.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The notation 'I_c1,2(B A_1,2)' is ambiguous because the equation as printed treats I_c1 and I_c2 as constants; please clarify how the individual Fraunhofer envelopes are incorporated into the fit.
  3. [Section II] The defining criteria for T_c = 1.85 K and for B_perp,c are not stated; please specify, for example, whether these are zero-resistance or 50% normal-resistance thresholds.
  4. [Section III] The Hall-bar mobility comparison would be easier to evaluate if the measurement temperature and the Hall-bar geometry were given in the main text.
  5. [Section IV] The statement that 'at zero gate voltage... there is no transport across junction 2' is confusing in the context of Fig. 3(a), where V_g,2 = 0 while V_g,1 is swept; please clarify that both junctions are off at V_g = 0.
  6. [Discussion] The claim that annealing at 550 C leads to a breakdown of superconductivity is only in the Supplementary Material; a brief explanation in the main text would make the thermal budget clear.
  7. [Fig. 2(d)-(e)] Adding explicit labels for the Al2O3, SiGe barriers, and Ge quantum well directly on the STEM/EDX images would help the reader evaluate the 'buried quantum well' and the uneven diffusion.
  8. [Section III] The material name 'platinum iridium germanosilicide' could be read as implying a stoichiometric compound, while the EDX data show an intermixed alloy; wording such as 'alloy formed by the process' would be safer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all central claims are direct empirical measurements supported by consistency checks.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental observations rather than derived predictions: the critical temperature and out-of-plane critical field of PtIrSiGe are read directly from four-terminal resistance versus temperature and magnetic field measurements (Fig. 1), and the integrity of the germanium quantum well is established by Hall bar mobility and density data (Fig. 2b). The proximitisation claim rests on gate-tunable switching currents and magnetic-field-modulated SQUID oscillations (Fig. 3). The only fitting step, the SQUID critical-current fit to Eq. (1), is used to extract an effective loop area of 10.47 and 10.48 µm² and is explicitly compared with the lithographic area of 10 µm², so it is a consistency check rather than a fitted input renamed as a prediction. No superconducting property is defined by a fitted parameter. Self-citations to prior PtSiGe work [4] and to IrSiGe studies [27] are used for context and comparison, not as a load-bearing uniqueness argument or as a substitute for the present measurements. The authors explicitly acknowledge limitations — the uneven PtIrSiGe diffusion and the absence of a measured induced superconducting gap — which reduces the strength of the proximity claim for applications but does not make the argument circular. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to its empirical inputs, and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No theoretical derivation is used; the paper is an experimental materials and device demonstration. The only fitted number is the effective SQUID loop area, which matches geometry. The main unproven assumption is that the supercurrent is carried by the buried quantum well rather than by a parasitic shunt caused by uneven silicide diffusion.

free parameters (1)
  • effective SQUID loop area A_SQUID = 10.47 square micrometres (positive branch), 10.48 square micrometres (negative branch)
    Extracted by fitting critical current oscillations to Eq. (1). Close to the geometric area of 10 square micrometres, so this is a consistency check and is not used to establish superconductivity.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The measured zero-resistance and supercurrent states arise from the PtIrSiGe/Ge device and not from an alternative conduction path.
    Assumed when interpreting Fig. 3 switching currents and Fraunhofer patterns; not directly excluded by a control sample without accumulation, though gate-tunability supports it.
  • domain assumption The nominal 500 degree Celsius anneal preserves the strained Ge quantum well and its transport properties.
    Supported by Hall bar mobility of 1.3 x 10^6 cm^2/Vs and STEM images, but the authors note the true anneal temperature was likely below 500 degrees Celsius.
invented entities (1)
  • PtIrSiGe alloy independent evidence
    purpose: Thin-film superconductor contact for hybrid Ge quantum well devices
    Directly measured Tc about 1.85 K and B_perp,c up to 1.9 T in thin films; composition confirmed by EDX mapping in Fig. 2(e).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Buried germanium quantum well proximitised by magnetic field-resilient superconducting platinum iridium germanosilicide." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WO2WJBV5

@misc{pith2026260809611,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Buried germanium quantum well proximitised by magnetic field-resilient superconducting platinum iridium germanosilicide},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WO2WJBV5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09611}
}
abstract

Hybrid superconductor-semiconductor systems provide a versatile platform for quantum technologies, ranging from superconducting-spin interfaces to topological quantum devices. Progress toward scalable implementations requires superconductors that exhibit high critical fields ($>1$T) at accessible temperatures integrated with low-disorder semiconductor heterostructures. Here we demonstrate a superconducting platinum iridium germanosilicide (PtIrSiGe), with critical out-of-plane magnetic field up to $B_{\perp} = 1.9$T and critical temperature of $T_c\sim 1.85$K, integrated with planar germanium with mobility $\mu = 1.3\times 10^6$cm$^{2}$/Vs via top-down lithography fabrication. We show that the integrity of the germanium quantum well and mobility and density of the 2D hole gas are preserved despite annealing at $500\deg$C, a temperature comparable to that used for strained germanium epitaxy. We further demonstrate proximitisation of a buried germanium quantum well in a gate-defined Josephson junction/SQUID on a Ge/SiGe heterostructure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09611 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Thin film sample a: Resistance R4T vs out-of plane magnetic field B⊥ for a range of temperatures. Inset: resistance R4T measured as a function for in-plane magnetic fields B∥ up to 1 T at 400 mK. (b) Thin film sample b: R4T vs B⊥ for varying temperature, measured in two separate cool downs in a dilution refrigerator and a 4He refrigerator. II. THIN FILM CHARACTERISATION To characterise the superconducting proper… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the fabrication process. After removing the native oxide, platinum is deposited followed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (b) is a colour map of V measured across junction 1 as a function of Idc and applied out-of-plane magnetic field B⊥ for Vg,1 = −1.9 V. The white superconduct￾ing region exhibits Fraunhofer-like oscillations centered and symmetric around B⊥ = 0 T (corrected for a known hysteresis offset in the magnet). The oscillations do not exhibit the characteristic single-period Fraunhofer pat￾tern, which we attribute to the vari… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Scappucci, C

    G. Scappucci, C. Kloeffel, F. A. Zwanenburg, D. Loss, M. Myronov, J.-J. Zhang, S. De Franceschi, G. Katsaros, and M. Veldhorst, The germanium quantum information route, Nature Reviews Materials6, 926 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Watzinger, J

    H. Watzinger, J. Kukuˇ cka, L. Vukuˇ si´ c, F. Gao, T. Wang, F. Sch¨ affler, J.-J. Zhang, and G. Katsaros, A germanium hole spin qubit, Nature Communications9, 3902 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    N. W. Hendrickx, W. I. L. Lawrie, L. Petit, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, A single-hole spin qubit, Nature Communications11, 3478 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Tosato, V

    A. Tosato, V. Levajac, J.-Y. Wang, C. J. Boor, F. Bor- soi, M. Botifoll, C. N. Borja, S. Mart ´ ı-S´ anchez, J. Arbiol, A. Sammak, M. Veldhorst, and G. Scappucci, Hard su- perconducting gap in germanium, Communications Ma- terials4, 23 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    ten Kate, D

    S. ten Kate, D. Ohnmacht, M. Coraiola, T. An- tonelli, S. Paredes, F. Schupp, M. Hinderling, S. Bedell, W. Belzig, J. Cuevas, A. Svetogorov, F. Nichele, and D. Sabonis, Finite-length effects and coulomb interaction in josephson junctions based on ge quantum wells and probed with microwave spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 064005 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Lakic, W

    L. Lakic, W. I. L. Lawrie, D. van Driel, L. E. A. Ste- houwer, Y. Su, M. Veldhorst, G. Scappucci, F. Kuem- meth, and A. Chatterjee, A quantum dot in germanium proximitized by a superconductor, Nat. Mater.24, 552 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    R. M. Lutchyn, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, L. P. Kouwen- hoven, P. Krogstrup, C. M. Marcus, and Y. Oreg, Majo- rana zero modes in superconductor–semiconductor het- erostructures, Nature Reviews Materials3, 52 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Flensberg, F

    K. Flensberg, F. von Oppen, and A. Stern, Engineered platforms for topological superconductivity and Ma- jorana zero modes, Nature Reviews Materials6, 944 (2021)

    2021

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    M.-S. Choi, C. Bruder, and D. Loss, Spin-dependent josephson current through double quantum dots and measurement of entangled electron states, Phys. Rev. B 62, 13569 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    Leijnse and K

    M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Coupling spin qubits via superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 060501 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    van Loo, F

    N. van Loo, F. Zatelli, G. O. Steffensen, B. Roovers, G. Wang, T. Van Caekenberghe, A. Bordin, D. van Driel, Y. Zhang, W. D. Huisman,et al., Single-shot parity read- out of a minimal kitaev chain, Nature650, 334 (2026)

    2026

  4. [12]

    S. L. Ten Haaf, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, A. Bordin, C.-X. Liu, I. Kulesh, V. P. Sietses, C. G. Prosko, D. Xiao, C. Thomas,et al., Observation of edge and bulk states in a three-site kitaev chain, Nature641, 890 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Casparis, M

    L. Casparis, M. R. Connolly, M. Kjaergaard, N. J. Pear- son, A. Kringhøj, T. W. Larsen, F. Kuemmeth, T. Wang, C. Thomas, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, C. M. Marcus, and K. D. Petersson, Superconducting gatemon qubit based on a proximitized two-dimensional electron ga...

    2018

  6. [14]

    O. Sagi, A. Crippa, M. Valentini, M. Janik, L. Baghumyan, G. Fabris, L. Kapoor, F. Hassani, J. Fink, S. Calcaterra,et al., A gate tunable transmon qubit in planar ge, nature communications15, 6400 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Cerrillo, P

    J. Cerrillo, P. Krogstrup, A. Levy Yeyati,et al., Coherent manipulation of an andreev spin qubit, Science373, 430 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Parity-protected superconductor-semiconductor qubit, Physical review letters125, 056801 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Bøttcher, F

    C. Bøttcher, F. Nichele, M. Kjaergaard, H. Suominen, J. Shabani, C. Palmstrøm, and C. Marcus, Supercon- ducting, insulating and anomalous metallic regimes in a gated two-dimensional semiconductor–superconductor array, Nature Physics14, 1138 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Vignaud, D

    H. Vignaud, D. Perconte, W. Yang, B. Kousar, E. Wag- ner, F. Gay, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Courtois, Z. Han,et al., Evidence for chiral supercurrent in quan- tum hall josephson junctions, Nature624, 545 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Aggarwal, A

    K. Aggarwal, A. Hofmann, D. Jirovec, I. Prieto, A. Sam- mak, M. Botifoll, S. Mart ´ ı-S´ anchez, M. Veldhorst, J. Ar- biol, G. Scappucci, J. Danon, and G. Katsaros, Enhance- ment of proximity-induced superconductivity in a planar Ge hole gas, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L022005 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Valentini, O

    M. Valentini, O. Sagi, L. Baghumyan, T. de Gi- jsel, J. Jung, S. Calcaterra, A. Ballabio, J. Aguil- era Servin, K. Aggarwal, M. Janik, T. Adletzberger, R. Seoane Souto, M. Leijnse, J. Danon, C. Schrade, E. Bakkers, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, and G. Katsaros, Parity-conserving Co...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Fabris, P

    G. Fabris, P. Falthansl-Scheinecker, D. Shah, D. M. Pino, M. Borovkov, A. Bubis, K. Roux, D. Sokolova, A. A. Juanes, T. Costanzo, I. Taha, A. Gen¸ c, J. Arbiol, S. Cal- caterra, A. D. C. Oliveira, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, R. S. Souto, M. J. Calderon, R. Aguado, J. C. Abadillo-...

    2026 arXiv

  14. [22]

    L. E. A. Stehouwer, A. Tosato, D. Degli Esposti, D. Costa, M. Veldhorst, A. Sammak, and G. Scappucci, Germanium wafers for strained quantum wells with low disorder, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 10.1063/5.0158262 (2023)

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Costa, L

    D. Costa, L. E. A. Stehouwer, Y. Huang, S. Mart ´ ı- S´ anchez, D. Degli Esposti, J. Arbiol, and G. Scappucci, Reducing disorder in Ge quantum wells by using thick 7 SiGe barriers, Appl. Phys. Lett.125, 10.1063/5.0242746 (2024)

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Costa, L

    D. Costa, L. E. A. Stehouwer, D. Degli Esposti, and G. Scappucci, Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in two- dimensional hole gases with competing cyclotron and Zeeman energy, Phys. Rev. B113, 115418 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    Hendrickx, S

    N. Hendrickx, S. Bedell, G. Salis, and A. Fuhrer, Sweet- spot operation of a germanium hole spin qubit with highly anisotropic noise sensitivity, Nature Materials23, 920 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    P. J. Strohbeen, T. Banerjee, A. M. Brook, I. Levy, W. L. Sarney, J. van Dijk, H. Orth, M. Mikalsen, V. Fatemi, and J. Shabani, Molecular beam epitaxy growth of super- conducting tantalum germanide, Applied Physics Letters 124, 092102 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    H. Li, Z. Shang, M. Lilly, M. Myronov, and L. Rokhin- son, Characterization of superconducting germanide and germanosilicide films of pd, pt, rh, and ir formed by solid- phase epitaxy, APL Materials14(2026)

    2026

  20. [28]

    Raub, Superconductivity of the platinum metals and their alloys, Materials & Design5, 129 (1984)

    C. Raub, Superconductivity of the platinum metals and their alloys, Materials & Design5, 129 (1984)

    1984

  21. [29]

    D. U. Gubser and R. J. Soulen, Thermodynamic proper- ties of superconducting iridium, Journal of Low Temper- ature Physics13, 211 (1973)

    1973

  22. [30]

    Sammak, D

    A. Sammak, D. Sabbagh, N. W. Hendrickx, M. Lodari, B. Paquelet Wuetz, A. Tosato, L. Yeoh, M. Bollani, M. Virgilio, M. A. Schubert, P. Zaumseil, G. Capellini, M. Veldhorst, and G. Scappucci, Shallow and undoped germanium quantum wells: A playground for spin and hybrid quantum t...

    2019

  23. [31]

    Morgan, R

    S. Morgan, R. Williams, and J. Mooney, An xps study of thin pt and ir silicide overlayer formation on si(100)2 x 1 surfaces, Applied Surface Science56-58, 493 (1992)

    1992

  24. [32]

    Md. A. Rahman, T. Osipowicz, K. L. Pey, L. J. Jin, W. K. Choi, D. Z. Chi, D. A. Antoniadis, E. A. Fitzger- ald, and D. M. Isaacson, Suppression of oxidation in nickel germanosilicides by Pt incorporation, Appl. Phys. Lett.87, 182116 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Ya. V. Fominov and D. S. Mikhailov, Asymmetric higher- harmonic SQUID as a Josephson diode, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134514 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Granata and A

    C. Granata and A. Vettoliere, Nano superconduct- ing quantum interference device: A powerful tool for nanoscale investigations, Physics Reports614, 1 (2016), nano Superconducting Quantum Interference device: a powerful tool for nanoscale investigations

    2016

  27. [35]

    buried ger- manium quantum well proximitised by magnetic field- resilient superconducting platinum iridium germanosili- cide

    P. Viswanathan and K. L. Hudson, Data for “buried ger- manium quantum well proximitised by magnetic field- resilient superconducting platinum iridium germanosili- cide” (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.