Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Rooted Gibbs-DLR Measures in Planar Directed Polymers

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In planar directed polymers whose disorder satisfies a mild tail-divergence condition, the extremal rooted Gibbs-DLR measures form a closed, totally ordered set, and this order makes the tilt-indexed Busemann process canonical and…

desk verdict Major structural advance in planar directed polymers; the core theorems look right, but the print's most public claims outrun the actual hypotheses (Condition 2.2 is doing real work; the L1 continuity theorem is conditional at β=∞). read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09881 v1 pith:YICGL3CY submitted 2026-08-10 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Christopher Janjigian , Firas Rassoul-Agha , Timo Seppäläinen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60K3560K3782B4460F10
keywords directedpolymerGibbs-DLRmeasuresBusemannprocessplanarrandomenvironmentcoalescencetotalorderlargedeviationszero-temperaturelimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the infinite-volume Gibbs states ('Gibbs-DLR measures') of the directed polymer on the square lattice $\mathbb{Z}^2$ with ergodic random weights, and asks how those states are organized by the disorder. Its central claim is that, under a mild hypothesis on the environment — that the one-dimensional random walks built from differences of weights on adjacent rows and columns drift to $-\infty$ almost surely — the extremal (irreducible) rooted Gibbs states form a closed and totally ordered collection under stochastic dominance. From that order the paper derives a complete structural picture: a fully supported state is extremal exactly when the path measures it induces admit a coalescing coupling; every extremal state canonically generates a consistent, totally ordered family of extremal states rooted at every lattice site; and the associated Busemann process exists canonically on the weight space and is strongly unique. This yields an $L^1$ continuity theorem for the Busemann cocycles jointly in inverse temperature, tilt, and environment, with corollaries giving stability in probability of the generated Gibbs measures under bounded weight perturbations and, in the zero-temperature limit, quenched large deviation principles whose rate functions vanish precisely on infinite geodesics. Why it matters: the same planar total order that organizes semi-infinite geodesics in zero-temperature growth models also organizes the entire positive-temperature Gibbs state space, making the Busemann process a genuine function of the disorder rather than a construction dependent on an extended probability space.

What carries the argument

The central objects are rooted Gibbs-DLR measures: probability laws on semi-infinite up-right paths from a site $x$ that satisfy the polymer Gibbs property $\Pi(x_{k:n})=Q^{\beta,\omega}_{x,x_n}(x_{k:n})\Pi(x_n)$ for every finite segment, together with their extreme points $\operatorname{ext}\mathrm{DLR}_x^{\beta,\omega}$. The load-bearing mechanism is the closed total order of Theorem 3.8 on the event $\Omega_0$: it rests on Lemma 3.5 (any non-fully-supported Gibbs measure is a mixture of the two trivial coordinate rays), on a maximal-coupling criterion (two path measures agree on the tail $\sigma$-algebra if and only if they admit a coalescing coupling), and on a random directed spanning tree whose root-to-point paths realize all point-to-point polymer measures simultaneously — this tree lets any coupling of Gibbs measures be approximated by concatenation couplings that preserve the Gibbs property after conditioning on joint tail events. Closure plus total order makes the extreme state space a random compact totally ordered space, so a shift-covariant inverse-CDF sampling scheme can select canonical representatives; coalescence forces the selection to depend only on the weights, giving strong existence, and the total order gives strong uniqueness. The Busemann cocycle $A(y,z)=\lim_n \beta^{-1}\log(Z_{y,X_n}/Z_{z,X_n})$ is the additive field that carries states between roots: its recovery condition $\sum_{i=1}^2 e^{\beta\omega_y-\beta A(y,y+e_i)}=1$ defines the transition probabilities and, at zero temperature, the large-deviation rate functions.

What would settle it

Build the positive-temperature analogue of the trapped-ray example described in Remark 3.6: an ergodic environment, as in the inhomogeneous corner growth model of the paper's [28] reference, where a labeled infinite path is trapped on a row or column once it meets a random barrier. If such a fully supported, non-trivial Gibbs-DLR measure exists whose mass is concentrated on trapped rays, then Lemma 3.5's conclusion fails, Condition 2.2 is violated, and the total-order and closedness theorems cannot hold in that environment — the single example would delineate exactly where the structural theory stops. A more direct test of strong uniqueness: in an i.i.d. environment at fixed positive $\beta$, look for two distinct extremal rooted Gibbs measures with the same tilt cocycle $B^{\beta,h}$; Theorem 3.32 says they must agree almost surely, so finding any such pair would falsify the uniqueness claim outright.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the full-probability event $\Omega_0$ where every row- and column-difference random walk $S_{z,j,n}$ diverges to $-\infty$ (Condition 2.2), the paper proves that for each root $x$ and inverse temperature $\beta \in (0,\infty)$ the set $\operatorname{ext}\mathrm{DLR}_x^{\beta,\omega}$ of extremal rooted Gibbs-DLR measures is closed in the weak topology and totally ordered by stochastic monotonicity (Theorem 3.8), with the two trivial coordinate-ray measures as the only non-fully-supported extremes. Extremality is characterized by coalescence: a fully supported rooted Gibbs measure is extreme if and only if the family of descendant measures it induces admits a coalescing coupling (Theorem 3.16). Each fully supported extreme state generates, through a backward-martingale limit, a globally consistent and totally ordered family of extreme states rooted at every lattice site, all sharing one $\beta$-recovering Busemann cocycle $A^\Pi$ (Proposition 3.21). Using the closed total order to view the extreme states as a random compact totally ordered space, the authors construct a shift-covariant quantile selection and prove strong existence and strong uniqueness: the tilt-indexed Busemann process $(B^{\beta,h}_{\pm})$ defined by monotone limits is a shift-covariant, $\beta$-recovering $L^1$ cocycle on the canonical weight space, and any other process with the same tilts agrees almost surely (Theorem 3.38).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Condition 2.2: for every site, the one-dimensional random walk formed by taking differences of the weights on adjacent rows (and the analogous walk for columns) must converge to $-\infty$ almost surely. If such a difference walk instead fails to diverge, non-trivial trapped rays can exist — Remark 3.6 describes an ergodic environment of this kind — and then the classification of Gibbs states as trivial mixtures collapses, taking the total order, the closedness, and the canonical Busemann process with it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every probability space that supports the weight field also supports a canonical realization of the tilt-indexed Busemann process, and any two such realizations agree almost surely: the cocycles are bona fide functions of the disorder, not of an extended probability space.
  • Any shift-covariant $\beta$-recovering $L^1$ cocycle defined on an extended space is an ergodic mixture of the canonical tilt-indexed cocycles, with the law of its tilt vector as the mixing measure and no mass on discontinuity tilts (Theorem 3.42).
  • The Busemann cocycles and the extremal Gibbs measures they generate are jointly $L^1$-continuous, and continuous in probability, in inverse temperature, tilt, and environment; in directions where the limit shape is differentiable, bounded perturbations of the weights move the cocycles by $O(\epsilon)$.
  • As $\beta\to 8$, along deterministic subsequences the positive-temperature rooted Gibbs measures satisfy quenched large deviation principles on path space, with rate functions built from the zero-temperature Busemann cocycle that vanish precisely on the infinite geodesics generated by that cocycle.
  • Extremality equals coalescence, so the phase structure of the polymer is read off from whether infinite paths eventually merge: two extreme states with the same Busemann cocycle are consistent and coalesce, while distinct ones are strictly stochastically ordered everywhere.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the coalescence characterization of extremality and the canonical extension of a rooted state to the whole lattice do not use planarity, and the paper says so for those steps; the genuinely planar input is the proof that shift-covariantly selected states are extreme, so transferring that one selection argument to higher dimensions would carry the whole program to random walks in rand
  • My inference: the closed totally ordered state space suggests a positive-temperature analogue of the zero-temperature 'no three geodesics' picture — at most two extremal states per asymptotic direction — and the paper's Remark 3.41 isolates the precise missing input (at most two distinct extreme states from the origin with a given direction); if established, it would imply that the Busemann proces
  • My inference for computational practice: the $L^1$ continuity of the cocycles in the environment is exactly the stability property a finite-volume sampling scheme needs, since it implies that small bounded perturbations of the disorder change infinite-volume Gibbs probabilities by a small amount in probability rather than amplifying exponentially.
  • My inference: whether left- or right-isolated extreme states exist is open even in the exactly solvable log-gamma polymer; if they do, Proposition 5.3(e) places them inside an explicit countable, shift-covariant set built from dyadic path-interval infima and suprema, giving a concrete search target in models where the full extremal set might be computable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a structural theory of rooted Gibbs–DLR measures for the planar directed polymer with nearest-neighbor up-right paths, in a fixed realization of an ergodic random environment. The hypotheses are Condition 2.2 (a weight-difference random walk drifts to −∞), assumed throughout and used to prove that non-fully-supported Gibbs measures are trivial mixtures (Lemma 3.5), and Condition 2.3 (mixing and moment hypotheses of class-L type), used once the limiting free energy and Busemann cocycles enter. The main structural results are: extremal rooted Gibbs measures form a closed and totally ordered set (Theorem 3.8); extremality is characterized by the existence of a coalescing self-coupling (Theorem 3.16); every fully supported extremal measure generates a consistent, coalescing, globally totally ordered family of extremal measures indexed by all lattice sites (Proposition 3.21, Theorems 3.24–3.25, Proposition 3.28); and cocycle equality is equivalent to consistency and coalescence.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a significant advance for the mathematical theory of planar directed polymers. The proofs are fully rigorous, are built from explicit couplings (the tree coupling of Lemma 4.1, Goldstein's maximal-coupling criterion, inverse-CDF sampling via a measurable quantile function, and an adaptation of the Licea–Newman argument), and contain no fitted parameters or post-hoc numerical claims. The closedness of the extremal set (Theorem 3.8) is a genuinely new structural fact for which no a priori reason was known, and the strong existence and strong uniqueness of the Busemann process on the canonical space resolve questions left open in [46] for positive temperature. The joint L1 continuity of the Busemann cocycles is, to my knowledge, the first result of its kind, and the large-deviation corollaries give a novel quantitative bridge between positive and zero temperature. The manuscript is unusually candid: Remarks 3.6, 3.45, 3.48, and 5.4 state limitations, unproved inputs, and open problems explicitly, and the conditional theorems are stated with their hypotheses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Condition 2.2; Lemma 3.5; Remark 3.6] The abstract's phrase 'additional mild hypothesis' materially understates the role of Condition 2.2. The condition is not implied by ergodicity or by Condition 2.3(a): for a bounded, non-degenerate i.i.d. sequence (f_k), set ω_{(a,b)} = f_{a+b}. The environment is ergodic under the Z^2 shifts and satisfies Condition 2.3(a)(ii) (weights are bounded and the class-L estimate (2.9) holds trivially), yet S^1_{z,n} = Σ_{i=0}^{n-1}(f_{s+2i} − f_{s+2i}) = 0 almost surely for every z, so (2.6) fails. Condition 2.2 is load-bearing: the proof of Lemma 3.5 uses the almost-sure divergence of S_{v,2}^N to −∞ to rule out non-trivial coordinate rays, and Lemma 3.5 in turn feeds the total order (Prop. 4.6), closedness (Prop. 4.18), the extension to all roots (Prop. 3.21), the global total order (Thms. 3.24–3.25), and the coalescence criterion (Prop. 3.28), hence the entire Busemann construction. Remark 3.6 already exhibits ergodic environments failing Condition 2.2 with trapped zero-temperature geodesics and conjectures the same phenomenon at positive temperature, so the restriction is known to be substantive, not merely technical. I ask that the abstract and Introduction describe Condition 2.2 as a substantive non-trapping hypothesis, with an example such as the diagonal-constant field above to calibrate its scope, and state explicitly that the structural theorems are not asserted under plain ergodic disorder.
  2. [Theorem 3.44; Condition 3.43; Remarks 3.45 and 3.48; Corollaries 3.49–3.53] The headline L1 continuity theorem is not unconditional in its zero-temperature regime, as the abstract's wording suggests. At β = ∞, Theorem 3.44 requires Condition 3.43, which is precisely the unproved statement that zero-temperature shift-covariant recovering L1 cocycles are strongly unique without a finite-energy/coalescence hypothesis; Remark 3.45 concedes that removing it would require different methods planned for future work, with an i.i.d. alternative that only covers the β_n < ∞ cases. Remark 3.48 concedes an additional restriction: the condition (β_∞, h_∞) ∈ H^{ν_∞,ext} leaves a potential gap in the convergence of the Busemann process if cocycles with non-extremal tilts exist. Since Corollaries 3.49–3.53, including the quenched subsequential large deviation principles, inherit these hypotheses, the abstract's claim of a joint L1 continuity theorem and of zero-temperature LDPs overstates what is currently proved. I request that Theorem 3.44 and the abstract explicitly distinguish the unconditional positive-temperature statement from the β = ∞ statement conditional on Condition 3.43, and that the extreme-tilt restriction of Remark 3.48 be reflected in the statement of the theorem or in a prominent remark attached to it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.2] Duplicate word: 'would require either restricting to i.i.d. weights throughout throughout or extending one of our results from [50]'; delete the second 'throughout'.
  2. [Remark 3.47] The phrase 'c` adl` ag functions' has corrupted accents; it should read 'càdlàg functions'.
  3. [Lemma 3.30] The statement 'Assume that Condition 2.3 holds' should specify that Condition 2.3(a) is meant for β < ∞ and Condition 2.3(b) for β = ∞, since Condition 2.3 is parametrized by β and the two parts are mutually exclusive alternatives.
  4. [§3.6, Eq. (3.27)] The notation H^{β,ν} is introduced in (3.27) but the superscript order (β before ν) is not used consistently in the following displayed equations; a brief remark or consistent ordering would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the structural theorems and Busemann strong existence/uniqueness are proved from explicit standing conditions and established external theorems; conditional and definitional points are flagged as such.

full rationale

This is a pure proof-based paper with no fitted parameters and no post-hoc predictions. The load-bearing results are proved in the text: Theorem 3.8 follows from Lemma 3.5 (proved from Condition 2.2) together with the tree coupling and weak-limit arguments; Proposition 3.21 follows from backward martingale convergence and the DLR cocycle characterization; Theorem 3.38 is assembled from Propositions 4.6, 4.18, 3.33, and Lemma 3.37. Weak existence of recovering cocycles is imported from [38], and coalescence of generated Gibbs measures from [46]; these are prior published theorems with independent proofs, not restatements of the present conclusions. Condition 2.2 is a substantive standing hypothesis, not derived from ergodicity; Remark 3.6 explicitly constructs ergodic environments that fail it, so the word 'mild' in the abstract is optimistic but the argument is not circular. The zero-temperature part of Theorem 3.44 is explicitly conditional on Condition 3.43, and Remarks 3.45 and 3.48 identify the missing input and the technical restriction to extreme tilts; importing an unproved condition as a hypothesis is a caveat, not a circular reduction. Similarly, the identification in Corollary 3.52 that the rate function vanishes exactly on B-geodesics is immediate from the definition of a B-geodesic via recovery (3.17); it is a transparent definitional equivalence, stated as such in the proof, and it is not load-bearing for the main derivation chain. No step of the proof reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants or hand-tuned parameters appear; all quantities are constructed from the weight field and limiting procedures. The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central claims rest on the stated ergodic, divergence, mixing, and zero-temperature uniqueness assumptions, plus standard external theorems.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ergodicity of the environment under lattice shifts (Condition 2.1).
    Assumed throughout and used for almost-sure, shift-invariant statements about cocycles and for the ergodic decomposition in Theorem 3.42.
  • domain assumption Divergence condition S_{z,j,n} -> -∞ (Condition 2.2).
    Underlies Lemma 3.5, which classifies non-fully-supported Gibbs measures as trivial mixtures; this is the base of the total order, closedness, and coalescence results. Remark 3.6 shows it can fail.
  • domain assumption Mixing and moment hypotheses (Condition 2.3(a)/(b)).
    Needed for the limiting free energy, the cocycle shape theorem, and the Busemann process constructions; not implied by ergodicity alone.
  • ad hoc to paper Strong uniqueness at zero temperature without finite energy (Condition 3.43).
    Assumed in Theorem 3.44 and Corollary 3.50 at β=∞. Remark 3.45 says an improved zero-temperature input is expected from future work, and unconditional results are available only under i.i.d. weights.
  • standard math External theorems: Goldstein's maximal coupling, Strassen's theorem, Choquet representation, backward martingale convergence, Dawson-Gärtner theorem.
    Invoked in Sections 4-7 and Appendix B as standard probability results; their correctness is assumed.
  • standard math Known shape theorem and continuous extension of the limiting free energy (Lemma 3.1, from [44] and [61]).
    Provides the superdifferential geometry and convergence used in Lemma 3.30 and Theorem 3.44.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rooted Gibbs-DLR Measures in Planar Directed Polymers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YICGL3CY

@misc{pith2026260809881,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rooted Gibbs-DLR Measures in Planar Directed Polymers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YICGL3CY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09881}
}
abstract

We study rooted Gibbs-DLR measures in the directed polymer model on $\mathbb{Z}^2$ with an ergodic disorder distribution which satisfies an additional mild hypothesis. We prove that the set of extremal rooted Gibbs-DLR measures is closed and totally ordered, characterize extremality in terms of path coalescence, and show that each fully supported extremal rooted Gibbs measure canonically generates a globally consistent and coalescing family of extremal rooted Gibbs measures indexed by all lattice sites. These families are, moreover, totally ordered. Building on this structure, we prove strong existence and strong uniqueness of the associated Busemann process, together with an $L^1$ continuity theorem for the shift-covariant Busemann cocycles which is joint in the inverse temperature, the tilt parameter, and the random environment. This yields, as a corollary, in-probability continuity of the generated extremal Gibbs measures corresponding to directions of differentiability under bounded i.i.d. perturbations of the weights. In positive temperature, it shows in-probability convergence of the generated extremal Gibbs measures. At zero temperature, it also yields quenched subsequential large deviation principles for the corresponding positive-temperature rooted Gibbs-DLR measures on path space. The rate functions are determined by a zero-temperature Busemann cocycle and vanish precisely on the infinite geodesics generated by that cocycle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09881 by the authors.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. A level set tx P R 2 ě0 : Λβ pxq “ 1u of a possible limiting free energy (left) and its associated super-differential curve BΛ β pUq (right). The full level set of the free energy is depicted in the inset image on the left and the dashed lines indicate the enlarged portion. This free energy has four linear segments and a cusp on the diagonal. It is differentiable at the endpoints of the two inner segments (green) an… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    Busemann functions and Gibbs measures in directed polymer models onZ 2.Ann

    Christopher Janjigian and Firas Rassoul-Agha. Busemann functions and Gibbs measures in directed polymer models onZ 2.Ann. Probab., 48(2):778–816, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Random coalescing geodesics in first-passage per- colation

    Daniel Ahlberg and Christopher Hoffman. Random coalescing geodesics in first-passage per- colation. 2016. Preprint (arXiv:1609.02447)

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions.Comm

    Michael Aizenman and Jan Wehr. Rounding effects of quenched randomness on first-order phase transitions.Comm. Math. Phys., 130(3):489–528, 1990

    work page 1990

  4. [3]

    Alexander

    Kenneth S. Alexander. Geodesics, bigeodesics, and coalescence in first passage percolation in general dimension.Electron. J. Probab., 28:Paper No. 160, 83, 2023. 62 C. JANJIGIAN, F. RASSOUL-AGHA, AND T. SEPP ¨AL¨AINEN

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    Aliprantis and Kim C

    Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border.Infinite dimensional analysis. Springer, Berlin, third edition, 2006. A hitchhiker’s guide

    work page 2006

  6. [5]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017

    Antonio Auffinger, Jack Hanson, and Michael Damron.50 years of first passage percolation, volume 68 ofUniversity Lecture Series. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    The Burgers equation with Poisson random forcing.Ann

    Yuri Bakhtin. The Burgers equation with Poisson random forcing.Ann. Probab., 41(4):2961– 2989, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    Inviscid Burgers equation with random kick forcing in noncompact setting

    Yuri Bakhtin. Inviscid Burgers equation with random kick forcing in noncompact setting. Electron. J. Probab., 21:Paper No. 37, 50, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Space-time stationary solutions for the Burgers equation.J

    Yuri Bakhtin, Eric Cator, and Konstantin Khanin. Space-time stationary solutions for the Burgers equation.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 27(1):193–238, 2014

    2014

  2. [9]

    Thermodynamic limit for directed polymers and stationary solu- tions of the Burgers equation.Comm

    Yuri Bakhtin and Liying Li. Thermodynamic limit for directed polymers and stationary solu- tions of the Burgers equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 72(3):536–619, 2019

    2019

  3. [10]

    Non-existence of bi-infinite geodesics in the exponential corner growth model.Forum Math

    M´ arton Bal´ azs, Ofer Busani, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Non-existence of bi-infinite geodesics in the exponential corner growth model.Forum Math. Sigma, 8:Paper No. e46, 34, 2020

    2020

  4. [11]

    Nonexistence of bigeodesics in planar exponential last passage percolation.Comm

    Riddhipratim Basu, Christopher Hoffman, and Allan Sly. Nonexistence of bigeodesics in planar exponential last passage percolation.Comm. Math. Phys., 389(1):1–30, 2022

    2022

  5. [12]

    Geodesic trees and exceptional directions in FPP on hyperbolic groups.Adv

    Riddhipratim Basu and Mahan Mj. Geodesic trees and exceptional directions in FPP on hyperbolic groups.Adv. Math., 498:Paper No. 111030, 52, 2026

    2026

  6. [13]

    Intertwining the Busemann process of the directed polymer model.Electron

    Erik Bates, Wai-Tong Fan, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Intertwining the Busemann process of the directed polymer model.Electron. J. Probab., 30:Paper No. 50, 80, 2025

    2025

  7. [14]

    Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993

    Gerald Beer.Topologies on closed and closed convex sets, volume 268 ofMathematics and its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993

    1993

  8. [15]

    V. I. Bogachev.Measure theory. Vol. I, II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007

    2007

  9. [16]

    R. M. Burton and M. Keane. Density and uniqueness in percolation.Comm. Math. Phys., 121(3):501–505, 1989

    1989

  10. [17]

    Non-existence of three non-coalescing infinite geodesics with the same direction in the directed landscape.Probab

    Ofer Busani. Non-existence of three non-coalescing infinite geodesics with the same direction in the directed landscape.Probab. Th. Rel. Fields, 2025.Online first

    2025

  11. [18]

    Non-existence of bi-infinite polymers.Electron

    Ofer Busani and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Non-existence of bi-infinite polymers.Electron. J. Probab., 27:Paper No. 14, 40, 2022

    2022

  12. [19]

    The stationary horizon and semi-infinite geodesics in the directed landscape.Ann

    Ofer Busani, Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen, and Evan Sorensen. The stationary horizon and semi-infinite geodesics in the directed landscape.Ann. Probab., 52(1):1–66, 2024

    2024

  13. [20]

    Souganidis

    Pierre Cardaliaguet and Panagiotis E. Souganidis. On the existence of correctors for the stochastic homogenization of viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equations.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 355(7):786–794, 2017

    2017

  14. [21]

    Castaing and M

    C. Castaing and M. Valadier.Convex analysis and measurable multifunctions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 580. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977

    1977

  15. [22]

    On the input-output map of aG{G{1 queue.J

    Cheng Shang Chang. On the input-output map of aG{G{1 queue.J. Appl. Probab., 31(4):1128– 1133, 1994

    1994

  16. [23]

    Springer, Cham, 2017

    Francis Comets.Directed polymers in random environments, volume 2175 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2017. Lecture notes from the 46th Probability Summer School held in Saint-Flour, 2016

    2017

  17. [24]

    Directed polymers in random environment are diffusive at weak disorder.Ann

    Francis Comets and Nobuo Yoshida. Directed polymers in random environment are diffusive at weak disorder.Ann. Probab., 34(5):1746–1770, 2006

    2006

  18. [25]

    Multiple geodesics with the same direction.Electron

    David Coupier. Multiple geodesics with the same direction.Electron. Commun. Probab., 16:517–527, 2011

    2011

  19. [26]

    Busemann functions and infinite geodesics in two- dimensional first-passage percolation.Comm

    Michael Damron and Jack Hanson. Busemann functions and infinite geodesics in two- dimensional first-passage percolation.Comm. Math. Phys., 325(3):917–963, 2014

    2014

  20. [27]

    Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998

    Amir Dembo and Ofer Zeitouni.Large deviations techniques and applications, volume 38 of Applications of Mathematics (New York). Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998. ROOTED GIBBS-DLR MEASURES IN PLANAR DIRECTED POLYMERS 63

    1998

  21. [28]

    Anomalous geodesics in the inhomogeneous corner growth model.Comm

    Elnur Emrah, Christopher Janjigian, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Anomalous geodesics in the inhomogeneous corner growth model.Comm. Math. Phys., 406(12):Paper No. 316, 65, 2025

    2025

  22. [29]

    Ethier and Thomas G

    Stewart N. Ethier and Thomas G. Kurtz.Markov Processes: Characterization and Conver- gence. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986

    1986

  23. [30]

    Joint distribution of Busemann functions in the exactly solvable corner growth model.Prob

    Wai-Tong (Louis) Fan and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Joint distribution of Busemann functions in the exactly solvable corner growth model.Prob. Math. Phys., 1(1):55–100, 2020

    2020

  24. [31]

    Coexistence in two-type first-passage percolation models

    Olivier Garet and R´ egine Marchand. Coexistence in two-type first-passage percolation models. Ann. Appl. Probab., 15(1A):298–330, 2005

    2005

  25. [32]

    Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1988

    Hans-Otto Georgii.Gibbs measures and phase transitions, volume 9 ofde Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1988

    1988

  26. [33]

    Geodesics and the competition interface for the corner growth model.Probab

    Nicos Georgiou, Firas Rassoul-Agha, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Geodesics and the competition interface for the corner growth model.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 169(1-2):223–255, 2017

    2017

  27. [34]

    Stationary cocycles and Buse- mann functions for the corner growth model.Probab

    Nicos Georgiou, Firas Rassoul-Agha, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Stationary cocycles and Buse- mann functions for the corner growth model.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 169(1-2):177–222, 2017

    2017

  28. [35]

    Ratios of partition functions for the log-gamma polymer.Ann

    Nicos Georgiou, Firas Rassoul-Agha, Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen, and Atilla Yilmaz. Ratios of partition functions for the log-gamma polymer.Ann. Probab., 43(5):2282–2331, 2015

    2015

  29. [36]

    Maximal coupling.Z

    Sheldon Goldstein. Maximal coupling.Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete, 46(2):193–204, 1978/79

    1978

  30. [37]

    Shape of territories in some competing growth models.Ann

    Jean-Baptiste Gou´ er´ e. Shape of territories in some competing growth models.Ann. Appl. Probab., 17(4):1273–1305, 2007

    2007

  31. [38]

    Existence of generalized Busemann functions and Gibbs measures for random walks in random potentials.Trans

    Sean Groathouse, Christopher Janjigian, and Firas Rassoul-Agha. Existence of generalized Busemann functions and Gibbs measures for random walks in random potentials.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 378(12):8487–8563, 2025

    2025

  32. [39]

    Non-existence of non-trivial bi-infinite geodesics in Geometric Last Passage Percolation.J

    Sean Groathouse, Christopher Janjigian, and Firas Rassoul-Agha. Non-existence of non-trivial bi-infinite geodesics in Geometric Last Passage Percolation.J. Stat. Phys., 192(6):Paper No. 81, 2025

    2025

  33. [40]

    Geodesics in first passage percolation.Ann

    Christopher Hoffman. Geodesics in first passage percolation.Ann. Appl. Probab., 18(5):1944– 1969, 2008

    1944

  34. [41]

    Huse and Christopher L

    David A. Huse and Christopher L. Henley. Pinning and roughening of domain walls in ising systems due to random impurities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(25):2708–2711, Jun 1985

    1985

  35. [42]

    Existence of weak solutions for stochastic differential equations with driving semimartingales.Stochastics, 4(4):317–337, 1980/81

    Jean Jacod and Jean M´ emin. Existence of weak solutions for stochastic differential equations with driving semimartingales.Stochastics, 4(4):317–337, 1980/81

    1980

  36. [43]

    Sur un type de convergence interm´ ediaire entre la convergence en loi et la convergence en probabilit´ e

    Jean Jacod and Jean M´ emin. Sur un type de convergence interm´ ediaire entre la convergence en loi et la convergence en probabilit´ e. InSeminar on Probability, XV (Univ. Strasbourg, Stras- bourg, 1979/1980) (French), volume 850 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 529–546. Spring...

    1979

  37. [44]

    A shape theorem and a variational formula for the quenched Lyapunov exponent of random walk in a random potential

    Christopher Janjigian, Sergazy Nurbavliyev, and Firas Rassoul-Agha. A shape theorem and a variational formula for the quenched Lyapunov exponent of random walk in a random potential. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 58(2):1010–1040, 2022

    2022

  38. [45]

    Busemann functions and Gibbs measures in directed polymer models onZ 2

    Christopher Janjigian and Firas Rassoul-Agha. Busemann functions and Gibbs measures in directed polymer models onZ 2. 2018. Extended version (arXiv:1810.03580v2)

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Uniqueness and Ergodicity of Stationary Di- rected Polymers onZ 2.J

    Christopher Janjigian and Firas Rassoul-Agha. Uniqueness and Ergodicity of Stationary Di- rected Polymers onZ 2.J. Stat. Phys., 179(3):672–689, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Ergodicity and synchro- nization of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation

    Christopher Janjigian, Firas Rassoul-Agha, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Ergodicity and synchro- nization of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation. 2023. Preprint (arXiv:2211.06779)

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Geometry of geodesics through Busemann measures in directed last-passage percolation.J

    Christopher Janjigian, Firas Rassoul-Agha, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Geometry of geodesics through Busemann measures in directed last-passage percolation.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 64 C. JANJIGIAN, F. RASSOUL-AGHA, AND T. SEPP ¨AL¨AINEN 25(7):2573–2639, 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Strong existence and uniqueness of the tilt-indexed Busemann process in the planar corner growth model

    Christopher Janjigian, Firas Rassoul-Agha, and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Strong existence and uniqueness of the tilt-indexed Busemann process in the planar corner growth model. 2025. Preprint (arXiv:2507.08757)

    2025

  43. [51]

    Kechris.Classical descriptive set theory, volume 156 ofGraduate Texts in Math- ematics

    Alexander S. Kechris.Classical descriptive set theory, volume 156 ofGraduate Texts in Math- ematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995

    1995

  44. [52]

    Thomas G. Kurtz. The Yamada-Watanabe-Engelbert theorem for general stochastic equations and inequalities.Electron. J. Probab., 12:951–965, 2007

    2007

  45. [53]

    Cristina Licea and Charles M. Newman. Geodesics in two-dimensional first-passage percola- tion.Ann. Probab., 24(1):399–410, 1996

    1996

  46. [54]

    James B. Martin. Limiting shape for directed percolation models.Ann. Probab., 32(4):2908– 2937, 2004

    2004

  47. [55]

    Charles M. Newman. A surface view of first-passage percolation. InProceedings of the Inter- national Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Z¨ urich, 1994), pages 1017–1023, Basel, 1995. Birkh¨ auser

    1994

  48. [56]

    Newman.Topics in disordered systems

    Charles M. Newman.Topics in disordered systems. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z¨ urich. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1997

    1997

  49. [57]

    Phelps.Lectures on Choquet’s theorem, volume 1757 ofLecture Notes in Mathemat- ics

    Robert R. Phelps.Lectures on Choquet’s theorem, volume 1757 ofLecture Notes in Mathemat- ics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2001

    2001

  50. [58]

    Quenched point-to-point free energy for random walks in random potentials.Probab

    Firas Rassoul-Agha and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Quenched point-to-point free energy for random walks in random potentials.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 158(3-4):711–750, 2014

    2014

  51. [59]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015

    Firas Rassoul-Agha and Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen.A course on large deviations with an introduction to Gibbs measures, volume 162 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015

    2015

  52. [60]

    Quenched free energy and large deviations for random walks in random potentials.Comm

    Firas Rassoul-Agha, Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen, and Atilla Yilmaz. Quenched free energy and large deviations for random walks in random potentials.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 66(2):202–244, 2013

    2013

  53. [61]

    Tyrrell Rockafellar.Convex analysis

    R. Tyrrell Rockafellar.Convex analysis. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970

    1970

  54. [62]

    Scaling for a one-dimensional directed polymer with boundary conditions

    Timo Sepp¨ al¨ ainen. Scaling for a one-dimensional directed polymer with boundary conditions. Ann. Probab., 40(1):19–73, 2012. Corrected version available atarXiv:0911.2446

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Strassen

    V. Strassen. The existence of probability measures with given marginals.Ann. Math. Statist., 36:423–439, 1965. Christopher Janjigian, Purdue University, Department of Mathematics, 150 N University St, West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA. Email address:cjanjigi@purdue.edu URL:http://...

    1965

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.