Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Heavy neutral leptons beyond the BBN bound: probing the lepton asymmetry of the Universe

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Large lepton flavor asymmetries lift the Big Bang nucleosynthesis bound on sub-GeV heavy neutral leptons, opening lifetimes up to about a second to accelerator searches.

desk verdict A Dirac-HNL mechanism that evades the hadronic BBN bound via charge-asymmetric pion injection; the existence claim is solid, cross-checked, and honestly caveated — send it to referees. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10123 v1 pith:DAXYIXVE submitted 2026-08-10 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Kensuke Akita , Maksym Ovchynnikov , Vsevolod Syvolap This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords heavyneutralleptonsBigBangnucleosynthesisleptonflavorasymmetryDiracneutrinoseffectivenumberofrelativisticspeciescosmicneutrinobackgroundQCDphasetransitiongravitationalwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a universe with large lepton flavor asymmetries can evade the standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis bound on hadronically decaying heavy neutral leptons (HNLs), hypothetical singlet fermions that mix with ordinary neutrinos and are primary targets of upcoming accelerator searches. Normally, mesons from HNL decays convert protons into neutrons, overproducing helium and excluding lifetimes $\tau_N\gtrsim0.02$ s almost regardless of abundance. The paper shows that if the HNL is Dirac and inherits an asymmetry between particles and antiparticles, its decays inject more $\pi^+$ than $\pi^-$, converting neutrons back to their standard abundance, while the flavor asymmetries and decay heating nearly cancel in the effective number of relativistic neutrino species $N_{\rm eff}$. This opens the window $m_\mu+m_\pi\lesssim m_N\lesssim1$ GeV with $\tau_N\lesssim1$ s, much of it within reach of the next generation of beam-dump experiments, so an HNL discovery there would signal a non-standard MeV-temperature universe and would pin down the primordial flavor asymmetries up to one direction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the particle–antiparticle ratio $r\equiv n_N/n_{\bar N}$ of the HNL population. While charged pions are present, the neutron fraction tracks the quasi-static equilibrium $X_n \simeq C_\pi/(C_\pi + r)$, with $C_\pi = \langle\sigma v\rangle_{\pi^- p\to n}/\langle\sigma v\rangle_{\pi^+ n\to p} = \mathcal O(1)$; choosing $r_{\rm req} = C_\pi(1-X_n^{\rm SBBN})/X_n^{\rm SBBN} \simeq 4$–$10$ pins the neutron fraction to the standard track once the mesons disappear. The mechanism needs the charged-pion channel to track the parent: $N\to\pi^+ l^-$ while $\bar N\to\pi^- l^+$, which holds cleanly below about $1$ GeV. Lepton number conservation with $\delta m\lesssim\hbar/\tau_N$ prevents $N\leftrightarrow\bar N$ oscillations from erasing the imbalance before decay.

What would settle it

Measure the mass splitting between the two states of a GeV-scale HNL, for instance by searching for lepton-number-violating decays that would signal a non-Dirac component: if the splitting exceeds $\hbar/\tau_N\simeq10^{-15}$ eV for a candidate with $\tau_N$ in the opened window, the particle–antiparticle asymmetry is erased before decay and the standard BBN bound returns.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the meson-driven BBN bound, which excludes hadronically decaying relics with lifetimes $\tau\gtrsim0.02$ s almost independently of their abundance, can be lifted for Dirac heavy neutral leptons that inherit part of the lepton flavor asymmetries of the Universe, without modifying their laboratory decay rates. Because the HNL decays as $N\to\pi^+l^-$ and its antiparticle as $\bar N\to\pi^-l^+$, an asymmetry in the population injects an excess of $\pi^+$, and the strong pion–nucleon conversions return the neutron fraction to its standard value; a cancellation between the asymmetry-driven increase and the decay-driven decrease of $N_{\rm eff}$ keeps the CMB observable small. The paper demonstrates, with a three-stage momentum-resolved evolution, that these solutions exist over $m_\mu+m_\pi\lesssim m_N\lesssim1$ GeV and $\tau_N\lesssim1$ s, including a substantial region within the reach of upcoming accelerator searches, and that a discovery there would fix the primordial flavor asymmetries up to one remaining direction, which the relic neutrino background and a possible first-order cosmic QCD transition may probe.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism works only if the heavy neutral lepton is a Dirac particle whose lepton number is conserved so precisely that particle–antiparticle oscillations cannot wash out the asymmetry before decay, which requires a mass splitting below $\hbar/\tau_N\sim10^{-15}$ eV; otherwise the injected pion charges are symmetric and the standard BBN exclusion returns.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sub-GeV HNLs with lifetimes 0.02–1 s, including mixing angles that upcoming beam-dump and long-baseline experiments will probe, are not cosmologically excluded provided the Universe carries large lepton flavor asymmetries.
  • A detection in the opened window would, together with $Y_P$, D/H, and $N_{\rm eff}$, determine two combinations of the three primordial flavor asymmetries at the percent level, leaving a one-parameter family.
  • The remaining direction changes the cosmic QCD epoch: some members of the family cross into a first-order transition and could source a stochastic gravitational wave background, while others leave no such signature.
  • The relic neutrino sea can be enhanced by more than 30% even where $|\Delta N_{\rm eff}|$ is tiny, so the cosmic neutrino background becomes a probe separate from the CMB.
  • The mechanism leaves laboratory decay rates untouched and requires a lepton-number-conserving (Dirac) HNL sector, so lepton-number-violation searches are a direct companion test.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not apply the mechanism to other relics, but any hadronically decaying species with a conserved particle–antiparticle asymmetry and charge-correlated meson final states would evade the BBN bound the same way, making the essential condition the asymmetry, not the neutrino nature of the particle.
  • The paper does not discuss a laboratory readout of the asymmetry, but the charge-tracking relation suggests one: measuring whether $N$ decays preferentially produce $\pi^+$ or $\pi^-$ could directly expose the sign of the primordial lepton asymmetry that created the population.
  • The paper does not claim the current CMB preference for $N_{\rm eff}<3$ is explained, but the negative $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ realized in part of the opened region gives a concrete target for near-future CMB measurements and a physical route to such a deficit.
  • The paper leaves supernova constraints as a fixed input; a dedicated core-collapse supernova reanalysis in the sub-GeV mass range could materially shrink or extend the region that accelerator searches could claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism by which hadronically decaying heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) with lifetimes τ_N ≳ 0.02 s can evade the otherwise near-universal BBN bound. The essential idea is that a Dirac HNL decays into π+ and its antiparticle into π−, so an asymmetry between the N and antiN populations injects an excess of π+, which converts neutrons back to protons and restores the neutron fraction to its standard-BBN trajectory. The same large lepton flavor asymmetries raise N_eff, while HNL decays lower it, and the authors show that the two effects can cancel. The calculation uses a three-stage pipeline: momentum-resolved production of HNLs with exact plasma charge redistribution, a quantum-kinetic flavor-evolution stage, and a momentum-resolved transport stage matched to a BBN network. The authors map the open parameter space in (m_N, τ_N), finding a substantial region within SHiP reach, and identify correlated signatures: an N_eff deficit, an enhanced relic neutrino number density, and a possible first-order QCD transition sourcing gravitational waves. A model example with an exactly conserved global lepton number is provided. The authors also argue that an earlier proposal for relaxing BBN bounds with Majorana HNLs and lepton asymmetries fails once meson-driven p↔n conversion is included.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result overturns a standard cosmological exclusion for sub-GeV HNLs and turns a future accelerator discovery into a probe of primordial lepton flavor asymmetries. The paper is unusually careful for a scenario paper: the core cancellation is presented transparently in Eqs. (1)–(2); the numerical pipeline passes multiple consistency checks (charge conservation, zero-asymmetry limits reproducing the standard τ_N ≲ 0.02 s bound, convergence in step size and particle number); and the structural approximations of the hybrid QKE/transport treatment are stated explicitly and, in several places, bounded by alternative implementations. The correlated predictions—N_eff deficits, CνB enhancement, and a gravitational-wave target—are falsifiable. The paper also fairly identifies the model-level premise on which the scenario rests: exact or nearly exact lepton-number conservation with δm ≲ 10^-15 eV. If that premise is accepted, the work constitutes a significant and well-validated advance in the phenomenology of heavy neutral leptons.

major comments (2)
  1. [The laboratory; SuM F] The central claim that hadronically decaying HNLs can evade the BBN bound is conditional on the Dirac-ness of the HNL: the paper states in 'The laboratory' that any Majorana mass splitting must satisfy δm ≲ ℏ/τ_N ≈ 10^-15 eV for the particle–antiparticle asymmetry to survive until decay. This is a load-bearing external premise: if δm is larger, N↔antiN oscillations erase the asymmetry and the neutron fraction is driven to the isospin plateau, reproducing the standard BBN bound. The model example in SuM F posits an exactly conserved global U(1)_L, but no argument is given for why such a symmetry is natural under radiative corrections or Planck-suppressed operators, and no estimate of the induced δm is provided. I recommend that the authors add a dedicated discussion of the naturalness of δm (e.g., an approximate symmetry with small explicit breaking, a gauged B-L symmetry, or a discrete remnant) or, failing that, explicitly quantify the tuning and state the implications for the scenario if any realistic completion generates δm above the quoted bound.
  2. [SuM C (Statistics of the transport)] The final acceptance rule for the domain classification is that a candidate is accepted if it is 'not excluded at one standard error by any window,' i.e., if the 1σ uncertainty interval overlaps the window (SuM C). Since the boundaries of Regions 1–4 in Fig. 1 and the SHiP-reach claims are built from points selected by this rule, it may systematically enlarge the plotted domains relative to a criterion that requires the mean predicted values to lie inside the windows. This is particularly relevant for the δD and ΔN_eff windows, whose widths are comparable to the statistical errors of the benchmarks. Please reclassify the grid with the mean-inside-window criterion, or alternatively report the number and fraction of accepted points whose central values fall outside one or more windows, and state the effect on the final region boundaries.
minor comments (5)
  1. [The laboratory] The phrase 'the primordial flavor asymmetries are therefore an output of the scenario' is potentially misleading: in the calculation (L_e, L_mu, L_tau) are inputs to the scan, and a hypothetical detection would constrain them along a one-parameter family. Please rephrase to avoid implying that the model itself predicts the asymmetries.
  2. [Eq. (2) and Table I] The estimate r_req ≃ 4–10 in Eq. (2) is usefully contrasted with the actual benchmark q_N values in Table I; I suggest adding a sentence in the main text clarifying that q_N = (r−1)/(r+1) for the quoted benchmarks corresponds to r values below 4, which the full calculation accommodates through the ξ_e shift and additional meson channels.
  3. [Fig. 1] The overlap of Regions 2 and 4 in the figure would be easier to read if the hatching and color legend explicitly distinguished the overlap region, since the text states that Regions 2 and 4 overlap.
  4. [SuM D] The convergence test at strong degeneracy (0.55 GeV, 0.17 s) shows ΔN_eff rising from 0.09 to 0.24 as the particle number increases from 10^4 to 6.4×10^4 per species, with a residual of ≲0.02 at the adopted 3.2×10^4 setting. This is acceptable, but it would be helpful to state explicitly whether the quoted benchmark ΔN_eff values assume the same sign for that residual at all deficit-window points.
  5. [SuM J] The assertion that 'the two conditions cannot align in any pattern' rests on a qualitative argument, since the general-pattern calculation is explicitly left for future work; I suggest softening the wording to 'are not expected to align' to avoid overclaiming beyond the computed cases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity; free lepton asymmetries are solved as inputs and signatures are conditional outputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is a parameter-space existence argument, not a circular prediction. The three primordial flavor asymmetries are explicitly treated as free inputs: "We never scan blindly over (Le, Lµ, Lτ): the helium and Neff conditions fix two combinations of them, and we explore the third direction explicitly" (Target parameter space). The two conditions are used to solve for the asymmetries, and the paper states "the asymmetries are free parameters of the scenario" (SuM I), so the agreement of Y_P, D/H, and N_eff with the adopted windows is enforced by construction but is not presented as a prediction of those observables. The claimed content is the existence of solutions and the correlated signatures along the remaining one-parameter family; these are conditional outputs, with the CνB enhancement and first-order QCD criterion explicitly depending on the unspecified sharing between electron and tau flavors. The QCD/GW criterion is calibrated to an external endpoint (Ref. [28]) with a stated model-dependent factor and margin, and the paper explicitly declines to calculate a spectrum, so no prediction is being disguised as a first-principles result. Self-citations appear for methodology (production rates, νDSMC transport, metastable decay evolution) and for a cross-check of the zero-HNL asymmetry redistribution, but these are not load-bearing: the central existence result is supported by comparisons to external calculations and by conservation and thermodynamic checks, including the statement that "The condition is not fitted to data: it does not use Y_P, D/H, or N_eff" (SuM B 4). The exact lepton-number conservation requirement (δm ≲ ℏ/τ_N) is an external model premise explicitly acknowledged as a limitation of the scenario, not an internal circular step. The paper also distinguishes its two claims of different strength: existence of compensating solutions versus the precise map from (m_N, τ_N) to the asymmetries, and it flags structural approximations. No equation is shown to be equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on two scenario-level postulates not established by the calculation itself: large primordial lepton flavor asymmetries, and a lepton-number-conserving (Dirac) HNL. The BBN/CMB part then depends on standard strong-interaction cross sections and on the chosen D/H normalization, while the GW region additionally depends on a calibrated QCD endpoint and assumed slopes. The paper is transparent about most of these inputs.

free parameters (4)
  • Primordial lepton flavor asymmetries L_e, L_mu, L_tau (degeneracies xi_alpha at T=20 MeV) = Benchmark 1: xi20=(0.00,-0.05,+1.83); Benchmark 2: xi20=(-2.98,+0.48,+1.95)
    These are the scenario's inputs, solved by root-finding so that Y_P, D/H and N_eff fall inside the chosen windows. They are not independently measured; the paper selects them rather than predicting them.
  • QCD calibration factor 3.79 in Eq. (S31) = 3.79 (mean of 3.70, 3.77, 3.78, 3.91)
    Fixed by matching the paper's ideal-gas quark potentials to the Dyson-Schwinger critical endpoint of Ref. [28], and used only for the first-order QCD/GW criterion (Region 4).
  • First-order line slope family k in Eq. (S33) = k = 0, 2, 5 (assumed family)
    The slope of the first-order QCD line away from the endpoint is unknown; the paper assumes three values to define the exit temperature and the escape from the slow-wall corridor.
  • Adopted 20% overshoot margin in Eq. (S32) = 1.2
    Chosen because the calibration factor scatters by about six percent across four directions; it is an ad hoc margin affecting the GW target only.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Large lepton flavor asymmetries (|L_alpha| of order 0.1) exist after sphaleron freeze-out and before HNL production.
    This is the scenario's defining input. SuM F argues it can be generated by Affleck-Dine leptoflavorgenesis or a heavy messenger, but the calculation itself takes the asymmetries as given.
  • ad hoc to paper Lepton number is conserved to delta_m less than about 10^-15 eV, making the HNL effectively Dirac.
    Required so the N/anti-N asymmetry survives; stated in the 'The laboratory' section. The model example in SuM F imposes an exact U(1)_L, but this is a model assumption, not a standard background fact.
  • domain assumption While mesons are present, the strong meson-driven p to n reactions overwhelm the weak rates.
    Basis of Eq. (1) and the whole mechanism; cross sections taken from Refs. [3,4]. Standard physics for MeV temperatures.
  • domain assumption The neutrino evolution can be approximated by a momentum-averaged QKE solver (adiabatic, collective neutrino-neutrino potential switched off) matched to a momentum-resolved Boltzmann transport.
    Stated in SuM B as a structural approximation; the paper quantifies its impact in SuM D but cannot replace a full momentum-dependent quantum kinetic treatment.
  • domain assumption The higher deuterium theoretical prediction (2.51 plus or minus 0.07) is adopted.
    Stated in the 'Observational constraints' section; choosing it decides which sign of Delta_N_eff the abundances accommodate. The lower prediction would favor an N_eff excess.
  • domain assumption The Dyson-Schwinger critical endpoint of Ref. [28] and the fitted calibration factor locate the first-order QCD surface at nonzero charge chemical potential.
    Used for Eq. (S32); the paper notes lattice-anchored trajectories do not cover this region, so the criterion is conditional.
invented entities (1)
  • Heavy Dirac messenger X (m_X = 100 GeV)
    purpose: In the model example of SuM F, X transfers the lepton asymmetry from singlet fields to active leptons below the sphaleron temperature without generating baryon number.
    It is one possible realization of the assumed large asymmetries; no direct experimental signature is predicted or analyzed. The central BBN mechanism does not require this specific field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heavy neutral leptons beyond the BBN bound: probing the lepton asymmetry of the Universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DAXYIXVE

@misc{pith2026260810123,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heavy neutral leptons beyond the BBN bound: probing the lepton asymmetry of the Universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DAXYIXVE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10123}
}
abstract

Hadronically decaying particles with lifetimes $\tau\gtrsim0.02\,{\rm s}$ are excluded by Big Bang Nucleosynthesis almost independently of their abundance: the mesons from their decays convert protons into neutrons faster than the reverse, and helium is overproduced. For heavy neutral leptons (HNLs), this blankets the couplings the upcoming accelerator searches can reach. We propose a scenario with large lepton flavor asymmetries in which HNLs evade it. A Dirac HNL decays into $\pi^+$ and its antiparticle into $\pi^-$, so an asymmetry between the two populations injects an excess of $\pi^+$, which converts the neutrons back to their standard abundance, while a cancellation between the asymmetries and the HNL decays keeps the shift in $N_{\rm eff}$ small. This opens the parameter space with $m_l+m_\pi\lesssim m_N\lesssim1\,{\rm GeV}$ and $\tau_N\lesssim1\,{\rm s}$, including a substantial region within the reach of SHiP. A discovery there, combined with the BBN and CMB observables, would fix the primordial flavor asymmetries up to one remaining direction. The relic neutrino background and a possibly first-order cosmic QCD transition, a source of gravitational waves, may probe that direction, and with it the lepton asymmetry of the Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10123 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Parameter space of HNLs mixing with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. How the BBN bound is avoided in the scenario with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Effects of an Intermediate Mass Sterile Neutrino Population on the Early Universe

    Rasmussen, Hannah and McNichol, Alex and Fuller, George M. and Kishimoto, Chad T. Effects of an intermediate mass sterile neutrino population on the early Universe. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083513. arXiv:2109.11176

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [63]

    Resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter with a refined numerical scheme

    Kasai, Kentaro and Kawasaki, Masahiro and Murai, Kai. Resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter with a refined numerical scheme. JCAP. 2026. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/048. arXiv:2510.01907

    work page arXiv 2026

  3. [1]

    Prediction for Maximum Supercooling in SU(N) Confinement Transition

    Agrawal, Prateek and Kane, Gaurang Ramakant and Loladze, Vazha and March-Russell, John. Prediction for Maximum Supercooling in SU(N) Confinement Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2026. doi:10.1103/3r5x-vhnd. arXiv:2508.10091

    arXiv 2026

  4. [2]

    Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look

    Escudero Abenza, Miguel and Garcia-Perez, Clara and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Nucleosynthesis and CMB bounds on photophilic ALPs: a fresh look. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2026. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15544-z. arXiv:2511.00157

    arXiv 2026

  5. [3]

    and Gonzalo, Tom \'a s E

    Deppisch, Frank F. and Gonzalo, Tom \'a s E. and Majumdar, Chayan and Zhang, Zhong. Relaxing limits from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis on Heavy Neutral Leptons with axion-like particles. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/054. arXiv:2410.06970

    arXiv 2025

  6. [4]

    Dev, P. S. Bhupal and Wu, Quan-feng and Xu, Xun-Jie. No Hiding in the Dark: Cosmological Bounds on Heavy Neutral Leptons with Dark Decay Channels. Phys. Rev. D. 2026. doi:10.1103/r7bw-jzjl. arXiv:2507.12270

    arXiv 2026

  7. [5]

    and others

    Albanese, R. and others. SHiP experiment at the SPS Beam Dump Facility. 2025. arXiv:2504.06692

    arXiv 2025

  8. [6]

    Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles

    Kawasaki, Masahiro and Kohri, Kazunori and Moroi, Takeo and Takaesu, Yoshitaro. Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles. Phys. Rev. D. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023502. arXiv:1709.01211

    arXiv 2018

Show all 72 references
  1. [7]

    New bounds on heavy QCD axions from big bang nucleosynthesis

    Jung, Tae Hyun and Okui, Takemichi and Tobioka, Kohsaku and Wang, Jiabao. New bounds on heavy QCD axions from big bang nucleosynthesis. Phys. Rev. D. 2026. doi:10.1103/l2m1-h1cp. arXiv:2510.23695

    2026

  2. [8]

    Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics

    de Blas, Jorge and others. Physics Briefing Book: Input for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. 2025. doi:10.23731/CYRM-2025-008. arXiv:2511.03883

    2026

  3. [9]

    and others

    Abdul Karim, M. and others. DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6. arXiv:2503.14738

    2025 arXiv

  4. [10]

    A new tension in the cosmological model from primordial deuterium?

    Pitrou, Cyril and Coc, Alain and Uzan, Jean-Philippe and Vangioni, Elisabeth. A new tension in the cosmological model from primordial deuterium?. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab135. arXiv:2011.11320

    2021 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Primordial Deuterium after LUNA: concordances and error budget

    Pisanti, Ofelia and Mangano, Gianpiero and Miele, Gennaro and Mazzella, Pierpaolo. Primordial Deuterium after LUNA: concordances and error budget. JCAP. 2021. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/020. arXiv:2011.11537

    2021 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Precision calculation of N_ eff with Neutrino Direct Simulation Monte Carlo

    Ihnatenko, Oleksii and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Precision calculation of N_ eff with Neutrino Direct Simulation Monte Carlo. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/21gr-4xgd. arXiv:2508.08379

    2025

  7. [13]

    Gariazzo, S. and F. de Salas, P. and Pisanti, O. and Consiglio, R. PArthENoPE revolutions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108205. arXiv:2103.05027

    2022

  8. [14]

    Reno, M. H. and Seckel, D. Primordial Nucleosynthesis: The Effects of Injecting Hadrons. Phys. Rev. D. 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3441

    1988 doi

  9. [15]

    and Kishimoto, Chad T

    Fuller, George M. and Kishimoto, Chad T. and Kusenko, Alexander. Heavy sterile neutrinos, entropy and relativistic energy production, and the relic neutrino background. 2011. arXiv:1110.6479

    2011 arXiv

  10. [16]

    How new physics affects primordial neutrinos decoupling: Direct simulation Monte Carlo approach

    Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Syvolap, Vsevolod. How new physics affects primordial neutrinos decoupling: Direct simulation Monte Carlo approach. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063527. arXiv:2409.07378

    2025 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Primordial Neutrinos and New Physics: Novel Approach to Solving the Neutrino Boltzmann Equation

    Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Syvolap, Vsevolod. Primordial Neutrinos and New Physics: Novel Approach to Solving the Neutrino Boltzmann Equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.101003. arXiv:2409.15129

    2025 arXiv

  12. [18]

    and Kawasaki, Masahiro and Kusenko, Alexander and Murai, Kai and Takhistov, Volodymyr

    Gelmini, Graciela B. and Kawasaki, Masahiro and Kusenko, Alexander and Murai, Kai and Takhistov, Volodymyr. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on sterile neutrino and lepton asymmetry of the Universe. JCAP. 2020. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/051. arXiv:2005.06721

    2020 arXiv

  13. [19]

    New Physics Decaying into Metastable Particles: Impact on Cosmic Neutrinos

    Akita, Kensuke and Baur, Gideon and Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Schwetz, Thomas and Syvolap, Vsevolod. New Physics Decaying into Metastable Particles: Impact on Cosmic Neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.121001. arXiv:2411.00892

    2025 arXiv

  14. [20]

    and others

    Navas, S. and others. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  15. [21]

    Cosmological beam dump: constraints on dark scalars mixed with the Higgs boson

    Fradette, Anthony and Pospelov, Maxim and Pradler, Josef and Ritz, Adam. Cosmological beam dump: constraints on dark scalars mixed with the Higgs boson. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.075004. arXiv:1812.07585

    2019 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Sensitivities to feebly interacting particles: Public and unified calculations

    Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Tastet, Jean-Loup and Mikulenko, Oleksii and Bondarenko, Kyrylo. Sensitivities to feebly interacting particles: Public and unified calculations. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.075028. arXiv:2305.13383

    2023 arXiv

  17. [23]

    An Extended Analysis of Heavy Neutral Leptons during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    Sabti, Nashwan and Magalich, Andrii and Filimonova, Anastasiia. An Extended Analysis of Heavy Neutral Leptons during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. JCAP. 2020. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/056. arXiv:2006.07387

    2020 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Metastable GeV-scale particles as a solution to the cosmological lithium problem

    Pospelov, Maxim and Pradler, Josef. Metastable GeV-scale particles as a solution to the cosmological lithium problem. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.103514. arXiv:1006.4172

    2010 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Constraints on primordial lepton asymmetries with full neutrino transport

    Froustey, Julien and Pitrou, Cyril. Constraints on primordial lepton asymmetries with full neutrino transport. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103551. arXiv:2405.06509

    2024 arXiv

  20. [26]

    and others

    Beacham, J. and others. Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report. J. Phys. G. 2020. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab4cd2. arXiv:1901.09966

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    and Buldgen, Gilles and De Salas, Pablo F

    Bennett, Jack J. and Buldgen, Gilles and De Salas, Pablo F. and Drewes, Marco and Gariazzo, Stefano and Pastor, Sergio and Wong, Yvonne Y. Y. Towards a precision calculation of N_ eff in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and fin...

    2021 arXiv

  22. [29]

    A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling

    Akita, Kensuke and Yamaguchi, Masahide. A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling. JCAP. 2020. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/012. arXiv:2005.07047

    2020 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis

    Froustey, Julien and Pitrou, Cyril and Volpe, Maria Cristina. Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis. JCAP. 2020. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/015. arXiv:2008.01074

    2020 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Primordial neutrino asymmetry evolution with full mean-field effects and collisions

    Froustey, Julien and Pitrou, Cyril. Primordial neutrino asymmetry evolution with full mean-field effects and collisions. JCAP. 2022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/065. arXiv:2110.11889

    2022 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Dynamics of metastable standard model particles from long-lived particle decays in the MeV primordial plasma

    Akita, Kensuke and Baur, Gideon and Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Schwetz, Thomas and Syvolap, Vsevolod. Dynamics of metastable standard model particles from long-lived particle decays in the MeV primordial plasma. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063542. arXiv:2411.00931

    2025 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions

    Pitrou, Cyril and Coc, Alain and Uzan, Jean-Philippe and Vangioni, Elisabeth. Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions. Phys. Rept. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.005. arXiv:1801.08023

    2018 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Phenomenology of GeV-scale Heavy Neutral Leptons

    Bondarenko, Kyrylo and Boyarsky, Alexey and Gorbunov, Dmitry and Ruchayskiy, Oleg. Phenomenology of GeV-scale Heavy Neutral Leptons. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)032. arXiv:1805.08567

    2018 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Improved big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on heavy neutral leptons

    Boyarsky, Alexey and Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Ruchayskiy, Oleg and Syvolap, Vsevolod. Improved big bang nucleosynthesis constraints on heavy neutral leptons. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023517. arXiv:2008.00749

    2021 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Current Constraints on Cosmological Scenarios with Very Low Reheating Temperatures

    Barbieri, Nicola and Brinckmann, Thejs and Gariazzo, Stefano and Lattanzi, Massimiliano and Pastor, Sergio and Pisanti, Ofelia. Current Constraints on Cosmological Scenarios with Very Low Reheating Temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025. doi:10.1103/j5rj-dz1k. arXiv:2501.01369

    2025

  30. [37]

    A New dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos

    Shi, Xiang-Dong and Fuller, George M. A New dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2832. arXiv:astro-ph/9810076

    1999 arXiv

  31. [38]

    and Cuteri, Francesca and Endr o di, Gergely and Hajkarim, Fazlollah and Schaffner-Bielich, J \"u rgen

    Vovchenko, Volodymyr and Brandt, Bastian B. and Cuteri, Francesca and Endr o di, Gergely and Hajkarim, Fazlollah and Schaffner-Bielich, J \"u rgen. Pion Condensation in the Early Universe at Nonvanishing Lepton Flavor Asymmetry and Its Gravitational Wave Signatures. Phys. Rev....

    2021 arXiv

  32. [39]

    and Laurent, Benoit

    Cline, James M. and Laurent, Benoit. Bubble wall velocity for first-order QCD phase transition. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083522. arXiv:2502.12321

    2025 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Cosmology Meets Functional QCD: First-Order Cosmic QCD Transition Induced by Large Lepton Asymmetries

    Gao, Fei and Oldengott, Isabel M. Cosmology Meets Functional QCD: First-Order Cosmic QCD Transition Induced by Large Lepton Asymmetries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.131301. arXiv:2106.11991

    2022 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Betti, M. G. and others. Neutrino physics with the PTOLEMY project: active neutrino properties and the light sterile case. JCAP. 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/047. arXiv:1902.05508

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    and Hippert, Maur

    Ferreira, Osvaldo and Fraga, Eduardo S. and Hippert, Maur. Chiral symmetry breaking and pion condensation in the early Universe. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/bcz6-xxn8. arXiv:2507.06518

    2025

  36. [43]

    Dynamical evolution of the pressure on the bubble wall

    Laurent, Benoit and Vanvlasselaer, Miguel. Dynamical evolution of the pressure on the bubble wall. 2026. arXiv:2606.30740

    2026 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Upper Bound on the Cosmic Baryon Chemical Potential from Lepton-Flavor Asymmetry

    Di Clemente, Francesco and Drago, Alessandro and Formaggio, Lorenzo and Ratti, Claudia and Vovchenko, Volodymyr and Yadav, Geetika. Upper Bound on the Cosmic Baryon Chemical Potential from Lepton-Flavor Asymmetry. 2025. arXiv:2511.11995

    2025

  38. [45]

    and Douspis, M

    Tristram, M. and Douspis, M. and Gorce, A. and Henrot-Versill \'e , S. and Hergt, L. T. and Ilic, S. and McBride, L. and Mu \ n oz-Echeverr \' a, M. and Pointecouteau, E. and Salvati, L. Combining CMB datasets with consistent foreground modelling. Astron. Astrophys. 2026. doi:...

    2026 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Affleck-Dine leptoflavorgenesis

    Akita, Kensuke and Hamaguchi, Koichi and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Affleck-Dine leptoflavorgenesis. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)142. arXiv:2509.08175

    2025

  40. [47]

    Maximal Parameter Space of Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Lepton Asymmetries

    Akita, Kensuke and Hamaguchi, Koichi and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Maximal Parameter Space of Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Lepton Asymmetries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2026. doi:10.1103/d2qg-clrz. arXiv:2507.20659

    2026

  41. [48]

    and Garc \' a Escudero, Helena and Froustey, Julien and Abazajian, Kevork N

    Vogel, Cannon M. and Garc \' a Escudero, Helena and Froustey, Julien and Abazajian, Kevork N. Return of the lepton number: Sterile neutrino dark matter production and the revival of the Shi-Fuller mechanism. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/nys6-tkhl. arXiv:2507.18752

    2025

  42. [49]

    Playing with lepton asymmetry at the resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter

    Gorbunov, Dmitry and Kalashnikov, Dmitry and Krugan, George. Playing with lepton asymmetry at the resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter. Phys. Lett. B. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139750. arXiv:2502.17374

    2025

  43. [50]

    A limit on the total lepton number in the Universe from BBN and the CMB

    Domcke, Valerie and Escudero, Miguel and Fernandez Navarro, Mario and Sandner, Stefan. A limit on the total lepton number in the Universe from BBN and the CMB. JCAP. 2026. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/017. arXiv:2510.02438

    2026

  44. [51]

    Lepton flavor asymmetries: from the early Universe to BBN

    Domcke, Valerie and Escudero, Miguel and Fernandez Navarro, Mario and Sandner, Stefan. Lepton flavor asymmetries: from the early Universe to BBN. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)137. arXiv:2502.14960

    2025 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Studying decaying relics with Neutrino Direct Simulation Monte Carlo

    Akita, Kensuke and Escudero Abenza, Miguel and Ihnatenko, Oleksii and Ovchynnikov, Maksym. Studying decaying relics with Neutrino Direct Simulation Monte Carlo. 2026

    2026

  46. [53]

    What does it take to have N_ eff < 3 at CMB times?

    Escudero, Miguel and Ovchynnikov, Maksym and Weiner, Neal. What does it take to have N_ eff < 3 at CMB times?. 2026. arXiv:2603.22391

    2026

  47. [54]

    and Pogge, Richard W

    Aver, Erik and Skillman, Evan D. and Pogge, Richard W. and Rogers, Noah S. J. and Weller, Miqaela K. and Olive, Keith A. and Berg, Danielle A. and Salzer, John J. and Miller, John H. and M \'e ndez-Delgado, Jos \'e Eduardo. The LBT Y _p Project IV: A New Value of the Primordia...

    2026

  48. [55]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models

    Calabrese, Erminia and others. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/063. arXiv:2503.14454

    2025 arXiv

  49. [56]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and CDM parameters

    Louis, Thibaut and others. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and CDM parameters. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062. arXiv:2503.14452

    2025 arXiv

  50. [57]

    and others

    Camphuis, E. and others. SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G main field. Phys. Rev. D. 2026. doi:10.1103/7wt3-9v2y. arXiv:2506.20707

    2019 arXiv

  51. [58]

    and others

    Abitbol, M. and others. The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts for the enhanced Large Aperture Telescope. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/034. arXiv:2503.00636

    2025 arXiv

  52. [59]

    The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts

    Ade, Peter and others. The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts. JCAP. 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056. arXiv:1808.07445

    2019 arXiv

  53. [60]

    The Small observed baryon asymmetry from a large lepton asymmetry

    March-Russell, John and Murayama, Hitoshi and Riotto, Antonio. The Small observed baryon asymmetry from a large lepton asymmetry. JHEP. 1999. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/11/015. arXiv:hep-ph/9908396

    1999 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Large Lepton Asymmetry for Small Baryon Asymmetry and Warm Dark Matter

    Gu, Pei-Hong. Large Lepton Asymmetry for Small Baryon Asymmetry and Warm Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.093009. arXiv:1005.1632

    2010 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe from Lepton Flavor Violation

    Mukaida, Kyohei and Schmitz, Kai and Yamada, Masaki. Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe from Lepton Flavor Violation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.011803. arXiv:2111.03082

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    and Takahashi, Fuminobu and Yamaguchi, Masahide

    Kawasaki, M. and Takahashi, Fuminobu and Yamaguchi, Masahide. Large lepton asymmetry from Q balls. Phys. Rev. D. 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043516. arXiv:hep-ph/0205101

    2002 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Generation of cosmological large lepton asymmetry from a rolling scalar field

    Yamaguchi, Masahide. Generation of cosmological large lepton asymmetry from a rolling scalar field. Phys. Rev. D. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.063507. arXiv:hep-ph/0211163

    2003 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Lepton asymmetric universe

    Kawasaki, Masahiro and Murai, Kai. Lepton asymmetric universe. JCAP. 2022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/041. arXiv:2203.09713

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Affleck-Dine leptogenesis scenario for resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter

    Kasai, Kentaro and Kawasaki, Masahiro and Murai, Kai. Affleck-Dine leptogenesis scenario for resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter. JCAP. 2024. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/008. arXiv:2402.11902

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    A Review of Neutrino Decoupling from the Early Universe to the Current Universe

    Akita, Kensuke and Yamaguchi, Masahide. A Review of Neutrino Decoupling from the Early Universe to the Current Universe. Universe. 2022. doi:10.3390/universe8110552. arXiv:2210.10307

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Ringwald, Andreas and Wong, Yvonne Y. Y. Gravitational clustering of relic neutrinos and implications for their detection. JCAP. 2004. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/12/005. arXiv:hep-ph/0408241

    2004 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Comprehensive constraints on heavy sterile neutrinos from core-collapse supernovae

    Carenza, Pierluca and Lucente, Giuseppe and Mastrototaro, Leonardo and Mirizzi, Alessandro and Serpico, Pasquale Dario. Comprehensive constraints on heavy sterile neutrinos from core-collapse supernovae. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063010. arXiv:2311.00033

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Low-energy supernovae bounds on sterile neutrinos

    Chauhan, Garv and Horiuchi, Shunsaku and Huber, Patrick and Shoemaker, Ian M. Low-energy supernovae bounds on sterile neutrinos. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/052. arXiv:2309.05860

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Andrew and Shoemaker, Ian M

    Chauhan, Garv and Gustafson, R. Andrew and Shoemaker, Ian M. Supernova gamma-ray constraints from heavy sterile neutrino decays. JCAP. 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/012. arXiv:2503.13607

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.