Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Carrier-tunable RKKY magnetism in a crystalline magnet

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that in epitaxial Cr-NbSe2 films the RKKY magnetic ground state is set by carrier density rather than by the chromium superstructure alone: two annealed samples with identical √3×√3R30° Cr ordering are respectively…

desk verdict Careful growth work and one striking 400C/500C contrast, but the central carrier-density claim is an assumption the data don't yet support. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10574 v1 pith:56V7UZRV submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xiang S.W. Huang , Bruno K. Saika , Satoshi Hamao , Yuki Majima , Yuki Settai , Hideki Matsuoka , Yuki M. Itahashi , Masato Sakano
show 5 more authors
Taro Nakajima Shinichiro Seki Yoshihiro Iwasa Kyoko Ishizaka Masaki Nakano
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords RKKYinteractionintercalatedtransition-metaldichalcogenidesmolecular-beamepitaxypost-growthannealingcarrier-densitytuningitinerantmagnetismCr-NbSe2epitaxialthinfilmsHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a crystalline thin-film system in which the two variables that control RKKY magnetism—the spacing between magnetic moments and the Fermi wavevector of the mediating electrons—can be tuned separately in the same material. The authors grow Cr$_{1/4}$NbSe$_2$ and Cr$_{1/3}$NbSe$_2$ films with distinct Cr superstructures by molecular-beam epitaxy, then anneal pieces of the same wafer to change carrier density while leaving the Cr lattice intact below a structural-transition threshold. The key observation is that two samples sharing the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}\mathrm{R}30^\circ$ Cr superstructure, annealed at 400 °C and 500 °C, are respectively non-ferromagnetic and ferromagnetic ($T_\mathrm{C}=71$ K), while the Hall response evolves continuously across the series. This is taken as evidence that carrier density, not moment geometry alone, selects the magnetic ground state, realizing carrier-sensitive RKKY magnetism in a single crystalline host. If correct, it makes Cr-NbSe$_2$ and similar intercalated dichalcogenides a platform for switching magnetism by doping instead of by structural change.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the RKKY exchange coupling $J_\mathrm{RKKY}(r,k_\mathrm{F}) \propto F(2k_\mathrm{F}r)/r^n$, where $F$ is an oscillatory function and $n$ depends on dimensionality; it ties magnetic-state selection to the joint coordinate $(r,k_\mathrm{F})$. In this paper, the Cr superstructure realizes two discrete $r$ values—6.74 Å for the $2\times2$ phase and 5.84 Å for the $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ phase—and the annealing series realizes a continuum of $k_\mathrm{F}$ values whose proxy is the Hall coefficient. The experimental lever is the annealing series itself: pieces of one wafer annealed from 200 °C to 600 °C, with LEED and Raman tracking structure while Hall and magnetization track carriers and magnetism. The non-bijective map, same superstructure but different magnetic ground state, is what does the argumentative work.

What would settle it

Measure the Fermi wavevector directly (ARPES Fermi-surface mapping or quantum oscillations) on the 400 °C and 500 °C annealed samples: if the two have the same $k_\mathrm{F}$ while one is ferromagnetic and the other is not, the carrier-selection claim fails. Electrostatic gating of a 400 °C sample that induces ferromagnetism without reheating would confirm the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Cr superstructure in Cr-NbSe$_2$ does not uniquely determine the magnetic ground state, and that the missing selecting variable is the carrier density of the NbSe$_2$ itinerant background. In the annealing series, the 400 °C and 500 °C samples share the same $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}\mathrm{R}30^\circ$ Cr ordering, yet only the 500 °C sample is ferromagnetic ($T_\mathrm{C}=71$ K), with saturation magnetization about 3/4 of the as-grown Cr$_{1/3}$NbSe$_2$ reference; the Hall coefficient meanwhile evolves monotonically across the series, including a sign change at 600 °C. The authors interpret this as a joint $(r,k_\mathrm{F})$ selection rule for the RKKY exchange $J_\mathrm{RKKY}(r,k_\mathrm{F})\propto F(2k_\mathrm{F}r)/r^n$: the superstructure fixes $r$ at discrete values (2$a_{\mathrm{NbSe}_2}$ = 6.74 Å and $\sqrt{3}a_{\mathrm{NbSe}_2}$ = 5.84 Å), while annealing-induced Se vacancies dope electrons and shift $k_\mathrm{F}$. Ferromagnetism emerges only above a critical annealing temperature, placing the system in a low-carrier-density RKKY regime where modest $k_\mathrm{F}$ tuning crosses an exchange sign reversal. The paper concludes that carrier density and moment geometry are experimentally disentangled in a single crystalline host, and that the MBE-plus-annealing route generalizes across intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 400 °C and 500 °C samples differ only in carrier density, with the Hall coefficient standing in for a direct density measurement in a multicarrier system and with phase fractions and disorder left unquantified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, the same $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}\mathrm{R}30^\circ$ structural class can host both non-ferromagnetic and ferromagnetic ground states, so diffraction alone cannot predict the magnetism of an intercalated TMDC.
  • Carrier density becomes a practical tuning axis: post-growth annealing shifts the Hall response monotonically and, above a threshold, switches on ferromagnetic order with $T_\mathrm{C}=71$ K at 500 °C and $T_\mathrm{C}=84$ K at 600 °C.
  • The low-carrier-density, multicarrier Hall response implies that modest perturbations—annealing, gating, or doping—can move $k_\mathrm{F}$ enough to cross an RKKY exchange oscillation, enabling magnetic-state control at fixed moment spacing.
  • The MBE-plus-annealing protocol is extensible to other intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenides, offering a general route to decouple moment geometry from carrier density in itinerant magnets.
  • The 400 °C intermediate window, where the superstructure has transformed but ferromagnetism has not yet emerged, shows the structural and magnetic transitions need not coincide and defines the experimentally accessible carrier-tuned regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the carrier-density picture is right, electrostatic gating of a 400 °C-annealed film should drive it ferromagnetic without any structural change, giving a reversible test that the irreversible annealing series cannot provide.
  • Editorial inference: the saturation magnetization ratio of about 3/4 suggests the 500 °C sample is a phase mixture of Cr$_{1/3}$NbSe$_2$ and NbSe$_2$; spatially resolved magnetometry could separate percolation of ferromagnetic ordered regions from uniform $k_\mathrm{F}$ tuning.
  • Editorial inference: the Hall coefficient is only a proxy for carrier density in a multicarrier system; a direct Fermi-surface measurement on the 400 °C/500 °C pair would either harden the assignment or reveal a second variable at work.
  • Editorial inference: because $J_\mathrm{RKKY}$ oscillates in $2k_\mathrm{F}r$, a continuously tunable $k_\mathrm{F}$ should produce more than one magnetic-state switch; finer annealing steps could look for further ferromagnet/antiferromagnet oscillations as a test of the RKKY sign-reversal mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports MBE growth of two Cr-intercalated NbSe2 phases, Cr1/4NbSe2 with a 2x2R0° Cr superstructure and Cr1/3NbSe2 with a sqrt3 x sqrt3R30° superstructure, and characterizes them by STEM, XRD, LEED, RHEED, ARPES, Raman, magnetization, and transport, with neutron scattering on a bulk Cr1/4NbSe2 reference. The as-grown phases differ in magnetic ground state (AFM with TN≈50 K in 370-layer Cr1/4NbSe2; FM with TC=71 K in 9-layer Cr1/3NbSe2) and in electronic/transport signatures. The central experiment is a post-growth annealing series on 6-layer Cr1/4NbSe2 films: annealing at 400 °C and 500 °C both transform the superlattice to the sqrt3 x sqrt3R30° class, yet only the 500 °C sample becomes ferromagnetic, while the Hall coefficient evolves systematically across the series. The authors conclude that the carrier density, inferred from Hall measurements, selects the magnetic ground state at fixed moment geometry, and interpret the result within an RKKY framework as evidence of carrier-sensitive RKKY magnetism.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the work would constitute a notable advance: independent tuning of the RKKY variables r and kF within a single crystalline host, using a thin-film plus annealing approach that is in principle generalizable to other intercalated TMDCs. The paper's strengths are its extensive cross-checked structural characterization (LEED, Raman, STEM, XRD, RHEED), the clean distinction between the two as-grown superlattice phases, the neutron-scattering confirmation of the bulk Cr1/4NbSe2 magnetic structure, and the transparency of the transport fits (Supplemental Table S1). The empirical observation that two samples with the same LEED-resolved superlattice can have different magnetic ground states is interesting in its own right. However, the mechanistic conclusion that carrier density is the operative axis is currently under-supported: it relies on a Hall proxy in a multicarrier system and on an unquantified structural equivalence between the 400 °C and 500 °C samples, and the RKKY interpretation is not tested quantitatively. The paper would be suitable for a strong venue if these gaps are addressed or the claims are appropriately softened.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 4, and Supplemental S10] The load-bearing comparison between the 400 °C and 500 °C annealed samples does not establish that they are structurally equivalent in every relevant way except carrier density. LEED and Raman determine superlattice periodicity, not phase fraction, coherent domain size, or chemical homogeneity. Supplemental S10 itself states that, if Cr is conserved, the 2x2-to-sqrt3 transformation should be accompanied by phase separation into 75% Cr1/3NbSe2 plus 25% NbSe2; the 3/4 saturation-magnetization ratio is reported only for the 500 °C sample. Without phase-fraction evidence for the 400 °C sample, the absence of ferromagnetism at 400 °C could stem from a smaller volume fraction of the Cr1/3NbSe2 phase, smaller ferromagnetic domains, or greater disorder, rather than from a different carrier density. This ambiguity directly undermines the central claim that the sqrt3 structural class has a non-unique magnetic ground state selected by carrier density.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 4d; Supplemental Section D, Table S1] The carrier-density axis is inferred entirely from the Hall coefficient R_H in a system that the paper explicitly identifies as multicarrier (Supplemental Section D). In the two-band model of Eqs. S1-S5, the linear Hall coefficient A depends on both carrier densities and mobilities, and annealing-induced Se vacancies can change mobilities as well as carrier numbers. The systematic evolution of R_H across the annealing series therefore does not uniquely identify k_F as the tunable axis; changes in mobility or in the relative weights of electron and hole pockets could produce the same Hall trend without a corresponding shift in k_F. Since the manuscript's title and conclusions assert carrier-tunable RKKY magnetism, a direct carrier-density probe (e.g., quantum oscillations, Seebeck coefficient, or ARPES-derived Fermi-surface volume) or an explicit modeling of R_H in terms of carrier densities is needed to support the operative-axis claim.
  3. [Section V, Eq. (2), and Fig. 5f] The RKKY interpretation is presented without quantitative test. Equation (2) is introduced as an interpretive framework, but no parameter is fitted, no k_F values are extracted from the transport data, and the authors explicitly state in Fig. 5f that 'quantitative calibration to the Cr-NbSe2 band structure is not attempted in this work.' The empirical structure-magnetism decoupling in Fig. 4 could equally be explained by annealing-induced disorder, phase-fraction changes, or modifications of the Cr valence state. As it stands, the paper demonstrates a non-bijective correspondence between superlattice and magnetic ground state, but the conclusion that this correspondence reflects carrier-sensitive RKKY exchange goes beyond the evidence. A model calculation of J_RKKY(r,kF) for these two Cr geometries, or a control experiment that varies carrier density without changing the superlattice or disorder, would be required to substantiate the mechanistic claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Controlled post-growth annealing ... modifies the carrier density while leaving the Cr superstructure intact below a structural-transition threshold' is slightly misleading, because the superstructure changes at 400 °C and 500 °C; consider rewording to make explicit that the structure is preserved only for low annealing temperatures.
  2. [Section IV] The '3/4 ratio' is stated as quantitatively consistent with a 75% Cr1/3NbSe2 + 25% NbSe2 phase mixture, but no error bar or propagation analysis is given; since this ratio is used to support phase conservation, it should be quantified.
  3. [Section V, Fig. 5c] The phase diagram axes and the meaning of the colored bands are only described in the caption; adding labels directly to the figure would improve readability.
  4. [Supplemental Table S1] The table lists R² values but no uncertainties on the fitted coefficients A and C; reporting standard errors would strengthen the claim that the cubic term is robust across all temperatures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the structure–magnetism decoupling claim rests on in-paper LEED, magnetization, and Hall data; RKKY Eq. (2) is explicitly schematic with no fitted parameters, and the self-citations (Refs. 14, 20) are non-essential.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that the 400 °C and 500 °C annealed pieces share the √3×√3R30° Cr superstructure yet differ in magnetic ground state, so that carrier density selects the magnetic state at fixed moment geometry — is an empirical contrast supported by data taken in this work (LEED/Raman for structure, M(T) for magnetism, R_H(T) for the carrier axis), not a quantity derived from a definition. No parameter is fitted to the RKKY expression of Eq. (2): the Fig. 5 caption states that "quantitative calibration to the Cr-NbSe2 band structure is not attempted in this work," and panels d–f are "schematic illustrations consistent with the observed trends." The RKKY formula is therefore an interpretive framing, not a prediction mechanism, so no fitted-input-called-prediction failure occurs. The Table S1 Hall fits (ρ_xy = AH + CH^3) are descriptive fits that do not feed back into the magnetic classification. The self-citations are minor and non-load-bearing: Ref. 14 (co-author Saika et al.) is cited only for the dispersive band character of as-grown Cr1/3NbSe2, while the 71 K T_C and the 3/4 saturation-magnetization comparison used in the annealing argument are measured in this paper; Ref. 20 (companion Yamaoka et al. neutron study) supplies the 120° AFM spin structure of the as-grown phase, which is background context rather than a premise of the non-bijective structure–magnetism argument. The genuine weaknesses are inferential, not circular: Supplemental S10 concedes that the transformation of the superstructure from 2×2R0° to √3×√3R30° "should accompany a phase separation from 100% of Cr1/4NbSe2 to a mixture of 75% of Cr1/3NbSe2 and 25% of NbSe2," yet the phase fractions and disorder at 400 °C are not quantified; R_H is a mobility-weighted proxy in an explicitly multicarrier system (Supplemental D); and one piece per annealing condition leaves sample-to-sample variation unexcluded. These are robustness limitations of the causal inference, not circular reductions, and the structure–magnetism decoupling and the Hall evolution are independent observables. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained at the level the paper claims, and the score reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard RKKY theory and on several domain assumptions about how annealing modifies the films. The most consequential are the electron-donor role of Se vacancies and the use of the Hall coefficient as a kF proxy, neither of which is directly verified by a quantitative carrier density measurement. The phase-separation assumption in S10 is also needed to reconcile the magnetization ratio with Cr conservation.

free parameters (3)
  • A (linear Hall coefficient) = 0.1935 to 0.4625 Ohm/T across 2 to 200 K (Table S1)
    Fit to rho_xy = A H + C H^3 in the as-grown 6L Cr1/4NbSe2 film. Used to demonstrate multicarrier transport; does not enter the central structure-magnetism claim.
  • C (cubic Hall coefficient) = 1.025e-4 to 5.980e-4 Ohm/T^3 across 2 to 200 K
    Same fit; nonzero C establishes two-carrier behavior, supporting the low-carrier-density interpretation but not directly testing the RKKY mechanism.
  • rho(T) exponents alpha = alpha = 2 below T2 and alpha approximately 1.5 between T2 and T*
    Fitted to the 370L Cr1/4NbSe2 resistivity to define the three temperature scales; the exact exponents are descriptive and not load-bearing for the main claim.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math RKKY coupling has the form J_RKKY(r,kF) proportional to F(2 kF r) / r^n (Eq. 2).
    Taken from Refs. [3-5,22] and invoked in Section V to interpret the annealing series as a carrier-density sweep at fixed moment spacing.
  • domain assumption Se vacancies created by annealing donate electrons to the NbSe2 host, so annealing acts as an electron-doping axis.
    This follows Refs. [16,17] and is used in Section IV and S10 to explain the Hall evolution as carrier doping.
  • domain assumption The Cr content is conserved during annealing, so the 2x2 to sqrt3 transformation implies phase separation into 75% Cr1/3NbSe2 + 25% NbSe2.
    Used in S10 and the main text to interpret the 3/4 saturation magnetization ratio of the 500 degree sample.
  • domain assumption The Hall coefficient magnitude and sign evolution can be used as a proxy for carrier density, and hence kF, even in a multicarrier semimetal.
    Section V uses large RH and its monotonic evolution to infer low carrier density; this is an interpretation rather than a direct measurement.
  • domain assumption The 370L Cr1/4NbSe2 film and bulk crystals represent the intrinsic magnetic properties of the 6L film used in the annealing series.
    The 6L film shows no detectable M(T) signature, so the AFM ground state and its temperature scales are extrapolated from thicker and bulk samples.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carrier-tunable RKKY magnetism in a crystalline magnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/56V7UZRV

@misc{pith2026260810574,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carrier-tunable RKKY magnetism in a crystalline magnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/56V7UZRV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10574}
}
abstract

In itinerant magnets governed by the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction, the exchange coupling depends on both the moment-moment distance $r$ and the Fermi wavevector $k_{\mathrm{F}}$, yet in bulk synthesis the two are tightly coupled: a change in composition typically alters both. Here, we use a thin-film approach to tune these two variables independently in a single crystalline host. Using molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE), we stabilize either $2\times2\mathrm{R}0^\circ$ Cr$_{1/4}$NbSe$_2$ or $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}\mathrm{R}30^\circ$ Cr$_{1/3}$NbSe$_2$ within the same NbSe$_2$ host through separate growth windows. Controlled post-growth annealing performed across a series of temperatures then modifies the carrier density while leaving the Cr superstructure intact below a structural-transition threshold. The two as-grown phases are distinct in electronic structure, magnetic ground state, and transport. Along this annealing series, the Hall response evolves systematically while the magnetic response changes in a structurally insensitive manner, with ferromagnetic order emerging within the same $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}\mathrm{R}30^\circ$ structural class only above a critical annealing temperature, experimentally disentangling carrier density and moment geometry. The Hall magnitude and sign evolution point to a low-carrier-density system in which $k_{\mathrm{F}}$ is susceptible to modest external tuning. Cr-NbSe$_2$ thus realizes carrier-sensitive RKKY magnetism in a single crystalline host, within an MBE-plus-annealing approach extensible across the intercalated transition-metal dichalcogenide family.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10574 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Local moments and localized states, Rev. Mod. Phys.50, 191-201 (1978)

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    G. G. Lonzarich, D. Pines, and Y.-F. Yang, Toward a new microscopic framework for Kondo lattice materials, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 024501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect Exchange Cou- pling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Elec- trons, Phys. Rev.96, 99-102 (1954)

    work page 1954

  4. [4]

    Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s Model, Prog

    T. Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro- and Antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s Model, Prog. Theor. Phys.16, 45- 57 (1956)

    work page 1956

  5. [5]

    Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys, Phys

    K. Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu-Mn Alloys, Phys. Rev.106, 893-898 (1957)

    work page 1957

  6. [6]

    Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin glasses: Redux: An updated exper- imental/materials survey, Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 052501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    S. S. P. Parkin, N. More, and K. P. Roche, Oscillations in exchange coupling and magnetoresistance in metallic su- perlattice structures: Co/Ru, Co/Cr, and Fe/Cr, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2304-2307 (1990)

    work page 1990

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Coleman, and M. S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Nan- otechnol.7, 699-712 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Z. Wang, R. Li, C. Su, and K. P. Loh, Intercalated phases of transition metal dichalcogenides, SmartMat1, e1013 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    L. S. Xie, S. Husremovi´ c, O. Gonzalez, I. M. Craig, and D. K. Bediako, Structure and magnetism of iron- and chromium-intercalated niobium and tantalum disulfides, J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 9525-9542 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Koet al., RKKY Ferromagnetism with Ising-Like Spin States in Intercalated Fe 1/4TaS2, Phys

    K.-T. Koet al., RKKY Ferromagnetism with Ising-Like Spin States in Intercalated Fe 1/4TaS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 247201 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    S. S. P. Parkin and R. H. Friend, 3d transition-metal in- tercalates of the niobium and tantalum dichalcogenides. I. Magnetic properties, Philos. Mag. B41, 65-93 (1980)

    1980

  6. [14]

    B. K. Saikaet al., Signature of topological band crossing in ferromagnetic Cr 1/3NbSe2 epitaxial thin film, Phys. Rev. Research4, L042021 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Togawaet al., Chiral Magnetic Soliton Lattice on a Chiral Helimagnet, Phys

    Y. Togawaet al., Chiral Magnetic Soliton Lattice on a Chiral Helimagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 107202 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Bonillaet al., Compositional phase change of early transition metal diselenide VSe 2 and TiSe 2 ultra-thin films by postgrowth annealing, Adv

    M. Bonillaet al., Compositional phase change of early transition metal diselenide VSe 2 and TiSe 2 ultra-thin films by postgrowth annealing, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2000497 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    O. N. Andreeva, I. S. Braude, and A. A. Mamalui, Sele- nium vacancies and their effect on the fine structure of NbSe2 quasi-two-dimensional single crystals, Phys. Met. Metallogr.113, 888-892 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    L. S. Xieet al., Comparative electronic structures of the chiral helimagnets Cr1/3NbS2 and Cr1/3TaS2, Chem. Mater.35, 7239-7251 (2023). 7

    2023

  11. [19]

    Hulliger and E

    F. Hulliger and E. Pobitschka, On the magnetic behavior of new 2H-NbS 2-type derivatives, J. Solid State Chem. 1, 117-119 (1970)

    1970

  12. [21]

    M. P. Erodiciet al., Bridging Structure, Magnetism, and Disorder in Iron-Intercalated Niobium Diselenide, FexNbSe2, belowx= 0.25, J. Phys. Chem. C127, 9787- 9795 (2023)

    2023

  13. [22]

    D. N. Aristov, Indirect RKKY interaction in any dimen- sionality, Phys. Rev. B55, 8064-8066 (1997)

    1997

  14. [23]

    N. H. Joet al., Manipulating of magnetism in the topological semimetal EuCd 2As2, Phys. Rev. B101, 140402(R) (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    X. Y. Chenet al., Carrier-induced transition from an- tiferromagnetic insulator to ferromagnetic metal in the layered phosphide EuZn2P2, Phys. Rev. B109, L180410 (2024)

    2024

  16. [25]

    S. S. Fenderet al., Unconventional superlattice or- dering in intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide V1/3NbS2, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 32315-32320 (2025)

    2025

  17. [26]

    Carrier-tunable RKKY magnetism in a crystalline magnet

    T. Nakajimaet al., Polarized and Unpolarized Neu- tron Scattering for Magnetic Materials at the Triple-axis Spectrometer PONTA in JRR-3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 091002 (2024). 8 FIG. 1.Superstructure-selective epitaxy of Cr-NbSe 2 thin films. a,b,Schematic side-view of the cryst...

    2024

  18. [27]

    T. H. Choudhuryet al., Epitaxial Growth of Two- Dimensional Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.50, 155-177 (2020)

    2020

  19. [28]

    A. Koma, K. Ueno, and K. Saiki, Heteroepitaxial growth by Van der Waals interaction in one-, two- and three- dimensional materials, J. Cryst. Growth111, 1029-1032 (1991)

    1991

  20. [29]

    Yamaokaet al., Magnetic order and excitations in the magnetically intercalated van der Waals material Cr1/4NbSe2, arXiv:2604.07117 (2026)

    R. Yamaokaet al., Magnetic order and excitations in the magnetically intercalated van der Waals material Cr1/4NbSe2, arXiv:2604.07117 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  21. [30]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976)

    1976

  22. [31]

    Fanet al., Excitations of Intercalated Metal Monolayers in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Nano Lett.21, 99- 106 (2020)

    S. Fanet al., Excitations of Intercalated Metal Monolayers in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Nano Lett.21, 99- 106 (2020). 4 TABLE S1.Multi-band fit for the Hall response in the as-grown 6L-thick Cr 1/4NbSe2.Fit form:ρ xy(H) = AH+CH 3 applied to antisymmetrized Hall data fr...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.