Torsional pseudo-inflation beyond Einstein-Cartan

Cristian Quinzacara; Fernando Izaurieta; Samuel Lepe

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Torsional pseudo-inflation beyond Einstein-Cartan

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A spin-fluid torsion bounce can accelerate expansion for at most 0.46 e-folds; an axial torsion condensate can sustain a quasi-de Sitter phase with an algebraic exit.

desk verdict The spin-fluid e-fold budget is settled with a clean 0.46 bound, and the axial-condensate de Sitter background is a new exact solution; the open perturbation sector is the real make-or-break. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11453 v1 pith:OPTWNZZK submitted 2026-08-11 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

Fernando Izaurieta , Samuel Lepe , Cristian Quinzacara This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO

keywords torsionRiemann-Cartangeometryearly-universecosmologyEinstein-CartanbounceGauss-Bonnetcouplingaxialcondensatepseudo-inflationspinfluid

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether torsion can do the work of cosmic inflation. It first settles the budget of the classic spin-fluid mechanism: after the Einstein-Cartan bounce, a barotropic spin fluid with $w\in[0,1]$ produces at most $\frac{1}{3}\ln 4\simeq0.46$ e-folds of acceleration, since spin density dilutes as $a^{-6}$ and positive curvature only narrows the window. The paper then argues that in Riemann-Cartan cosmology with nonminimal couplings the source of torsion need not be spin. On the vectorial branch the theory reduces to the already viable connection-formulation of nonminimal inflation, while on the axial branch a linear Gauss-Bonnet coupling sustains an exact de Sitter background held by a constant axial torsion condensate. That condensate is a homogeneous attractor with eigenvalue $-3H$, ends when the coupling slope reaches the floor $5/(16V_0)$, and forces a near-Planckian Hubble rate, $H\gtrsim0.3$; its perturbation spectrum is not yet computed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the axial torsion condensate on the axial branch of the nonminimally coupled Riemann-Cartan system. With metric and connection independent, the torsion tensor in a Friedmann-Lemaitre background reduces to one vector mode $h(t)$ and one axial mode $f(t)$; the axial mode survives only while the Gauss-Bonnet coupling satisfies $N=8U'\dot\phi Z$ (Eq. 12). On this branch, with $N=1$, $U=u_1\phi$, and $V=V_0$, the constraints fix $Z$, $f_0$, $v$, $u_1$, and $H$ algebraically (Eqs. 14-15), so the torsion fluid acts as a cosmological constant, $\rho_T=3H^2=-p_T$. The same constraint structure supplies the exit: $U'$ decreases with the roll speed and reaches the floor $5/(16V_0)$, where $f_0=0$ and the branch snaps back to the vectorial/no-axial branch.

What would settle it

Compute the full linearized perturbation equations around the exact de Sitter solution (14)-(15) on the axial branch, including metric, scalar, and torsion fluctuations after eliminating the algebraic constraints. If any mode grows, or if the scalar power spectrum is far from scale-invariant, the pseudo-inflation phase is not viable; a simpler preliminary check is to derive the reduced flow $\dot p = F(p)$ from Eqs. (7)-(11) and verify $F'(v)=-3H$ with no additional homogeneous directions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that torsion can sustain a quasi-de Sitter epoch, provided it is sourced by nonminimal couplings rather than by spin. In the Riemann-Cartan system of Eq. (4), the axial torsion mode $f$ survives only on the branch $N=8U'\dot\phi Z$; with $N=1$, $U=u_1\phi$, and a flat potential $V=V_0$, the field equations admit the exact de Sitter background $a=e^{Ht}$, $\dot\phi=v$, $f=f_0$, with the constants locked by $Z^2=v^2+3f_0^2$, $H=(Z^2+f_0^2)/(2Z)$, $u_1=1/(8vZ)$, and $V_0=6f_0^2+\tfrac52 v^2$ (Eq. 15). This condensate is a homogeneous attractor with eigenvalue exactly $-3H$ (Eq. 18), so nearby histories track it; as the coupling slope $U'$ declines with rising roll speed, $f_0^2$ drains to zero at the floor $U'_{\rm floor}=5/(16V_0)$, and the branch snaps back to the torsionless scalar theory. The paper presents this as a background-level result: it is proven for homogeneous dynamics, the perturbation spectrum remains open, and effective-theory consistency requires $H\gtrsim0.3$ in reduced Planck units.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the claim, stated without derivation around Eq. (18), that on the axial branch all homogeneous histories are pulled toward the condensate at a single rate set by $3H$; if that reduction is wrong or another direction grows, the tracking picture, the exit timing, and the e-fold count all collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The spin-fluid Einstein-Cartan bounce cannot by itself provide the needed 50 to 60 e-folds; the accelerated window is at most $\frac13\ln4\simeq0.46$ e-folds for any barotropic index $w\in[0,1]$, so the original torsion-inflation mechanism must be augmented.
The vectorial branch of coupling-sourced torsion is equivalent to the known connection-formulation of nonminimal scalar inflation, so its observational predictions already inherit a viable status.
The axial condensate gives a proof of principle that torsion can sustain a quasi-de Sitter background without slow roll, with an exactly flat potential and an exit written into the constraint structure rather than into the potential.
Any successful use of the axial branch operates near the Planck scale: the cutoff $\Lambda=1/U'$ together with the branch condition forces $H\gtrsim0.3$ in reduced Planck units, a narrow corridor.
The paper's claims are background-level; the perturbation spectrum, stability, and reheating history of the axial branch remain open, so the mechanism is not yet established as a complete cosmology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference (beyond the paper): if the deferred perturbation calculation gives a nearly scale-invariant curvature spectrum, this becomes a distinct inflationary mechanism with no slow roll, and the parity-odd background $f_0\neq0$ could imprint chiral correlations (TB and EB) in the microwave background.
Inference (beyond the paper): the two results suggest a natural two-stage historical sequence in one theory, with the spin-fluid bounce igniting expansion and the same nonminimal couplings then taking over as the condensate; the handover at the branch snap is a concrete numerical problem.
Inference (beyond the paper): because consistency forces a near-Planckian operating point, generic higher-curvature operators are likely unsuppressed; appending such operators to Eq. (4) and checking whether the exact de Sitter solution survives would be a direct robustness test.
Inference (beyond the paper): the branch-snap exit is a constraint-driven transition rather than a potential-driven one, so its gravitational-wave and reheating signatures could distinguish the condensate from ordinary slow-roll inflation once perturbations are computed.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version first. Two genuinely useful things here. One is a clean, parameter-free upper bound on the accelerated phase after the Einstein-Cartan spin-fluid bounce: at most (1/3) ln 4 ≈ 0.46 e-folds, for any barotropic index between dust and stiff matter, with positive curvature making it shorter. The other is an exact de Sitter background on the axial branch of the nonminimally coupled torsion cosmology, held up by a constant axial torsion condensate with no slow roll. Both survive contact with the algebra.

The budget bound is the cleanest part of the paper. Spin density dilutes as a^{-6}; the acceleration window between s^2=4ρ and s^2=(1+3w)ρ closes after the stated number. I re-derived it; it is correct. This is a genuinely useful negative result, and the paper states it without drama. The vectorial branch is honestly identified as Palatini inflation in torsional clothing, with its known observables, so that half of the paper is a translation, not a claim.

The axial solution (Eqs. 14-15) is new, as far as I can tell, and it does satisfy the displayed field equations. The one thing that worried me was Eq. (18), the attractor eigenvalue F'(v)=-3H, which the paper states as 'comes out' without showing the flow. I re-derived the single-flow reduction from the constraints and linearized at two benchmark points; the identity holds. The adiabatic tracking of a slowly varying U'(φ) is also controlled for the worked profile, and the e-fold integral reproduces.

The real load-bearing gap is perturbations. The authors are explicit: 'Nothing in this work is a statement about the perturbations of the axial branch.' That honesty matters, but it also means the phase is not yet an inflation mechanism. If the quadratic action has ghosts or gradient instabilities, or if the tensor spectrum is non-standard, the exact background does not rescue it. Footnote 8 adds that the axial fluctuation's algebraic determination loses rank exactly at the snap, so the final stretch and handover are uncontrolled at linear order. The paper deserves credit for saying this rather than burying it in prose.

Two lesser caveats. The operating point is forced near the Planck scale (H≳0.3 in reduced Planck units) to remain within the effective theory, and the authors flag the generic UV-operator problem themselves. The spin-fluid budget assumes the Weyssenhoff description at face value, but the conclusion is robust because no w rescues the window.

Citation pattern is fine: the field equations come from Ref. [15], which is one author's earlier framework, but the axial solution and the budget bound are new. Self-citation here is contextual, not padding.

Who is this for: torsion cosmologists and anyone cataloging alternatives to slow-roll inflation. It is a serious background-level contribution with one clean negative result and one new exact solution. It is not a complete inflationary model, and it does not pretend to be. Send it to peer review; a good referee will spend most of the time on perturbations, but the paper's positive results are real and its limitations are honestly declared.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies whether torsion can sustain a quasi-de Sitter phase in early-universe cosmology. It first derives a kinematic budget for the Einstein-Cartan spin-fluid bounce, showing that for any barotropic index w in [0,1] the accelerated window after the bounce is at most (1/3) ln 4 ≈ 0.46 e-folds, and that positive spatial curvature only shortens it. It then moves to Riemann-Cartan cosmology with a nonminimally coupled scalar, where torsion is sourced by couplings rather than by spin. The vectorial torsion branch is shown to reproduce Palatini inflation with its known observables. The axial branch, which requires a Gauss-Bonnet coupling, is the paper's main new result: the authors exhibit an exact de Sitter solution with constant axial torsion f0, constant scalar velocity v, linear coupling U = u1 phi, and flat potential, with the constants locked by Eqs. (14)-(15). They claim this solution is an attractor of the homogeneous dynamics with eigenvalue exactly -3H, that the phase exits when U' reaches the floor 5/(16 V0), and that effective-theory consistency places the episode near the Planck scale. The perturbation spectrum of the axial branch is explicitly left open.

Significance. If the background claims hold, the paper gives a clean negative result for the original spin-fluid torsion-inflation proposal, and a constructive two-branch alternative in which torsion is sustained by couplings. The budget bound in Eq. (3) is a genuinely parameter-free kinematic statement, and the exact solution in Eqs. (14)-(15) is a concrete, checkable contribution to Riemann-Cartan cosmology: an algebraic, non-propagating axial torsion condensate that supports an exact de Sitter background without slow-roll. The identification of the vectorial branch with Palatini inflation is useful and connects the framework to an observationally viable program. The paper is also commendably explicit about its limitations: it states that the perturbation spectrum of the axial branch is open and that the exit handover needs numerical treatment. The main significance gap is that the cosmological viability of 'pseudo-inflation' on the axial branch is precisely what remains unestablished: without a perturbative analysis, the background attractor cannot yet be connected to observable predictions.

major comments (2)

[§5, Eq. (18)] The claim that the axial-branch homogeneous dynamics reduce to a single first-order flow p_dot = F(p) with F'(v) = -3H is load-bearing for the adiabatic tracking, the exit timing, and the e-fold estimate, but the function F(p) is never displayed and the eigenvalue is asserted rather than derived. As written, the reader cannot check that the reduction captures all directions on the constraint surface or that the eigenvalue is exactly -3H. Please derive F(p) explicitly and show the linearization at the fixed point, or move this derivation to an appendix.
[§5 (after Eq. (17)) and §6] The manuscript explicitly leaves the perturbation spectrum of the axial branch open, stating that 'nothing in this work is a statement about the perturbations of the axial branch,' and the snap discussion notes that the algebraic determination of the axial fluctuation loses rank exactly at the exit. Since the paper presents this phase as 'pseudo-inflation,' the perturbation sector is not a peripheral issue: it is the condition under which the axial branch could play an inflationary role. I therefore ask either for a perturbative analysis (at minimum, the quadratic action and stability of the homogeneous background against inhomogeneous perturbations) or for a clear re-scoping of the abstract and title so that the claims are explicitly limited to the background solution, with the perturbation sector identified as a necessary precondition for the inflationary interpretation.

minor comments (5)

[§5, after Eq. (15)] The sentence 'It is possible to verify that (14)-(15) solves all five equations' is vague; since the verification is claimed to be direct, please state that it follows by substitution or show the key algebra in one line.
[§5, Eq. (19)] The effective cutoff Lambda = 1/U' is introduced as 'naive,' yet it is used to pin the Hubble scale to H ≳ 0.3 in reduced Planck units. Please label this estimate explicitly as heuristic and clarify the dimensionful convention for U(phi) and Lambda, since the bound is presented as a 'sharp feature' of the mechanism.
[§2, Eq. (3) and footnote 1] The main text says that positive spatial curvature shrinks the accelerated window, while footnote 1 notes that open curvature widens it. The qualification is important and should appear in the main text alongside Eq. (3), to avoid an apparent contradiction for readers who skip footnotes.
[§1 and §3] The field equations (7)-(11) are imported from Ref. [15] and the companion paper [17]. A brief appendix or a more explicit mapping of the displayed equations to the numbering in Ref. [15] would make the paper more self-contained, given that several subsequent claims rest on this system.
[§5] There are minor stylistic informalities, such as the parenthetical 'which nothing here forbids!' in the effective-theory discussion; these do not affect the substance but are out of place in a formal research paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exact condensate and attractor follow from the displayed field equations; self-citations are not load-bearing and the open perturbation sector is an acknowledged limitation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The spin-fluid budget of Sec. 2 follows from the Friedmann pair (1) and the a^{-6} dilution of the spin density, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The axial-branch exact de Sitter solution (14)-(15) is an algebraic solution of the displayed system (7)-(11): the branch condition (12), the h-constraint, the Friedmann constraint and the scalar equation fix u_1, V_0, Z and H without observational input, and the constants can be substituted back into the equations. The attractor statement F'(v)=-3H in Eq. (18) is asserted without derivation, but it is not imported from a self-citation; it is a computable consequence of the same constraints, and direct linearization of the reduced one-dimensional flow at the paper's own benchmarks reproduces the claimed eigenvalue. The adiabatic promotion of u_1 to U'(phi) and the exit condition (17) are standard slaving arguments, supported by the explicit bound on the adiabaticity ratio in the worked profile. The vectorial branch is explicitly identified with known Palatini inflation, so no known result is renamed as new. Self-citations occur, notably Ref. [15] for the field-equation system, but those equations are general, parameter-free field equations whose stated assumptions do not include the target condensate solution, so the citation is not load-bearing in a circular sense. The paper explicitly leaves the perturbation sector open ('Nothing in this work is a statement about the perturbations of the axial branch'), which is a genuine limitation on cosmological relevance but not a circularity. No step reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the imported field equations of Ref. [15] and on a set of model-building choices, namely N=1, linear U, flat V, and a chosen U'(phi) profile. The exact solution itself is derived within the paper, but the hand-set parameters and ad hoc tracking assumptions delimit how much of the quasi-de Sitter story is proven rather than chosen.

free parameters (3)

V0 = 17/2 in benchmark
Height of the exactly flat potential, chosen by hand so the benchmark solution has v=f0=1. For general V0 the condensate family is fixed by V0 = 5/2 v^2 + 6 f0^2.
phi_c = about 75 for 60 e-folds
Width of the U'(phi) plateau in the worked profile. It sets the e-fold count N_e about 0.81 phi_c and the field excursion about 62 Planck units. It is a model-building knob, not a prediction.
U'(phi) profile = 1/16 [1+(phi/phi_c)^2]^{-1}
Ad hoc smoothly descending slope chosen for a concrete example; nothing in the action fixes this shape.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The field equations (7)-(11) from Ref. [15] are correct and complete for action (4).
The exact solution is verified against these equations, not against the action directly; an error in the imported equations would invalidate the condensate branch.
domain assumption FLRW symmetry reduces torsion to vector and axial components with h0=h(t), f0=f(t).
Standard cosmological principle applied to Riemann-Cartan geometry; quoted from Ref. [15].
domain assumption Unpolarized Weyssenhoff spin fluid with s^2 proportional to n^2 proportional to a^-6.
Imported from the Einstein-Cartan spin-fluid literature and used for the budget bound; the paper notes its conclusion does not depend on the fine print of the averaging.
ad hoc to paper Adiabatic tracking: a slowly varying U'(phi) can be promoted from the constant u1 solution.
Used for the exit and e-fold count; licensed by the underived attractor result Eq. (18) and checked in the example by the ratio |U'' dotphi /3H U'| < 10^-2.
ad hoc to paper Effective cutoff Lambda = 1/U' for the Gauss-Bonnet operator.
Used to derive the bound H >= 0.3; the paper calls it a naive cutoff and admits higher-curvature operators are not obviously suppressed.
domain assumption Barotropic matter with w in [0,1] for the budget bound.
Covers dust to stiff matter for the spin-fluid budget; wider ranges of w are not considered.

invented entities (1)

Axial torsion condensate f0
purpose: Holds the exact de Sitter background on the axial branch; a constant axial torsion sustained by the Gauss-Bonnet coupling rather than by spin.
No observable signature outside the model is computed; the perturbation spectrum is open, so there is no independent falsifiable handle yet.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Torsional pseudo-inflation beyond Einstein-Cartan." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OPTWNZZK

@misc{pith2026260811453,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Torsional pseudo-inflation beyond Einstein-Cartan},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OPTWNZZK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11453}
}

abstract

Torsion entered early-universe cosmology twice: through the nonsingular Einstein--Cartan bounce, where the quantum spin of fermions halts the contraction, and through the proposal that the expansion following that bounce could take over the duties of cosmic inflation. We revisit the second idea in a constructive spirit. First we compute its budget: for a Weyssenhoff spin fluid with barotropic source, $w\in\left[0,1\right]$, the accelerated window that follows the bounce spans $N_e=\ln\left[4/\left(1+3w\right)\right]/3\left(1-w\right)\leq\tfrac{1}{3}\ln4\simeq0.46$ e-folds, and positive spatial curvature only shrinks it. The mechanism is sound; its torsional ``fuel'' dilutes as $a^{-6}$, and the engine stops two orders of magnitude short of inflationary needs. We then ask what torsion would need in order to sustain a quasi-de Sitter phase, and give a two-branch answer in Riemann--Cartan cosmology with nonminimal couplings, where torsion is fed by the couplings rather than by spin. The vectorial branch reproduces Palatini inflation, observationally alive. On the axial branch we exhibit an exact de Sitter solution sustained by a torsion condensate: constant axial torsion $f_{0}$, a linear Gauss--Bonnet coupling, and a potential fixed to $V_{0}=6f_{0}^{2}+\tfrac{5}{2}v^{2}$ by the Friedmann constraint. The solution is an attractor of the homogeneous dynamics, with eigenvalue exactly $-3H$. The phase ends when the slope $U^{\prime}$, a decreasing function of the roll speed at fixed flat potential, drifts down to the floor $5/16V_{0}$ and the condensate switches itself off; consistency of the effective theory pins the whole episode near the Planck scale, $H\gtrsim0.3$ in reduced Planck units. We studied this branch at background level; its perturbation spectrum remains open.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11453 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

[15]

Non-minimally coupled scalar field cosmology with torsion,

A. Cid, F. Izaurieta, G. Leon, P. Medina and D. Narbona, “Non-minimally coupled scalar field cosmology with torsion,” JCAP04(2018) 041, arXiv:1704.04563 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2018
[1]

Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory,

M. Gasperini, “Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986) 2873

work page 1986
[2]

Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation,

N. J. Pop lawski, “Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation,” Phys. Lett. B 694(2010) 181 [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B701(2011) 672], arXiv:1007.0587 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2010
[3]

Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling,

N. J. Pop lawski, “Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling,” Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 107502, arXiv:1111.4595 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2012
[4]

Universe in a black hole in Einstein$-$Cartan gravity

N. J. Pop lawski, “Universe in a black hole in Einstein-Cartan gravity,” Astrophys. J.832 (2016) 96, arXiv:1410.3881 [gr-qc]. 10

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[5]

Big bounce and closed universe from spin and torsion

G. Unger and N. Pop lawski, “Big bounce and closed universe from spin and torsion,” Astro- phys. J.870(2019) 78, arXiv:1808.08327 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[6]

Thermal fluctuations in Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble-Dirac bouncing cosmology

N. J. Pop lawski, “Thermal fluctuations in Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble-Dirac bouncing cos- mology,” arXiv:1201.0316 [astro-ph.CO] (unpublished)

work page Pith review arXiv
[7]

General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,

F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick and J. M. Nester, “General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,” Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1976) 393

work page 1976

Show all 48 references

[8]

Spin and torsion may avert gravitational singularities,

A. Trautman, “Spin and torsion may avert gravitational singularities,” Nature Phys. Sci.242 (1973) 7

1973
[9]

Torsion cosmology and the accelerating universe,

K.-F. Shie, J. M. Nester and H.-J. Yo, “Torsion cosmology and the accelerating universe,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 023522, arXiv:0805.3834 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[10]

Alleviating the Hubble tension with Torsion Condensation (TorC),

S. Legner, W. Handley, W. Barker and A. Ormondroyd, “Alleviating the Hubble tension with Torsion Condensation (TorC),” JCAP03(2026) 003, arXiv:2507.09228 [astro-ph.CO]

2026
[11]

Inflating and reheating the Universe with an independent affine connection,

A. Salvio, “Inflating and reheating the Universe with an independent affine connection,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 103510, arXiv:2207.08830 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[12]

Einstein-Cartan pseudoscalaron inflation,

A. Di Marco, E. Orazi and G. Pradisi, “Einstein-Cartan pseudoscalaron inflation,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 146, arXiv:2309.11345 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[13]

Inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity,

I. D. Gialamas and K. Tamvakis, “Inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044007, arXiv:2410.16364 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[14]

Geometrical origin of inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity,

G. K. Karananas, “Geometrical origin of inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity,” Phys. Lett. B862(2025) 139343, arXiv:2501.16416 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[16]

Cosmology with scalar-Euler form coupling,

A. Toloza and J. Zanelli, “Cosmology with scalar-Euler form coupling,” Class. Quantum Grav. 30(2013) 135003, arXiv:1301.0821 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[17]

From cold dark matter to apparent phantom energy: the equation of state of cosmological torsion,

F. Izaurieta, S. Lepe and C. Quinzacara, “From cold dark matter to apparent phantom energy: the equation of state of cosmological torsion,” companion paper, submitted to Phys. Dark Univ. (2026). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7227888

2026
[18]

No late-time role for adiabatic torsion: a no-go result for Hubble-cutoff holographic dark energy in Einstein–Cartan cosmology,

F. Izaurieta, S. Lepe and C. Quinzacara, “No late-time role for adiabatic torsion: a no-go result for Hubble-cutoff holographic dark energy in Einstein–Cartan cosmology,” arXiv:2607.16370 [gr-qc], submitted to Eur. Phys. J. C (2026)

2026 arXiv
[19]

Higgs inflation in Einstein-Cartan gravity,

M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov and S. Zell, “Higgs inflation in Einstein-Cartan gravity,” JCAP02(2021) 008 [Erratum: JCAP10(2021) E01], arXiv:2007.14978 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[20]

Einstein-Cartan gravity, matter, and scale-invariant generalization,

M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov and S. Zell, “Einstein-Cartan gravity, matter, and scale-invariant generalization,” JHEP10(2020) 177, arXiv:2007.16158 [hep-th]

2020 arXiv
[21]

Matter matters in Einstein- Cartan gravity,

G. K. Karananas, M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin and S. Zell, “Matter matters in Einstein- Cartan gravity,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 064036, arXiv:2106.13811 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[22]

Progress in Einstein-Cartan gravity,

M. Shaposhnikov, “Progress in Einstein-Cartan gravity,” arXiv:2506.11847 [gr-qc]. 11

arXiv
[23]

Higgs inflation with the Holst and the Nieh-Yan term,

M. L˚ angvik, J.-M. Ojanper¨ a, S. Raatikainen and S. R¨ as¨ anen, “Higgs inflation with the Holst and the Nieh-Yan term,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083514, arXiv:2007.12595 [astro-ph.CO]

2021 arXiv
[24]

Inflation with non-minimal coupling: metric versus Palatini formulations,

F. Bauer and D. A. Demir, “Inflation with non-minimal coupling: metric versus Palatini formulations,” Phys. Lett. B665(2008) 222, arXiv:0803.2664 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[25]

Higgs inflation with loop corrections in the Palatini formula- tion,

S. R¨ as¨ anen and P. Wahlman, “Higgs inflation with loop corrections in the Palatini formula- tion,” JCAP11(2017) 047, arXiv:1709.07853 [astro-ph.CO]

2017 arXiv
[26]

Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini infla- tion,

T. Tenkanen, “Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini infla- tion,” Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 33, arXiv:2001.10135 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[27]

Relativistic dynamics of spin-fluids and spin-particles,

J. Weyssenhoff and A. Raabe, “Relativistic dynamics of spin-fluids and spin-particles,” Acta Phys. Polon.9(1947) 7

1947
[28]

The earliest evolutionary stages of the universe and space-time torsion,

I. S. Nurgaliev and W. N. Ponomariev, “The earliest evolutionary stages of the universe and space-time torsion,” Phys. Lett. B130(1983) 378

1983
[29]

The Weyssenhoff fluid in Einstein-Cartan theory,

Y. N. Obukhov and V. A. Korotky, “The Weyssenhoff fluid in Einstein-Cartan theory,” Class. Quantum Grav.4(1987) 1633

1987
[30]

Classical big-bounce cosmology: dynamical analysis of a homogeneous and irrotational Weyssenhoff fluid,

S. D. Brechet, M. P. Hobson and A. N. Lasenby, “Classical big-bounce cosmology: dynamical analysis of a homogeneous and irrotational Weyssenhoff fluid,” Class. Quantum Grav.25 (2008) 245016, arXiv:0807.2523 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[31]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

Planck Collaboration, Y. Akramiet al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[32]

Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein-Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology,

J. Stingley, “Dynamical systems analysis of an Einstein-Cartan ekpyrotic nonsingular bounce cosmology,” Gen. Rel. Grav.58(2026) 46, arXiv:2512.11885 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[33]

Evolution of the early universe in Einstein-Cartan theory,

Q. Huang, H. Huang, B. Xu and K. Zhang, “Evolution of the early universe in Einstein-Cartan theory,” Universe11(2025) 147, arXiv:2404.10400 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[34]

Cosmology and particle pair production via gravitational spin-spin interaction in the Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble theory of gravity,

G. D. Kerlick, “Cosmology and particle pair production via gravitational spin-spin interaction in the Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble theory of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 3004

1975
[35]

Cosmology with a spin,

J. Magueijo, T. G. Z lo´ snik and T. W. B. Kibble, “Cosmology with a spin,” Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 063504, arXiv:1212.0585 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[36]

Fermi-bounce cosmology and scale invariant power-spectrum,

S. Alexander, C. Bambi, A. Marcian` o and L. Modesto, “Fermi-bounce cosmology and scale invariant power-spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 123510, arXiv:1402.5880 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[37]

Fermi-bounce cosmology and the fermion curvaton mechanism,

S. Alexander, Y.-F. Cai and A. Marcian` o, “Fermi-bounce cosmology and the fermion curvaton mechanism,” Phys. Lett. B745(2015) 97, arXiv:1406.1456 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[38]

Cosmological principle and torsion,

M. Tsamparlis, “Cosmological principle and torsion,” Phys. Lett. A75(1979) 27

1979
[39]

Gauss-Bonnet inflation,

P. Kanti, R. Gannouji and N. Dadhich, “Gauss-Bonnet inflation,” Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 041302, arXiv:1503.01579 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Improved Constraints on Primordial Grav- itational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Ob- serving Season,

BICEP/Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Adeet al., “Improved Constraints on Primordial Grav- itational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Ob- serving Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 151301, arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]. 12

2021
[41]

Wave operators, torsion, and Weitzenb¨ ock identities,

J. Barrientos, F. Izaurieta, E. Rodr´ ıguez and O. Valdivia, “Wave operators, torsion, and Weitzenb¨ ock identities,” Gen. Rel. Grav.54(2022) 26, arXiv:1903.04712 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[42]

Grav- itational Faraday–Cartan effect beyond gravitomagnetism due to dark matter intrinsic spin,

F. Barriga, F. Izaurieta, S. Lepe, P. Meza, J. Mu˜ noz, C. Quinzacara and O. Valdivia, “Grav- itational Faraday–Cartan effect beyond gravitomagnetism due to dark matter intrinsic spin,” JCAP02(2025) 003, arXiv:2409.15509 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[43]

The Spin Tensor of Dark Matter and the Hubble Parameter Tension,

F. Izaurieta, S. Lepe and O. Valdivia, “The Spin Tensor of Dark Matter and the Hubble Parameter Tension,” Phys. Dark Univ.30(2020) 100662, arXiv:2004.13163 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[44]

Cosmological Dark Matter Amplification through Dark Torsion,

F. Izaurieta and S. Lepe, “Cosmological Dark Matter Amplification through Dark Torsion,” Class. Quantum Grav.37(2020) 205004, arXiv:2004.06058 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[45]

Non-zero torsion and late cosmology,

M. Cruz, F. Izaurieta and S. Lepe, “Non-zero torsion and late cosmology,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80(2020) 559, arXiv:2005.04550 [gr-qc]

2020 arXiv
[46]

Gravitational waves in Einstein–Cartan theory: On the effects of dark matter spin tensor,

E. Elizalde, F. Izaurieta, C. Riveros, G. Salgado and O. Valdivia, “Gravitational waves in Einstein–Cartan theory: On the effects of dark matter spin tensor,” Phys. Dark Univ.40 (2023) 101197, arXiv:2204.00090 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Luminal propagation of gravitational waves in scalar-tensor theories: The case for torsion,

J. Barrientos, F. Cordonier-Tello, C. Corral, F. Izaurieta, P. Medina, E. Rodr´ ıguez and O. Val- divia, “Luminal propagation of gravitational waves in scalar-tensor theories: The case for torsion,” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 124039, arXiv:1910.00148 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[48]

Cosmological inflation driven by a scalar torsion function,

T. M. Guimar˜ aes, R. de C. Lima and S. H. Pereira, “Cosmological inflation driven by a scalar torsion function,” Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 271, arXiv:2011.13906 [gr-qc]. 13

2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [15]

Non-minimally coupled scalar field cosmology with torsion,

A. Cid, F. Izaurieta, G. Leon, P. Medina and D. Narbona, “Non-minimally coupled scalar field cosmology with torsion,” JCAP04(2018) 041, arXiv:1704.04563 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2018

[2] [1]

Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory,

M. Gasperini, “Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986) 2873

work page 1986

[3] [2]

Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation,

N. J. Pop lawski, “Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation,” Phys. Lett. B 694(2010) 181 [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B701(2011) 672], arXiv:1007.0587 [astro-ph.CO]

arXiv 2010

[4] [3]

Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling,

N. J. Pop lawski, “Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling,” Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 107502, arXiv:1111.4595 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2012

[5] [4]

Universe in a black hole in Einstein$-$Cartan gravity

N. J. Pop lawski, “Universe in a black hole in Einstein-Cartan gravity,” Astrophys. J.832 (2016) 96, arXiv:1410.3881 [gr-qc]. 10

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

[6] [5]

Big bounce and closed universe from spin and torsion

G. Unger and N. Pop lawski, “Big bounce and closed universe from spin and torsion,” Astro- phys. J.870(2019) 78, arXiv:1808.08327 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[7] [6]

Thermal fluctuations in Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble-Dirac bouncing cosmology

N. J. Pop lawski, “Thermal fluctuations in Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble-Dirac bouncing cos- mology,” arXiv:1201.0316 [astro-ph.CO] (unpublished)

work page Pith review arXiv

[8] [7]

General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,

F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick and J. M. Nester, “General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,” Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1976) 393

work page 1976