Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Two routes to quantum anomalous Hall states in altermagnets

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two perturbations turn altermagnets into quantum anomalous Hall insulators.

desk verdict Solid mean-field paper with a clean C=1 route and a distinctive C=2 route that rests on a metastable branch whose local-minimum status is never demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12124 v1 pith:7KP7LY6D submitted 2026-08-12 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Makoto Naka , Shuntaro Sumita , Yukitoshi Motome , Hitoshi Seo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetquantumanomalousHalleffectChernnumberRashbaspin-orbitcouplingHubbardmodelstaggeredpotentialmetastabletopologicalstateconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a topologically trivial altermagnet can be turned into a quantum anomalous Hall insulator by either of two experimentally feasible perturbations. In a minimal square-lattice Hubbard model with antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling and Rashba-type spin-orbit coupling, a staggered potential (realizable by uniaxial strain) produces a ground state with Chern number $C=1$ and Hall conductivity $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=e^2/h$, while a perpendicular magnetic field produces a metastable state with $C=2$ and $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=2e^2/h$ during magnetic hysteresis. The claim matters because altermagnets have collinear antiferromagnetic order and no net magnetization, yet break time-reversal symmetry macroscopically; these routes avoid idealized lattices and point to realistic platforms such as strained altermagnetic films and molecular systems with heavy transition-metal ions. The topological transitions are governed by gap closings at the Brillouin-zone boundary, and the paper shows that the number of gap-closing points sets the Chern number.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-site square-lattice Hubbard model with three ingredients: antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling $\lambda_A$, which removes certain mirror symmetries and imposes the orthorhombic altermagnetic symmetry; Rashba-type spin-orbit coupling $\lambda_R$, which drives band inversion across the antiferromagnetic gap; and one of two perturbations, a staggered potential $\Delta$ or a Zeeman field $h$, which gaps the inverted crossing. The mean-field self-consistent solution produces an altermagnetic state with an antiferromagnetic moment along $x$ and a weak ferromagnetic moment along $z$; the Rashba term reduces the gap along $M$-$X$ and inverts the valence and conduction bands. The symmetry of the perturbation fixes the topology through the pattern of gap closings at the Brillouin-zone boundary: the staggered potential breaks the twofold rotation about the bond midpoint, so the gap closes on only one side of $X$ and yields $C=1$, whereas the magnetic field preserves that rotation, forcing simultaneous closings on both sides and yielding $C=2$. The Chern number is evaluated with a gauge-invariant lattice discretization of the Berry curvature over the two occupied bands.

What would settle it

A numerically exact finite-size calculation for the same model at $U/t=1.5$, $\lambda_A/t=\lambda_R/t=0.1$, and $\Delta/t=0.01$ would settle whether the $C=1$ quantized gap survives beyond mean field; for the second route, a magnetization-field sweep on a candidate altermagnet film that shows no hysteresis loop, or no plateau at $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=2e^2/h$ on the metastable branch, would falsify the $C=2$ prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that band inversion induced by Rashba spin-orbit coupling across the antiferromagnetic gap of an altermagnet, combined with a symmetry-breaking perturbation, converts an otherwise topologically trivial altermagnetic insulator into quantized anomalous Hall states. With a staggered potential that makes the two glide-related sublattices inequivalent, the trivial state becomes a $C=1$ topological altermagnetic ground state with Hall conductivity $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=e^2/h$; the topological transition occurs through a single gap closing on one side of the $X$ point along the $M$-$X$-$M$ line. With a perpendicular magnetic field, the same trivial state develops a metastable branch inside the magnetic hysteresis loop of the weak ferromagnetic moment; this branch undergoes simultaneous gap closings on both sides of the $X$ point and supports a $C=2$ state with Hall conductivity $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=2e^2/h$. The paper establishes that the number of gap-closing points at the zone boundary is the quantity that determines the Chern number, and that ribbon-geometry edge states are chiral and spin-polarized along $z$: one spin-polarized chiral channel per edge for $C=1$, and two channels per edge with opposite spin polarizations but identical propagation direction for $C=2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the mean-field solution at moderate interaction ($U/t \approx 1.5$, $\lambda_A/t=\lambda_R/t=0.1$) correctly describes both the ground state and the metastable hysteresis branch, so the band inversions and quantized Hall responses survive electron-correlation fluctuations beyond mean field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Uniaxial compression or tension along $[110]$ or $[1\bar{1}0]$ in an altermagnetic thin film should produce a strain-controlled $C=1$ quantum anomalous Hall state with $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=e^2/h$ at half filling.
  • A magnetic-field sweep that reverses the weak ferromagnetic moment should pass through a metastable $C=2$ state with $\lvert\sigma_{xy}\rvert=2e^2/h$, making a quantized Hall plateau observable during hysteresis.
  • The two topological states carry distinct spin-polarized chiral edge transport: a single spin-polarized channel per edge in the $C=1$ state, and two oppositely spin-polarized channels moving in the same direction per edge in the $C=2$ state.
  • Compensated ferrimagnetic thin films, which are symmetry-equivalent to the strained altermagnet, should also realize the quantized Hall state without external strain.
  • The required Rashba coupling strength $\lambda_R/t \approx 0.1$ is within reach of transition-metal-oxide interfaces and molecular $\pi$-$d$ systems containing heavy $5d$ ions, so the routes identify concrete material platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the $C=1$ and $C=2$ states are confirmed, the same two-perturbation logic may extend to other altermagnet space groups, where the symmetry operation connecting opposite-spin sublattices could produce gap-closing patterns with Chern numbers other than 1 and 2.
  • Beyond the paper: the metastable $C=2$ state being reachable only inside a hysteresis loop suggests a field-history-controlled topological switch, in which the same sample can be cycled between trivial, strained $C=1$, and field-driven $C=2$ states.
  • Beyond the paper: the mean-field prediction of a metastable branch with quantized $2e^2/h$ depends on fluctuations not destabilizing it; a direct numerical check of the same model at the quoted couplings would test whether the hysteresis loop and the $C=2$ plateau survive beyond mean-field theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a minimal two-site square-lattice Hubbard model with antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling and Rashba spin-orbit coupling, solved in the Hartree-Fock approximation, as a platform for quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) states in altermagnets. In the absence of external fields, the model realizes a topologically trivial altermagnetic insulator with a weak ferromagnetic moment at representative parameters U/t=1.5, λA/t=λR/t=0.1. The authors demonstrate two routes to QAH states: (i) a staggered potential stabilizes a C=1 altermagnetic ground state with |σxy|=e^2/h, and (ii) a perpendicular magnetic field produces a C=2 state with |σxy|=2e^2/h on a branch labeled metastable, claimed to be part of a magnetic hysteresis loop. The paper supports these claims with band-structure gap closings, non-Abelian Chern numbers, Hall conductivity from the Kubo formula, and ribbon edge-state spectra.

Significance. The bulk topological calculations are internally consistent and form the paper's clear strength: the quantized σxy and Chern numbers agree with each other, and the ribbon edge states show the correct number of chiral modes for the C=1 and C=2 states. If the second route is physically realized, the paper introduces a simple, symmetry-based mechanism for QAH states in altermagnets, including an intriguing hidden metastable phase, without requiring engineered lattices. However, the second route depends on the nontrivial assertion that the followed Hartree-Fock branch is a genuine metastable local minimum, and this assertion is not supported by the presented data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III C and Fig. 4] The existence of the C=2 topological phase rests entirely on the claim that the circular-symbol branch is a metastable state reached during a hysteresis loop, but the manuscript provides no energy or stability analysis for this branch. In the Hartree-Fock approximation, every self-consistent solution is a stationary point of the mean-field energy functional, but it need not be a local minimum; a saddle-point solution would satisfy the same equations and would not be physically accessible as a metastable state. The authors should present the Hartree-Fock energy of both branches as functions of h, show that the circular branch lies above the square-symbol ground-state branch where both exist, and check the local stability of the circular branch (e.g., by evaluating the eigenvalues of the second derivative of the mean-field energy with respect to the local mean-fields, or by an equivalent small-perturbation test). Without such analysis, the 'hysteresis loop' in Fig. 4(a) and the magnetic-field route to the quantized Hall effect are not established.
  2. [Sec. III C, near h/t≈0.012] The text describes the metastable solution as 'ceas[ing] to exist' and 'merg[ing] into the ground-state branch' and thereby infers a first-order-like transition, but no energy comparison is shown across this field range. It is necessary to demonstrate that the lower-energy solution is indeed the square-symbol branch for all h and to quantify the energy barrier between the branches if the loop is to be called a hysteresis loop. This is a second, closely related consequence of the missing stability analysis and should be addressed in the same revision.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos, including 'absecnce' in Sec. II, 'accompnanied' and 'transiton' in Sec. III B, and 'conductvitity' in Sec. III B; the manuscript should be proofread.
  2. [Figs. 3(e) and 4(c)] The label 'Chern number of the occupied band manifold, −C' is confusing because the main text refers to C=1 and C=2 while the plotted quantity may be −C, and the relation between σxy and C is not stated explicitly. Please define the sign convention between σxy and C and explain what is plotted in the figures.
  3. [Sec. III D and Fig. 5] The ribbon calculations replace the Hubbard term by a molecular field hx_AF/t=0.2, but the text does not explain how this value is chosen or how it relates to the self-consistent sublattice moment at U/t=1.48; a brief statement of this correspondence would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Sec. III B and Fig. 3(f)] At the lower boundary of the topological phase, the gap closes along Γ-Y, while the upper boundary closes along M-X; the text describes these closings clearly, but a small schematic of the gap-closing momenta in the BZ would help the reader follow the band-structure panels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Chern numbers and Hall conductivities are computed from the solved mean-field Hamiltonian, not assumed or fitted.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the C=1 staggered-potential ground state and the C=2 magnetic-field-induced metastable topological state, each with a quantized Hall conductivity. These claims are obtained by solving the Hubbard model in the Hartree-Fock approximation (Sec. II), evaluating the Kubo formula for the Hall conductivity (Eq. 5), computing the Chern number with the non-Abelian Fukui-Hatsugai-Suzuki method (Eqs. 8-11), and checking chiral edge states in a ribbon geometry (Sec. III D). The input parameters U/t, lambda_A/t, lambda_R/t, Delta/t, and h/t are presented as tunable control parameters, not fitted to the target Chern numbers or to the quantized Hall values. The topological invariants and edge-state structures are numerical outputs of the calculation, so no prediction reduces by construction to an input. The model Hamiltonian is motivated by earlier works by the same group, including the antisymmetric SOC pattern and the known altermagnetic spin pattern, but those citations supply only the starting model and its qualitative baseline; they do not contain the topological phase diagram, the gap-closing mechanism, or the C=1 and C=2 quantization reported here. The only caveat worth noting is in Sec. III C: the paper labels the field-induced branch as metastable and describes a hysteresis loop, but it does not compare the mean-field energy of that branch with the ground-state branch or prove that the branch is a local minimum of the Hartree-Fock functional rather than a saddle point. That is a stability/correctness concern, not a circularity, because even if the branch were a saddle, the Chern number and Hall conductivity of that self-consistent solution would still be genuine computed results rather than assumptions. The self-citations to the authors' prior model papers are therefore real baseline support and are not load-bearing for the new topological claims, consistent with a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters are control parameters of the model, not fitted to experimental data. The central claim is qualitative: certain parameter regimes exhibit quantum anomalous Hall phases. The main axioms are the mean-field approximation and the symmetry assignment of the model. No new particles or entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • U/t = 1.5 (scan 1.4-1.6)
    Coulomb repulsion strength chosen to stabilize an insulating altermagnetic state at half filling. It is a control parameter, not fitted to data.
  • lambda_A/t = 0.1
    Antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling strength, chosen as in prior models of organic altermagnets (refs 19, 38).
  • lambda_R/t = 0.1
    Rashba spin-orbit coupling strength chosen to induce band inversion across the antiferromagnetic gap. The paper argues this value is achievable at oxide interfaces.
  • Delta/t = 0.01 (threshold about 0.003)
    Staggered potential amplitude for the C=1 route, chosen to open a gap in the inverted band structure.
  • h/t = about 0.004-0.012
    External magnetic field strength for the C=2 metastable route, chosen to traverse the hysteresis loop.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock mean-field approximation
    The Hamiltonian is solved via self-consistent mean fields (Sec. II), and all topological phases and metastable states are defined within this approximation.
  • domain assumption The lambda_A pattern in Fig. 1(a) realizes the symmetry of orthorhombic altermagnets
    The paper asserts this pattern satisfies the symmetry requirements for the AHE in altermagnets; it is a modeling choice, not derived from a specific material.
  • domain assumption Rashba SOC of the form in Eq. (2) induces band inversion without destroying altermagnetic order
    The paper assumes this term breaks inversion and mirror symmetries and produces the inversion; the numerical results confirm the inversion in the chosen parameter range.
  • standard math The Fukui-Hatsugai-Suzuki method correctly computes the Chern number for degenerate occupied bands
    Standard lattice gauge theory method used to evaluate the non-Abelian Chern number on a discretized Brillouin zone (Sec. II).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two routes to quantum anomalous Hall states in altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KP7LY6D

@misc{pith2026260812124,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two routes to quantum anomalous Hall states in altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KP7LY6D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12124}
}
abstract

We theoretically propose two possible routes to realizing quantum anomalous Hall states in altermagnetic materials. We consider a minimal square-lattice Hubbard model with antisymmetric spin-orbit coupling associated with an orthorhombic crystal structure, which supports a topologically trivial altermagnetic state. By incorporating Rashba-type spin-orbit coupling and external perturbations, we demonstrate that this trivial state can be turned into topological altermagnetic phases in two distinct ways. The first route is driven by a staggered potential that breaks the symmetry connecting crystallographically equivalent sublattices, leading to a topological altermagnetic ground state characterized by a quantized Hall conductivity $\left| \sigma_{xy} \right|=e^2/h$ and a Chern number $C=1$. The second route is realized by applying a magnetic field perpendicular to the two-dimensional plane. The resulting topological state appears as a metastable state in the magnetic hysteresis loop, exhibiting a quantized Hall conductivity $\left| \sigma_{xy} \right|=2e^2/h$ associated with a Chern number $C=2$. We show that these topological transitions are accompanied by characteristic gap closings at the Brillouin-zone boundary, with the number of gap-closing points determining the Chern number. Ribbon-geometry calculations reveal chiral edge states consistent with the bulk topological invariants and demonstrate distinct spin polarizations between the $C=1$ and $C=2$ states. Our results establish experimentally accessible routes to quantized anomalous Hall responses in altermagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12124 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic lattice structure and spatial patterns of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic picture of an altermagnetic ground sta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic illustration of the system with a stagg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnetic-field dependences of (a) the spin moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the ribbon geometry us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Energy spectrum as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The gray curves represent the bulk bands, which show an insulating gap opened by the molec- ular field hx AF

    C=1 state under staggered potential Figure 5(b) shows the energy spectrum of the topologi- cal altermagnetic phase with C = 1 induced by the stag- gered potential with ∆/t = 0 .01 for hx AF/t = 0 .2 and λA/t = λR/t = 0 .1. The gray curves represent the bulk bands, which show an insulating gap opened by the molec- ular field hx AF. The colored curves corres...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Fig- ure 6(a) shows the energy spectrum obtained from the rib- bon geometry calculation at h/t = 0.01, hx AF/t = 0.2, and λA/t = λR/t = 0.1

    C=2 state under magnetic field Next, we examine the edge states in the topological alter- magnetic metastable state with C = 2 , realized under the uniform magnetic field h applied along the z direction. Fig- ure 6(a) shows the energy spectrum obtained from the rib- bon geometry calculation at h/t = 0.01, hx AF/t = 0.2, and λA/t = λR/t = 0.1. As in Fig. 5(b...

    work page

  3. [3]

    R. Y u, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Science 329, 61 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  5. [5]

    Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y . Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B 82, 161414(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Y oung, Science 367, 900 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K . Li, Y . Ou, P . Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y . Feng, S.-H. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y . Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Science 340, 167 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Ohgushi, S

    K. Ohgushi, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 62, R6065(R) (2000)

    2000

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y . Yanagi, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    In this way, the symmetry re- quirements for orthorhombic altermagnets are satisfied sol ely by λA ij

    planes, which are present in the simple square lattice, are lost due to λA ij, resulting in or- thorhombic crystal symmetry. In this way, the symmetry re- quirements for orthorhombic altermagnets are satisfied sol ely by λA ij. In the absence of λA ij, the present model reduces...

  3. [11]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P . Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88,123702 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Y . Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Okugawa, K

    T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y . Noda, and S. Nakamura, J. Phys. Con- dens. Matter 30, 075502 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, et al. , Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    M. Naka, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125114 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Gonz ´ alez-Hern´ andez, L

    R. Gonz ´ alez-Hern´ andez, L. ˇSmejkal, K. V ´ yborn´ y, Y . Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    I. V . Solovyev, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8060 (1997)

    1997

  14. [22]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y . Yanagi, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075112 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Samanta, M

    K. Samanta, M. Lezaic, M. Merte, F. Freimuth, S. Blugel, and Y . Mokrousov, J. Appl. Phys.127, 213904 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    M. Naka, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195149 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, et al., Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Aoyama and K

    T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Phys. Rev. Materials 8, L041402 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    K. V . Yershov, V . P . Kravchuk, M. Daghofer, and J. van den 10 Brink, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144421 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    M. Naka, Y . Motome, T. Miyazaki, and H. Seo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 083702 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Sumita, M

    S. Sumita, M. Naka, and H. Seo, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043171 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Nat. Commun. 15, 1801 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060508 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Sumita, M

    S. Sumita, M. Naka, and H. Seo, Phys. Rev. B 112, 144510 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Guo, Z.-X

    P .-J. Guo, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y . Lu, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 70 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Ma and J.-F

    H.-Y . Ma and J.-F. Jia, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064426 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, H

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, H. Serrano, and B. Uribe, Phys. Rev. B 111, 085127 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. V enderbos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez and B

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez and B. Uribe, Phys. Rev. B 112, 184101 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    X. Li, A. H. MacDonald, and H. Chen, arXiv.1902.10650 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. Naka, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, npj Spintronics 3, 1 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    I. V . Solovyev, S. Nikolaev, and A. Tanaka, npj Quantum Mater. 11, 54 (2026)

    2026

  33. [41]

    I. V . Solovyev, arXiv:2509.00369 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P . Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  35. [43]

    M. V . Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  36. [44]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y . Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1674 (2005)

    2005

  37. [45]

    Y okomori, S

    S. Y okomori, S. Dekura, S. Imajo, T. Higashino, M. Ito, T . Fu- jino, T. Kobayashi, S. Fujiyama, N. Matsushita, and H. Mori, unpublished

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.