Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Logarithmic intermittency of the critical 2D SHF

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The critical 2D stochastic heat flow is logarithmically intermittent.

desk verdict Sharp logarithmic intermittency for critical 2D SHF, proved with substantial new machinery; the abstract overstates one per-ball claim, but the main theorem is sound and deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12270 v1 pith:A654O2OL submitted 2026-08-12 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Shirshendu Ganguly , Kyeongsik Nam This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60H1560F1082B4460J65
keywords critical2Dstochasticheatflowdirectedpolymerintermittencylargedeviationslogarithmicfractalcoveringnumbermassconcentrationrandommeasures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the critical two-dimensional stochastic heat flow (SHF) — the random measure obtained as the scaling limit of $2+1$-dimensional directed polymers at their critical intermediate-disorder scaling — is logarithmically intermittent. Almost surely, for every sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, all but a vanishing fraction of the flow's mass in $[0,1]^2$ is carried by at most $\varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2+\xi}$ balls of radius $\varepsilon$, each carrying roughly $\varepsilon^2(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{1/2}$ mass; conversely, any union of $\varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2-\xi}$ radius-$\varepsilon$ balls has vanishing mass. Hence both the minimal covering number and the maximum sparse mass are exactly $\varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2+o(1)}$. This refines the earlier almost-sure singularity of the SHF into a sharp logarithmic-fractal statement, and the proof supplies a large-deviation machinery for the block decomposition of the flow, including a conditioning estimate showing that conditioning on a large upper tail shifts means but barely changes the law projected onto a few coordinates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multiplicative block decomposition $G_i=p(t_{i-1})\blacktriangleleft Z_i\blacktriangleright 1$, with $t_i=\varepsilon^2b^{-2i}$ and $N_{\varepsilon,b}\asymp\log\varepsilon^{-1}$ blocks; the $G_i$ are independent and in the quasi-critical bulk each is concentrated near $1$, with $\mathbb{E}(G_i-1)^2\sim(N_{\varepsilon,b}-i)^{-1}$ and matching high-moment bounds. Because of this concentration, $\log G_i$ is close to $W_i-W_i^2/2$, turning products into tilted Gaussian-like sums. The machinery consists of three interlocking estimates: sharp upper-tail large deviations for the bulk product (Proposition 2.1, via moment-generating-function expansions and a Berry–Esseen bound under exponential tilt), a conditional-decoupling estimate comparing the true partition function to the decoupled product (Proposition 2.2), and a Radon–Nikodym bound showing that conditioning on the upper tail shifts the mean of each coordinate by $\alpha/(N_{\varepsilon,b}-i)$ but leaves the joint law on any small coordinate set nearly unchanged (Propositions 7.7 and 11.1). The mass-concentration and covering-number conclusions follow by first-moment arguments on these level sets.

What would settle it

Evaluate, analytically or numerically, the second moment of $G_i$ for indices $i$ within $(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^\eta$ of the terminal scale: if $\sup_{\varepsilon,i}(N_{\varepsilon,b}-i)\,\mathbb{E}(G_i-1)^2$ fails to converge to $1$ as $b\to0$, or if the high-moment bound $\mathbb{E}|G_i-1|^p\le C_p(N_{\varepsilon,b}-i)^{-p/2}$ fails there, then the upper-tail exponent and the covering-number exponent collapse. A purely numerical falsifier would be to simulate the critical lattice directed polymer at inverse temperature $\beta_N$ satisfying (5) and count the $\varepsilon$-balls needed to contain almost all mass: the count must be $\varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2+o(1)}$, and a different logarithmic exponent would disprove Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is the exact logarithmic sparsity of the critical two-dimensional SHF. Theorem 1.1 states that for every fixed $\xi\in(0,1/10)$, almost surely, for all small $\varepsilon$, there is a collection $\mathcal{B}_\varepsilon$ of radius-$\varepsilon$ balls with $|\mathcal{B}_\varepsilon|\le \varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2+\xi}$ such that the SHF mass of $[0,1]^2\setminus\bigcup_{B\in\mathcal{B}_\varepsilon}B$ is $o_\varepsilon(1)$; and conversely every union of at most $\varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2-\xi}$ such balls has mass $o_\varepsilon(1)$. Since the flow gives positive mass to every nonempty open set, the random measure is not supported on a finite set: it is carried by a dense but logarithmically sparse collection of tiny peaks, each of height $\varepsilon^2(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{1/2+o(1)}$ relative to Lebesgue measure.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument imports from [35] the uniform moment bounds that each quasi-critical block variable $G_i$ is concentrated near $1$ with second moment $\asymp(N_{\varepsilon,b}-i)^{-1}$ and all higher moments matching that decay, uniformly for every bulk index; if these bounds failed near the final block $M_{\varepsilon,\eta}$, the sharp large-deviation rate and therefore the covering exponent in Theorem 1.1 would no longer be established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The minimal number of $\varepsilon$-balls needed to capture all but a vanishing fraction of the point-to-plane SHF mass in a bounded domain is exactly $\varepsilon^{-2}(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2+o(1)}$, so the measure's support has Minkowski dimension $2$ but a precise logarithmic correction.
  • Any $\varepsilon$-ball in the carrying collection carries mass $\varepsilon^2(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{1/2+o(1)}$, while a typical $\varepsilon$-ball carries only $\varepsilon^2(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2}$; the mean is therefore dominated by rare peaks whose probability is $(\log\varepsilon^{-1})^{-1/2+o(1)}$.
  • The same comparison between the true flow and its decoupled product implies that the small-ball averaged SHF is, at the level of its first moment, indistinguishable from a log-Normal variable whose variance is $\log\log\varepsilon^{-1}$, confirming the heuristic that the measure is almost a function.
  • Because the result holds simultaneously for all small $\varepsilon$ almost surely, it gives a sharp two-sided statement, not just an upper envelope: no sparse set with slightly fewer balls can capture a non-vanishing fraction of the mass.
  • The proof's estimates are stable under $\varepsilon$-dependent choices of the block ratio $b$ and coupling $\vartheta$, so the logarithmic covering statement transfers from the auxiliary scale-$\varepsilon$ object to the original spatial $[0,1]$ flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step the paper leaves open is the exact Hausdorff measure with gauge $r^2(\log r^{-1})^{1/2}$; the two-sided covering estimates here are exactly the scale at which such a gauge statement should be provable.
  • The conditioning mechanism — a Brownian large-endpoint event shifts means without changing increment laws — is generic for log-Normal-like cascades, so the same large-deviation-plus-Radon–Nikodym strategy may transfer to other critical multiplicative measures such as critical Gaussian multiplicative chaos.
  • The paper only treats the upper tail through the decoupled proxy; extending the sharp large-deviation estimate directly to the true partition function would yield extreme-value statistics for the SHF maxima, for instance a prediction for the law of the maximum over $\varepsilon$-balls.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a sharp logarithmic intermittency statement for the critical 2D stochastic heat flow. In Theorem 1.1 it shows that, almost surely, for every small ε, the point-to-plane SHF in [0,1]^2 can be covered up to vanishing mass by at most ε^{-2}(log ε^{-1})^{-1/2+ξ} balls of radius ε, and conversely that any union of ε^{-2}(log ε^{-1})^{-1/2-ξ} such balls carries negligible mass. The proof proceeds by decomposing the time interval into geometric blocks, comparing the SHF with a decoupled product of single-block partition functions, proving a sharp upper-tail large-deviations estimate for the bulk product (Proposition 2.1), establishing a conditional decoupling bound (Proposition 2.2), and then deriving a mass-concentration estimate (Proposition 2.3) that is transferred from the sparse sequence r_m=e^{-e^m} to all scales by sandwiching. The heart of the argument is the large-deviations analysis of the decoupled product in Section 10 and the Radon-Nikodym stability estimate in Section 11.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial quantitative advance: it gives the first sharp covering-number estimate for the support of the critical SHF, exposing the logarithmic correction beyond ordinary Minkowski dimension, and it introduces reusable tools (conditional-density estimates under large-deviation conditioning, approximate log-Laplace expansions, and a projected Radon-Nikodym stability estimate). The proof is internally structured and does not fit parameters: the log-normal and Gaussian heuristics are motivational only, and the main imports from [35], [45], and [46] are prior results with independent proofs. The central theorem is stated precisely and is falsifiable. The issues I identify do not appear to threaten the core derivation, but one uniformity gap in the proof of the lower covering bound needs to be repaired before the theorem is fully proved as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 9, Step 3 (around Eq. (206))] The proof of part (ii) applies the Borel-Cantelli lemma to a fixed sequence of coverings C_n, but the theorem requires control of the supremum over all such coverings. For each deterministic choice of C_n the argument yields Z(C_n∩Q)→0 almost surely along that fixed sequence; this does not rule out rare adversarial coverings at each scale. The bound preceding (206) is uniform in C_n, so the gap is repairable: if a covering with Z(C_n∩Q)>δ exists, its r_n/10-neighborhood can be replaced by a union of O(m_n) rational-grid balls, and the resulting deterministic union of radius O(r_n) balls has the same small cardinality; the low-density part of the integral is then < c_2δ/2 for large n, forcing the global high-density integral in (195) to exceed c_2δ/2, an event whose probability is summable by (195). As written, however, the uniformity over all coverings is not justified, and this is load-bearing for Theorem 1.1(ii).
  2. [Abstract and Remark 1.3] The abstract states that the SHF mass is concentrated on balls 'each containing ε^2 log^{1/2+o(1)}(1/ε) mass.' Theorem 1.1 and its proof only establish that the total mass outside a family of at most ε^{-2}(log ε^{-1})^{-1/2+ξ} balls is o(1); this gives a lower bound for the average mass per covering ball of order ε^2(log ε^{-1})^{1/2-o(1)}, but no upper bound on the mass of an individual covering ball is proved. The formal theorem also concerns Q=[0,1]^2, while the abstract says 'in any domain.' These two phrases should be reformulated so that the advertised claims match the theorem and its proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 9, Step 4] The extension to general ε is phrased as an argument along an arbitrary decreasing sequence ε_n; for the 'simultaneously for all ε' formulation it would be clearer to state that for each ε one takes m=m(ε) with r_{m+1}<ε≤r_m, so the same estimates give the simultaneous statement directly.
  2. [Section 10.2, Eq. (282)] The term (log ε^{-1})^{-η/2+o(1)} is used as an additive error in a logarithmic ratio; the o(1) in the exponent should be made unambiguous, since the final uniformity in |s|≤A is important for the application in Section 11.
  3. [Section 7.4, Eq. (137)] The use of Lemma B.1 and Corollary B.3 to justify that Y(eI,eJ) is measurable with respect to H_{eK} is correct but terse; a sentence explaining why the Radon-Nikodym factor depends only on the bulk variables would improve readability.
  4. [Notation around (73)] The notation bG^tail_{eI} is typographically heavy and easily confused with the tail product G_{η;2}; renaming it, for instance G^{tail,¬}_{eI}, would reduce the notational load in Sections 5 and 7.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is derived from external moment bounds and self-contained large-deviation, decoupling, and covering arguments.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorem 1.1 is self-contained relative to its stated inputs. The central imported estimates are the uniform moment asymptotics (62) and (63), quoted from [35], together with shrinking-ball moment bounds from [45], strict positivity from [46], and the SHF construction/uniqueness from [14] and [51]; none of these are by the present authors, and none are equivalent to the theorem being proved. The authors' own prior work [31] appears only in the introduction as background on double-exponential moment growth and is not used in the proof of Theorem 1.1. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the target data and then renamed as a prediction: the constants b, eta, delta, and xi are free small parameters chosen by the proof, and the logarithmic exponents in Theorem 1.1 are obtained from explicit large-deviation rate computations rather than from calibration. The large-deviation statement Proposition 2.1 is proved from the moment-generating-function expansions in Lemma 10.5, which in turn use only the imported moment bounds and Taylor expansion; the log-Normal and Brownian heuristics in Section 1.2 are explicitly informal and do not carry logical weight. The decoupling estimates Propositions 2.2, 5.1, 5.2, and 7.8 are derived by expanding the partition function around the product of single-scale factors, with all error terms estimated from the imported bounds. The mass-concentration result Corollary 8.4 is transferred to the original SHF by an exact scaling identity, and Theorem 1.1 follows by first-moment estimates and Borel-Cantelli along sparse scales with a sandwiching argument. Every step that could in principle have been circular—such as defining the upper-tail event in terms of the decoupled product G_{eta;1} and then comparing Z to it—is handled by an independent expansion identity (Lemma 4.1) and explicit L^2 estimates, not by definitional equivalence. The one discrepancy between the abstract's per-ball mass phrasing and the formal theorem is a presentation issue about an upper bound on individual ball mass, not a circularity; the covering and sparse-mass statements in Theorem 1.1 are proved directly. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants: b, η, δ, ζ, α, ξ are asymptotic parameters chosen small but not tuned to data. No new physical or mathematical entities are postulated. The load-bearing imports are prior construction and moment results, listed as axioms.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the critical 2D SHF Z^ϑ with the axiomatic properties of Section 2.1 (continuity, Chapman-Kolmogorov, independence, moment condition).
    Theorems from [14] and [51]; the paper analyzes this object directly and never re-derives it. Invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption The convolution Z_{s,t} • Z_{t,u} defined by (35) exists as the limit of mollified convolutions and satisfies the flow property.
    From [23]; used to define block products and the decoupling expansion in Section 4, Lemma 4.1.
  • domain assumption Strict local positivity: u0 ◀ Z^ϑ_{0,T} ▶ 1_{B'} > 0 almost surely for nonzero u0 ≥ 0, and hence the block variables G_i are positive almost surely.
    From [46, Theorem 1.4]; required to define Y_i = log G_i and the upper-tail events in Sections 7.3 and 10. See Remark 10.2.
  • domain assumption Uniform moment controls for W_i = G_i - 1: the second-moment asymptotic (62) and the p-th moment bound (63) from [35, (2.15) and Corollary B.3] hold uniformly in i up to the boundary c*, and the shrinking-ball moment bounds from [45] hold.
    These are the backbone of the Gaussian approximation of the blocks; used in Lemma 3.2, Lemma 3.3, Lemma 10.5, and throughout Sections 6-11.
  • standard math Berry-Esseen theorem for sums of independent zero-mean finite-third-moment random variables.
    Invoked in Section 10.2, Step 3 to quantify the Gaussian approximation of the tilted sum S_{Uc}.
  • domain assumption Collision-diagram integral representation for integer moments of the SHF and the monotonicity of the integrand in ϑ.
    From [34]; used in Appendix A to prove Lemma 7.1, which feeds the block moment bounds in Lemma 7.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Logarithmic intermittency of the critical 2D SHF." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A654O2OL

@misc{pith2026260812270,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Logarithmic intermittency of the critical 2D SHF},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A654O2OL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12270}
}
abstract

While the solution to the $1+1$ dimensional stochastic heat equation with multiplicative noise is closely related to the exponential of a Brownian motion, the two-dimensional picture exhibits an additional weak-to-strong disorder transition. In [CSZ '23], the critical two-dimensional stochastic heat flow (SHF) was constructed as the scaling limit of the partition function of $2+1$ dimensional directed polymers under the logarithmic intermediate-disorder scaling at criticality. The SHF is a random measure and, like many naturally occurring random measures, it is expected to exhibit rich intermittency. [CSZ '25] established that it is almost surely singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure. More recently, [GT '26] showed that the logarithm of the SHF averaged over small balls is asymptotically Gaussian, with both its mean and variance diverging as the ball radius tends to zero. In this paper we prove a sharp result quantifying the singularity of the support of the SHF as well as its intermittency. In particular, we show that, almost surely, for all small $\varepsilon>0$, up to a vanishing error, all the mass of the point-to-plane SHF in any domain is concentrated on ${1}/{\big(\varepsilon^2\log^{1/2+o(1)}(1/\varepsilon)\big)}$ balls of radius $\varepsilon$, each containing $\varepsilon^2{\log^{1/2+o(1)}(1/\varepsilon)}$ mass, thus precisely establishing its logarithmic fractal behavior. A key ingredient in the proof is a refined large-deviations theory, which allows access to conditional distributions, by taking advantage of the Gaussian-like behavior of the SHF at quasi-critical scales. A further useful observation that features prominently is that conditioning a Brownian motion on its endpoint being unusually large essentially induces a shift in the mean of its increments, and consequently, at small enough scales, their distributions do not alter significantly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12270 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A simulation of the point-to-plane partition function for the lattice di￾rected polymer on Z 2+1 (two spatial dimensions and one time dimension) of length N = 1000, with the inverse temperature parameter βN in the critical window given by e β 2 N −1 = 1 RN  1 + ϑ+o(1) log N  . Here, ϑ = −6, 0, 6 from left to right, respectively. RN denotes the expected number of collisions or overlap of two independent simple ran￾… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of the decomposition into blocks Gi in (15). The points marked on the time axis correspond to the times ti = ε 2 b −2i . While the block Gi = pti−1 ◀ Z ϑ ti−1,ti ▶ 1 actually depends on the entire noise in the time strip [ti−1, ti ], since the heat kernel pti−1 is primarily concentrated on the spatial window of width √ ti−1 and the expectation of the SHF Z ϑ ti−1,ti is again the heat kernel, the effe… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fractional moments of the Stochastic Heat Flow and 2D Directed Polymers

    math.PR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For 0<p<1, the p-th moment of the critical 2D SHF mass on a small ball is bounded by the second moment raised to a negative power whenever the second moment diverges, uniformly in time, disorder, and radius.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [35]

    Log log fluctuations of the stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.03246, 2026

    Yu Gu and Li-Cheng Tsai. Log log fluctuations of the stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.03246, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  2. [45]

    On the moments of the mass of shrinking balls under the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 407(6):132, 2026

    Ziyang Liu and Nikos Zygouras. On the moments of the mass of shrinking balls under the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 407(6):132, 2026

    work page 2026

  3. [46]

    An upper bound of the lower tail of the mass of balls under the critical2dstochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18080, 2025

    Makoto Nakashima. An upper bound of the lower tail of the mass of balls under the critical2dstochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18080, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [51]

    Stochastic heat flow by moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14657, 2024

    Li-Cheng Tsai. Stochastic heat flow by moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14657, 2024. Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley Email address:sganguly@berkeley.edu Department of Mathematical Sciences, KAIST, South Korea Email address:ksnam@kaist.ac.kr

    arXiv 2024

  5. [1]

    The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension1 + 1.The Annals of Probability, 42(3):1212, 2014

    Tom Alberts, Konstantin Khanin, and Jeremy Quastel. The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension1 + 1.The Annals of Probability, 42(3):1212, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [2]

    Fundamental solution of the heat and schrödinger equations with point interaction.Journal of Functional Analysis, 130(1):220–254, 1995

    S Albeverio, Z Brzezniak, and Ludwik Dabrowski. Fundamental solution of the heat and schrödinger equations with point interaction.Journal of Functional Analysis, 130(1):220–254, 1995

    1995

  7. [3]

    Probability distribution of the free energy of the continuum directed random polymer in 1+ 1 dimensions.Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 64(4):466–537, 2011

    Gideon Amir, Ivan Corwin, and Jeremy Quastel. Probability distribution of the free energy of the continuum directed random polymer in 1+ 1 dimensions.Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 64(4):466–537, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [4]

    Basic properties of critical lognormal multiplicative chaos.Annals of Probability, 43(5):2205–2249, 2015

    Julien Barral, Antti Kupiainen, Antti Nikula, Eero Saksman, and Christian Webb. Basic properties of critical lognormal multiplicative chaos.Annals of Probability, 43(5):2205–2249, 2015. LOGARITHMIC INTERMITTENCY OF THE CRITICAL 2D SHF 77

    work page 2015

Show all 51 references
  1. [5]

    Critical mandelbrot cascades.Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics, 325(2):685–711, 2014

    Julien Barral, Antti Kupiainen, Miika Nikula, and Christian Webb. Critical mandelbrot cascades.Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics, 325(2):685–711, 2014

    2014

  2. [6]

    Strong disorder for stochastic heat flow and 2d directed polymers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02478, 2025

    Quentin Berger, Francesco Caravenna, and Nicola Turchi. Strong disorder for stochastic heat flow and 2d directed polymers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02478, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  3. [7]

    The accuracy of the gaussian approximation to the sum of independent variates.Transactions of the american mathematical society, 49(1):122–136, 1941

    Andrew C Berry. The accuracy of the gaussian approximation to the sum of independent variates.Transactions of the american mathematical society, 49(1):122–136, 1941

    1941

  4. [8]

    The two-dimensional stochastic heat equation: renormalizing a multi- plicative noise.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(2):615, 1998

    Lorenzo Bertini and Nicoletta Cancrini. The two-dimensional stochastic heat equation: renormalizing a multi- plicative noise.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(2):615, 1998

    1998

  5. [9]

    Extreme local extrema of two-dimensional discrete gaussian free field.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 345(1):271–304, 2016

    Marek Biskup and Oren Louidor. Extreme local extrema of two-dimensional discrete gaussian free field.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 345(1):271–304, 2016

    2016

  6. [10]

    Convergence in law of the maximum of the two-dimensional discrete gaussian free field.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 69(1):62–123, 2016

    Maury Bramson, Jian Ding, and Ofer Zeitouni. Convergence in law of the maximum of the two-dimensional discrete gaussian free field.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 69(1):62–123, 2016

    2016

  7. [11]

    Universality in marginally relevant disordered systems

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. Universality in marginally relevant disordered systems. The Annals of Applied Probability, 27(5):3050–3112, 2017

    2017

  8. [12]

    On the moments of the (2+ 1)-dimensional di- rected polymer and stochastic heat equation in the critical window.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 372(2):385–440, 2019

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. On the moments of the (2+ 1)-dimensional di- rected polymer and stochastic heat equation in the critical window.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 372(2):385–440, 2019

    2019

  9. [13]

    The two-dimensional kpz equation in the entire subcritical regime.The Annals of Probability, 48(3):1086–1127, 2020

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The two-dimensional kpz equation in the entire subcritical regime.The Annals of Probability, 48(3):1086–1127, 2020

    2020

  10. [14]

    The critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Inventiones mathematicae, 233(1):325–460, 2023

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Inventiones mathematicae, 233(1):325–460, 2023

    2023

  11. [15]

    The critical 2d stochastic heat flow is not a gaussian multiplicative chaos.The Annals of Probability, 51(6):2265–2300, 2023

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The critical 2d stochastic heat flow is not a gaussian multiplicative chaos.The Annals of Probability, 51(6):2265–2300, 2023

    2023

  12. [16]

    The critical 2d stochastic heat flow and related models

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The critical 2d stochastic heat flow and related models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10311, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [17]

    Singularity and regularity of the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06128, 2025

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. Singularity and regularity of the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06128, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  14. [18]

    Constructing a solution of the(2 + 1)-dimensional kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 48(2):1014, 2020

    Sourav Chatterjee and Alexander Dunlap. Constructing a solution of the(2 + 1)-dimensional kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 48(2):1014, 2020

    2020

  15. [19]

    Precise intermittency for the parabolic anderson equation with an(1 + 1)-dimensional time–space white noise

    Xia Chen. Precise intermittency for the parabolic anderson equation with an(1 + 1)-dimensional time–space white noise. InAnnales de l’IHP Probabilités et statistiques, volume 51, pages 1486–1499, 2015

    2015

  16. [20]

    Two-dimensional delta-bose gas: skew-product relative motion and exact non-gaussianity for the stochastic heat equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06331, 2022

    Yu-Ting Chen. Two-dimensional delta-bose gas: skew-product relative motion and exact non-gaussianity for the stochastic heat equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06331, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  17. [21]

    Delta-bose gas from the viewpoint of the two-dimensional stochastic heat equation.The Annals of Probability, 52(1):127–187, 2024

    Yu-Ting Chen. Delta-bose gas from the viewpoint of the two-dimensional stochastic heat equation.The Annals of Probability, 52(1):127–187, 2024

    2024

  18. [22]

    Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-bose gas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17243, 2024

    Yu-Ting Chen. Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-bose gas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17243, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [23]

    Continuum polymer measures corresponding to the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 407(7):152, 2026

    Jeremy Clark and Barkat Mian. Continuum polymer measures corresponding to the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 407(7):152, 2026

    2026

  20. [24]

    The kardar–parisi–zhang equation and universality class.Random Matrices: Theory and Applica- tions, 1(01):1130001, 2012

    Ivan Corwin. The kardar–parisi–zhang equation and universality class.Random Matrices: Theory and Applica- tions, 1(01):1130001, 2012

    2012

  21. [25]

    Law of iterated logarithms and fractal properties of the kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 51(3):930–986, 2023

    Sayan Das and Promit Ghosal. Law of iterated logarithms and fractal properties of the kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 51(3):930–986, 2023

    2023

  22. [26]

    Liouville quantum gravity and kpz.Inventiones mathematicae, 185(2):333–393, 2011

    Bertrand Duplantier and Scott Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and kpz.Inventiones mathematicae, 185(2):333–393, 2011

    2011

  23. [27]

    On the Liapounoff limit of error in the theory of probability.Arkiv för Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik, 28A(9):1–19, 1942

    Carl-Gustav Esseen. On the Liapounoff limit of error in the theory of probability.Arkiv för Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik, 28A(9):1–19, 1942

    1942

  24. [28]

    Intermittence and nonlinear parabolic stochastic partial differ- ential equations.Electronic Journal of Probability, 14:548, 2009

    Mohammud Foondun and Davar Khoshnevisan. Intermittence and nonlinear parabolic stochastic partial differ- ential equations.Electronic Journal of Probability, 14:548, 2009

    2009

  25. [29]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017

    Sacha Friedli and Yvan Velenik.Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Systems: A Concrete Mathematical Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017

    2017

  26. [30]

    Fractal structure in the directed landscape

    Shirshendu Ganguly and Milind Hegde. Fractal structure in the directed landscape. InProbability and Stochastic Processes: A Volume in Honour of Rajeeva L. Karandikar, pages 129–147. Springer, 2024

    2024

  27. [31]

    Sharp moment and upper tail asymptotics for the critical2dstochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22029, 2025

    Shirshendu Ganguly and Kyeongsik Nam. Sharp moment and upper tail asymptotics for the critical2dstochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22029, 2025. 78 SHIRSHENDU GANGULY, KYEONGSIK NAM

    2025 arXiv

  28. [32]

    Robert D Gordon. Values of mills’ ratio of area to bounding ordinate and of the normal probability integral for large values of the argument.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12(3):364–366, 1941

    1941

  29. [33]

    Gaussian fluctuations from the 2d kpz equation.Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, 8:150–185, 2020

    Yu Gu. Gaussian fluctuations from the 2d kpz equation.Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, 8:150–185, 2020

    2020

  30. [34]

    Moments of the 2d she at criticality.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 2(1):179–219, 2021

    Yu Gu, Jeremy Quastel, and Li-Cheng Tsai. Moments of the 2d she at criticality.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 2(1):179–219, 2021

    2021

  31. [36]

    Paracontrolled distributions and singular pdes

    Massimiliano Gubinelli, Peter Imkeller, and Nicolas Perkowski. Paracontrolled distributions and singular pdes. InForum of mathematics, Pi, volume 3, page e6. Cambridge University Press, 2015

    2015

  32. [37]

    A theory of regularity structures.Inventiones mathematicae, 198(2):269–504, 2014

    Martin Hairer. A theory of regularity structures.Inventiones mathematicae, 198(2):269–504, 2014

    2014

  33. [38]

    Thick points of the gaussian free field.The Annals of Probability, 38(2):896–926, 2010

    Xiaoyu Hu, Jason Miller, and Yuval Peres. Thick points of the gaussian free field.The Annals of Probability, 38(2):896–926, 2010

    2010

  34. [39]

    Fractional moments of small-ball masses for the stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.01141, 2026

    Jhuan Huang. Fractional moments of small-ball masses for the stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.01141, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Sur le chaos multiplicatif.Ann

    Jean-Pierre Kahane. Sur le chaos multiplicatif.Ann. Sci. Math. Québec, 9(2):105–150, 1985

    1985

  36. [41]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2014

    Davar Khoshnevisan.Analysis of stochastic partial differential equations, volume 119. American Mathematical Soc., 2014

    2014

  37. [42]

    Linear algebraic techniques for weighted spanning tree enumeration.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 582:391–402, 2019

    Steven Klee and Matthew T Stamps. Linear algebraic techniques for weighted spanning tree enumeration.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 582:391–402, 2019

    2019

  38. [43]

    Royen’s proof of the gaussian correlation inequality

    Rafał Latała and Dariusz Matlak. Royen’s proof of the gaussian correlation inequality. InGeometric Aspects of Functional Analysis: Israel Seminar (GAFA) 2014–2016, pages 265–275. Springer, 2017

    2014

  39. [44]

    Wiener sausage and self-intersection local times.Journal of functional analysis, 88(2):299– 341, 1990

    Jean-François Le Gall. Wiener sausage and self-intersection local times.Journal of functional analysis, 88(2):299– 341, 1990

    1990

  40. [47]

    A condensation of interacting bosons in two dimensional space.arXiv preprint hep-th/9905120, 1999

    SG Rajeev. A condensation of interacting bosons in two dimensional space.arXiv preprint hep-th/9905120, 1999

    1999 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: A review.Probability Surveys, 11, 2014

    Rémi Rhodes and Vincent Vargas. Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: A review.Probability Surveys, 11, 2014

    2014

  42. [49]

    A simple proof of the gaussian correlation conjecture extended to multivariate gamma distribu- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.1028, 2014

    Thomas Royen. A simple proof of the gaussian correlation conjecture extended to multivariate gamma distribu- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.1028, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  43. [50]

    The exact hausdorff measure of the sample path for planar brownian motion

    S James Taylor. The exact hausdorff measure of the sample path for planar brownian motion. InMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, volume 60, pages 253–258. Cambridge University Press, 1964

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.