Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 78 references

All-optical switching of nonlinear structured light in crystal-engineered van der Waals materials

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 46-nm crystal of engineered 3R-MoS2 generates and all-optically switches second-harmonic vortex beams, swapping between topological charge +1, –1, and a Hermite-Gaussian-like mode by tuning the delay between two pump pulses with…

desk verdict A genuinely new monolithic all-optical OAM switch for SHG in 3R-MoS2, with clean tensor-driven phase physics—but the 'Laguerre-Gaussian' claim outruns the four-sector phase-mask data. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13548 v1 pith:PCQREBHO submitted 2026-08-13 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Paolo Valisa , Marc Richstaetter , Bianca Sanfilippo , Benedikt Ursprung , Zhi Hao Peng , Victoria Quiros-Cordero , Francesco Gucci , Xiaoyang Zhu
show 4 more authors
P. James Schuck Giulio Cerullo Luca Carletti Chiara Trovatello
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orbitalangularmomentumsecond-harmonicgenerationgeometricphasevanderWaalsmaterials3R-MoS2all-opticalswitchingstructuredlightopticalvortex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a single monolithic 46-nm-thick artificial crystal made of four 3R-MoS2 squares can generate second-harmonic light carrying orbital angular momentum and switch that light between three distinct spatial modes purely by changing the relative delay of two orthogonally polarized pump pulses. The switching is driven by a tensor-induced geometric phase: the crystal's local orientation imprints a phase of ±3θ on the second-harmonic field, so rotating each square by 30 degrees creates a discretized spiral phase mask. A sympathetic reader would care because this collapses frequency conversion and wavefront shaping into one atomically thin medium, removing the bulky external optics that currently control OAM beams. If correct, it points toward chip-scale, all-optically reconfigurable sources of structured light for classical and quantum photonics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the tensor-driven geometric phase in the second-order nonlinear susceptibility of 3R-MoS2, expressed in the circular-polarization basis as $P_R^{{2ω}}$ = -i ε0 χ(2) √2 (E_L^+)^2 $e^{{-i3θ}}$ and its conjugate counterpart. This equation carries the argument because it converts a purely geometric parameter—the orientation angle θ of the crystal axes—into a phase shift of the emitted second-harmonic field, independent of the flake thickness and without any propagation-induced phase. The paper uses this relation to design a four-quadrant phase mask, and it uses the same relation to show that switching the pump helicity flips the sign of the phase ramp, thus flipping the vortex charge. The switching itself is actuated by a common-path birefringent interferometer (TWINS) that controls the relative phase of two orthogonal pump components with ~0.02 fs resolution.

What would settle it

Measure the second-harmonic beam's complex field at a plane well beyond the sample and decompose it into Laguerre-Gaussian modes; if the overlap of the measured field with a pure LG±1 mode is below a few tens of percent at the operating fluence, the claim of 'vortex beam generation with topological charge ±1' would be unsupported, even if the phase maps show a spiral-like pattern.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the C3v symmetry of 3R-MoS2 enforces a nonlinear polarization that acquires a geometric phase equal to three times the in-plane crystal rotation angle, with the sign depending on the helicity of the circularly polarized fundamental field. Equations (4) and (5) state this explicitly: for a left-circular pump, the right-circular second-harmonic field is proportional to $e^{{-i3θ}}$, and for a right-circular pump, the left-circular field is proportional to $e^{{+i3θ}}$. By patterning four 20-micron squares with relative rotations of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, the authors realize a four-level discrete spiral phase mask that produces a second-harmonic vortex with topological charge ±1. By delaying two orthogonal linearly polarized pump replicas, they shift the pump between circular and linear polarization states, which in their sample switches the emitted second-harmonic between vortex and Hermite-Gaussian-like spatial profiles. The paper argues this is the first monolithic demonstration of all-optical OAM switching in a van der Waals material.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed switching between vortex and Hermite-Gaussian-like beams rests on the assumption that a phase mask discretized into only four quadratic regions, with a gap between them, produces second-harmonic fields whose spatial mode content is well described by the nominal Laguerre-Gaussian and Hermite-Gaussian modes, not merely by a square-aperture approximation of those modes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the geometric phase claim holds, any 3R-stacked transition metal dichalcogenide with C3v symmetry could be patterned into arbitrary nonlinear phase masks, enabling higher-order vortex beams and multiplexed structured-light generation in a single ultra-thin layer.
  • The switching mechanism is intrinsically broadband and does not rely on resonances, so the same device could operate across the transparency window of the material, not just at a single pump wavelength.
  • Because the switching is all-optical and pulse-width-limited, it could be extended to faster modulation—potentially approaching the single-cycle limit—without cascaded components.
  • The monolithic design removes the need for separate frequency-conversion and wavefront-shaping elements, which could simplify integrated photonic circuits that currently require external spatial light modulators or metasurface cascades.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The four-level discrete mask is only a coarse approximation of a continuous spiral; higher-level discretization (more orientation steps) would likely improve the mode purity, and the paper's own assertion of 'Hermite-Gauss-like' and 'Laguerre-Gaussian' modes relies on quantitative mode-overlap that is deferred to supplementary material.
  • The same tensor-driven phase could be combined with resonant nanostructures to enhance the weak second-harmonic efficiency of a 46-nm film, which the paper notes as a future possibility; here I extend that to suggest that the phase mechanism would survive such a resonant enhancement.
  • The paper's claim that switching is 'sub-optical-cycle' is actually demonstrated as switching between polarization states that are set by quarter-cycle delays; a direct time-resolved measurement of the output mode during the switching transient would clarify whether the OAM state itself changes within the pulse envelope, not just at the four sampled delays.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a monolithic approach to nonlinear structured light: a 46-nm-thick 3R-MoS2 artificial crystal patterned into four squares with crystal orientations 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° imprints a tensor-driven geometric phase on the second-harmonic (SH) field. For a circularly polarized pump, the SH phase is proportional to ±3θ (Eqs. (4)-(5)), and the four-quadrant mask is designed to produce a vortex with principal topological charge l=±1. By using a TWINS birefringent delay line to switch the pump between circular and linear polarizations, the authors claim all-optical switching between l=±1 vortex beams and Hermite-Gaussian-like beams with sub-optical-cycle precision. The experimental evidence consists of off-axis digital holography phase maps (Figs. 3c-d and 4e) and a visibility curve (Fig. 4f), with qualitative agreement to simulations.

Significance. The physical mechanism is attractive: the geometric phase follows directly from the C3v tensor and does not rely on optical or material resonances, so the approach is intrinsically broadband and in principle scalable to arbitrary orientation patterns. Demonstrating OAM generation and polarization-driven switching in a single van der Waals crystal, without cascaded downstream optics, would be a meaningful step for active nanophotonic sources. The analytic derivation and numerical validation are clean, and the measured phase maps are qualitatively consistent with the predicted spiral and pi-flip patterns. However, the quantitative mode identity of the output—the difference between a structured beam with a principal OAM charge and an actual Laguerre-Gaussian or Hermite-Gaussian mode—is load-bearing for the abstract's central claims and is not established in the main text.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Figs. 3c-d and 4e; 'principal topological charge' discussion] The central claim of generation and switching between Laguerre-Gaussian vortex beams and Hermite-Gaussian beams is not quantitatively supported by the main-text data. The device is a four-level phase mask (four 20-µm squares at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°), and the measured phase maps show a coarse, square-aperture staircase rather than a smooth azimuthal phase. The manuscript explicitly states 'principal topological charge' and defers quantitative comparison to Supplementary Note 8, which is not part of the main text. For an ideal four-level phase-only mask, the power in the intended l=1 OAM order is at most 8/pi^2 ≈ 0.81, with the remainder in spurious orders; square apertures, inter-square gaps, and NA=0.5 collection can only reduce this weight. A measured modal decomposition (for example, overlap integrals with LG_{0,+1}, LG_{0,-1}, and HG_{01}/HG_{10} basis fields) with associated uncertainties is therefore required before the abstract's specific mode-family claims can be accepted.
  2. [Ultrafast control section; Fig. 4f] The all-optical switching claim lacks quantitative metrics. Fig. 4f shows a visibility curve with no error bars, no labeled y-axis, and no reported extinction ratio or fit to the asserted period-2T modulation. The phase maps are shown at only four discrete delays, so the demonstration does not by itself establish continuous all-optical switching with sub-optical-cycle precision. The 'sub-fs' capability is a property of the TWINS delay line quoted in the Methods (minimum delay increment ~0.02 fs), not a measured property of the switched beam, and should be presented as such.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The word 'prominsing' should be corrected to 'promising'.
  2. [Fig. 4e caption] The phrase 'clear distinction between the vortexes and non HG beams' should presumably read 'clear distinction between the vortex and HG beams'.
  3. [Figs. 3 and 4] The phase maps lack scale bars and a quantitatively defined color axis; without a colorbar, the claimed pi/2 phase shift between adjacent squares cannot be read off by the reader.
  4. [Methods; TWINS] The text should clarify whether 'sub-fs resolution' refers to the delay-line step size, the demonstrated stability, or the temporal precision of the switching measurement; currently only the minimum delay increment is quoted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SH geometric phase is derived from the C3v tensor symmetry and the switching is directly measured.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction, Eqs. (4)-(5), is derived algebraically from the C3v nonlinear susceptibility tensor in Eq. (1) by transforming to the circular-polarization basis (Supplementary Note 1). The phase factor e^{±i3θ} follows from the tensor components and the Euler-angle rotation; it is not fitted to the measured SH phase maps. The fabricated four-sector mask is an application of this derived relation, and the holographic phase reconstruction independently measures the resulting wavefront. The switching demonstration between vortex and Hermite-Gauss-like beams is obtained by controlling the relative delay of a collinear pulse pair, with the phase maps compared to simulation. No parameter appearing in the claim is fitted from the claimed output. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 36, 64, 71, 73) provide background or prior demonstrations and are not load-bearing for the new 3R-MoS2 switching result, which is directly measured. The deferred quantitative mode-purity analysis and the coarse four-level discretization are characterization and correctness concerns, not circularity: the paper does not define the mode identity in terms of the measured phase in a way that reduces the prediction to its input. Thus no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard crystal symmetry and the design of a discrete phase mask. No parameters were fitted to data. The main unproven or assumed inputs are the C3v tensor structure and the forward-emission/TAM selection rules. The four-quadrant mask is a pragmatic design choice that limits the fidelity of the generated modes.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption 3R-MoS2 belongs to point group C3v and its chi(2) tensor has the form chi_yyy = -chi_yxx = -chi_xxy = -chi_xyx = chi(2).
    This is the basis of the entire geometric phase derivation (Eq. 1). It follows from the crystal structure and is standard for 3R-TMDs, but the specific values of tensor components are not experimentally determined in this work.
  • domain assumption The forward-emitted SH field can be described by the nonlinear polarization P^{2omega} with total angular momentum projection conservation m_{2omega} = 2m_omega + m_chi, where m_chi = plus or minus 3.
    Used to derive selection rules and the phase relations Eqs. (4)-(5). This conservation is standard for C3v but assumes the emission is collected along the vertical direction and that the sample behaves in the electric-dipole approximation.
  • domain assumption The nonlinear geometric phase is independent of the flake thickness and propagation effects (Supplementary Note 7).
    The paper claims the phase mechanism is not a propagation effect. This is supported by simulation for a 100 nm flake, but the assumption underlies using a 46 nm flake to represent any thickness. If propagation or multiphoton absorption altered the phase, the vortex masks would be distorted.
  • ad hoc to paper The four-quadrant orientation pattern (0, 30, 60, 90 degrees) produces a discretized spiral phase mask yielding a vortex of topological charge plus or minus 1.
    The phase mask is a design choice, not derived from first principles. The 4-level approximation implies that the emitted beam is only an approximation of a pure LG vortex; the paper does not quantify the mode purity in the main text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All-optical switching of nonlinear structured light in crystal-engineered van der Waals materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCQREBHO

@misc{pith2026260813548,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All-optical switching of nonlinear structured light in crystal-engineered van der Waals materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCQREBHO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13548}
}
abstract

The orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light is a discrete, unbounded degree of freedom that underpins mode-multiplexed communications and high-dimensional quantum photonics. Yet, dynamic OAM control remains dependent on bulky free-space optics or cascaded architectures that separate switching from wavefront shaping, hindering nanoscale integration. Here, we engineer artificial van der Waals crystals from rhombohedrally stacked (3R) MoS$_2$, in which spatial control of the local crystal orientation imprints a nonlinear geometric phase onto the second-harmonic (SH) field, enabling background-free generation of SH vortex beams in an ultrathin (46 nm) van der Waals platform. Leveraging the C$_{3v}$ symmetry of 3R-MoS$_2$, we demonstrate monolithic, all-optical switching with sub-optical-cycle precision between Hermite-Gauss-like and Laguerre-Gaussian vortex SH beams with opposite topological charges ($l=\pm1$). Our results establish artificial 3R-MoS$_2$ crystals as a monolithic platform for the generation and all-optical reconfiguration of nonlinear structured light at the nanoscale, advancing active nanophotonic sources for integrated classical and quantum photonic technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Dennis, M

    Forbes, A., de Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. R. Structured light.Nature Photonics 15, 253–262 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H.et al.Roadmap on structured light.Journal of Optics 19, 013001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    & Padgett, M

    Franke-Arnold, S., Allen, L. & Padgett, M. Advances in optical angular momentum.Laser & Photonics Reviews2, 299–313 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    & Woerdman, J

    Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M., Spreeuw, R. & Woerdman, J. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes. Physical Review A45, 8185–8189 (1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Trichili, A.et al.Communicating using spatial mode multiplexing: potentials, challenges, and perspectives.IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials21, 3175–3203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    E.et al.Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams.Adv

    Willner, A. E.et al.Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams.Adv. Opt. Photonics7, 66–106 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Photonics6, 488–496 (2012)

    Wang, J.et al.Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing.Nat. Photonics6, 488–496 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Bozinovic, N.et al.Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers.Science340, 1545–1548 (2013). 14

    work page 2013

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    & Zeilinger, A

    Gr¨ oblacher, S., Jennewein, T., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental quantum cryptography with qutrits.New J. Phys.8, 75 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Berkhout, G. C. G., Lavery, M. P. J., Courtial, J., Beijersbergen, M. W. & Pad- gett, M. W. Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 153601 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Fickler, R.et al.Quantum entanglement of high angular momenta.Science338, 640–643 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Mirhosseini, M.et al.High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light. New J. Phys.17, 033033 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Photonics 10, 248 (2016)

    Malik, M.et al.Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions.Nat. Photonics 10, 248 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Cozzolino, D.et al.Orbital angular momentum states enabling fiber-based high- dimensional quantum communication.Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 064058 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Hell, S. W. & Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimu- lated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy.Opt. Lett. 19, 780–782 (1994)

    1994

  8. [16]

    & Ritsch-Marte, M

    F¨ urhapter, S., Jesacher, A., Bernet, S. & Ritsch-Marte, M. Spiral phase contrast imaging in microscopy.Opt. Express13, 689–694 (2005)

    2005

  9. [17]

    & Ritsch-Marte, M

    F¨ urhapter, S., Jesacher, A., Bernet, S. & Ritsch-Marte, M. Spiral interferometry. Opt. Lett.30, 1953–1955 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    & Ritsch-Marte, M

    Steiger, R., Bernet, S. & Ritsch-Marte, M. Slm-based off-axis fourier filtering in microscopy with white light illumination.Opt. Express20, 15377–15384 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Science292, 912–914 (2001)

    Paterson, L.et al.Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles. Science292, 912–914 (2001)

    2001

  12. [20]

    Garc´ es-Ch´ avez, V.et al.Observation of the transfer of the local angular momen- tum density of a multiringed light beam to an optically trapped particle.Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 093602 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    & Feng, L

    Forbes, A., Mkhumbuza, L. & Feng, L. Orbital angular momentum lasers.Nature Reviews Physics6(2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    V., Michinel, H., Salgueiro, J

    Carpentier, A. V., Michinel, H., Salgueiro, J. R. & Olivieri, D. Making optical vortices with computer-generated holograms.American Journal of Physics76, 916–921 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    W., Allen, L., van der Veen, H

    Beijersbergen, M. W., Allen, L., van der Veen, H. E. L. O. & Woerdman, J. P. Astigmatic laser mode converters and transfer of orbital angular momentum. 15 Optics Communications96, 123–132 (1993)

    1993

  16. [24]

    & Paparo, D

    Marrucci, L., Manzo, C. & Paparo, D. Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media.Physical Review Letters96, 163905 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    S., Jeffries, G

    Zhao, Y., Edgar, J. S., Jeffries, G. D. M., McGloin, D. & Chiu, D. T. Spin- to-orbital angular momentum conversion in a strongly focused optical beam. Physical Review Letters99, 073901 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Genevet, P.et al.Ultra-thin plasmonic optical vortex plate based on phase discontinuities.Applied Physics Letters100, 013101 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    & Ebbesen, T

    Gorodetski, Y., Drezet, A., Genet, C. & Ebbesen, T. W. Generating far-field orbital angular momenta from near-field optical chirality.Physical Review Letters 110, 203906 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    & Capasso, F

    Genevet, P. & Capasso, F. Holographic optical metasurfaces: A review of current progress.Reports on Progress in Physics78, 024401 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Guo, X.et al.Tying polarization-switchable optical vortex knots and links via holographic all-dielectric metasurfaces.Laser and Photonics Reviews14, 1900366 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    de Oliveira, M.et al.Radially and azimuthally pure vortex beams from phase- amplitude metasurfaces.ACS Photonics10, 290–297 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    I.et al.Roadmap for optical metasurfaces.ACS Photonics(2024)

    Kuznetsov, A. I.et al.Roadmap for optical metasurfaces.ACS Photonics(2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Buono, W. T. & Forbes, A. Nonlinear optics with structured light.Opto- Electronic Advances5, 210174 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    T., Tasca, D

    Pinheiro da Silva, B., Buono, W. T., Tasca, D. S., Dechoum, K. & Khoury, A. Z. Spin to orbital angular momentum transfer in frequency up-conversion. Nanophotonics11, 771–778 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Tang, Y.et al.Harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum cascade in nonlinear optical crystals.Nature Photonics14, 658–662 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    de Ceglia, D., Coudrat, L., Roland, I.et al.Nonlinear spin-orbit coupling in optical thin films.Nature Communications15, 1625 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    ACS Photonics13, 3134–3140 (2026)

    Guercio, G.et al.Tensor-driven geometric phase in nonlinear algaas metasurfaces. ACS Photonics13, 3134–3140 (2026)

    2026

  29. [37]

    & Ellenbogen, T

    Keren-Zur, S., Avayu, O., Michaeli, L. & Ellenbogen, T. Nonlinear beam shaping with plasmonic metasurfaces.ACS Photonics3, 117–123 (2016). 16

    2016

  30. [38]

    Rong, R.et al.Beam steering of nonlinear optical vortices with phase gradient plasmonic metasurfaces.ACS Photonics10, 3248–3254 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Coudrat, L., Boulliard, G., G´ erard, J.-M.et al.Unravelling the nonlinear generation of designer vortices with dielectric metasurfaces.Light: Science & Applications14, 51 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Wang, L.et al.Nonlinear wavefront control with all-dielectric metasurfaces.Nano Letters18, 3978–3984 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Reineke Matsudo, B.et al.Efficient frequency conversion with geometric phase control in optical metasurfaces.Advanced Science9, 2104508 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Trovatello, C.et al.Tunable optical nonlinearities in layered materials.ACS Photonics(2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    de Abajo, F. J. G.et al.Roadmap for photonics with 2d materials.ACS Photonics 12, 3961–4095 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Liu, F.et al.Disassembling 2d van der waals crystals into macroscopic monolayers and reassembling into artificial lattices.Science367, 903–906 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Zhang, X.et al.Integrated van der waals waveguides for all-optical nonlinear photonic circuits.Nature Communications17, 6549 (2026)

    2026

  38. [46]

    Nature Materials(2026)

    Wang, Z.-Y.et al.All-van der waals microcavities for low-loss nonlinear photonics. Nature Materials(2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    Lin, K.et al.Nonlinear phase-matched van der waals crystals integrated on optical fibres.Nature Materials25, 581–587 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    Boyd, R.Nonlinear Optics (Fourth Edition)Fourth edition edn (Academic Press, 2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Butcher, P. N. & Cotter, D.The Elements of Nonlinear OpticsCambridge Studies in Modern Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1990)

    1990

  42. [50]

    Klimmer, S.et al.All-optical polarization and amplitude modulation of second- harmonic generation in atomically thin semiconductors.Nature Photonics15, 837–842 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Zhang, Y.et al.Coherent modulation of chiral nonlinear optics with crystal symmetry.Light: Science & Applications11, 216 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Zhang, Y.et al.Chirality logic gates.Science Advances8, eabq8246 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    ACS Nano19, 30919–30929 (2025)

    Norden, T.et al.Twisted nonlinear optics in monolayer van der waals crystals. ACS Nano19, 30919–30929 (2025). 17

    2025

  46. [54]

    L¨ ochner, F. J. F.et al.Controlling second-harmonic diffraction by nano- patterning mos2 monolayers.Opt. Express27, 35475–35484 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    & Yang, X

    Dasgupta, A., Gao, J. & Yang, X. Atomically thin nonlinear transition metal dichalcogenide holograms.Nano Letters19, 6511–6516 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    & Gao, J

    Dasgupta, A., Yang, X. & Gao, J. Nonlinear beam shaping with binary phase modulation on patterned ws2 monolayer.ACS Photonics7, 2506–2514 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Hu, G.et al.Coherent steering of nonlinear chiral valley photons with a synthetic au–ws2 metasurface.Nature Photonics13, 467–472 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Nano Letters19, 6097–6103 (2019)

    Busschaert, S.et al.Beam steering with a nonlinear optical phased array antenna. Nano Letters19, 6097–6103 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    & Zentgraf, T

    Spreyer, F., Zhao, R., Huang, L. & Zentgraf, T. Second harmonic imaging of plasmonic pancharatnam-berry phase metasurfaces coupled to monolayers of ws2. Nanophotonics9, 351–360 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Hong, X.et al.Structuring nonlinear wavefront emitted from monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides.Research2020(2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Zhao, W.et al.Large second-harmonic vortex beam generation with quasi- nonlinear spin-orbit interaction.Science Bulletin66, 449–456 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    L.et al.Second-harmonic generation of structured light by transition- metal dichalcogenide metasurfaces.Phys

    Meng, L. L.et al.Second-harmonic generation of structured light by transition- metal dichalcogenide metasurfaces.Phys. Rev. A102, 043508 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    & Gao, J

    Deka, J., Yang, X. & Gao, J. Anisotropic and temperature-tunable second- harmonic vortex generation in ferroelectric nbocl2 holograms.Laser & Photonics Reviews20, e01523 (2026)

    2026

  56. [64]

    Sinelnik, A.et al.Ultrafast all-optical second harmonic wavefront shaping.Nature Communications15, 2507 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Trovatello, C.et al.Optical parametric amplification by monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides.Nature Photonics15, 6–10 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Zhao, M.et al.Atomically phase-matched second-harmonic generation in a 2d crystal.Light: Science & Applications5, e16131–e16131 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    Xu, X.et al.Towards compact phase-matched and waveguided nonlinear optics in atomically layered semiconductors.Nature Photonics16, 698–706 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Trovatello, C.et al.Quasi-phase-matched up- and down-conversion in periodically poled layered semiconductors.Nature Photonics19, 291–299 (2025). 18

    2025

  61. [69]

    arXiv:2606.14553

    Braun, B.et al.Scaling native entanglement generation in layered semiconductors with quasi-phase matching (2026). arXiv:2606.14553

    2026

  62. [70]

    Zograf, G.et al.Combining ultrahigh index with exceptional nonlinearity in resonant transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks.Nature Photonics18, 751– 757 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    H.et al.3r-stacked transition metal dichalcogenide non-local metasurface for efficient second-harmonic generation.Nature Photonics19, 1376–1384 (2025)

    Peng, Z. H.et al.3r-stacked transition metal dichalcogenide non-local metasurface for efficient second-harmonic generation.Nature Photonics19, 1376–1384 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Zhu, Y.et al.Nonreciprocal-like chiral second-harmonic generation in a chiral 3r-mos2 metasurface.Nano Letters26, 5504–5513 (2026)

    2026

  65. [73]

    Seidt, L.et al.Ultrafast all-optical switching in nonlinear 3r-mos2 van der waals metasurfaces.npj Nanophotonics2, 37 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Menshikov, E.et al.Light structuring via nonlinear total angular momentum addition with flat optics.Light: Science & Applications14, 381 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    M., Alencar, T

    Malard, L. M., Alencar, T. V., Barboza, A. P. M., Mak, K. F. & de Paula, A. M. Observation of intense second harmonic generation from mos 2 atomic crystals. Phys. Rev. B87, 201401 (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    & Depeursinge, C

    Cuche, E., Marquet, P. & Depeursinge, C. Spatial filtering for zero-order and twin-image elimination in digital off-axis holography.Applied Optics38, 6994 (1999)

    1999

  69. [77]

    Pachava, S.et al.Generation and decomposition of scalar and vector modes carrying orbital angular momentum: a review.Optical Engineering59, 041205 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    & Cerullo, G

    Brida, D., Manzoni, C. & Cerullo, G. Phase-locked pulses for two-dimensional spectroscopy by a birefringent delay line.Opt. Lett.37, 3027–3029 (2012). 19

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.