Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Half-sized gaps between zeros of the Riemann zeta function

Number Theory · Submitted 19 Oct 2026 · 10 references

Pith's verdict: Clean, clever, and important: first conditional proof that normalized gaps between zeros of the Riemann zeta function can be at most 1/2, breaking a long-standing barrier with a genuinely new technique.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 20, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2610.26038 (version 1)
Pith IDB7ISBE7S, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndriy Bondarenko, Winston Heap. "Half-sized gaps between zeros of the Riemann zeta function." arXiv:2610.26038 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B7ISBE7S
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, the lower limit of normalized gaps between consecutive zeros of the zeta function is at most 1/2.

The reading

This paper, assuming the Riemann Hypothesis, proves that the lower limit of the normalized gaps between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta function is at most 1/2. This is a significant improvement over the previous best bound of 0.50895 obtained by Inoue (2026). The result suggests that zeros can be arbitrarily close to half the average spacing, and it supports the conjecture that the true lower limit is zero. The proof uses a novel variation of the resonance method, working with a quotient of shifted zeta functions rather than the counting function.

What carries the argument

The key object is the quotient function F(s) = tan(π/2 (z(s)-1/2)), where z(s) involves a logarithmic derivative integral of shifted zeta functions. The assumption that μ > 1/2 forces |F(s)| ≤ 1 + o(1) in a certain rectangle. A cleverly chosen Möbius resonator (Dirichlet polynomials R and Q with coefficients derived from μ(n) and trigonometric functions) satisfies the identity F(s)R(s) = Q(s) in the sense of Dirichlet series. By integrating F R Q against a Gaussian weight, a contradiction arises from comparing the growth of coefficient sums, proving that μ cannot exceed 1/2.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under the Riemann Hypothesis, the liminf of (γ_{n+1} - γ_n) log γ_n / (2π) is at most 1/2.

Load-bearing premise

The entire proof assumes the Riemann Hypothesis, that all non-trivial zeros lie on the line Re(s)=1/2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Riemann Hypothesis holds, the maximal lower bound for gaps is reduced to 1/2, narrowing the possible range for μ.
  • The method breaks the earlier barrier thought to limit the resonance technique to above 0.508, opening new approaches for gap problems.
  • The technique may be adaptable to other families of L-functions to obtain similar sharp bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof critically depends on the Riemann Hypothesis; without it, the conclusion is not known to hold.
  • The coefficient identity and the choice of resonator suggest that achieving μ < 1/2 might require an even more refined construction, likely involving longer Dirichlet polynomials or higher-order correlations.
  • The success of the quotient approach indicates that other problems in value distribution of zeta functions could benefit from similar ratio-symmetric resonators.
Original abstract

Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, we prove that the lower limit of the normalised gaps between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta function is at most $1/2$. Our methods utilise a more efficient method for detecting gaps with short Dirichlet polynomials. Specifically, we apply resonance to a quotient of shifted zeta functions, rather than to the number of zeros in a short interval, using a M\"obius resonator adapted to the symmetry between the shifts.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-20: 1 request, 2,965 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.66 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, we prove that the lower limit of the normalised gaps between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta function is at most $1/2$. Our methods utilise a more efficient method for detecting gaps with short Dirichlet polynomials. Specifically, we apply resonance to a quotient of shifted zeta functions, rather than to the number of zeros in a short interval, using a M\"obius resonator adapted to the symmetry between the shifts.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, we prove that the lower limit of the normalised gaps between consecutive zeros of the Riemann zeta function is at most $1/2$. result 1.00 0.95 0.96 asserted 1.00
s1 Our methods utilise a more efficient method for detecting gaps with short Dirichlet polynomials. method 0.93 0.81 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Specifically, we apply resonance to a quotient of shifted zeta functions, rather than to the number of zeros in a short interval, using a M\"obius resonator adapted to the symmetry between the shifts. method 0.98 0.91 0.03 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.