Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Upper Bounds on the de Bruijn-Newman constant for Dirichlet $L$-functions with primitive real-valued characters

Number Theory · Submitted 19 Oct 2026 · 37 references

Pith's verdict: First non-trivial de Bruijn–Newman bounds for Dirichlet L-functions, with a solid analytic core and one decisive gap: 235 of 242 numerical certificates are private until the code is released.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 21, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 3 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2610.27343 (version 1)
Pith ID2ZXQT574, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationClaudio Mu\~noz, Cristian Gonz\'alez-Riquelme, Felipe Poblete, Ricardo Freire, Vicente Salinas. "Upper Bounds on the de Bruijn-Newman constant for Dirichlet $L$-functions with primitive real-valued characters." arXiv:2610.27343 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ZXQT574
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

For every primitive real Dirichlet character of conductor up to 400, the generalized de Bruijn–Newman constant is at most 953/3200 = 0.2978125 — the first nontrivial upper bound for any Dirichlet L-function.

The reading

This paper establishes the first nontrivial upper bounds on the generalized de Bruijn–Newman constant $\Lambda_L$ for Dirichlet $L$-functions with primitive real-valued characters. The constant $\Lambda_L$ is a single real number attached to $L$: it is the threshold time at which the heat-flow deformation $H^L_t$ of the completed $L$-function has only real zeros, and the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for $L$ is equivalent to $\Lambda_L \le 0$. Unconditionally, the paper proves $\Lambda_L \le 953/3200 = 0.2978125$ for every such character of conductor $3 \le m \le 400$, improving on the trivial bound $\Lambda_L \le 1/2$; under an assumed initial zero strip $|\operatorname{Im} z| \le D < 1$ — for example $D = 3/4$, which would follow from a zero-free half-plane $\operatorname{Re}(s) > 7/8$ of the preprint [24] — the same machinery gives stronger bounds, with 149 characters falling below $9/32 = 0.28125$. Since a theorem of [11] gives $\Lambda_L \ge 0$, each constant is now bracketed in $[0, 0.2978125]$ rather than $[0, 1/2]$, a quantitative measure of how close the heat-flow picture comes to GRH for this family. The method extends the effective-approximation strategy of the zeta case [28] to $L$-functions, tracking the conductor through every error term and feeding the estimates into a rigorous interval-arithmetic verification of three explicit zero-free regions.

What carries the argument

Three pieces carry the argument. The strip-contraction theorem [9] gives $\Lambda_L \le t_0 + y_0^2/2$ whenever $H^L_{t_0}$ has no zeros with $\operatorname{Im} z \ge y_0$, and the zero-dynamics machinery [7, 28] converts this into a velocity comparison: no zero of the moving family can cross a barrier above the strip, because the vertical velocity at the boundary is always more negative than the boundary's own rate of descent. The zero-free-region criterion (Lemma 3.3) reduces the bound to three explicitly described regions — an initial rectangle at $t = 0$ (covered for $x \le 2h_m$ by the GRH verification [25]), a moving barrier of width $\Delta_D = \sqrt{D^2 - y_0^2 - 2t_0}$ swept for $0 \le t \le t_0$, and an analytic right tail at the final time. The effective Riemann–Siegel approximation (Theorem 4.3) is the third piece: for $x \ge 480$, $|y| \le 1$, $0 \le t \le 1/2$, it writes $H^L_t(x+iy)/B^L_t(x+iy)$ as a pair of conductor-truncated Dirichlet sums plus an error $O_\le(e_A + e_B + e_{C,0})$ with every constant explicit. The conductor enters through the kernel $W_L(x) = \frac{\pi}{2m}\sum_{k=1}^{2m}\chi_m(k)e^{-i\pi k^2/m}\cot(\pi(x-k)/(2m))$, whose leading saddle coefficient $C^{(m)}_0(p) = e^{-i\pi/8}J_m(\delta)$ satisfies the uniform bound $|C^{(m)}_0(p)| \le B^\star_m < 3.33\sqrt{m}$ by a rearrangement argument that avoids incomplete character sums. The finitely many inequalities are finally checked in rigorous ball/interval arithmetic with a fixed numerical tolerance of $10^{-8}$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, pairs a criterion with a computation. For each primitive real character $\chi_m$, attach the heat-flow family $H^L_t(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tu^2}\Phi_L(u)e^{izu}\,du$, whose zeros are all real exactly when $t \ge \Lambda_L$. If every zero of $H^L_0$ lies in the strip $|\operatorname{Im} z| \le D$, then $\Lambda_L \le \min\{D^2/2,\, \Lambda^\ast(m,\chi_m;D)\}$, where $\Lambda^\ast$ is the infimum of $t_0 + y_0^2/2$ over parameter triples whose three zero-free regions have been verified. At $D = 1$, the classical critical strip available unconditionally, the verified triples give $\Lambda_L \le 953/3200 = 0.2978125$ for all 242 real primitive characters with $3 \le m \le 400$, with individual bounds as low as 0.2278. The proof decomposes the required zero-free region into an initial rectangle at $t = 0$ (supplied by the published GRH verification [25]), a moving barrier swept out by the zero dynamics for $0 \le t \le t_0$, and an analytic right tail at the final time, and every error bound in the underlying effective Riemann–Siegel approximation is explicit and tracks the conductor $m$, uniform for $3 \le m \le 4\cdot10^5$.

Load-bearing premise

The unconditional bound rests on the correctness of the paper's private interval-arithmetic verification of regions (a)–(c) for the 242 characters — the code, mesh choices, and verification records are not public — and the conditional $D = 3/4$ rows additionally rest on the zero-free half-plane $\operatorname{Re}(s) > 7/8$ asserted in the unpublished preprint [24] rather than proved here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every one of the 242 real primitive characters with conductor up to 400 now has a verified bound $\Lambda_L \le 0.2978125 < 1/2$; combined with the non-negativity theorem of [11], each constant is bracketed in $[0, 0.2978125]$ rather than $[0, 1/2]$.
  • The conditional gains are substantial: under the initial-strip hypothesis (for instance $|\operatorname{Im} z| \le 3/4$, which would follow from a zero-free half-plane $\operatorname{Re}(s) > 7/8$), 136 of the reference pairs and 149 cap-specific searches put $\Lambda_L$ strictly below $9/32 = 0.28125$.
  • The approximation is strong enough to describe the zeros themselves: Theorem 8.1 gives a Riemann–von Mangoldt-type formula $N^L_t(X) = g_L(X,t) + O(\log(2+X))$ for $t > 0$, with all but finitely many large zeros real, simple, and spaced like $4\pi/\log(mX/4\pi)$.
  • The paper's calibrated scale estimate (Remark 8.2) indicates that pushing the conductor-4 bound toward 0.1 would require a rigorous verification height on the order of $7\times10^{20}$, against the current $2.5\times10^7$; the logarithmic bottleneck is quantitative, not just qualitative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Until the certificate behind Theorem 1.1 is public — the paper states in Section 7.7 that its code, inputs, and verification records are retained in a private repository offered to referees — the unconditional bound is best read as a certified claim awaiting independent reproduction, and the decisive check is a re-implementation of regions (a)–(c) with different interval-arithmetic software.
  • The $D = 3/4$ rows stand on the zero-free half-plane $\operatorname{Re}(s) > 7/8$ asserted in the unpublished preprint [24] rather than proved here; if that claim were withdrawn, the 149 improvements below $9/32$ would be lost and those characters would fall back to their unconditional $D = 1$ bounds.
  • The analytic error bounds are uniform for conductors up to $4\cdot10^5$, but the verification height $h_m = 10^8/m$ shrinks with the conductor, so the practical ceiling of the method is the height of the rigorous GRH verification, not the quality of the approximation; raising that height (as was done for the zeta function up to $3\cdot10^{12}$) is the most direct path to stronger bounds.
  • The architecture should transfer to any family with a functional equation and an effective Riemann–Siegel expansion with explicit conductor dependence, and the near-periodic large-zero spacing $4\pi/\log(mX/4\pi)$ predicted by Corollary 8.4 for $t > 0$ is a concrete pattern that numerical contouring could test without new theory.
Original abstract

Let $\chi_m$ be a primitive real-valued Dirichlet character of conductor $m\ge3$, let $L(s)=L(s,\chi_m)$ be the associated Dirichlet $L$-function, and let $\xi_L(s)$ denote its completed form. For each $t \in \mathbb R,$ we define the entire function \[ H^L_t(z) := \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tu^2}\, \Phi_L(u)\, e^{izu}\, du, \] where $\Phi_L$ is the superexponentially decaying density \[ \Phi_L(u) := \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \xi_L\!\left(\frac{1+is}{2}\right) e^{-isu}\, ds. \] The family $\{H_t^L\}_{t \in \mathbb R}$ describes the heat-flow evolution of $\xi_L$ and solves a backward heat equation. By the work of Newman, there exists a finite constant $\Lambda_L$, called the generalized de Bruijn--Newman constant, such that all the zeros of $H_t^L$ are real if and only if $t \ge \Lambda_L$. The Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH) for $L$ is equivalent to the assertion that $\Lambda_L \le 0$. Dobner established the matching lower bound $\Lambda_L \ge 0$, while de Bruijn proved the upper bound $\Lambda_L \le \tfrac12$. We prove the unconditional uniform bound $\Lambda_L\le953/3200=0.2978125$ for every primitive real-valued character of conductor $3\le m\le400$, together with stronger individual bounds. The proof extends the effective approximation of Polymath to Dirichlet $L$-functions, retaining the conductor dependence in the error estimates. We combine these estimates with Platt's numerical verification of GRH by Platt and rigorous interval computations. We also give conditional bounds under explicit global initial zero-strip hypotheses, including $|\operatorname{Im}z|\le3/4$ for the zeros of $H_0^L$.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-21: 1 request, 8,151 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Let $\chi_m$ be a primitive real-valued Dirichlet character of conductor $m\ge3$, let $L(s)=L(s,\chi_m)$ be the associated Dirichlet $L$-function, and let $\xi_L(s)$ denote its completed form. For each $t \in \mathbb R,$ we define the entire function \[ H^L_t(z) := \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tu^2}\, \Phi_L(u)\, e^{izu}\, du, \] where $\Phi_L$ is the superexponentially decaying density \[ \Phi_L(u) := \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \xi_L\!\left(\frac{1+is}{2}\right) e^{-isu}\, ds. \] The family $\{H_t^L\}_{t \in \mathbb R}$ describes the heat-flow evolution of $\xi_L$ and solves a backward heat equation. By the work of Newman, there exists a finite constant $\Lambda_L$, called the generalized de Bruijn--Newman constant, such that all the zeros of $H_t^L$ are real if and only if $t \ge \Lambda_L$. The Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH) for $L$ is equivalent to the assertion that $\Lambda_L \le 0$. Dobner established the matching lower bound $\Lambda_L \ge 0$, while de Bruijn proved the upper bound $\Lambda_L \le \tfrac12$. We prove the unconditional uniform bound $\Lambda_L\le953/3200=0.2978125$ for every primitive real-valued character of conductor $3\le m\le400$, together with stronger individual bounds. The proof extends the effective approximation of Polymath to Dirichlet $L$-functions, retaining the conductor dependence in the error estimates. We combine these estimates with Platt's numerical verification of GRH by Platt and rigorous interval computations. We also give conditional bounds under explicit global initial zero-strip hypotheses, including $|\operatorname{Im}z|\le3/4$ for the zeros of $H_0^L$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Let $\chi_m$ be a primitive real-valued Dirichlet character of conductor $m\ge3$, let $L(s)=L(s,\chi_m)$ be the associated Dirichlet $L$-function, and let $\xi_L(s)$ denote its completed form. background 1.00 0.08 0.01 asserted 0.80
s1 For each $t \in \mathbb R,$ we define the entire function \[ H^L_t(z) := \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{tu^2}\, \Phi_L(u)\, e^{izu}\, du, \] where $\Phi_L$ is the superexponentially decaying density \[ \Phi_L(u) := \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \xi_L\!\left(\frac{1+is}{2}\right) e^{-isu}\, ds. background 0.61 0.37 0.02 asserted 0.97
s2 \] The family $\{H_t^L\}_{t \in \mathbb R}$ describes the heat-flow evolution of $\xi_L$ and solves a backward heat equation. background 0.89 0.10 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 By the work of Newman, there exists a finite constant $\Lambda_L$, called the generalized de Bruijn--Newman constant, such that all the zeros of $H_t^L$ are real if and only if $t \ge \Lambda_L$. background 1.00 0.02 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 The Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH) for $L$ is equivalent to the assertion that $\Lambda_L \le 0$. background 0.98 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s5 Dobner established the matching lower bound $\Lambda_L \ge 0$, while de Bruijn proved the upper bound $\Lambda_L \le \tfrac12$. background 0.98 0.03 0.03 asserted 1.00
s6 We prove the unconditional uniform bound $\Lambda_L\le953/3200=0.2978125$ for every primitive real-valued character of conductor $3\le m\le400$, together with stronger individual bounds. result 0.94 0.97 0.95 asserted 1.00
s7 The proof extends the effective approximation of Polymath to Dirichlet $L$-functions, retaining the conductor dependence in the error estimates. method 0.92 0.75 0.03 asserted 1.00
s8 We combine these estimates with Platt's numerical verification of GRH by Platt and rigorous interval computations. method 0.99 0.76 0.04 asserted 0.99
s9 We also give conditional bounds under explicit global initial zero-strip hypotheses, including $|\operatorname{Im}z|\le3/4$ for the zeros of $H_0^L$. result 0.67 0.91 0.04 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 3. 1: The two branches from a double zero on iR remain on the imaginary axis for nearby times t < T. Proof. Choose r0 > 0 so that P is the only zero of HL T in D(P, r0). By Rouché’s theorem, HL t has exactly q zeros in this disc, counted with multiplicity, for t sufficiently close to T. Proposition 3.2(ii) shows that, for t < T, these zeros are simple and satisfy zj (t) = P + i p 2(T − t) λj + O(T − t), j = 1, . . . , q, where λ1 < · · · < λq are the real roots of Heq. Choose ρ > 0 such that 2ρ < minj̸=k |λj − λk|. For t < T sufficiently close to T, the discs Bj (t) := D  P + i p
Figure 4. 2: Comparison of |f L t (x+iy)| and |HL t (x+iy)|/|BL t (x+iy)| for m = 4, y = 0, and t = 0.3, on 1000 ≤ x ≤ 1030 (left) and 106 ≤ x ≤ 106 + 30 (right). The main term is defined in (4.40), and the error terms are specified in Proposi￾tions 4.15, 4.16 and 4.17. We first estimate the Dirichlet terms and the integral remain￾der, then combine them in Section 4.3.4. 4.3. Proof of Theorem 4.3. We estimate r L t,n and RL t,N separately and then combine them in the symmetric decomposition. 4.3.1. The Dirichlet terms. By (2.3), α ′ L(s) = 1 2(s + a) + 1 2(s + a) 2 . If Im(s) > 1
Figure 6. 1: Truncated Euler products for the beta function (m = 4, d = −4), with r = 3, 5, 7, 20, on the search window (top) and near the candidate X⋆ 4 selected with r = 20 (bottom). Platt’s verification of GRH up to height hm excludes such a zero. It remains to verify hypotheses (2) and (3) of Lemma 3.3. 6.3. The truncation parameters. For x ≥ 2hm − ∆m ≥ 480 and 0 ≤ t ≤ t0, define M(x, t) := $s m 4π  x + πt 4 % , δ(x, t) := s m 4π  x + πt 4  . Thus M(x, t) = ⌊δ(x, t)⌋. For every integer M ≥ 1, define xM(t) := 4πM2 m − πt 4 . Then, M(x, t) = M ⇐⇒ xM(t) ≤ x < xM+1(t)
Figure 7. 1: Sampled boundary minima and stepwise error bounds for m = 4, d = −4, with the parameters in
Figure 8. 1: Dirichlet beta function (m = 4). Upper: numerical con￾tour HL t (x) = 0 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 80 and −12 ≤ t ≤ 8, computed from the Fourier integral; the dashed line marks t = 0. Lower: phase residuals for large x. Each plotted center x RS j is a zero of the leading Riemann– Siegel term, and nj is the nearest integer to gL(x RS j , 1/2)

Showing 5 of the paper's 8 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.27343 by the authors.

References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.