Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Large values of Hardy's Function from the Selberg class

Number Theory · Submitted 27 Oct 2026 · 37 references

Pith's verdict: Solid, competent extension of the resonance method for Hardy's Z to degree-1 and degree-2 Selberg-class L-functions; the degree-2 unconditional results for cusp forms, Dedekind zeta, and products are new and correctly argued.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2610.36885 (version 1)
Pith IDRZ6IG7NM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAhammad Mostafa Hossain, Akshaa Vatwani, Kamalakshya Mahatab. "Large values of Hardy's Function from the Selberg class." arXiv:2610.36885 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZ6IG7NM
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

Hardy's function for degree-1 and many degree-2 L-functions attains values exp(C sqrt(log T / log log T)).

The reading

The paper proves that for every L-function of degree 1 in the Selberg class (Riemann zeta and shifted Dirichlet L-functions) and for several families of degree 2 functions — including cusp forms, Dedekind zeta of quadratic fields, and products of Dirichlet L-functions — the maximal size of the associated Hardy's function on the interval [T,2T] is at least exp(C_F sqrt(log T / log log T)) with explicit constants. For degree 1 the constant is 1/2; for cusp forms and the other special degree-2 families it is 1/√2. The result uses the resonance method and gives the first such lower bounds for many of these L-functions. It unifies and extends previous work for the Riemann zeta function to a broader class of L-functions.

What carries the argument

The resonance method with a Dirichlet polynomial resonator R(t)=∑_{m≤N} r(m) $m^{{-it}}$ where r(n)=a_F(n) f(n) and f is a multiplicative function supported on squarefree integers in a carefully chosen range. The lower bound for the integral of F(1/2+it)|R(t)|^2 comes from Euler product calculations and the Selberg normality conjecture (or its verified versions), while the upper bound for the integral of Z_F(t)|R(t)|^2 is obtained by shifting the contour and using exponential sum estimates (Hypothesis 1 for degree 2, or faster derivative estimates for degree 1, or special handling for Dedekind zeta and products). The balance of these two integrals forces large values of Z_F(t).

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for any L-function F of degree 1 in the Selberg class (including shifts of Dirichlet L-functions) and for several degree 2 functions (Hecke cusp forms, Maass cusp forms, Dedekind zeta of quadratic fields, products L(s,χ1)L(s,χ2) with q1q2 not a square), we have max_{T≤t≤2T} ± Z_F(t) ≫ exp(C_F √(log T / log log T)) where C_F is explicit: 1/2 for degree 1, 1/√2 for cusp forms and the listed special degree-2 cases, and √(κ(1-γ)) for general degree 2 under an exponential sum hypothesis and the Selberg normality conjecture. The proof is based on Soundararajan's resonance method with a Dirichlet polynomial resonator, and requires exponential sum estimates for the Dirichlet coefficients. The paper also obtains an unconditional result for Maass cusp forms with constant √(25/71) using the Kim-Sarnak bound.

Load-bearing premise

For the general degree-2 result (Theorem 1.3), the load-bearing premise is Hypothesis 1: there exists γ<1 such that the exponential sum ∑_{n≤x} a_F(n) $e^{{2π i n x}}$ is O(x^γ (log x)^{γ1}) uniformly. This hypothesis is not proved for all Selberg class degree-2 functions and is only verified for specific families (cusp forms, etc.). If γ were 1, the condition α<1-γ would require α<0, making the resonator useless.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For all degree-1 Selberg class L-functions, Hardy's function has maximal values of order exp((1/2-ϵ)√(log T / log log T)), confirming the resonance method works universally for this degree.
  • For holomorphic and Maass cusp forms of arbitrary level and nebentypus, the same lower bound with constant 1/√2 is obtained, providing the first such result for these L-functions.
  • For Dedekind zeta of quadratic fields and for products of distinct primitive Dirichlet L-functions with non-square conductor product, the constant is also 1/√2, showing that even when a uniform exponential sum bound is not available, the method can still succeed via alternative estimates.
  • The method fails for degree ≥3, so a new idea is needed to extend such results to higher degree.
  • The results contribute to the understanding of the distribution of values of L-functions on the critical line and support the consistency of the Selberg class framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit constants C_F appear to be maximal achievable under current techniques: for degree 1 the constant 1/2 matches the exponent from the Riemann zeta case, suggesting an optimal bound for this method; for degree 2 the constant 1/√2 is the same across several families, possibly indicating a universal bound for degree 2 L-functions under suitable hypotheses.
  • The reliance on the unproven Hypothesis 1 for general degree-2 L-functions highlights a gap: the exponential sum bound may be a barrier to proving such large values for all degree-2 Selberg class functions.
  • The treatment of Dedekind zeta and products via Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3 provides a template for handling L-functions that do not admit a uniform exponential sum bound but still have enough cancellation from Diophantine approximation.
  • The results suggest a connection between the constant C_F and the rank (degree) of the L-function: the method naturally gives a constant that decreases as the degree increases, consistently with the difficulty of controlling the integral of Z_F(t)R(t)^2 for higher degree.
Original abstract

Let $Z_F(t):=F(1/2+it) H(1/2+it)^{-1/2}$ denote Hardy's function, where the function $F(s)$ belongs to the Selberg class with polynomial Euler product and satisfies the functional equation $F(s)=H(s)\overline{F}(1-\bar{s})$. We prove that for every function of degree $1$ and for certain functions of degree $2$ belonging to the Selberg class, one has \begin{align*} \max_{T\leq t\leq 2T} \pm Z_F(t) &\gg \exp\left(C_F \sqrt{ \frac{{\log T}}{{\log \log T}} } \right), \end{align*} where the constant $C_F$ depends on $F(s)$ and are explicitly determined.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-28: 1 request, 2,628 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Let $Z_F(t):=F(1/2+it) H(1/2+it)^{-1/2}$ denote Hardy's function, where the function $F(s)$ belongs to the Selberg class with polynomial Euler product and satisfies the functional equation $F(s)=H(s)\overline{F}(1-\bar{s})$. We prove that for every function of degree $1$ and for certain functions of degree $2$ belonging to the Selberg class, one has \begin{align*} \max_{T\leq t\leq 2T} \pm Z_F(t) &\gg \exp\left(C_F \sqrt{ \frac{{\log T}}{{\log \log T}} } \right), \end{align*} where the constant $C_F$ depends on $F(s)$ and are explicitly determined.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Let $Z_F(t):=F(1/2+it) H(1/2+it)^{-1/2}$ denote Hardy's function, where the function $F(s)$ belongs to the Selberg class with polynomial Euler product and satisfies the functional equation $F(s)=H(s)\overline{F}(1-\bar{s})$. background 1.00 0.12 0.02 asserted 0.80
s1 We prove that for every function of degree $1$ and for certain functions of degree $2$ belonging to the Selberg class, one has \begin{align*} \max_{T\leq t\leq 2T} \pm Z_F(t) &\gg \exp\left(C_F \sqrt{ \frac{{\log T}}{{\log \log T}} } \right), \end{align*} where the constant $C_F$ depends on $F(s)$ and are explicitly determined. result 0.99 0.95 0.95 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.