Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Pointwise Ergodic Theorems Along $\lfloor p^c\rfloor$ for Every $c>1$

Classical Analysis and ODEs · Submitted 2 Nov 2026 · 29 references

Pith's verdict: The full-range c>1 theorem for prime-weighted fractional-power averages is real and well-built; the MSTT black box (Prop 2.7) needs a source-check and Prop 3.4's proof needs fleshing out, but nothing here looks fatal.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on November 3, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2611.02465 (version 1)
Pith IDZGU5Z2YB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAnastasios Fragkos. "Pointwise Ergodic Theorems Along $\lfloor p^c\rfloor$ for Every $c>1$." arXiv:2611.02465 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZGU5Z2YB
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

The paper

The paper claims

The paper proves a full-range ergodic theorem along fractional powers of primes: for every noninteger $c>1$ and $1<p<\infty$, von Mangoldt-weighted averages converge a.e., and Möbius-weighted averages vanish at any logarithmic rate.

The reading

This paper proves that ergodic averages sampled along fractional powers of primes converge for every noninteger exponent $c>1$, the full range beyond the previously settled $12$, and consequently the averages converge almost everywhere and in $L^p$, with the prime-normalized averages converging to the same limit. The engine is a uniform discorrelation bound showing that $\Lambda(n)$ — the von Mangoldt weight that assigns $\log p$ to prime powers — is indistinguishable from the constant weight $1$ against the phases $e(\xi\lfloor n^c\rfloor)$, up to errors smaller than any power of $\log N$, uniformly in the frequency $\xi$. The same mechanism, with the Möbius function $\mu(n)$ in place of $\Lambda(n)-1$, makes the Möbius-weighted averages along $\lfloor n^c\rfloor$ converge to zero almost everywhere at rate $(\log N)^{-A}$ for every $A>1$, settling an open question from a conference problem list. A sympathetic reader should care because the result fuses the two classical sources of sparsity — primes and non-integer powers — into one quantitative theorem valid throughout the reflexive range $1

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three linked mechanisms. First, short-interval polynomial approximation: on an interval of length $|\mathbf{I}|\asymp N^\theta$, $0<\theta<1$, the fractional phase $e(\xi n^c)$ is replaced, up to a power-saving error, by the polynomial phase $e(\xi P_k(n))$ with $P_k$ the Taylor polynomial of $t^c$ at the interval's center, so any correlation with a fractional phase reduces to a correlation with a polynomial phase (Lemma 4.1). Second, short-interval polynomial uniformity (Proposition 2.7, imported from [21]): on every interval $(X,X+H]$ with $X^{5/8+\varepsilon}\le H\le X^{1-\varepsilon}$, the weights $\Lambda-\Lambda_{\mathrm{Cramer},Q_J}$ and $\mu$ have polynomial-phase correlation at most $(\log X)^{-A}$ for every $A>0$, uniformly over all real polynomial coefficients; the fundamental lemma of sieve theory then converts the Cramér approximant $\Lambda_{\mathrm{Cramer},Q_J}$ — a pseudorandom model of the primes — into a divisor sum, and Lemma 3.3 evaluates that divisor sum's correlation with the fractional phase by an oscillatory integral. Third, the unweighted variation theorem for $B_N^c$ (Proposition 3.4, proved here from scratch) supplies the model dynamics that the $\Lambda$-weighted averages are forced to match; Proposition 4.2 makes the discrepancy at every dyadic scale smaller than $(\log N)^{-A}$, and the long-variation/short-variation decomposition turns that comparison into the claimed bound.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 1, asserts that for every noninteger $c>1$, every $1<p<\infty$ and every $r>2$, on every $\sigma$-finite measure-preserving system $(X,\mathcal{B},\nu,T)$ and every $f\in L^p(X)$, $$\bigl\|\mathcal{V}^r(A_N^c f:N\in\mathbb{N})\bigr\|_{L^p(X)}\lesssim_{c,p,r}\|f\|_{L^p(X)}.$$ Because the homogeneous $r$-variation seminorm controls the oscillation of the whole sequence of averages, the estimate yields almost-everywhere and $L^p$ convergence of $A_N^c f$, and Corollary 2 transfers the conclusion to the prime-normalized averages $P_N^c f(x)=\frac{1}{\pi(N)}\sum_{p\le N}f(T^{\lfloor p^c\rfloor}x)$, which share the same limit. Theorem 3 is the Möbius analogue: $\frac{(\log N)^A}{N}\sum_{n\le N}\mu(n)f(T^{\lfloor n^c\rfloor}x)\to 0$ almost everywhere for every $A>1$, every $1<p<\infty$ and every $f\in L^p(X)$. The load-bearing discovery behind all three statements is Proposition 4.2, $$\sup_{\xi\in\mathbb{T}}\left|\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n\le N}(\Lambda(n)-1)e(\xi\lfloor n^c\rfloor)\right|\lesssim_{c,A}(\log N)^{-A}\quad(A>0),$$ which says that at every frequency simultaneously the prime-weight discrepancy $\Lambda-1$ decorrelates from fractional-power phases with arbitrary logarithmic savings, forcing the weighted averages to track the unweighted averages $B_N^c f$, whose variation is controlled separately in Proposition 3.4.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the imported short-interval uniformity statement (Proposition 2.7, quoted from [21]): on every interval $(X,X+H]$ with $X^{5/8+\varepsilon}\le H\le X^{1-\varepsilon}$, the weights $\Lambda-\Lambda_{\mathrm{Cramer},Q_J}$ and $\mu$ have correlation at most $(\log X)^{-A}$ with every real-coefficient polynomial phase, uniformly in the interval's position and over all real coefficients, and the paper takes this in as a black box, asserting the polynomial-phase specialization without displaying the reduction from the published Gowers-norm form — if the cited result's actual length range or its uniformity over real coefficients were weaker than asserted, the discorrelation bound and with it both main theorems would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every noninteger $c>1$ and every $1<p<\infty$, the von Mangoldt-weighted averages $A_N^c f$ and the prime-normalized averages $P_N^c f$ converge almost everywhere and in $L^p$ on every $\sigma$-finite measure-preserving system, with the same limit for both normalizations.
  • The Möbius-weighted averages $\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n\le N}\mu(n)f(T^{\lfloor n^c\rfloor}x)$ converge to $0$ almost everywhere for every $f\in L^p$, $1<p<\infty$, with a guaranteed rate $o((\log N)^{-A})$ for every fixed $A>1$.
  • The previously known range for prime-weighted convergence along fractional powers is extended from $1<c<4/3$ to all noninteger $c>1$, and the proof avoids the circle-method minor-arc bottleneck that had limited the exponent.
  • Because the variational estimate transfers to the integer shift and holds on every $\sigma$-finite system, the bounds are uniform in the system, covering infinite-measure dynamics as well as probability spaces.
  • The unweighted variation theorem for $B_N^c$ receives a self-contained proof, so the convergence of the unweighted averages no longer depends on the earlier proof of that input.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof's partition of each dyadic block into short subintervals of length at least $X^{5/8+1/100}$ indicates that the exponent $5/8$ in the imported uniformity estimate is the true bottleneck; if that estimate were later pushed to shorter intervals, the same short-interval replacement would plausibly extend to faster-growing sequences such as $\lfloor n^c(\log n)^a\rfloor$ or toward the unweigh
  • Proposition 4.2 is itself a theorem about the distribution of primes: it says the primes are uniform against the curve $n\mapsto\lfloor n^c\rfloor$ with more-than-polylogarithmic precision, and that statement is likely reusable for equidistribution or recurrence questions involving several fractional powers at once, where current results mostly live in $L^2$.
  • The paper notes that the second part of the original Möbius problem — the largest range of $c$ for which $L^1$ convergence holds — remains open; the present proof is firmly $L^p$-based, so reaching $f\in L^1$ would need weak-type input rather than a routine variation of this argument.
  • Because the whole comparison runs through the Cramér model, the same discorrelation estimate should hold for any 'Cramér-like' weight (for example indicators of almost-primes), yielding a family of sparse ergodic theorems with essentially the same proof.
Original abstract

Let $c>1$ be noninteger, and let $\Lambda$ denote the von Mangoldt function. The averages \[ A_N^{c} f(x):=\frac1N\sum_{n=1}^{N} \Lambda(n)f\bigl(T^{\lfloor n^c\rfloor}x\bigr) \] satisfy the variational estimate \[ \bigl\|\mathcal{V}^r(A_N^{c} f:N\in\mathbb{N})\bigr\|_{L^p(X)} \lesssim_{c,p,r}\|f\|_{L^p(X)} \] for every $1<p<\infty$ and $r>2$, on every $\sigma$-finite measure-preserving system. In particular, the normalized averages along fractional powers of primes converge almost everywhere. The main arithmetic ingredient is a uniform bound on the correlations of $\Lambda-1$ with fractional-power exponential phases, yielding arbitrarily large powers of logarithmic gain. We obtain this estimate through short-interval polynomial approximation of the fractional phase and higher-order discorrelation estimates. The same approach yields almost-everywhere convergence to for the M\"obius-weighted averages along $\left( \lfloor n^c \rfloor \right)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ throughout $1<p<\infty$.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-11-03: 1 request, 5,289 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.90 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Let $c>1$ be noninteger, and let $\Lambda$ denote the von Mangoldt function. The averages \[ A_N^{c} f(x):=\frac1N\sum_{n=1}^{N} \Lambda(n)f\bigl(T^{\lfloor n^c\rfloor}x\bigr) \] satisfy the variational estimate \[ \bigl\|\mathcal{V}^r(A_N^{c} f:N\in\mathbb{N})\bigr\|_{L^p(X)} \lesssim_{c,p,r}\|f\|_{L^p(X)} \] for every $1<p<\infty$ and $r>2$, on every $\sigma$-finite measure-preserving system. In particular, the normalized averages along fractional powers of primes converge almost everywhere. The main arithmetic ingredient is a uniform bound on the correlations of $\Lambda-1$ with fractional-power exponential phases, yielding arbitrarily large powers of logarithmic gain. We obtain this estimate through short-interval polynomial approximation of the fractional phase and higher-order discorrelation estimates. The same approach yields almost-everywhere convergence to for the M\"obius-weighted averages along $\left( \lfloor n^c \rfloor \right)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ throughout $1<p<\infty$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Let $c>1$ be noninteger, and let $\Lambda$ denote the von Mangoldt function. background 0.99 0.10 0.02 unclear 0.59
s1 The averages \[ A_N^{c} f(x):=\frac1N\sum_{n=1}^{N} \Lambda(n)f\bigl(T^{\lfloor n^c\rfloor}x\bigr) \] satisfy the variational estimate \[ \bigl\|\mathcal{V}^r(A_N^{c} f:N\in\mathbb{N})\bigr\|_{L^p(X)} \lesssim_{c,p,r}\|f\|_{L^p(X)} \] for every $1<p<\infty$ and $r>2$, on every $\sigma$-finite measure-preserving system. result 0.99 0.88 0.60 asserted 1.00
s2 In particular, the normalized averages along fractional powers of primes converge almost everywhere. interpretation 0.68 0.86 0.48 asserted 1.00
s3 The main arithmetic ingredient is a uniform bound on the correlations of $\Lambda-1$ with fractional-power exponential phases, yielding arbitrarily large powers of logarithmic gain. contribution 0.62 0.87 0.06 asserted 1.00
s4 We obtain this estimate through short-interval polynomial approximation of the fractional phase and higher-order discorrelation estimates. method 1.00 0.91 0.03 asserted 1.00
s5 The same approach yields almost-everywhere convergence to for the M\"obius-weighted averages along $\left( \lfloor n^c \rfloor \right)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ throughout $1<p<\infty$. result 0.94 0.92 0.14 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Human review
References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.