Universal Phase Locking from Slowly Varying Inhomogeneity in Tunnel-Coupled One-Dimensional Condensates

Bence Fitos; G\'abor Tak\'acs

REVIEW

Universal Phase Locking from Slowly Varying Inhomogeneity in Tunnel-Coupled One-Dimensional Condensates

Bence Fitos, Gábor Takács

Quantum Gases · Submitted 5 Nov 2026 · 37 references

Pith's verdict: The curvature-only phase-locking timescale is a genuine result backed by a sound asymptotic derivation and a parameter-free check over a decade in epsilon; the real weakness is that the long-time locked plateau rests entirely on TWA with no exact-quantum cross-check.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on November 6, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2611.07657 (version 1)

Pith IDGNEWKM5E, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationBence Fitos, G\'abor Tak\'acs. "Universal Phase Locking from Slowly Varying Inhomogeneity in Tunnel-Coupled One-Dimensional Condensates." arXiv:2611.07657 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GNEWKM5E

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The one thing to know: this paper actually answers the question its predecessors left open. Refs [16] and [17] reproduced phase locking numerically, but nobody had said what sets the timescale. Here it is, in Eq. (2): the drift rate is determined solely by the local curvature of the density profile at its maximum, independent of tunnel coupling, giving tau = sqrt(2)/omega_parallel for a harmonic trap. That is a real, clean, testable claim.

What is new and good: the Appendix C derivation is a standard Liouville-coordinate + inverted-oscillator calculation, honestly scoped (validity t = O(1), mu -> infinity, breakdown bounded by O(log mu), stated in the text). The parameter-free prediction m*tau = 1/epsilon is checked against fitted relaxation times over more than a decade, and the quadratic-vs-arc sqrt(2) ratio comes out as predicted. The linearized model is cross-checked against TWA quantitatively until revival time (Fig. S.5). The comparison of quadratic, arc, ramp and homogeneous profiles cleanly separates curvature effects from finite-size effects, and the authors are careful to distinguish the drift (local, curvature-set) from revivals (global, finite-size). The universal drift is an intermediate window, and they say so.

Soft spots, in proportion:

1. The load-bearing late-time claim — that nonlinearity suppresses the returning boundary echo and C(t) settles at 0.87-0.89 — rests entirely on TWA. The linearized theory revives almost fully (Fig. S.5), so the persistent lock is a purely nonlinear, purely TWA-based statement. The authors acknowledge TWA loses validity at larger beta (Appendix A), and the mechanism is explicitly semiclassical anyway. So this is not a qualitative hole in the drift mechanism; it is a quantitative reliance in the one place where a TWA artifact would change the abstract's story. An exact cross-check (even small-system TCSA) or a classical-equation comparison in the revival window would settle it. This is the main reason the paper is conditional rather than clean accept.

2. The numerics are delegated to the unpublished same-author preprint [17], with no code or data in this submission. Minor-to-moderate reproducibility concern.

3. Minor: the arc-profile fitted exponent is -0.936(17) against the predicted -1, about four standard errors off, attributed to fit-window and finite-size effects. The authors flag residual fit-window dependence themselves. Against a decade of agreement elsewhere, this is minor.

One transparency note that is a plus, not a flaw: the acknowledgments credit an AI assistant for substantial help with the asymptotic formula, with the authors verifying all results. That is the right way to do it.

Who this is for: anyone working on sine-Gordon, tunnel-coupled condensates, or integrability-breaking in near-integrable systems. The mechanism — the trap reshapes collective modes into an inverted oscillator, curvature sets the scale — is physically clean and should survive scrutiny.

Recommendation: send it to referees. A serious referee should push on the TWA-late-time question and the unpublished numerical implementation, but the core result is derived, parameter-free, and worth publishing. I would cite it.

Referee report

Significance

If correct, the result provides a concrete, parameter-free resolution of a longstanding puzzle: the experimentally observed phase locking is neither homogeneous integrable dynamics nor primarily nonlinear thermal relaxation, but a universal local effect of the trap curvature. The main analytic formula Eq. (2) is derived, not fitted, and the paper explicitly checks it against TWA data over a range of system sizes and two density profiles, including an analytic sqrt(2) ratio between quadratic and arc profiles. The derivation in Appendix C is a clean inverted-oscillator calculation with stated validity t = O(1), mu to infinity, and the authors themselves bound the breakdown by O(log mu). The physical conversion to tau_rel = sqrt(2)/omega_parallel for a harmonic trap gives a falsifiable experimental prediction. The main weakness is that the long-time phase-locked plateau and the suppression of revivals rest entirely on TWA simulations of the nonlinear model, with no exact-quantum cross-check; this part of the claim is therefore conditional rather than established.

Major objections (3)

[Results, Fig. 1b and Fig. S.5; Appendix A] The claim that the system relaxes to a persistent phase-locked state, rather than merely exhibiting a transient linear drift, rests on the statement that beyond the light-cone time C(t) settles at 0.87-0.89 and that nonlinearity suppresses the returning boundary excitation. This part is not supported by the analytic derivation: Fig. S.5 shows that the linearized model revives almost fully, so the persistence of the plateau is a purely nonlinear effect. The only evidence for this nonlinear effect is TWA, and Appendix A acknowledges that TWA loses validity for larger beta. No exact-quantum calculation, such as a truncated conformal space approach for the inhomogeneous trap, and no independent classical-field or other cross-check of the post-light-cone window is provided. I therefore consider the persistent-locking conclusion conditional on TWA accuracy at late times. In addition, for the largest system size in Fig. 1b (R = 4 R0), the plotted window ends at t/R about 2.77, before the light-cone time t* = pi R, so the claimed plateau is directly demonstrated only for the smaller systems. The authors acknowledge this: “In this deep quantum regime, the Truncated Wigner Approximation (TW A) eventually loses its validity.”
[Model and quench protocol; numerical implementation] The central nonlinear TWA results depend on numerical implementation details that are delegated to Ref. [17], an unpublished same-author arXiv preprint. The Letter states that 'the detailed numerical implementation and parameter choices can be found in Ref. [17]', but the reader of the present manuscript cannot assess discretization, sampling, regularization, or convergence from the Letter alone. Because these simulations are the only test of the full nonlinear model and the only evidence for the persistent locked plateau, the implementation should be described in the main text or supplement, or a published version of Ref. [17] should be provided.
[Fig. 4 and Eq. (S.2)] The fit of the arc profile gives exponent -0.936(17), which is about four standard errors from the predicted -1, while the quadratic fit -0.974(22) is consistent. The text attributes the arc deviation to fit-window and finite-size effects but provides no quantitative support for this attribution. Since Fig. 4 is the direct, quantitative test of the parameter-free prediction m tau = 1/epsilon, this discrepancy needs a systematic analysis of fit-window dependence and finite-size corrections; without it, the statement that Eq. (2) is followed 'over more than a decade in epsilon' is stronger than the data demonstrate.

Minor objections (4)

[Eq. (S.2)] The fit function appears to be missing a division sign: the intended form is presumably C_fit(t|A,tau,delta) = 1 - A^{1/2}/cosh(t/tau) + delta, consistent with Eq. (S.20). Please correct the typo and define A in terms of phi0, sigma0, and delta.
[Appendix B, after Eq. (S.3)] The supplement states that time t is measured in units of R, but Eq. (2) and the surrounding main text are written in dimensionful form. Please state the conversion explicitly when Eq. (2) is introduced so that the dimensionless supplement formulas and the dimensionful physical formulas are not confused.
[Fig. 4] The vertical axis label 'm tau' should be defined precisely: tau is the fitted relaxation time from Eq. (S.2), while the analytic result is tau_rel from Eq. (2). Please clarify the relationship between the two symbols, especially because the fit extracts tau rather than predicting it.
[Appendix B, Eq. (S.12)-(S.13)] The normal-ordering prescription uses the cutoff a both as a lattice spacing and in 'log a + reg.'. Please state that phi^2 is evaluated on a lattice with spacing a and that the additive constant is adjusted so that the same regularization is used in the TWA simulations.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A slowly varying trap density — not tunnel coupling or homogeneous integrable dynamics — drives the phase locking observed in tunnel-coupled one-dimensional condensates, on a timescale set only by the density curvature at its maximum.

The reading

Experiments on tunnel-coupled one-dimensional Bose condensates show the relative phase settling into a phase-locked state, a fate the homogeneous, integrable sine-Gordon model — the standard description of these systems — does not predict. This paper claims the trap itself is responsible: a slowly varying density profile, with curvature small on the correlation-length scale, makes the relative phase near the density maximum drift toward zero on a timescale set by the curvature alone, $1/\tau_{\rm rel}=(1/R)\sqrt{-f''(0)/2}$, independent of the tunnel coupling. The drift is a linear effect of the inhomogeneous mode structure, already visible in the linearised theory where the modes near the density maximum behave like an inverted harmonic oscillator, rather than nonlinear thermal relaxation. If the claim holds, the experimentally observed locking becomes a universal, parameter-free consequence of trap shape, and the long-time dynamics of trapped near-integrable quantum fields are governed by a single local scale.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the inhomogeneous sine-Gordon action (1) with a slowly varying density profile $f(z)=1-z^2$ (harmonic trap) and small parameter $\epsilon=\sqrt{-f''(0)/2}/m\ll 1$, which for the harmonic trap is precisely $mR\gg 1$. The argument is carried by the linearised mode structure: in the Liouville coordinate $dy/dz=1/\sqrt{f(z)}$, with modes rescaled by $f^{1/4}$, the spatial operator near the density maximum becomes an inverted harmonic oscillator $-\partial_\eta^2-\eta^2/4$ with rate $\nu=\sqrt{-f''(z_*)/2}/R$, whose propagator supplies the $\sqrt{\cosh(t/\tau_{\rm rel})}$ envelope in Eq. (2) while the bare mass at the centre supplies the $\cos(m\sqrt{f(0)}\,t)$ factor. That asymptotic formula, $1/\tau_{\rm rel}=(1/R)\sqrt{-f''(0)/2}$, is the identity that carries the claim: it is a parameter-free prediction that the full sine-Gordon dynamics, simulated with the truncated Wigner approximation (quantum fluctuations sampled as stochastic initial conditions, with classical equations of motion thereafter), matches over more than a decade in $\epsilon$ with fitted exponents $-0.97(2)$ (quadratic) and $-0.94(2)$ (arc). Two further elements close the argument: the scaling collapse in $t/\tau_{\rm rel}$ that identifies the curvature as the controlling scale across system sizes and profile shapes, and the demonstration that nonlinearity suppresses the excitation returning from the edges, so the locked state persists beyond the light-cone time.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the phase locking observed in tunnel-coupled one-dimensional condensates, which the homogeneous integrable sine-Gordon theory cannot produce, is generated by the trap itself. In the post-quench dynamics of the inhomogeneous sine-Gordon model, a slowly varying density profile creates a second, parametrically later dynamical regime: the relative phase distribution near the density maximum drifts toward $\varphi=0$, so the centre coherence $C(t)=\langle\cos\varphi(t,0)\rangle$ rises on a timescale $1/\tau_{\rm rel}=(1/R)\sqrt{-f''(0)/2}$ that is fixed by the curvature of the density profile at its maximum and is independent of the tunnel coupling. The drift is already present in the linearised theory: near a non-degenerate maximum of the profile the collective modes of the relative phase reduce to an inverted harmonic oscillator, giving $\langle\varphi(t,0)\rangle\simeq\varphi_0\cos(m\sqrt{f(0)}\,t)/\sqrt{\cosh(t/\tau_{\rm rel})}$, with the fluctuations $\langle\varphi^2(t,0)\rangle$ decaying as $1/\cosh(t/\tau_{\rm rel})$ so that $C(t)$ drifts upward. Nonlinearity does not cause the drift; its role is to damp the fast Josephson oscillations and to suppress the boundary echoes that, in the linearised theory, would revive the phase after the light-cone time $t^*=\pi R$. When time is rescaled by the analytic $\tau_{\rm rel}$, the dynamics for different system sizes and for quadratic versus arc-shaped profiles collapse onto a single curve, and in physical units the prediction is parameter-free: $\tau_{\rm rel}^{-1}=\sqrt{-g_{1D}\rho_0''(x_*)/2M}$, which for a harmonic trap reduces to $\sqrt{2}/\omega_\parallel$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the truncated Wigner approximation quantitatively captures the post-quench dynamics of the inhomogeneous sine-Gordon model across the entire phase-locking window, including the suppression of boundary echoes; the authors rely on TWA for all full-model numerics, acknowledge that it loses validity as $\beta$ grows, and provide no independent exact-quantum calculation for the inhomogeneous trap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Changing the tunnel coupling over a wide range should leave the phase-locking timescale untouched: the locking rate is a direct readout of the density curvature at the trap centre, not of the coupling strength.
In a harmonically trapped condensate the prediction is a single closed-form number, $\tau_{\rm rel}=\sqrt{2}/\omega_\parallel$ with $\omega_\parallel$ the longitudinal trap frequency, which an experiment can check directly.
Because the dynamics collapse when time is rescaled by $\tau_{\rm rel}$, the same cosh-envelope drift should appear for any slowly varying profile with a non-degenerate density maximum, while flat or ramped profiles should show no drift until edge signals return.
The onset and the persistence of locking are distinct effects: the drift itself is a linear collective-mode phenomenon, while nonlinearity only damps Josephson oscillations and suppresses boundary revivals — so the late-time plateau is nonlinear, but its timescale is not.
Phase locking is a semiclassical phenomenon: stronger quantum fluctuations (larger $\beta$) suppress the drift, and it disappears entirely for sufficiently large $\beta$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A cleaner experimental test would engineer a flat-topped or zero-curvature central density profile inside an otherwise bound trap: the paper's mechanism predicts no drift inside the light-cone window, so locking appearing there would point to a non-curvature cause.
The inverted-harmonic-oscillator reduction is generic, so any near-integrable one-dimensional field theory in a slowly varying trap whose effective mass has a local extremum should show the same $1/\sqrt{\cosh(t/\tau_{\rm rel})}$ envelope for observables tied to that region; probing relative-phase quadratures of other coupled low-dimensional systems would test how far the universality extends.
Since $\tau_{\rm rel}\propto R$, the drift is roughly 90% complete before the first edge echo returns at $t^*=\pi R$; simulating or measuring the collapse over a wider range of $mR$ than the values 25.5–102 used here would sharpen the fitted exponent and the predicted $\sqrt{2}$ ratio between quadratic and arc profiles.
The paper leaves the quantitative boundary of the semiclassical regime open; an exact quantum simulation of the inhomogeneous model at large $\beta$ (where the truncated Wigner approximation is acknowledged to lose validity) could map the $\beta^2$ suppression of the locked plateau and determine whether any locking survives deep in the quantum regime.

Original abstract

The sine-Gordon model can be experimentally realised by tunnel-coupled one-dimensional Bose condensates. However, the experiments show relaxation to a phase-locked state, which conflicts with the predictions of the homogeneous integrable theory. Here we combine the truncated Wigner approximation with an asymptotic analysis, and show that this locking is produced by a slowly varying density profile through a universal mechanism, whereby the relative phase near the density maximum drifts towards zero. We show that this drift is already present in the linearised theory and its timescale is determined by the density curvature alone, while it is independent of the tunnel coupling. Rescaling time by the relaxation time scale collapses the dynamics for different system sizes and density profiles, while non-linearity suppresses the excitation returning from the edges.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-11-06: 1 request, 4,332 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The sine-Gordon model can be experimentally realised by tunnel-coupled one-dimensional Bose condensates. However, the experiments show relaxation to a phase-locked state, which conflicts with the predictions of the homogeneous integrable theory. Here we combine the truncated Wigner approximation with an asymptotic analysis, and show that this locking is produced by a slowly varying density profile through a universal mechanism, whereby the relative phase near the density maximum drifts towards zero. We show that this drift is already present in the linearised theory and its timescale is determined by the density curvature alone, while it is independent of the tunnel coupling. Rescaling time by the relaxation time scale collapses the dynamics for different system sizes and density profiles, while non-linearity suppresses the excitation returning from the edges.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The sine-Gordon model can be experimentally realised by tunnel-coupled one-dimensional Bose condensates.	background 1.00	0.09	0.02	asserted 0.99
s1	However, the experiments show relaxation to a phase-locked state, which conflicts with the predictions of the homogeneous integrable theory.	background 0.69	0.12	0.04	asserted 1.00
s2	Here we combine the truncated Wigner approximation with an asymptotic analysis, and show that this locking is produced by a slowly varying density profile through a universal mechanism, whereby the relative phase near the density maximum drifts towards zero.	contribution 0.77	0.96	0.88	asserted 1.00
s3	We show that this drift is already present in the linearised theory and its timescale is determined by the density curvature alone, while it is independent of the tunnel coupling.	result 0.99	0.93	0.20	asserted 1.00
s4	Rescaling time by the relaxation time scale collapses the dynamics for different system sizes and density profiles, while non-linearity suppresses the excitation returning from the edges.	result 0.99	0.92	0.14	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.56.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** Demonstration of the universal dephasing (a) and phase locking (b) of the (inhomogeneous) sine-Gordon

**Figure 3.** The cosine of the relative phase at the cen

**Figure 4.** Fitted relaxation time τ [Eq. (S.2)] as a function of the curvature parameter ϵ = p −∂ 2 x f(0)/2 /m, for the quadratic (triangles, f(z) = 1 − z 2 ) and arc (squares, f(z) = √ 1 − z 2) profiles. The dashed line is the parameter-free prediction of Eq. (2), mτrel = 1/ϵ. Fitted exponents (std. error): −0.974(22) (quadratic) and −0.936(17) (arc). 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mt/(2π) hcos ϕ(z = 0)i Lin sG

**Figure 5.** The sine–Gordon vs. the linearized model. The

Showing 4 of the paper's 5 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2611.07657 by the authors.

References

Works cited (37)

[16]

M. Pigneur, T. Berrada, M. Bonneau, T. Schumm, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Relaxation to a Phase-Locked Equilibrium State in a One-Dimensional Bosonic Josephson Junction,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 173601,arXiv:1711.06635 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[17]

J. F. Mennemann, I. E. Mazets, M. Pigneur, H. P. Stimming, N. J. Mauser, J. Schmiedmayer, and S. Erne, “Relaxation in an extended bosonic Josephson junction,”Phys. Rev. Research3(2021) 023197, arXiv:2012.05885 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[1]

A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, “Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems,”Rev. Mod. Phys.83(2011) 863–883,arXiv:1007.5331 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[2]

Indeed, when time is measured in units of the analyticτ rel, the two profiles collapse onto a sin- gle curve formR= 25.5, 51 and 102, increasingly well asmRgrows, until the arc reaches its light-cone time t∗ ≈1.7τ rel (Fig. S.4 in [29]). We mention that phase locking is also sensitive to the sine-Gordon parameterβ[29]: quantum fluctuations sup- press it, ...

View on Pith 2024
[3]

C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, “Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems,”Rep. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 056001, arXiv:1503.07538 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[4]

Y. D. van Nieuwkerk and F. Essler, “On the low-energy description for tunnel-coupled one-dimensional Bose gases,”SciPost Phys.9(2020) 025,arXiv:2003.07873 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[5]

Y. D. van Nieuwkerk, J. Schmiedmayer, and F. Essler, “Josephson oscillations in split one-dimensional Bose gases,”SciPost Phys.10(2021) 090,arXiv:2010.11214 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[6]

J. I. Cirac, P. Maraner, and J. K. Pachos, “Cold Atom Simulation of Interacting Relativistic Quantum Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 190403, arXiv:1006.2975 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[7]

A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Factorized S-matrices in two dimensions as the exact solutions of certain relativistic quantum field theory models,”Ann. Phys.120(1979) 253–291

View on Pith 1979
[8]

A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Mass Scale in the Sine-Gordon Model and its Reductions,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10 (1995) 1125–1150

View on Pith 1995
[9]

E. G. Dalla Torre, E. Demler, and A. Polkovnikov, “Universal Rephasing Dynamics after a Quantum Quench via Sudden Coupling of Two Initially Independent Condensates,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 090404,arXiv:1211.5145 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[10]

D. X. Horv´ ath, I. Lovas, M. Kormos, G. Tak´ acs, and G. Zar´ and, “Nonequilibrium time evolution and rephasing in the quantum sine-Gordon model,”Phys. Rev. A100(2019) 013613,arXiv:1809.06789 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[11]

S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Non-equilibrium coherence dynamics in one-dimensional Bose gases,”Nature449 (2007) 324–327,arXiv:0706.2259 [cond-mat.other]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[12]

M. Gring, M. Kuhnert, T. Langen, T. Kitagawa, B. Rauer, M. Schreitl, I. Mazets, D. A. Smith, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Relaxation and Prethermalization in an Isolated Quantum System,” Science337(2012) 1318,arXiv:1112.0013 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[13]

A. Bastianello, A. De Luca, B. Doyon, and J. De Nardis, “Thermalization of a Trapped One-Dimensional Bose Gas via Diffusion,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 240604,arXiv:2007.04861 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[14]

A. Bastianello, V. Alba, and J.-S. Caux, “Generalized Hydrodynamics with Space-Time Inhomogeneous Interactions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 130602, arXiv:1906.01654 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[15]

D. Horvath, S. Sotiriadis, M. Kormos, and G. Takacs, “Inhomogeneous quantum quenches in the sine-Gordon theory,”SciPost Phys.12(2022) 144, arXiv:2109.06869 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[18]

B. Fitos and G. Tak´ acs, “Quantum fields in a cold atomic simulator: relaxation and phase locking in tunnel-coupled 1D bosonic quasi-condensates,”arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2512.13901,arXiv:2512.13901 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[19]

M. Kormos and G. Zar´ and, “Quantum quenches in the sine-Gordon model: A semiclassical approach,”Phys. Rev. E93(2016) 062101,arXiv:1507.02708 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[20]

D. Sz´ asz-Schagrin, I. Lovas, and G. Tak´ acs, “Quantum quenches in an interacting field theory: Full quantum evolution versus semiclassical approximations,”Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 014305,arXiv:2110.01636 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[21]

T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, I. Mazets, B. Rauer, F. Cataldini, T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Experimental characterization of a quantum many-body system via higher-order correlations,”Nature545(2017) 323–326, arXiv:1505.03126 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[22]

I. Bouchoule, “Modulational instabilities in Josephson oscillations of elongated coupled condensates,”Eur. Phys. J. D35(2005) 147–154,arXiv:physics/0502050 [physics.atom-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[23]

A. Polkovnikov, “Quantum corrections to the dynamics of interacting bosons: Beyond the truncated Wigner approximation,”Phys. Rev. A68(2003) 053604, arXiv:cond-mat/0303628 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[24]

A. Polkovnikov, “Phase space representation of quantum dynamics,”Ann. Phys.325(2010) 1790–1852, arXiv:0905.3384 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[25]

A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, “Classical-Field 6 Method for Time Dependent Bose-Einstein Condensed Gases,”Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 210404, arXiv:cond-mat/0101210 [cond-mat.soft]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[26]

A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, “The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: limits of validity and applications,”Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics35(2002) 3599–3631, arXiv:cond-mat/0201217 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[27]

B. Rauer, S. Erne, T. Schweigler, F. Cataldini, M. Tajik, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Recurrences in an isolated quantum many-body system,”Science360(2018) 307–310,arXiv:1705.08231 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[28]

T. Schweigler, M. Gluza,et al., “Decay and recurrence of non-Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system,”Nat. Phys.17(2021) 559–563, arXiv:2003.01808 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[29]

D. Adu Smith, M. Gring, T. Langen, M. Kuhnert, B. Rauer, R. Geiger, T. Kitagawa, I. Mazets, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Prethermalization revealed by the relaxation dynamics of full distribution functions,”New J. Phys.15(2013) 075011, arXiv:1212.4645 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[30]

See Supplemental Material

View on Pith
[31]

V. Kasper, J. Marino, S. Ji, V. Gritsev, J. Schmiedmayer, and E. Demler, “Simulating a quantum commensurate-incommensurate phase transition using two Raman-coupled one-dimensional condensates,”Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 224102, arXiv:2002.12311 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[32]

V. Yurov and A. Zamolodchikov, “Truncated conformal space approach to scaling Lee-Yang model,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5(1990) 3221–3246

View on Pith 1990
[33]

G. Feverati, F. Ravanini, and G. Tak´ acs, “Truncated conformal space at c=1, nonlinear integral equation and quantization rules for multi-soliton states,”Phys. Lett. B430(1998) 264–273,arXiv:hep-th/9803104 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[34]

D. X. Horv´ ath, K. H´ ods´ agi, and G. Tak´ acs, “Chirally factorised truncated conformal space approach,” Comput. Phys. Commun.277(2022) 108376, arXiv:2201.06509 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[35]

R. Koch and A. Bastianello, “Exact thermodynamics and transport in the classical sine-Gordon model,” SciPost Phys.15(2023) 140,arXiv:2303.16932 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[36]

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Time Dependence of Correlation Functions Following a Quantum Quench,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 136801, arXiv:cond-mat/0601225 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[37]

Here we indicated theµdependence as we will consider quenches inµ. Although the eigenvalues and eigenvectors also depend on the profile, we suppress this dependence to simplify the notation. 7 Supplemental Material Appendix A: Dependence on model parameters

View on Pith

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [16]

M. Pigneur, T. Berrada, M. Bonneau, T. Schumm, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Relaxation to a Phase-Locked Equilibrium State in a One-Dimensional Bosonic Josephson Junction,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 173601,arXiv:1711.06635 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[2] [17]

J. F. Mennemann, I. E. Mazets, M. Pigneur, H. P. Stimming, N. J. Mauser, J. Schmiedmayer, and S. Erne, “Relaxation in an extended bosonic Josephson junction,”Phys. Rev. Research3(2021) 023197, arXiv:2012.05885 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[3] [1]

A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, “Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems,”Rev. Mod. Phys.83(2011) 863–883,arXiv:1007.5331 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[4] [2]

Indeed, when time is measured in units of the analyticτ rel, the two profiles collapse onto a sin- gle curve formR= 25.5, 51 and 102, increasingly well asmRgrows, until the arc reaches its light-cone time t∗ ≈1.7τ rel (Fig. S.4 in [29]). We mention that phase locking is also sensitive to the sine-Gordon parameterβ[29]: quantum fluctuations sup- press it, ...

View on Pith 2024

[5] [3]

C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, “Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems,”Rep. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 056001, arXiv:1503.07538 [quant-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[6] [4]

Y. D. van Nieuwkerk and F. Essler, “On the low-energy description for tunnel-coupled one-dimensional Bose gases,”SciPost Phys.9(2020) 025,arXiv:2003.07873 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[7] [5]

Y. D. van Nieuwkerk, J. Schmiedmayer, and F. Essler, “Josephson oscillations in split one-dimensional Bose gases,”SciPost Phys.10(2021) 090,arXiv:2010.11214 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[8] [6]

J. I. Cirac, P. Maraner, and J. K. Pachos, “Cold Atom Simulation of Interacting Relativistic Quantum Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 190403, arXiv:1006.2975 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[9] [7]

A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Factorized S-matrices in two dimensions as the exact solutions of certain relativistic quantum field theory models,”Ann. Phys.120(1979) 253–291

View on Pith 1979

[10] [8]

A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Mass Scale in the Sine-Gordon Model and its Reductions,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10 (1995) 1125–1150

View on Pith 1995

[11] [9]

E. G. Dalla Torre, E. Demler, and A. Polkovnikov, “Universal Rephasing Dynamics after a Quantum Quench via Sudden Coupling of Two Initially Independent Condensates,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 090404,arXiv:1211.5145 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[12] [10]

D. X. Horv´ ath, I. Lovas, M. Kormos, G. Tak´ acs, and G. Zar´ and, “Nonequilibrium time evolution and rephasing in the quantum sine-Gordon model,”Phys. Rev. A100(2019) 013613,arXiv:1809.06789 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[13] [11]

S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Non-equilibrium coherence dynamics in one-dimensional Bose gases,”Nature449 (2007) 324–327,arXiv:0706.2259 [cond-mat.other]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[14] [12]

M. Gring, M. Kuhnert, T. Langen, T. Kitagawa, B. Rauer, M. Schreitl, I. Mazets, D. A. Smith, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Relaxation and Prethermalization in an Isolated Quantum System,” Science337(2012) 1318,arXiv:1112.0013 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[15] [13]

A. Bastianello, A. De Luca, B. Doyon, and J. De Nardis, “Thermalization of a Trapped One-Dimensional Bose Gas via Diffusion,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 240604,arXiv:2007.04861 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[16] [14]

A. Bastianello, V. Alba, and J.-S. Caux, “Generalized Hydrodynamics with Space-Time Inhomogeneous Interactions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 130602, arXiv:1906.01654 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[17] [15]

D. Horvath, S. Sotiriadis, M. Kormos, and G. Takacs, “Inhomogeneous quantum quenches in the sine-Gordon theory,”SciPost Phys.12(2022) 144, arXiv:2109.06869 [cond-mat.str-el]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[18] [18]

B. Fitos and G. Tak´ acs, “Quantum fields in a cold atomic simulator: relaxation and phase locking in tunnel-coupled 1D bosonic quasi-condensates,”arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2512.13901,arXiv:2512.13901 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[19] [19]

M. Kormos and G. Zar´ and, “Quantum quenches in the sine-Gordon model: A semiclassical approach,”Phys. Rev. E93(2016) 062101,arXiv:1507.02708 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[20] [20]

D. Sz´ asz-Schagrin, I. Lovas, and G. Tak´ acs, “Quantum quenches in an interacting field theory: Full quantum evolution versus semiclassical approximations,”Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 014305,arXiv:2110.01636 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[21] [21]

T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, I. Mazets, B. Rauer, F. Cataldini, T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Experimental characterization of a quantum many-body system via higher-order correlations,”Nature545(2017) 323–326, arXiv:1505.03126 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[22] [22]

I. Bouchoule, “Modulational instabilities in Josephson oscillations of elongated coupled condensates,”Eur. Phys. J. D35(2005) 147–154,arXiv:physics/0502050 [physics.atom-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[23] [23]

A. Polkovnikov, “Quantum corrections to the dynamics of interacting bosons: Beyond the truncated Wigner approximation,”Phys. Rev. A68(2003) 053604, arXiv:cond-mat/0303628 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[24] [24]

A. Polkovnikov, “Phase space representation of quantum dynamics,”Ann. Phys.325(2010) 1790–1852, arXiv:0905.3384 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[25] [25]

A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, “Classical-Field 6 Method for Time Dependent Bose-Einstein Condensed Gases,”Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 210404, arXiv:cond-mat/0101210 [cond-mat.soft]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[26] [26]

A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, “The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: limits of validity and applications,”Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics35(2002) 3599–3631, arXiv:cond-mat/0201217 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[27] [27]

B. Rauer, S. Erne, T. Schweigler, F. Cataldini, M. Tajik, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Recurrences in an isolated quantum many-body system,”Science360(2018) 307–310,arXiv:1705.08231 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[28] [28]

T. Schweigler, M. Gluza,et al., “Decay and recurrence of non-Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system,”Nat. Phys.17(2021) 559–563, arXiv:2003.01808 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[29] [29]

D. Adu Smith, M. Gring, T. Langen, M. Kuhnert, B. Rauer, R. Geiger, T. Kitagawa, I. Mazets, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, “Prethermalization revealed by the relaxation dynamics of full distribution functions,”New J. Phys.15(2013) 075011, arXiv:1212.4645 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[30] [30]

See Supplemental Material

View on Pith

[31] [31]

V. Kasper, J. Marino, S. Ji, V. Gritsev, J. Schmiedmayer, and E. Demler, “Simulating a quantum commensurate-incommensurate phase transition using two Raman-coupled one-dimensional condensates,”Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 224102, arXiv:2002.12311 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[32] [32]

V. Yurov and A. Zamolodchikov, “Truncated conformal space approach to scaling Lee-Yang model,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5(1990) 3221–3246

View on Pith 1990

[33] [33]

G. Feverati, F. Ravanini, and G. Tak´ acs, “Truncated conformal space at c=1, nonlinear integral equation and quantization rules for multi-soliton states,”Phys. Lett. B430(1998) 264–273,arXiv:hep-th/9803104 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[34] [34]

D. X. Horv´ ath, K. H´ ods´ agi, and G. Tak´ acs, “Chirally factorised truncated conformal space approach,” Comput. Phys. Commun.277(2022) 108376, arXiv:2201.06509 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[35] [35]

R. Koch and A. Bastianello, “Exact thermodynamics and transport in the classical sine-Gordon model,” SciPost Phys.15(2023) 140,arXiv:2303.16932 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[36] [36]

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Time Dependence of Correlation Functions Following a Quantum Quench,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 136801, arXiv:cond-mat/0601225 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[37] [37]

Here we indicated theµdependence as we will consider quenches inµ. Although the eigenvalues and eigenvectors also depend on the profile, we suppress this dependence to simplify the notation. 7 Supplemental Material Appendix A: Dependence on model parameters

View on Pith