Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CNN-CASS: CNN for Classification of Coronary Artery Stenosis Score in MPR Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.08593 v1 pith:26CWBFM3 submitted 2020-01-23 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords stenosisimagescoronarymodelarterycenterlineclassificationextraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

To decrease patient waiting time for diagnosis of the Coronary Artery Disease, automatic methods are applied to identify its severity using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography scans or extracted Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) images, giving doctors a second-opinion on the priority of each case. The main disadvantage of previous studies is the lack of large set of data that could guarantee their reliability. Another limitation is the usage of handcrafted features requiring manual preprocessing, such as centerline extraction. We overcome both limitations by applying a different automated approach based on ShuffleNet V2 network architecture and testing it on the proposed collected dataset of MPR images, which is bigger than any other used in this field before. We also omit centerline extraction step and train and test our model using whole curved MPR images of 708 and 105 patients, respectively. The model predicts one of three classes: 'no stenosis' for normal, 'non-significant' - 1-50% of stenosis detected, 'significant' - more than 50% of stenosis. We demonstrate model's interpretability through visualization of the most important features selected by the network. For stenosis score classification, the method shows improved performance comparing to previous works, achieving 80% accuracy on the patient level. Our code is publicly available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools