Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Efficient calculation of reactor noise via Ito-Langevin Process for correlated fluctuations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The super-Poisson part of detector noise is exactly the second moment of a Gaussian Ito process.

desk verdict A clever and mostly sound derivation of an effective Langevin equation for reactor noise, but the claimed generality to multi-isotope systems goes beyond what the math supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14388 v2 pith:26LHO6OX submitted 2024-11-21 cond-mat.stat-mech

Guy Gabrieli , Yair Shokef , Izhar Neder This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82D7560H10
keywords reactornoiseFeynman-alphaRossi-alphaIto-LangevinequationneutrontransportsubcriticalprobabilitygeneratingfunctionMonteCarloefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the hard part of neutron detector noise, the super-Poisson correlation caused by fission chains, obeys a simple equivalent Gaussian law. In a heterogeneous subcritical system, the covariance matrix of counts at two capture detectors deviates from Poisson statistics exactly as the second moment of an Ito-Langevin process would, provided the noise source is $\sqrt{\nu(\nu-1)F(x)}$ times the fission spectrum. If the equivalence holds, a notoriously expensive problem, simulating full stochastic branching histories to get Feynman-$\alpha$ and Rossi-$\alpha$ correlations, becomes a first-moment calculation: solve for the average flux and Green functions, then sample a white-noise-driven Gaussian field. The payoff is that spatial noise calculations for research reactors, safeguards assays, and cross-section validation become computationally practical.

What carries the argument

The object carrying the argument is the Ito-Langevin ansatz $\hat{L}_{\vartheta}\delta n=\sqrt{s(x)}\,\chi(\vartheta)\,\epsilon(x,t)$ with $s(x)=\nu(\nu-1)F(x)$, where $\hat{L}_{\vartheta}$ is the neutron transport operator, $F(x)$ is the mean fission-rate density, and $\chi$ is the fission spectrum. The key simplification is that all non-branching interactions contribute only Poisson noise, which cancels in $d_{ij}$; only fission, with its nonzero second factorial moment $\nu(\nu-1)$, survives. Technically, the proof rests on the one-particle Green function $g_1$ and the probability-generating-function transport equation of Bell, and the comparison of the two resulting double-Green-function expressions forces the source term to be $\sqrt{\nu(\nu-1)F(x)}\,\chi(\vartheta)$.

What would settle it

Take a heterogeneous subcritical assembly with a fission model in which neutrons from a single fission are correlated in direction or energy, compute the two-detector covariance matrix exactly from the second derivative of the probability generating function, or from a high-statistics analogue Monte Carlo run, and compare it with the covariance obtained by solving the Langevin equation with the same average fission-rate distribution and Green functions; any statistically significant mismatch in $d_{ij}$ would disprove the factorization premise and, with it, the exactness of the simple source term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is identity (7): for any two capture-based detectors and any counting window, the matrix $d_{ij}$ of deviations from Poisson statistics in a heterogeneous subcritical system equals the time-integrated second moment of a Gaussian Ito process $\delta n(\vartheta,t)$ obeying the Langevin equation $\hat{L}_{\vartheta}\delta n=\sqrt{\nu(\nu-1)F(x)}\,\chi(\vartheta)\,\epsilon(x,t)$, where $F(x)$ is the steady-state fission-rate density, $\nu$ is the fission neutron multiplicity, $\chi$ is the fission-emission spectrum, and $\epsilon$ is space-time white noise. The derivation compares two double-Green-function expressions: one obtained by transporting Gaussian noise through the one-particle Green function of the transport operator, and one obtained from the second derivative of the probability generating function for the real branching process. The equality fixes the noise amplitude and spectrum uniquely, and in the point-model limit the equation reduces to the classical Feynman-$\alpha$ formula.

Load-bearing premise

Each fission is assumed to emit its $\nu$ neutrons independently, all with the same energy-angle spectrum, so that the two-neutron emission probability is a product of single-neutron spectra.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-detector Feynman-alpha and Rossi-alpha correlations can be computed from the steady-state fission-rate distribution and one-particle Green functions, so a full branching-history simulation is not needed for second-moment noise.
  • The noise integral decomposes into fuel segments, so the contribution of each spatial region to the detector correlation becomes visible, which can guide detector placement and spent-fuel assay design.
  • In the point-model limit the Langevin result reduces to the classical Feynman-alpha formula, providing a benchmark validation of the method.
  • For low detection efficiency the required Monte Carlo histories scale as $1/\mu$ rather than $1/\mu^2$; the paper's estimates for research-reactor parameters are about $10^8$--$10^9$ histories versus $10^{11}$--$10^{13}$ for analogue simulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: when fission emission is correlated, Eq. (33) still gives the exact pair-emission kernel, so one could simulate the covariance by replacing the independent white noise with a correlated Gaussian field built from that kernel.
  • Because the effective process is Gaussian, only second moments are reproduced; any experiment sensitive to third or higher cumulants of the count distribution would need a treatment beyond what this paper provides.
  • The same cancellation argument should transfer to any multiplicative branching process, such as photomultiplier cascades, cosmic-ray air showers, or epidemic trees, where the non-Poisson part is controlled by the second factorial moment of the offspring distribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives an effective Ito-Langevin equation whose Gaussian fluctuations reproduce the super-Poisson part of the two-detector covariance in a subcritical neutron system. Section III computes the covariance of a linear Langevin transport model as an integral of a noise source times two one-particle Green functions; Section IV derives the same covariance from the probability generating function of the physical branching process; Section V equates the two expressions and thereby fixes the noise amplitude and spectrum, leading to the main result Eq. (36), with s(x) = nu(nu-1)F(x) and with chi the fission-neutron spectrum. The point-model reduction in Section VI reproduces the Feynman-alpha formula exactly, and Section VII discusses a multi-isotope extension and a numerical scheme with an estimated computational speedup relative to analogue Monte Carlo.

Significance. If the second-moment equivalence of Eq. (7) holds in the claimed generality, the paper provides a practical and parameter-free route to Feynman-alpha and Rossi-alpha correlations using only first-moment data (the steady fission-rate distribution and one-particle Green functions). The derivation is coherent, the matching of the Langevin expression with the exact PGF expression is a genuine structural result, and the point-model test is an exact check of the method. The efficiency estimate for low-efficiency detection is also plausible and useful. The main caveat is that the exactness is conditional on a factorization assumption for the fission pair-emission kernel; the manuscript currently overstates the range of validity of the single-scalar-noise form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Eqs. (33)-(36)] The equality (7) is established only when the pair-emission kernel factorizes as s(x) chi(ϑ1x) chi(ϑ2x). Equation (33) is general, but the step from (33) to (35) assumes that every fission emits neutrons independently from a single spectrum chi. This is not true for a general heterogeneous system, e.g. a mixture of fissile isotopes with different spectra, nor for real fission in which neutron energies and directions from one fission are correlated. The paper should state this factorization as an explicit assumption and restrict the headline claim of exactness to systems satisfying it, or replace the single-source ansatz with a sum of independent sources when the kernel is a sum of factorized terms.
  2. [Section VII, Eqs. (49)-(51)] The multi-isotope extension as written is internally inconsistent. For a mixture of isotopes the exact kernel obtained from Eq. (33) is a sum of factorized terms, Σ_i F_i(x) ν_i(ν_i−1) χ_i(ϑ1)χ_i(ϑ2), with no cross terms between different isotopes. Substituting the proposed total s(x) of Eq. (49) and the flux-weighted average spectrum chi of Eq. (51) into s(x)chi(ϑ1)chi(ϑ2) produces cross-isotope terms proportional to F_iF_jχ_iχ_j for i≠j, which are absent from the exact covariance. Thus Eq. (36) with the averaged chi cannot reproduce the exact second moments unless all fission spectra are identical. The derivation can be repaired by using one independent Langevin source per isotope, but the current text is not a valid generalization.
  3. [Section V, Eq. (34)] Equation (34) is not correctly normalized for its use in Eq. (33). As printed, for j=2 it gives c_i = P(i)χ(ϑ1)χ(ϑ2)C(i,2); combined with the explicit factor i(i−1) in Eq. (33), this would produce an extra combinatorial factor and would not lead to Eq. (35). The final result Eq. (35) corresponds instead to the two-neutron marginal c_i = P(i)χ(ϑ1)χ(ϑ2) for independent emission. This definition needs to be rewritten so that the multiplicity bookkeeping in Eqs. (29), (33), and (35) is consistent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section V] The abstract and the text describe the result as valid for a 'general heterogeneous sub-critical neutron system'; given the factorization assumption in Eq. (34), this should be qualified, for example as 'for systems in which fission-neutron emissions are independent and identically distributed'.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (11)] Equation (11) writes both L-dagger acting on primed variables and L acting on unprimed variables as equal to the same delta function; this is standard only if one recalls that the two operators act on different arguments. The notation would be clearer if the adjoint relation were written separately for the backward equation in (ϑ',t') and the forward equation in (ϑ,t).
  3. [Section III, Eq. (13)] The integration range of the source time t in Eq. (13) is left implicit. It is enforced by the retarded Green function, but stating t ≤ min(t1,t2) explicitly would help readers.
  4. [Section VII, Eqs. (56)-(60)] The symbol ν is used for both the random number of fission neutrons and its average in the efficiency estimate; using an overbar, e.g. ν̄, for the average would avoid ambiguity in the order-of-magnitude formulas.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the noise amplitude is derived by equating two independent expressions, not fitted or imported from prior work.

full rationale

The derivation chain compares two independently obtained formulas: Eq. (16), the second moment of the effective Gaussian Ito process expressed via one-particle Green functions, and Eq. (31), the exact non-Poisson count covariance obtained from Bell's PGF equation. Equating these two double-Green-function expressions and assuming the factorized fission-emission kernel of Eq. (34) yields s(x)=nu(nu-1)F(x) in Eq. (36). This is an equivalence computation, not a fit: no parameter is tuned to noise data, and the point-model limit reproduces the known Feynman-alpha formula (Eq. (46)). Self-citations (e.g., [30], [37]) are motivational or standard derivational scaffolding, not load-bearing circular support. The main validity limitation is explicitly stated in the paper: Eq. (34) assumes independent, identically distributed fission neutron spectra, so the 'general heterogeneous' claim is conditional on that physical ansatz. The multi-isotope extension in Eqs. (49)-(51) is also questionable, since substituting the averaged chi into Eq. (36) would generate cross-isotope terms absent from the exact kernel, but this is an overbreadth/consistency concern, not circularity in the sense of an input being renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; all input quantities are physical first-moment properties (cross sections, steady-state fission rate). The central result rests on standard branching-process theory (Bell's PGF) plus a set of domain assumptions: Poisson stationary source, prompt-only, capture-only detectors, and independent fission neutron emission. The effective Gaussian field δn is a constructed mathematical object validated against the point-model Feynman-alpha formula.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption External source is a stationary Poisson process in phase space and time.
    Used throughout Section IV via the compound Poisson PGF of Eq. (18).
  • domain assumption Delayed neutrons are neglected; only prompt timescales much shorter than precursor half-lives are considered.
    Stated in the Introduction; the noise analysis covers only prompt neutron effects.
  • domain assumption Detectors absorb neutrons and do not scatter or re-emit them.
    Stated in Section II: scattering or fission-chamber detectors produce additional non-Poisson autocorrelations and are excluded.
  • domain assumption Fission neutron multiplicity and spectra are independent: each of the ν emitted neutrons has the same spectrum χ(ϑ), independently (Eq. 34).
    This factorization is needed to reduce the general pair kernel in Eq. (33) to the product form s(x)χ(ϑ1x)χ(ϑ2x) with s(x)=ν(ν−1)F(x).
  • standard math The one-particle Green function g1 obeys the adjoint/forward transport equation with delta sources (Eq. 11), and the adjoint PGF equation (27) from Bell [37] is used without re-derivation.
    The derivation of Eqs. (28) and (29) relies on differentiating Eq. (27), which is cited from the prior literature.
invented entities (1)
  • Effective Gaussian fluctuation field δn(ϑ,t) independent evidence
    purpose: Mathematical construct whose second moments reproduce the non-Poisson part of the neutron counting noise at detectors, enabling efficient simulation via a Langevin equation.
    Introduced in Eq. (4) as the solution of the Ito-Langevin equation; it is not a new physical particle but a noise field whose covariance is matched to the exact PGF result. It is validated against the known Feynman-alpha formula in the point-model limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient calculation of reactor noise via Ito-Langevin Process for correlated fluctuations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/26LHO6OX

@misc{pith2026241114388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient calculation of reactor noise via Ito-Langevin Process for correlated fluctuations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/26LHO6OX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14388}
}
read the original abstract

We derive an Ito-Langevin stochastic process that captures the time-dependent deviation from Poisson behavior of the noise detected from a general heterogeneous sub-critical neutron system. Using the probability generating function for the actual physical process, we deduce the super-Poisson deviation of the covariance matrix of counts at the detector due to neutron multiplication upon fission. This leads to a general form that coincides with the second moment of an Ito process. This comparison facilitates the formulation of a corresponding effective Langevin equation, which potentially enables simulations that significantly reduce the computational resources required compared to direct simulation of the system's actual noise. This method could assist in designing sub-critical noise experiments for licensing new research reactors, for improving cross-section libraries and for non-destructive assays of spent fuel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14388 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Equivalence between non-Poisson correlations of the subcritical system detection signal and those [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. C. Diven, H. C. Martin, R. F. Taschek, and J. Terrell. Multiplicities of fission neutrons. Physical Review, 101(3):1012, 1956

    work page 1956

  2. [2]

    R. E. Uhrig and C. A. Stapleton. Random noise techniques in nuclear reactor systems. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 22(5):2124–2124, 1975

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    Mihalczo

    J.T. Mihalczo. Prompt alpha and reactivity measurements on fast metal assemblies. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 1(1):1–26, 1977

    work page 1977

  4. [4]

    H. Kim, H. R. Kim, K. H. Lee, and J. B. Lee. Design characteristics and startup tests of HANARO the newly in-service Korean research reactor.Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 33(7):527–538, 1996

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    D. F. Hergenreder, C. A. Lecot, and E. A. Villarino. Kinetic parameters calculation and measurements during the OPAL commissioning. Proceedings of the RRFM-IGORR, 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Croft, D

    S. Croft, D. Henzlova, and D.K. Hauck. Extraction of correlated count rates using various gate generation techniques: Part I theory. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , 691:152–158, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    J. Doyle. Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation: Achieving Security with Technology and Policy. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    I. Levi, A. C. Trahan, K. Ben-Meir, O. Ozeri, A. Krakovich, A. Pesach, O. Rivin, C. D. Rael, M. T. Swinhoe, H. O. Menlove, N. Hazenshprung, J. B. Marlow, and I. Neder. Nondestructive measurements of residual 235U mass of Israeli Research Reactor-1 fuel using the Advanced Experimental Fuel Counter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sectio...

    work page 2020

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    R. P. Feynman, F. de Hoffman, and R. Serber. Intensity fluctuations of a neutron chain reactor.LADC- 256, Los Alamos National Laboratory , 1944

    1944

  2. [10]

    R. P. Feynman, F. de Hoffmann, and R. Serber. Dispersion of the neutron emission in U-235 fission. Journal of Nuclear Energy (1954) , 3(1-2):64–IN10, 1956

    1954

  3. [11]

    Tonoike, T

    K. Tonoike, T. Yamamoto, S. Watanabe, and Y . Miyoshi. Real time α value measurement with Feynman-α method utilizing time series data acquisition on low enriched uranium system. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 41(2):177–182, 2004

    2004

  4. [12]

    Kuramoto, A

    R. Kuramoto, A. dos Santos, R. Jerez, U. D. Bitelli, R. Diniz, T. Madi Filho, and S. C. Santos. Rossi- alpha experiment in the IPEN/MB-01 research reactor. Brazilian Journal of Physics , 35:751–753, 2005

    2005

  5. [13]

    Kuramoto, A

    R. Kuramoto, A. dos Santos, R. Jerez, R. Diniz, U. D. Bitelli, T. Madi Filho, and C. L. Veneziani. Rossi-α experiment in the IPEN/MB-01 research reactor: Validation of two-region model and absolute measurement of βeff and λ. In PHYSOR-2006, ANS Topical Meeting on Reactor Physi...

    2006

  6. [14]

    M. Y . Hua, C. A. Bravo, A. T. MacDonald, J. D. Hutchinson, G. E. McKenzie, B. C. Kiedrowski, S. D. Clarke, and S. A. Pozzi. Rossi-alpha measurements of fast Plutonium metal assemblies using organic scintillators. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: ...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Berglöf, M

    C. Berglöf, M. Fernández-Ordóñz, D. Villamarín, V . Bécares, E. M. González-Romero, V . Bournos, and J. L. Muñoz-Cobo. Auto-correlation and variance-to-mean measurements in a subcritical core obeying multiple alpha-modes. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38(2):194–202, 2011

    2011

  8. [16]

    J. L. Muñoz-Cobo, C. Berglöf, J. Peña, D. Villamarín, and V . Bournos. Feynman- α and Rossi- α formulas with spatial and modal effects. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38(2):590–600, 2011

    2011

  9. [17]

    Szieberth, G

    M. Szieberth, G. Klujber, J. L. Kloosterman, and D. de Haas. Measurement of multiple alpha-modes at the Delphi subcritical assembly by neutron noise techniques. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 75:146–157, 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    J. R. Sheff and R. W. Albrecht. The space dependence of reactor noise II - calculations. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 26(2):207–221, 1966

    1966

  11. [19]

    Degweker and Rashbihari Rudra

    S.B. Degweker and Rashbihari Rudra. On the relation between Rossi alpha and Feynman alpha methods. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 94:433–439, 2016. 23

    2016

  12. [20]

    Anderson, D

    J. Anderson, D. Chernikova, I. Pázsit, L. Pál, and S. A. Pozzi. Two-point theory for the differential self-interrogation Feynman-alpha method. The European Physical Journal Plus, 127(8):90, Aug 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Chernikova, I

    D. Chernikova, I. Pázsit, L. Pál, and Z. Wang. Derivation of two-group two-region Feynman-alpha formulas and their application to Safeguards and accelerator-driven system (ads). In INMM 54th Annual Meeting, JW Marriott Desert Springs, Palm Desert, California USA , volume 7, pa...

    2013

  14. [22]

    M. Y . Hua, J. D. Hutchinson, G. E. McKenzie, S. D. Clarke T. H. Shin, and S. A. Pozzi. Derivation of the two-exponential probability density function for Rossi-alpha measurements of reflected assemblies and validation for the special case of shielded measurements. Nuclear Sci...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Malinovitch and C

    T. Malinovitch and C. Dubi. A multi-region multi-energy formalism for the Feynman-alpha formulas. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 76:297–304, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Kópházi and D

    J. Kópházi and D. Lathouwers. Three-dimensional transport calculation of multiple alpha modes in subcritical systems. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 50:167–174, 2012

    2012

  17. [25]

    C. J. Werner, J. S. Bull, C. J. Solomon, F. B. Brown, G. W. McKinney, M. E. Rising, D. A. Dixon, R. L. Martz, H. G. Hughes, L. J. Cox, et al. MCNP version 6.2. Los alamos. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Leppänen, M

    J. Leppänen, M. Pusa, T. Viitanen, V . Valtavirta, and T. Kaltiaisenaho. The Serpent Monte Carlo code: Status, development and applications in 2013. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82:142–150, 2015

    2013

  19. [27]

    P. K. Romano, N. E. Horelik, B. R. Herman, A. G. Nelson, B. Forget, and K. Smith. OpenMC: A state-of-the-art Monte Carlo code for research and development. Annals of Nuclear Energy , 82:90– 97, 2015

    2015

  20. [28]

    Y . S. Rana, A. Singh, and S. B. Degweker. Diffusion theory-based analog Monte Carlo for simulating noise experiments in subcritical systems. Nuclear Science and Engineering , 174:245–263, 2013

    2013

  21. [29]

    Szieberth and J

    M. Szieberth and J. L. Kloosterman. Unbiased estimators of coincidence and correlation in non- analogous Monte Carlo particle transport. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 73:270–281, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Gabrieli, I

    G. Gabrieli, I. Neder, and U. Steinitz. Full calculation of the long-time-interval limit of noise in reactors. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 191:109944, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    C. E. Cohn. A simplified theory of pile noise. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 7(5):472–475, 1960

    1960

  24. [32]

    S. B. Degweker and Y . S. Rana. The Langevin approach to reactor noise in accelerator-driven systems. Nuclear Science and Engineering , 169(3):296–313, 2011. 24

    2011

  25. [33]

    Dubi and R

    C. Dubi and R. Atar. Modeling neutron count distribution in a subcritical core by stochastic differential equations. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 111:608–615, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Ziya Akcasu and R

    A. Ziya Akcasu and R. K. Osborn. Application of Langevin’s technique to space-and energy- dependent noise analysis. Nuclear Science and Engineering , 26(1):13–25, 1966

    1966

  27. [35]

    J. R. Sheff and R. W. Albrecht. The space dependence of reactor noise I - theory. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 24(3):246–259, 1966

    1966

  28. [36]

    K. Saito. Noise-equivalent source in nuclear reactors. Nuclear Science and Engineering , 28(3):384– 396, 1967

    1967

  29. [37]

    G. I. Bell. On the stochastic theory of neutron transport. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 21(3):390– 401, 1965

    1965

  30. [38]

    G. F. Knoll. Radiation detection and measurement. John & Wiley Sons Inc, 2010

    2010

  31. [39]

    Pakari, D

    O. Pakari, D. Mancusi, O. Petit, A. Zoia, V . Lamirand, and A. Pautz. Towards the validation of noise experiments in the CROCUS reactor using the TRIPOLI-4 Monte Carlo code in analog mode. In EPJ Web of Conferences 247, 04007, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    S. Bae, S. Suh, and H. Cha. Assessment of the implementation of a neutron measurement system during the commissioning of the Jordan Research and Training Reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 49:504–516, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    Mickus and J

    I. Mickus and J. Dufek. Optimal neutron population growth in accelerated monte carlo criticality calculations. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 117:297–304, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    J. E. Hoogenboom, W. R. Martin, B. Petrovic, et al. The Monte Carlo performance benchmark test - AIMS, specifications and first results. In International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering , volume 2, page 15, 2011. 25

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.