pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30667 · v1 · pith:26N4X6MQnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💻 cs.CY

Practitioners At The Limit: Bereavement, Mockery and Ideology in Response to Crisis

Shahpour Akhavi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 07:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords software industrytechnocapitalismpractitioner crisiscountercultural responsesLuddismorganized labouranarchismcommunism
0
0 comments X

The pith

Software practitioners are actively unaligning from technocapitalist priorities and adopting countercultural responses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the current crises facing software industry employees, including economic pressures from a tightening job market, political entanglements with authoritarianism, professional constraints in extractive business models, disruption from generative AI, and widespread emotional distress. Through interviews and analysis of public statements, it establishes that many practitioners are responding by rejecting the system's priorities in favor of new ones, evidenced by mockery of technocapitalism, a revival of Luddite ideas, engagement with organized labor, and support for anarchism and communism. A sympathetic reader would care because these workers create the digital infrastructure of society, meaning their ideological shifts could have wide-reaching effects on technology development and its societal impacts.

Core claim

After decades in which the software industry heroized its technical employees, our current moment finds those employees in crisis across economic, political, professional, technical, and emotional dimensions. Analysis of practitioner interviews and ongoing content analysis of public statements on blogs, microblogs, podcasts and videos shows that much of the workforce of technocapitalism is actively unaligning itself from that system's priorities and seeking new ones, with countercultural responses proliferating including mockery of technocapitalists and technocapitalism, rehabilitation of Luddism, interest in organized labour, and endorsement of alternate systems including anarchism and comm

What carries the argument

Analysis of interviews and public practitioner statements that documents the unalignment from technocapitalist priorities through emerging countercultural expressions.

If this is right

  • Whether software practitioners will form an organized enough response to decisively influence the crises remains to be seen.
  • Heightened critical attention should be paid to this centrally-located population of technosocial actors in their new and volatile state.
  • Their responses may affect not only themselves but the wider world through the products they create.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trend continues, it could lead to increased unionization efforts or boycotts of certain tech projects in the industry.
  • Connections to similar disillusionment in other creative or knowledge-work fields facing automation pressures may emerge.
  • Future research could track the growth of these expressions through quantitative analysis of online discourse over time.

Load-bearing premise

The practitioners whose statements were analyzed represent a significant and growing trend in the software industry workforce rather than a vocal minority.

What would settle it

A broad survey of software developers finding that expressions of countercultural responses like mockery of technocapitalism or interest in anarchism are rare and not increasing would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30667 by Shahpour Akhavi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Meme posted to Mastodon by the account Fake Scrum Stats Memes & Humor March 12, 2026 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Viktor Deni, “Death to Capitalism or Death Under Capitalism,” 1919 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Harry Ryle Hopps, “Destroy This Mad Brute: Enlist,” 1917 3 Setting Limits: Practitioner Politics Listening to UX Designers and Data Scientists, Robert Dorschel finds evidence of “a new middle-class identity among contemporary tech workers.” [23, p. 4] This class identity, he grants, comes with a caveat: “[W]hile tech workers identify with ideals of social justice and critiques of power structures, there is… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

After decades in which the software industry heroized its technical employees, our current moment finds those employees in crisis. Economically, they are squeezed by a job market that has turned on them since Elon Musk gutted Twitter in 2022. Politically, their craft is continually pressed into the service of an ever tighter alliance between Big Tech and authoritarianism. Professionally, they find themselves less and less able to contribute anything good to anyone within business models that are running out of room to pretend they do anything but extract. Technically, they are confronted with a much-hyped technology, generative AI, that distorts their work while purporting to make them redundant. And emotionally, they are simply not ok - as designer and developer Andrew Sempere puts it, "I think the word I'm looking for is: bereft." This study draws from a series of practitioner interviews undertaken for a current dissertation in STS and from ongoing content analysis of practitioners' public statements on blogs, microblogs, podcasts and videos to argue that much of the workforce of technocapitalism is actively unaligning itself from that system's priorities and seeking new ones. Countercultural responses among practitioners are proliferating, including mockery of technocapitalists and technocapitalism, rehabilitation of Luddism, interest in organized labour, and endorsement of alternate systems including anarchism and communism. Whether software practitioners will form an organized enough response to decisively influence the crises that beset them (and, often through their products, the wider world) remains to be seen. But heightened critical attention should be paid to this centrally-located population of technosocial actors in their new and volatile state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper describes multiple crises confronting software practitioners in technocapitalism (economic squeeze post-2022, alignment with authoritarianism, extractive business models, generative AI disruption, and emotional bereavement) and, drawing on practitioner interviews for an STS dissertation plus content analysis of public statements on blogs, microblogs, podcasts, and videos, claims that much of the workforce is actively unaligning from the system's priorities. It identifies proliferating countercultural responses including mockery of technocapitalists, rehabilitation of Luddism, interest in organized labour, and endorsement of anarchism and communism, while noting that whether these will produce organized influence remains open.

Significance. If the sampled responses prove representative of broader trends, the work would contribute to STS and critical studies of technology by documenting ideological and emotional shifts among a centrally positioned workforce, with potential implications for labor organizing, technology governance, and the societal effects of software systems. The interpretive framing of bereavement and countercultural proliferation offers a lens on practitioner agency that complements quantitative industry surveys.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'much of the workforce of technocapitalism is actively unaligning itself' and that 'countercultural responses among practitioners are proliferating' rests on interviews and content analysis, yet the abstract (and by extension the reported methods) supplies no information on the number of interviews conducted, selection criteria, response rates, sampling frame, or analytical procedures for the content analysis. This absence prevents assessment of whether the observed responses support the generalization beyond the sampled individuals.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: Public-statement sources (microblogs, podcasts, videos) are acknowledged as the basis for content analysis, but no steps are described to address selection bias—practitioners who publicly critique technocapitalism are more likely to appear in such corpora—nor is any comparison offered to industry-wide surveys or prevalence metrics that would establish these responses as a significant and growing trend rather than a self-selected minority.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments regarding the abstract and the transparency of our empirical basis. We address each point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'much of the workforce of technocapitalism is actively unaligning itself' and that 'countercultural responses among practitioners are proliferating' rests on interviews and content analysis, yet the abstract (and by extension the reported methods) supplies no information on the number of interviews conducted, selection criteria, response rates, sampling frame, or analytical procedures for the content analysis. This absence prevents assessment of whether the observed responses support the generalization beyond the sampled individuals.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not supply these methodological particulars. The manuscript is a concise interpretive piece drawing on an ongoing STS dissertation; it does not present itself as a statistically representative survey. In revision we will add a short clause to the abstract stating that the claims rest on a qualitative series of practitioner interviews and ongoing content analysis of public statements, and we will explicitly qualify the language to emphasize observed patterns rather than quantified prevalence across the entire workforce. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: Public-statement sources (microblogs, podcasts, videos) are acknowledged as the basis for content analysis, but no steps are described to address selection bias—practitioners who publicly critique technocapitalism are more likely to appear in such corpora—nor is any comparison offered to industry-wide surveys or prevalence metrics that would establish these responses as a significant and growing trend rather than a self-selected minority.

    Authors: The referee is correct that public-statement corpora carry inherent selection bias. The paper documents visible countercultural expressions rather than claiming they constitute a majority or statistically significant trend. We will revise the abstract to acknowledge this limitation directly and to frame the contribution as the identification of proliferating responses among practitioners who are already voicing dissent, without asserting industry-wide prevalence. No direct comparison to external surveys appears in the current text because the focus is qualitative; we can note this as a boundary of the present study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: interpretive argument from interviews and content analysis

full rationale

The paper advances its central claim—that software practitioners are unaligning from technocapitalism—explicitly as an interpretation of practitioner interviews and public statements on blogs, microblogs, podcasts, and videos. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations appear; the text presents the argument as grounded in empirical observations without reducing any step to self-definition, self-citation chains, or renaming of inputs. The absence of mathematical or model-based structure means none of the enumerated circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, etc.) can be exhibited by quote. The representativeness concern raised by the skeptic is a methodological limitation on generalizability, not a circular reduction of the derivation to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities as this is a qualitative interpretive study in social science.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5830 in / 1091 out tokens · 58523 ms · 2026-07-01T07:02:22.740516+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sco A d a m s . 1 9 9 5 . Dilbert. Retrieved July 19, 2025 from hps://dilbert- viewer.herokuapp.com/1995-02-05

    2025

  2. [2]

    Alice (@alice@mk.nyaa.place). 2026. @fesshole@mastodon.social yup, this is the right way of dealing with employer forcing it - as opposed to pushing slop to unsuspecting open…. Mastodon. Retrieved March 5, 2026 from hps:// mk.nyaa.place/@alice/116153893573651617

    work page arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Amazon Employees for Climate Justice. 2025. AI Open Leer. AECJ. Retrieved March 20, 2026 from hps://www.amazonclimatejustice.org/open-leer

    2025

  4. [4]

    Marc Andreessen. 2020. It’s Time to Build. Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved April 20, 2025 from hps://a16z.com/its-time-to-build/

    2020

  5. [5]

    Marc Andreessen. 2023. e Techno-Optimist Manifesto. Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved October 25, 2023 from hps://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist- manifesto/

    2023

  6. [6]

    anonymous. 2026. Fesshole 🧻 ( @ f e s s h o l e @ m a s t o d o n . s o c i a l ) . Mastodon. Retrieved March 2, 2026 from hps://mastodon.social/@fesshole/ 116153883462428890

    2026

  7. [7]

    Kevin Beaumont (@GossieDog@cyberplace.social). 2024. ings I’ve been asked to produce over the years as a manager in security: - Blockchain strategy- Metaverse strategy - Generative AI strateg…. Mastodon. Retrieved June 4, 2024 from hps://cyberplace.social/@Gossi eDog/ 112524729500647541 LIMITS ’26, June, 2026, Online S. Akhavi

    2024

  8. [8]

    Kent Beck. 2005. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison- Wesley, Boston

    2005

  9. [9]

    Martin, Steve Mellor, Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and Dave omas

    Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, Jon Kern, Brian Marick, Robert C. Martin, Steve Mellor, Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and Dave omas. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Soware Development. Retrieved September 15, 2023 from hp:// agilemanifesto.org/

    2001

  10. [10]

    Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race Aer Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (1st edition ed.). Polity, Medford, MA

    2019

  11. [11]

    Greg Bensinger. 2025. Exclusive: Amazon targets as many as 30,000 corporate job cuts, sources say. Reuters. Retrieved March 19, 2026 from hps:// www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/amazon-targets-many-30000- corporate-job-cuts-sources-say-2025-10-27/

    2025

  12. [12]

    Baldur Bjarnason (@baldur@toot.cafe). 2025. In the absence of functioning regulation of the tech industry in the US, the only mechanism we have to mitigate the harms of generative…. Mastodon. Retrieved May 1, 2025 from hps://toot.cafe/@baldur/114409569604625925

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Baldur Bjarnason (@baldur@toot.cafe). 2026. (Following thread was prompted by people pointing out that the Bluesky dev team seems heavily into vibe- coding now and originally posted on…. Mastodon. Retrieved March 5, 2026 from hps://toot.cafe/@baldur/116170647581258934

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Chip Buy

    “Chip Buy” (@otfrom@functional.cafe). 2026. If it isn’t an anarcho- syndicalist system…. Mastodon. Retrieved February 27, 2026 from hps:// functional.cafehps://functional.cafe/@otfrom/116092159358360038

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Miguel Afonso Caetano (@remixtures@tldr.neime.org). 2026. "AI models have one undeniable virtue…. Mastodon. Retrieved March 21, 2026 from hps://tldr.ne ime.orghps://tldr.ne ime.org/@remixtures/ 116268159867510833

    2026

  16. [16]

    Danilo Campos. 2024. Sorry, I still want to build technology. Redeem Tomorrow. Retrieved April 14, 2024 from hps://redeem-tomorrow.com/sorry- i-still-want-to-build-technology

    2024

  17. [17]

    Joseph Cox. 2026. Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods. 404 Media. Retrieved January 8, 2026 from hps:// www.404media.co/inside-ices-tool-to-monitor-phones-in-entire- neighborhoods/

    2026

  18. [18]

    Alessandro Delfanti. 2021. e warehouse: workers and robots at Amazon. Pluto Press, London

    2021

  19. [19]

    Martin Deron. 2025. Sprouting technology otherwise, hospicing negative commons – Rethinking technology in the transition to sustainability-oriented futures. hps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05860

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Cory Doctorow. 2023. e ‘Enshiification’ of TikTok. Wired. Retrieved March 27, 2023 from hps://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/

    2023

  21. [21]

    Cory Doctorow. 2023. e proletarianization of tech workers. Medium. Retrieved October 12, 2023 from hps://doctorow.medium.com/the- proletarianization-of-tech-workers-ad0a6b09f7e6

    2023

  22. [22]

    Cory Doctorow. 2024. e moral injury of having your work enshi ified. Medium. Retrieved February 19, 2024 from hps://doctorow.medium.com/the- moral-injury-of-having-your-work-enshiified-2860c586ed44

    2024

  23. [23]

    Robert Dorschel. 2025. e Social Codes of Tech Workers: Class Identity in Digital Capitalism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Retrieved February 14, 2026 from hps://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262553537/the-social-codes-of-tech- workers/

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    𝖊 𝖓 𝖆 𝔯 𝔤 𝔢 𝔦 𝔞(@detondev@social.linux.pizza). 2026. Melinda Gates opens the office door…. Mastodon. Retrieved March 22, 2026 from hps:// social.linux.pizza/@detondev/115894843283266091

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Vioria Ellio. 2024. Elon Musk’s Twier Takeover Set Off a R a c e t o t h e Boom. Wired. Retrieved March 19, 2026 from hps://www.wired.com/story/ elon-musk-trust-safety-industry/

    2024

  26. [26]

    Careless, blatantly amateuristic, and lacking any ambition, to put it gently

    Wes Fenlon. 2026. Microso uses plagiarized AI slop flowchart to explain how Github works, removes it aer original creator calls it out: “Careless, blatantly amateuristic, and lacking any ambition, to put it gently. ” PC Gamer. Retrieved February 28, 2026 from hps://www.pcgamer.com/soware/ai/microso-uses- plagiarized-ai-slop-flowchart-to-explain-how-git...

    2026

  27. [27]

    Blair, and Adrian Friday

    Charloe Freitag, Mike Berners-Lee, Kelly Widdicks, Bran Knowles, Gordon S. Blair, and Adrian Friday. 2021. e real climate and transformative impact of ICT: A critique of estimates, trends, and regulations. Paerns 2 , 9 ( 2 0 2 1 ) . hps://doi.org/10.1016/j.paer.2021.100340

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pa 2021

  28. [28]

    omas Fuchs. 2026. Nobody gives a shit anymore about anything…. Mastodon. Retrieved February 27, 2026 from hps://hachyderm.io/ @thomasfuchs/116083623180403291

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Grmpyprogrammer (@grmpyprogrammer). 2026. e pinko commie in me… grumpy-learning.com. Retrieved March 14, 2026 from hps://yac.grumpy- learning.com/@grmpyprogrammer/statuses/ 01KKP6FWSA4XDWKJ8GQ0KTE7ST

    2026

  30. [30]

    Jürgen Gueter (tante). 2026. Artisanal care. Smashing Frames. Retrieved March 5, 2026 from hps://tante.cc/2026/03/04/artisanal-care/

    2026

  31. [31]

    Jürgen Gueter (@tante@tldr.neime.org). 2026. I am a luddite and to me there is a lot of joy in technology…. Mastodon. Retrieved February 20, 2026 from hps://tldr.neime.orghps://tldr.neime.org/@tante/116098132644817774

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Connor Hart. 2026. Pinterest to Lay O ff Up to 15% of Workforce in Restructuring. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 14, 2026 from hps:// www.wsj.com/business/pinterest-to-lay-o ff-up-to-15-of-workforce-in- restructuring-66a62170

    2026

  33. [33]

    Mike Hoye (@mhoye@mastodon.social). 2025. We joke about vibe coding but…. Mastodon. Retrieved July 17, 2025 from hps://mastodon.social/ @mhoye/114755311547143873

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    IEA. 2025. Energy and AI. Paris. Retrieved March 16, 2026 from hps:// www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai

    2025

  35. [35]

    Jayne (@dotjayne@tech.lgbt). 2025. @mhoye believable. e mirrortocracy in silicon valley fundraising is so bad… Mastodon. Retrieved July 17, 2025 from hps://tech.lgbt/@dotjayne/114756736215042238

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Ron Jeffries, Ann Anderson, and Chet Hendrickson. 2001. Extreme Programming Installed. Addison Wesley, Boston

    2001

  37. [37]

    Mike Judge. 2025. Where’s the Shovelware? Why AI Coding Claims Don’t Add Up. Mike Judge. Retrieved December 28, 2025 from hps:// mikelovesrobots.substack.com/p/wheres-the-shovelware-why-ai-coding

    2025

  38. [38]

    Labor Tech Research Network. 2026. Labor Tech Research Network. Retrieved March 8, 2026 from hps://labortechresearchnetwork.org/

    2026

  39. [39]

    JP Lebreton (@jplebreton@mastodon.social). 2026. a theory on the total demobilization of programmers…. Mastodon. Retrieved March 18, 2026 from hps://mastodon.social/@jplebreton/116250785169221112

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Steven Levy. 2025. I ought I Knew Silicon Valley. I Was Wrong. Wired. Retrieved February 28, 2026 from hps://www.wired.com/story/silicon-valley- politics-shi/

    2025

  41. [41]

    Ethan Marcoe. 2023. You deserve a tech union ([First edition]. ed.). A Book Apart, New York, New York

    2023

  42. [42]

    Brian Marick. 2009. AR⊗TA: Artisanal Retro-Futurism crossed with Team- Scale Anarcho-Syndicalism. AR⊗TA. Retrieved June 22, 2025 from hp:// arxta.net/explanation.html

    2009

  43. [43]

    Conor McGlynn. 2026. AI and the Myth of the Machine. Compact. Retrieved March 21, 2026 from hps://www.compactmag.com/article/ai-and-the-myth- of-the-machine/

    2026

  44. [44]

    Brian Merchant. 2026. ey just formed the biggest tech worker union in the US. ey plan to rein in AI and curb layoffs. Blood in the Machine. Retrieved May 27, 2026 from hps://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/they-just-formed- the-biggest-tech

    2026

  45. [45]

    Iris Meredith. 2024. Sam Altman is a dunce. deadSimpleTech. Retrieved April 21, 2025 from hps://deadsimpletech.com/blog/altman_dunce

    2024

  46. [46]

    Gavin Mueller. 2021. Breaking things at work: the Luddites are right about why you hate your job. Verso, London ; New York

    2021

  47. [47]

    Luke Munn. 2019. Alt-right pipeline: Individual journeys to extremism online. First Monday 24, 6 (2019). hps://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i6.10108

    work page doi:10.5210/fm.v24i6.10108 2019

  48. [48]

    Naysayers Club. 2026. e Naysayers Club. Retrieved March 9, 2026 from hps://naysayers.club/

    2026

  49. [49]

    Casey Newton. 2023. What we’re learning from the Reddit blackout. Platformer. Retrieved March 21, 2026 from hps://www.platformer.news/what- were-learning-from-the-reddit/

    2023

  50. [50]

    Johnathan Nightingale and Melissa Nightingale. 2025. e poser manifesto. Raw Signal Group. Retrieved April 20, 2025 from hps://www.rawsignal.ca/ newsleer-archive/the-poser-manifesto/

    2025

  51. [51]

    Dare Obasanjo. 2023. e past decade and a half of the tech industry.… Twier. Retrieved September 5, 2023 from hps://twier.com/Carnage4Life/status/ 1635131628573069313

    2023

  52. [52]

    Dare Obasanjo (@carnage4life@mas.to). 2026. I think two things are true…. Mastodon. Retrieved February 27, 2026 from hps://mas.to/@carnage4life/ 116143435828320419

    2026

  53. [53]

    Annie Palmer. 2026. Block shares soar as much as 24% as company slashes workforce by nearly half. CNBC. Retrieved March 14, 2026 from hps:// LIMITS ’26, June, 2026, Online S. Akhavi www.cnbc.com/2026/02/26/block-laying-off-about-4000-employees-nearly- half-of-its-workforce.html

    2026

  54. [54]

    Daniel Pargman and Elina Eriksson. 2023. Exploring Inner Transition: Expanding Computing for Sustainability. In Computing within Limits, June 14,

    2023

  55. [55]

    hps://doi.org/10.21428/bf6269.22dea4ad

    LIMITS. hps://doi.org/10.21428/bf6269.22dea4ad

    work page doi:10.21428/bf6

  56. [56]

    Jay Peters. 2025. Shopify CEO says no new hires without proof AI can’t do the job. e Verge. Retrieved April 10, 2025 from hps://www.theverge.com/news/ 644943/shopify-ceo-memo-ai-hires-job

    2025

  57. [57]

    Chris Pis (@thirstybear@agilodon.social). 2025. Ooooh boy…I do hope I get one of these ridiculous edicts…. Mastodon. Retrieved June 28, 2025 from hps://agilodon.social/@thirstybear/114760105019535127

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Mihaela Popa-Wya. 2020. Reclamation: Taking Back Control of Words. Grazer philosophische Studien 9 7 , 1 ( 2 0 2 0 ) , 1 5 9 – 1 7 6 . hps://doi.org/ 10.1163/18756735-09701009

    work page doi:10.1163/18756735-09701009 2020

  59. [59]

    Prosocial Tech Website

    Prosocial Tech Collab. Prosocial Tech Website. Retrieved March 22, 2026 from hps://prosocialtech.org/

    2026

  60. [60]

    Jamie Powell. 2019. e curious blocking of elonmusk.today. Financial Times. Retrieved July 18, 2025 from hp://alphaville. .com/ 2019/06/26/1561534366000/e-curious-blocking-of-elonmusk-today/

    2019

  61. [61]

    Archibald Pu

    “Archibald Pu. ” 1981. Pu’s law and the successful technocrat. Exposition Press, Smithtown, N.Y

    1981

  62. [62]

    rds-level-10.bsky.social. 2026. Bezos can take him for a cruise.… Bluesky. Retrieved March 22, 2026 from hps://bsky.app/pro file/rds- level-10.bsky.social/post/3mhjddhcmhc26

    2026

  63. [63]

    Reuters. 2026. Autodesk cuts 7% of workforce to redirect investments to AI, cloud. Reuters. Retrieved March 14, 2026 from hps://www.reuters.com/ business/world-at-work/autodesk-lay-off-about-7-workforce-2026-01-22/

    2026

  64. [64]

    Janus Rose. 2025. You Can’t Post Your Way Out of Fascism. 404 Media. Retrieved February 23, 2025 from hps://www.404media.co/you-cant-post- your-way-out-of-fascism/

    2025

  65. [65]

    Fergus Ryan, Bethany Allen, Shelly Shih, Stepan Robin, Nathan Arill, Jared Alpert, Astrid Young, and Tilla Hoja. 2025. e party’s AI: How China’s new AI systems are reshaping human rights. Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Barton, Australia. Retrieved March 3, 2026 from hps://aspi.s3.ap- southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/27122307...

    2025

  66. [66]

    Nick Seaver. 2019. Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture 24, 4 (2019), 421–436

    2019

  67. [67]

    Andrew Sempere. 2026. Don’t die lil thing. Feral Research. Retrieved February 6, 2026 from hps://feralresearch.org/newsleer/dont-die-lil-thing/

    2026

  68. [68]

    Adam Serwer. 2025. Americans Are Trapped in an Algorithmic Cage. e Atlantic. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from hps://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ archive/2025/02/trump-administration-voter-perception/681598/

    2025

  69. [69]

    Nick Srnicek. 2017. Platform capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

    2017

  70. [70]

    Using AI is no longer optional

    Ashley Stewart. 2025. Microso pushes staff to use internal AI tools more, and may consider this in reviews. “Using AI is no longer optional. ” Business Insider. Retrieved June 28, 2025 from hps://www.businessinsider.com/microso- internal-memo-using-ai-no-longer-optional-github-copilot-2025-6

    2025

  71. [71]

    Nikhil Suresh (Lucidity). 2024. Leadership Is A Hell Of A Drug. Ludicity. Retrieved May 16, 2024 from hps://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/leadership-is-a- hell-of-a-drug/

    2024

  72. [72]

    Every Way Twier Has Goen Worse Since It Became ‘X

    Paul Tassi. Every Way Twier Has Goen Worse Since It Became ‘X. ’ Forbes. Retrieved March 18, 2026 from hps://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/ 2024/05/29/every-way-twier-has-goen-worse-since-it-became-x/

    2026

  73. [73]

    David Van Dijcke, Florian Gunsilius, and Austin Wright. 2024. Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution. hps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.04352

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04352 2024

  74. [74]

    Tom Warren. 2022. Elon Musk demands Twi er employees commit to ‘extremely hardcore’ culture or leave. e Verge. Retrieved May 2, 2024 from hps://www.theverge.com/2022/11/16/23462026/elon-musk-twi er-email- hardcore-or-severance

    2022

  75. [75]

    Molly White. 2023. Effective obfuscation. Citation Needed. Retrieved November 26, 2023 from hps://newsleer.mollywhite.net/p/effective-obfuscation

    2023

  76. [76]

    Eileen Yu. 2024. Australia slams Twier (now X) for 80% cut in trust and safety engineers. ZDNET. Retrieved March 19, 2026 from hps://www.zdnet.com/ article/australia-slams-twier-now-x-for-80-cut-in-trust-and-safety-engineers/

    2024

  77. [77]

    Shoshana Zuboff. 1988. In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. Basic Books, New York

    1988

  78. [78]

    Love and Power

    2011. Love and Power. All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace . Retrieved April 10, 2022 from hps://vimeo.com/24737728

    work page arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    Im Schaen der Netzwelt ( e Cleaners)

    2018. Im Schaen der Netzwelt ( e Cleaners). Gebrueder Beetz Filmproduktion, Grifa Filmes, Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR)

    2018

  80. [80]

    is is what a digital coup looks like

    2025. is is what a digital coup looks like . Retrieved April 19, 2025 from hps://www.ted.com/talks/ carole_cadwalladr_this_is_what_a_digital_coup_looks_like

    2025

Showing first 80 references.