Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How to write and develop your astronomy research paper

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.05503 v5 pith:26UGR4AQ submitted 2021-10-11 astro-ph.IM physics.ed-ph

classification astro-ph.IMphysics.ed-ph
keywords writingresearchastronomydevelopfirstguideoftenpresented
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Writing is a vital component of a modern career in scientific research. But how to write correctly and effectively is often not included in the training that young astronomers receive from their supervisors and departments. We offer a step-by-step guide to tackle this deficiency, published as a set of two papers. In the first, we addressed how to plan and outline your paper and decide where to publish. In the current second paper, we describe the various sections that constitute a typical research paper in astronomy, sharing best practice for the most efficient use of each of them. We also discuss a selection of issues that often cause trouble to writers, from sentence to paragraph structure, the `writing mechanics' used to develop a manuscript. Our two-part guide is aimed primarily at master's and PhD level students who are presented with the daunting task of writing their first scientific paper, but more senior researchers or writing instructors may well find the ideas presented here useful.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How to set up your first machine learning project in astronomy

    astro-ph.IM 2025-02 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review that collects best-practice recommendations for designing, validating, and communicating astronomy machine learning projects, with no new empirical results.

Pith tools