Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of the Tetrahedron Method to Smearing Methods for the Electronic Density of States

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.03469 v1 pith:27FHJITS submitted 2021-03-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords densitymethodssmearingstateselectronicfeaturesmethodproperties
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The electronic density of states (DOS) highlights fundamental properties of materials that oftentimes dictate their properties, such as the band gap and Van Hove singularities. In this short note, we discuss how sharp features of the density of states can be obscured by smearing methods (such as the Gaussian and Fermi smearing methods) when calculating the DOS. While the common approach to reach a "converged" density of states of a material is to increase the discrete k-point mesh density, we show that the DOS calculated by smearing methods can appear to converge but not to the correct DOS. Employing the tetrahedron method for Brillouin zone integration resolves key features of the density of states far better than smearing methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools