REVIEW 1 cited by
Central limit theorems via Stein's method for randomized experiments under interference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study conditions under which treatment effect estimators constructed under the no-interference assumption in randomized experiments are asymptotically normal in the presence of interference. We prove that the standard Horvitz-Thompson estimator is asymptotically normal under a restricted interference condition characterized by limiting the degree of the dependency graph. The amount of interference is allowed to grow with the population size. We then provide a central limit theorem for the difference-in-means estimator that can handle interference that exists between all pairs of units, provided most of the interference is captured by a restricted-degree dependency graph. The asymptotic variance admits a decomposition into two terms: (a) the variance that is expected under no-interference and (b) the additional variance contributed by interference. We propose a conservative variance estimator based on this variance decomposition. The results arise as an application of Stein's method. For practitioners, our results show that standard estimators continue to exhibit normality in large sample sizes and that inference can be made robust to mild forms of interference.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Causal Inference under Interference: Regression Adjustment and Optimality
Under network interference, linear and kernel regression adjustments achieve the smallest asymptotic variance in their classes, and the paper provides consistent variance estimators.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.