Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 58 references

Rough sound waves in $3D$ compressible Euler flow with vorticity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that classical solutions to 3D compressible Euler flow with vorticity and entropy exist for a time controlled by the $H^{2+}$ norm of the sound-wave part of the data, one half-derivative below the standard threshold, and…

desk verdict Real advance in low-regularity 3D Euler with vorticity and entropy, but the proof as submitted is not self-contained: the key Strichartz estimate is deferred and full local well-posedness is not proved. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02550 v2 pith:27QKJG7D submitted 2019-09-05 math.AP math-phmath.MP

classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q3135Q3535L1035L67
keywords compressibleEulerlowregularityvorticityentropyStrichartzestimatesacousticgeometryeikonalequationshockformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a low-regularity existence theorem for the 3D compressible Euler equations with nontrivial vorticity and entropy. It shows that the time of classical existence can be controlled by the $H^{2+}$ Sobolev norm of the sound-wave part of the initial data together with extra Sobolev and Hölder regularity of the vorticity and entropy (the transport part). This lowers the required regularity of the wave part by half a derivative compared to classical local well-posedness, and the paper shows this is the best possible in the Sobolev scale: merely $H^2$ wave data can lead to immediate shock formation. The proof works by coupling a geometric wave-transport formulation, Strichartz estimates for sound waves, and Schauder estimates for the transport-div-curl part, and it is the first such result for a quasilinear system with multiple characteristic speeds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the geometric wave-transport formulation of the compressible Euler equations, which decomposes the solution into a wave part satisfying covariant wave equations for the acoustical metric $g(\rho,v,s)$ and a transport-div-curl part for the specific vorticity $\Omega=\mathrm{curl}\,v/e^{\rho}$ and the entropy gradient $S=\partial s$. The argument carries through a bootstrap that combines frequency-localized energy estimates, Strichartz estimates for the wave part, and Schauder estimates for the transport part, and it relies on controlling the acoustic geometry—in particular, an eikonal function whose level sets are sound cones—through quantities such as the null mean curvature, which evolves via Raychaudhuri's equation with source terms involving vorticity and entropy.

What would settle it

A reader could try to construct a smooth solution to the 3D compressible Euler equations with nonzero vorticity and entropy whose initial data satisfy the bounds of Theorem 1.2 but for which the time of classical existence is strictly smaller than any function of the stated norms and compact set, or for which the solution loses the propagated Hölder regularity before that time. Alternatively, testing the imported frequency-localized Strichartz estimate in numerical experiments for rough data with vorticity could reveal a loss of dispersion that would invalidate the bootstrap.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For smooth solutions to the 3D compressible Euler equations whose initial data satisfy the bounds of Theorem 1.2, the time of classical existence $T$ depends only on the data norms $D_{N;\alpha}$ and the compact state-space set $K$, and the solution propagates the assumed Sobolev and Hölder regularity up to time $T$. The key structural discovery is that the wave part (density and velocity, governed by the acoustical wave operator) and the transport part (vorticity and entropy, governed by material-derivative transport) can be separated in a geometric formulation, and that the transport part—even though it interacts nonlinearly with the rougher wave part—remains smoother and can be used to control the acoustic geometry. The regularity threshold $H^{2+}$ for the wave part is optimal, since Lindblad's results show that $H^2$ data can produce instantaneous shock singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on a frequency-localized Strichartz estimate (Theorem 7.2) whose proof is not included in this paper but is deferred to results in [54] and said to be essentially the same as in [56]; if this imported theorem does not hold at the stated low regularity with vorticity and entropy, or if the geometric hypotheses from [54]/[56] are not satisfied, the bootstrap argument does not close and Theorem 1.2 is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theorem is correct, local well-posedness for compressible Euler with vorticity and entropy holds at the $H^{2+}$ regularity threshold for the wave part, matching the known optimal result for scalar quasilinear wave equations.
  • The result provides a rigorous a priori estimate for smooth solutions from which existence and uniqueness in the stated spaces would follow, completing the low-regularity Cauchy theory for this system.
  • The new control of the acoustic geometry in the presence of transport phenomena can be used in future work on shock formation, since it shows how far the geometry can be controlled before singularities develop.
  • The Strichartz and Schauder estimates derived here are of independent interest for other quasilinear systems with multiple speeds, such as magnetohydrodynamics, though the paper notes that current techniques do not extend to general multi-speed systems.
  • The optimality statement indicates that any further lowering of the wave-part regularity would require a fundamentally different mechanism, since instantaneous shock formation prevents $H^2$ data from being well-posed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension would be to check whether the additional Hölder regularity of $C$ and $D$ can be replaced by a weaker condition, such as $BMO$, or whether the Schauder approach fundamentally requires Hölder spaces; the paper suggests BMO control would be insufficient for closing the energy estimates.
  • The geometric decomposition may be adapted to other fluid models with multiple characteristic speeds, but the paper's remark that general multi-speed systems are out of reach suggests that the specific structure of the acoustic metric and the transport-div-curl system is load-bearing.
  • The optimality at $H^2$ suggests that the full range $N\in(2,5/2]$ is natural: one might conjecture that the same theorem holds for all $N$ in this range, and that the restriction $N\le 5/2$ is an artifact of the proof technique rather than a sharp barrier.
  • The methods could potentially be combined with shock-formation results to determine, for open sets of data with vorticity, the precise critical regularity at which shocks form instantly versus persist for a positive time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework for proving low-regularity control of the classical existence time for 3D compressible Euler with vorticity and entropy. The main theorem (Theorem 1.2) states that for smooth data satisfying H^N wave-part bounds (2<N≤5/2), H^{N+1} entropy and H^N vorticity bounds, and C^{0,α} bounds on the modified variables (C,D), the time of existence depends only on the data norms and a compact state-space set, with propagation of Sobolev and Hölder regularity. The proof is structured as a bootstrap: energy and elliptic estimates along constant-time slices (Sections 4-5), null-hypersurface estimates (Section 6), Strichartz estimates for the wave part (Theorem 7.1, conditional on frequency-localized estimate Theorem 7.2), and Schauder-transport estimates (Section 8). Sections 9-10 construct the acoustic geometry and estimate the eikonal quantities; Section 11 summarizes reductions of Theorem 7.2, deferring the main proof to references [54] and [56]. The paper explicitly states (Remark 1.2) that only a priori estimates are established and full local well-posedness is not provided.

Significance. If completed, the result would be a significant advance: it would lower the regularity threshold for the wave part of compressible Euler with vorticity and entropy by half a derivative relative to classical local well-posedness, combining geometric null-frame techniques, Strichartz estimates, and Schauder estimates for genuinely multi-characteristic-speed quasilinear systems. The paper contains substantial and careful a priori estimates, including the null-hypersurface control of the modified variables (Prop. 6.1), the acoustic-geometry estimates (Prop. 10.1), and the Schauder estimates for transport-div-curl systems (Lemma 8.2, Theorem 8.1), with parameters tracked explicitly. These components are likely to be valuable beyond the present application. However, the advertised bootstrap is not closed within the manuscript: the proof of the key frequency-localized Strichartz estimate (Theorem 7.2) is deferred, and the main theorem is, by the authors' own statement, an a priori estimate result. The significance is therefore conditional on completing or correctly importing the missing ingredient.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.3, Theorem 7.2/eq. (110); §11] The frequency-localized Strichartz estimate Theorem 7.2 is the load-bearing ingredient of the bootstrap: Theorem 7.1, and hence the a priori estimate (1) and Theorem 1.2, depend on it. Section 11 does not prove Theorem 7.2; it defers to [54] and describes the argument as 'essentially the same' as in [56]. The setting here differs from the single-quasilinear-wave setting of [56] in ways the paper itself emphasizes: the acoustic metric coefficients have only H^N regularity with N≤5/2, and the vorticity/entropy variables enter the geometry through source terms such as (27) and (228a). A statement that the imported theorem applies to this coupled multiple-speed system, with a proof or a precise citation of a published proof, is required for the bootstrap to close. As written, Theorem 1.2 is not established.
  2. [Theorem 1.2 and footnote 10] Theorem 1.2 asserts that Hölder regularity is propagated by the flow, but footnote 10 states that the Hölder exponent that is actually controlled may be smaller than the α appearing in the data assumption. The theorem should be restated with the propagated exponent, or the C^{0,α} propagation should be proved; otherwise the statement is stronger than the demonstrated estimates.
  3. [§1.2, Remark 1.2, and equation (1)] The paper proves a priori estimates for smooth solutions, but Theorem 1.2 is titled and stated as a control of the time of classical existence. Remark 1.2 explicitly says that the remaining aspects of a full local well-posedness proof (existence and uniqueness) are anticipated but not provided. If the contribution is intended as an a priori-estimate paper, the theorem should be reformulated accordingly; if the full local well-posedness statement is intended, the approximation and uniqueness argument must be included or the claim explicitly weakened.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / §1.2] The notation H^{2^+} in the abstract and H^{2+} in the introduction should be unified and defined precisely.
  2. [§1.8] In the discussion of the L∞ norm, the phrase 'the L∞x norm norm on the LHS' appears to contain a typo.
  3. [§5.3] The line 'RHS (96) ≲ RHS (95)' is confusing because (95) is an inequality; the intended comparison is with the right-hand side of (95).
  4. [§11] The summary of reductions would benefit from a precise list of the equations and estimates imported from [54] and [56], since the local reader does not have the details of those papers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Bootstrap proof with heavy self-citation and a deferred Strichartz theorem, but no definitional reduction of the conclusion to an input.

full rationale

The derivation of Theorem 1.2 is a bootstrap in which the controlled quantities are energies and mixed spacetime norms stated in the bootstrap assumptions (42a)-(42b); these are strictly weaker than the final lifespan bound and are improved in Theorems 7.1 and 8.1. The acoustic geometry estimates of Prop. 10.1 are obtained under bootstrap assumptions and then feed into the frequency-localized Strichartz estimate Theorem 7.2, which in turn yields the improved Strichartz bound Theorem 7.1 and ultimately the a priori estimate (1). This is a standard bootstrap architecture: the assumed bounds are not the desired conclusion, and the paper never fits a parameter to the target lifespan or defines a controlled quantity in terms of the theorem's conclusion. The main caveat is that Theorem 7.2, the linchpin of the Strichartz argument, is not proved in this paper. Section 7 states that its proof is 'essentially the same' as in the authors' prior work [56], and Section 11 says it 'review[s] some results derived in [54], which in total show that the results of Sect. 10 imply Theorem 7.2.' This is a load-bearing self-citation/deferral and a genuine rigor gap: [56] treated single-speed quasilinear wave equations without vorticity and entropy, so the extension to the coupled multi-speed Euler system with lower regularity is exactly the missing content. However, this is a gap in the proof, not a circular reduction. The cited framework is not being used as a proxy for the theorem being proved, and no equation in the manuscript makes the desired control equivalent to an assumed bound by construction. Remark 1.2 further limits the paper to a priori estimates for smooth solutions and explicitly defers the remaining local well-posedness steps, which weakens the stated Theorem 1.2 but again is an incompleteness rather than circularity. Overall, the circularity burden is low: the main estimates are derived rather than assumed, and the self-citations are to prior formulations and techniques whose assumptions do not include the target result. The score reflects the significant but non-circular reliance on the authors' own deferred Strichartz machinery.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theorem's inputs are the data norms and the compact set K; the internal exponents such as epsilon0, delta0, delta, and delta1 are deterministic functions of N and alpha, so no independent free parameters are fitted. The central proof imports the geometric wave-transport formulation from [45] and the Strichartz framework from [56]/[54]; these are unproved background results in this paper. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Geometric wave-transport formulation of compressible Euler (Prop. 2.1), quoted from [45].
    The paper builds all estimates on this reformulation, which splits the system into wave and transport parts; it is not reproved here.
  • domain assumption Initial data satisfy the Sobolev and Holder bounds (39a)-(39b), the hyperbolicity compact set K, and smoothness as needed for qualitative arguments.
    These are the theorem's hypotheses; they encode the required extra regularity of the transport part relative to the wave part.
  • domain assumption Frequency-localized Strichartz estimate Theorem 7.2, imported from [54] and [56], including the geometric control of the eikonal function and the conformal energy framework.
    This is the main externally supplied ingredient; Section 11 only reviews the reduction and does not give the proof details.
  • standard math Standard analytic tools: Littlewood-Paley calculus, Sobolev embedding, elliptic Hodge identity (56), Schauder estimates, TT* argument, and decay estimates for wave equations.
    Used throughout Sections 4-11 without proof.
  • domain assumption The equation of state is smooth, with positive density and speed of sound bounded on the state-space set K.
    Needed for hyperbolicity and for the acoustic metric to be Lorentzian.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rough sound waves in $3D$ compressible Euler flow with vorticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/27QKJG7D

@misc{pith2026190902550,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rough sound waves in $3D$ compressible Euler flow with vorticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/27QKJG7D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02550}
}
abstract

We prove a series of results tied to the regularity and geometry of solutions to the $3D$ compressible Euler equations with vorticity and entropy. Our framework exploits and reveals additional virtues of a recent new formulation of the equations, which decomposed the flow into a geometric "(sound) wave-part" coupled to a "transport-div-curl-part" (transport-part for short), with both parts exhibiting remarkable properties. Our main result is that the time of existence can be controlled in terms of the $H^{2^+}(\mathbb{R}^3)$-norm of the wave-part of the initial data and various Sobolev and H\"{o}lder norms of the transport-part of the initial data, the latter comprising the initial vorticity and entropy. The wave-part regularity assumptions are optimal in the scale of Sobolev spaces: shocks can instantly form if one only assumes a bound for the $H^2(\mathbb{R}^3)$-norm of the wave-part of the initial data. Our proof relies on the assumption that the transport-part of the initial data is more regular than the wave-part, and we show that the additional regularity is propagated by the flow, even though the transport-part of the flow is deeply coupled to the rougher wave-part. To implement our approach, we derive several results of independent interest: i) sharp estimates for the acoustic geometry, i.e., the geometry of sound cones; ii) Strichartz estimates for quasilinear sound waves coupled to vorticity and entropy; and iii) Schauder estimates for the transport-div-curl-part. Compared to previous works on low regularity, the main new features of the paper are that the quasilinear PDE systems under study exhibit multiple speeds of propagation and that elliptic estimates for various components of the fluid are needed, both to avoid loss of regularity and to gain space-time integrability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02550 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The null frame Controlling the acoustic geometry means, essentially, deriving estimates for various connection coeffi￾cients35 of the null frame and their derivatives. There are many quantities that we need to estimate, but for brevity, in our discussion of the model problem, we will discuss only one of them. Specifically, of primary im￾portance for applications to Strichartz estimates is the null mean curvature of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The interior and exterior regions and related geometric constructions in the case z := 0 9.4.1. The interior solution emanating from the cone-tip axis and the region Mf(Int) . We let γz = γz(t) denote the future-directed integral curve of the vectorfield43 B emanating from the point z, i.e., γz(0) = z ∈ Σ0. We refer to {γz(t)}t∈[0,T∗;(λ)] as the cone-tip axis. Let q = q(t) := γz(t) be a point on the cone-tip axis. L… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Depiction of various subsets of spacetime in the case z := 0 the bounds (265a)-(273b) proved below; see also the proof of [52, Theorem 1.2] and [23, 27] for additional details. In particular, for u ∈ [−w(λ) , T∗;(λ) ] and t ∈ [[u]+, T∗;(λ) ], where [u]+ := max{0, u}, the sets St,u := Cu ∩ Σt (173) are embedded submanifolds that are diffeomorphic to S 2 , equipped with the (local) angular coordinates (ω1 , ω2 ). We a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the regions appearing in definition (366a) in the case z := 0. Definition 11.1 (Conformal energy). For scalar functions ϕ that vanish outside of Mf(Int) (see definition (171) and Remark 11.1), we define the conformal energy C [ϕ] as follows: C…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    Hyperbolic Differ

    Qian Wang, Causal geometry of rough Einstein CMCSH spacetime , J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 11 (2014), no. 3, 563–601. MR3261303

  2. [56]

    , A geometric approach for sharp local well-posedness of quasilinear wave equations , Annals of PDE 3 (2017May), no. 1, 12

  3. [45]

    A New Formulation of the $3D$ Compressible Euler Equations With Dynamic Entropy: Remarkable Null Structures and Regularity Properties

    , A new formulation of the 3D compressible Euler equations with dynamic entropy: Remarkable null structures and regularity properties, To appear in Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis; preprint available (January 2017), available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06626. 100 Rough sound waves in compressible Euler flow

  4. [1]

    Hajer Bahouri and Jean-Yves Chemin, ´Equations d’ondes quasilin´ eaires et estimations de Strichartz, Amer. J. Math. 121 (1999), no. 6, 1337–1377. MR1719798

  5. [2]

    343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    Hajer Bahouri, Jean-Yves Chemin, and Rapha¨ el Danchin, Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations , Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. MR2768550

  6. [3]

    343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    , Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations , Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 343, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. MR2768550

  7. [4]

    MR2284927 (2008e:76104)

    Demetrios Christodoulou, The formation of shocks in 3-dimensional fluids , EMS Monographs in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2007. MR2284927 (2008e:76104)

  8. [5]

    MR2488976 (2009k:83010)

    , The formation of black holes in general relativity , EMS Monographs in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2009. MR2488976 (2009k:83010)

Show all 58 references
  1. [6]

    41, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    Demetrios Christodoulou and Sergiu Klainerman, The global nonlinear stability of the Minkowski space , Princeton Math- ematical Series, vol. 41, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. MR1316662 (95k:83006)

  2. [7]

    9, International Press, Somerville, MA; Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2014

    Demetrios Christodoulou and Shuang Miao, Compressible flow and Euler’s equations , Surveys of Modern Mathematics, vol. 9, International Press, Somerville, MA; Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2014. MR3288725

  3. [8]

    Daniel Coutand, Hans Lindblad, and Steve Shkoller, A priori estimates for the free-boundary 3D compressible Euler equations in physical vacuum , Comm. Math. Phys. 296 (2010), no. 2, 559–587. MR2608125 (2011c:35629)

  4. [9]

    Pure Appl

    Daniel Coutand and Steve Shkoller, Well-posedness in smooth function spaces for moving-boundary 1-D compressible Euler equations in physical vacuum , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 3, 328–366. MR2779087 (2012d:76103)

  5. [10]

    , Well-posedness in smooth function spaces for the moving-boundary three-dimensional compressible Euler equations in physical vacuum , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 206 (2012), no. 2, 515–616. MR2980528

  6. [11]

    Dafermos and J

    M. Dafermos and J. Luk, The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: The C0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon , ArXiv e-prints (October 2017), available at 1710.01722

  7. [12]

    Mihalis Dafermos and Igor Rodnianski, A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes, XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, 2010, pp. 421–432. MR2730803

  8. [13]

    Disconzi and Jared Speck, The relativistic Euler equations: remarkable null structures and regularity properties, Ann

    Marcelo M. Disconzi and Jared Speck, The relativistic Euler equations: remarkable null structures and regularity properties, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e20 (2019), no. 7, 2173–2270. MR3962844

  9. [14]

    Boris Ettinger and Hans Lindblad, A sharp counterexample to local existence of low regularity solutions to Einstein equations in wave coordinates, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), no. 1, 311–330. MR3583356 M. Disconzi, C. Luo, G. Mazzone, J. Speck 99

  10. [15]

    Leonhard Euler, Principes generaux du mouvement des fluides 11 (1757), 274–315

  11. [16]

    Trudinger, Elliptic partial differential equations of second order , Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001

    David Gilbarg and Neil S. Trudinger, Elliptic partial differential equations of second order , Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. Reprint of the 1998 edition. MR1814364

  12. [17]

    Thesis, 2018 (English)

    Ross Granowski, Asymptotically stable ill-posedness of geometric quasilinear wave equations , Ph.D. Thesis, 2018 (English). Copyright - Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works; Last updated - 2018-06-28

  13. [18]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The large scale structure of space-time , Cambridge University Press, London, 1973. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, No. 1. MR0424186 (54 #12154)

  14. [19]

    Pure Appl

    Juhi Jang and Nader Masmoudi, Well-posedness for compressible Euler equations with physical vacuum singularity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 62 (2009), no. 10, 1327–1385. MR2547977 (2010j:35384)

  15. [20]

    , Vacuum in gas and fluid dynamics , Nonlinear conservation laws and applications, 2011, pp. 315–329. MR2857004 (2012i:35230)

  16. [21]

    Sergiu Klainerman, A commuting vectorfields approach to Strichartz-type inequalities and applications to quasi-linear wave equations, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 5 (2001), 221–274. MR1820023 (2001k:35210)

  17. [22]

    Sergiu Klainerman and Igor Rodnianski, Improved local well-posedness for quasilinear wave equations in dimension three , Duke Math. J. 117 (2003), no. 1, 1–124. MR1962783 (2004b:35233)

  18. [23]

    , Causal geometry of Einstein-vacuum spacetimes with finite curvature flux , Invent. Math. 159 (2005), no. 3, 437–

  19. [24]

    , The causal structure of microlocalized rough Einstein metrics , Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), no. 3, 1195–1243. MR2180401 (2007d:58052)

  20. [25]

    , Rough solutions of the Einstein-vacuum equations , Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), no. 3, 1143–1193. MR2180400 (2007d:58051)

  21. [26]

    , A geometric approach to the Littlewood-Paley theory , Geom. Funct. Anal. 16 (2006), no. 1, 126–163. MR2221254 (2007e:58046)

  22. [27]

    , On the radius of injectivity of null hypersurfaces , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), no. 3, 775–795. MR2393426

  23. [28]

    Sergiu Klainerman, Igor Rodnianski, and Jeremie Szeftel, The boundedL2 curvature conjecture, Invent. Math. 202 (2015), no. 1, 91–216. MR3402797

  24. [29]

    Hans Lindblad, Counterexamples to local existence for quasilinear wave equations , Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998), no. 5, 605–

  25. [30]

    org/abs/1610.00743

    Jonathan Luk and Jared Speck, The hidden null structure of the compressible Euler equations and a prelude to applications, To appear in Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations; preprint available (October 2016), available at https://arxiv. org/abs/1610.00743

  26. [31]

    , Shock formation in solutions to the 2D compressible Euler equations in the presence of non-zero vorticity , Invent. Math. 214 (2018), no. 1, 1–169. MR3858399

  27. [32]

    Majda, Compressible fluid flow and systems of conservation laws in several space variables , Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol

    A. Majda, Compressible fluid flow and systems of conservation laws in several space variables , Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 53, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. MR748308 (85e:35077)

  28. [33]

    Morawetz, Time decay for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations , Proc

    Cathleen S. Morawetz, Time decay for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations , Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 306 (1968), 291–296. MR0234136

  29. [34]

    Georgios Moschidis, A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein–null dust system with an inner mirror , arXiv e-prints (2017Apr), arXiv:1704.08681, available at 1704.08681

  30. [35]

    , A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein–massless Vlasov system , arXiv e-prints (2018Dec), arXiv:1812.04268, available at 1812.04268

  31. [36]

    Munkres, Topology, Topology, Prentice-Hall, 2000

    J.R. Munkres, Topology, Topology, Prentice-Hall, 2000

  32. [37]

    Eric Poisson, The motion of point particles in curved spacetime , Living Reviews in Relativity 7 (2004May), no. 1, 6

  33. [38]

    MR2527641

    Hans Ringstr¨ om,The Cauchy problem in general relativity , ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathe- matical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2009. MR2527641

  34. [39]

    Igor Rodnianski and Jared Speck, A regime of linear stability for the Einstein-scalar field system with applications to nonlinear Big Bang formation , Ann. of Math. (2) 187 (2018), no. 1, 65–156. MR3739229

  35. [40]

    , Stable Big Bang formation in near-FLRW solutions to the Einstein-scalar field and Einstein-stiff fluid systems , Selecta Mathematica (2018Sep)

  36. [41]

    Smith, A parametrix construction for wave equations with C1,1 coefficients, Ann

    Hart F. Smith, A parametrix construction for wave equations with C1,1 coefficients, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 48 (1998), no. 3, 797–835. MR1644105

  37. [42]

    Smith and Daniel Tataru, Sharp counterexamples for Strichartz estimates for low regularity metrics , Math

    Hart F. Smith and Daniel Tataru, Sharp counterexamples for Strichartz estimates for low regularity metrics , Math. Res. Lett. 9 (2002), no. 2-3, 199–204. MR1909638

  38. [43]

    , Sharp local well-posedness results for the nonlinear wave equation , Ann. of Math. (2) 162 (2005), no. 1, 291–366. MR2178963 (2006k:35193)

  39. [44]

    Jared Speck, Shock formation in small-data solutions to 3D quasilinear wave equations, Mathematical Surveys and Mono- graphs, 2016

  40. [46]

    , The maximal development of near-FLRW data for the Einstein-scalar field system with spatial topology S3, Comm. Math. Phys. 364 (2018), no. 3, 879–979. MR3875820

  41. [47]

    Daniel Tataru, Strichartz estimates for operators with nonsmooth coefficients and the nonlinear wave equation , Amer. J. Math. 122 (2000), no. 2, 349–376. MR1749052

  42. [48]

    II , Amer

    , Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients. II , Amer. J. Math. 123 (2001), no. 3, 385–423. MR1833146

  43. [49]

    , Strichartz estimates for second order hyperbolic operators with nonsmooth coefficients. III , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 2, 419–442. MR1887639

  44. [50]

    Taylor, Pseudodifferential operators and nonlinear pde, Birkh¨ auser, Boston, MA, 1991

    Michael E. Taylor, Pseudodifferential operators and nonlinear pde, Birkh¨ auser, Boston, MA, 1991

  45. [51]

    Thesis, 2006 (English)

    Qian Wang, Causal geometry of einstein -vacuum spacetimes, Ph.D. Thesis, 2006 (English). Copyright - Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works; Last updated - 2016-06-23

  46. [52]

    Pure Appl

    , Improved breakdown criterion for Einstein vacuum equations in CMC gauge , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 65 (2012), no. 1, 21–76. MR2846637

  47. [53]

    Qian Wang, A geometric approach for sharp Local well-posedness of quasilinear wave equations , arXiv e-prints (2014Aug), arXiv:1408.3780, available at 1408.3780

  48. [55]

    , Rough solutions of Einstein vacuum equations in CMCSH gauge , Comm. Math. Phys. 328 (2014), no. 3, 1275–

  49. [529]

    MR2125732 (2006e:58042)

  50. [622]

    MR1666844 (2000a:35171)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.