Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Open Source Software Development Tool Installation: Challenges and Strategies For Novice Developers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14637 v3 pith:27SAXGHE submitted 2024-04-23 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords challengessoftwaredevelopersdevelopmentinstallationnovicetoolsstrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As the world of technology advances, so do the tools that software developers use to create new programs. In recent years, software development tools have become more popular, allowing developers to work more efficiently and produce higher-quality software. Still, installing such tools can be challenging for novice developers at the early stage of their careers, as they may face challenges, such as compatibility issues (e.g., operating systems). Therefore, this work aims to investigate the challenges novice developers face in software development when installing software development tools. To investigate these, we conducted an analysis of 24 live software installation sessions to observe challenges and comprehend their actions, the strategies they apply, and the type of source of information they consult when encountering challenges. Our findings show that unclear documentation, such as installation instructions, and inadequate feedback during the installation process are common challenges faced by novice developers. Moreover, reformulating search queries and relying on non-official documentation were some of the strategies employed to overcome challenges. Based on our findings, we provide practical recommendations for tool vendors, tool users, and researchers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    This position paper classifies testing methods for LLM applications into three layers and proposes AICL, a structured protocol for testable agent communication; neither the framework nor the protocol is empirically validated.

Pith tools