Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Deep Investigation of Deep IR Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.07700 v1 pith:2B6MZOO4 submitted 2017-07-24 cs.IR

A Deep Investigation of Deep IR Models

classification cs.IR
keywords deepmodelsfeaturesautomaticallydifferenthand-craftedlearningwords
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The effective of information retrieval (IR) systems have become more important than ever. Deep IR models have gained increasing attention for its ability to automatically learning features from raw text; thus, many deep IR models have been proposed recently. However, the learning process of these deep IR models resemble a black box. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the difference between automatically learned features by deep IR models and hand-crafted features used in traditional learning to rank approaches. Furthermore, it is valuable to investigate the differences between these deep IR models. This paper aims to conduct a deep investigation on deep IR models. Specifically, we conduct an extensive empirical study on two different datasets, including Robust and LETOR4.0. We first compared the automatically learned features and hand-crafted features on the respects of query term coverage, document length, embeddings and robustness. It reveals a number of disadvantages compared with hand-crafted features. Therefore, we establish guidelines for improving existing deep IR models. Furthermore, we compare two different categories of deep IR models, i.e. representation-focused models and interaction-focused models. It is shown that two types of deep IR models focus on different categories of words, including topic-related words and query-related words.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A study on the Interpretability of Neural Retrieval Models using DeepSHAP

    cs.IR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Explores reference document choices for applying DeepSHAP to neural retrieval models and reports that its explanations differ substantially from those of LIME.