REVIEW 1 cited by
Wireless Image Transmission with Semantic and Security Awareness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Semantic communication is an increasingly popular framework for wireless image transmission due to its high communication efficiency. With the aid of the joint-source-and-channel (JSC) encoder implemented by neural network, semantic communication directly maps original images into symbol sequences containing semantic information. Compared with the traditional separate source and channel coding design used in bitlevel communication systems, semantic communication systems are known to be more efficient and accurate especially in the low signal-to-the-noise ratio (SNR) regime. This thus prompts an critical while yet to be tackled issue of security in semantic communication: it makes the eavesdropper more easier to crack the semantic information as it can be decoded even in a quite noisy channel. In this letter, we develop a semantic communication framework that accounts for both semantic meaning decoding efficiency and its risk of privacy leakage. To achieve this, targeting wireless image transmission, we on the one hand propose an JSC autoencoder featuring residual for efficient semantic meaning extraction and transmission, and on the other hand, propose a data-driven scheme that balances the efficiency-privacy tradeoff. Extensive experimental results are provided to show the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed scheme.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Shuffling for Semantic Secrecy
Random shuffling of semantic features, used as a shared secret key, is shown to protect a learned semantic communication system against eavesdroppers while adding little computational overhead.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.