Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that quantum mechanics—including the free particle, harmonic oscillator, and hydrogen atom—is not added to classical statistics but is found inside the Liouville equation as a subsystem of statistical observables.

desk verdict Hydrogen claim is asserted rather than demonstrated, but the oscillator/free-particle core is clean and the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13937 v1 pith:2D42GHQF submitted 2026-07-15 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Christof Wetterich This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph PACS 03.65.-w05.20.-y
keywords LiouvilleequationstatisticalobservablesquantumemergencephasespacehydrogenatomharmonicoscillatorSO(4)symmetryclassicalwavefunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that a probabilistic classical point particle already contains quantum mechanics. Starting from the Liouville equation for a phase-space probability distribution, it defines position and momentum not as phase-space coordinates but as statistical observables represented by non-commuting operators. For quadratic potentials this reproduces the free particle and the quantum harmonic oscillator exactly. For the Coulomb potential, a constrained SO(4)-symmetric subsystem yields the hydrogen energy spectrum −κ²/2n² with degeneracy n². If correct, the discrete spectrum of the hydrogen atom would not require a new dynamical postulate; it would be a selection rule inside classical statistics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the statistical observable: an operator attached to properties of the probability distribution rather than to a fixed phase-space point. The classical wave function q=√w and its Fourier transform φ turn the Liouville equation into a Schrödinger equation with Hamiltonian H=−∂_z∂_s−sF(z). For the hydrogen result, the central identity is the SO(4) algebra generated by the quantum angular momentum L_k and the quantum Runge–Lenz vector B_k; the constraints B_k L_k=0 and C_Qψ=ψ select the (n,n) representations and force the eigenvalues ω=−κ²/2n². The paper also relies on the particle–mirror particle decomposition, which for quadratic potentials decouples and leaves the s

What would settle it

Solve the constrained eigenvalue problem Hψ=ωψ together with D_Qψ=0 and C_Qψ=1 on the five-dimensional scale-invariant phase space; if no normalized solutions with degeneracy n² exist, or if the first few predicted levels differ from −κ²/2n², the central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, a classical point particle whose probability distribution obeys the Liouville equation is already a quantum system once observables are understood statistically. The real wave function q=√w Fourier-transforms into a complex Schrödinger wave function φ; the Hamiltonian H=−∂_z∂_s−sF(z) is hermitian, and the classical selection rule φ*(z,s)=φ(z,−s) forces the time-reversed pair structure of particle and mirror particle. For a harmonic potential the mirror particle decouples, so the reduced subsystem obeys the standard Schrödinger equation with equidistant oscillator levels. For the Coulomb potential, quantum angular momentum and a quantum Runge–Lenz vector generate an

Load-bearing premise

The hydrogen result rests on the unproven assertion that the constrained subspace of wave functions singled out by the two extra conditions is complete; the paper does not construct those wave functions, so the claimed equivalence is not yet demonstrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the standard quantum mechanics of a free particle and a harmonic oscillator is a closed subsystem of classical Liouville dynamics, with identical expectation values for quantum position and momentum.
  • For a Coulomb potential, the discrete hydrogen spectrum and its n² degeneracy follow from a constrained subsystem of classical statistics, not from a separate quantization rule.
  • Because pairs of statistical observables have no classical correlation function, the standard no-go arguments against classical hidden variables do not apply.
  • With boundary conditions that preserve subsystem unitarity, the free probabilistic classical particle can reproduce double-slit interference, meaning the interference pattern is compatible with classical probabilities under special initial conditions.
  • Conserved statistical observables in the Kepler problem give a common formalism for dust or planets around a star and for a spinless electron in hydrogen, with discrete subsystem frequencies on both scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could read the hydrogen construction as showing that the hard work is the choice of constraints: the dynamics is classical, but the energy scale of the discrete spectrum is inserted by hand through the eigenvalue condition C_Qψ=ψ, so the paper demonstrates embeddability rather than uniquely deriving quantum mechanics.
  • If the missing basis functions ψ_{nlmk}(σ,ζ) are ever constructed explicitly, they would give concrete phase-space probability distributions whose sampling would reproduce hydrogenic expectation values; that would turn the claim into a numerically testable classical algorithm for hydrogen.
  • A natural extension is to apply the same subsystem construction to other potentials with hidden symmetries, such as higher-dimensional isotropic oscillators or the Kepler problem with perturbations, to see whether discrete spectra appear whenever a closed algebra and an eigenvalue-one constraint exist.
  • Macroscopically, the paper leaves implicit that its quantum-in-the-sky picture predicts stable discrete frequency bands in dust or planetary distributions around a star; observing such bands would be a large-scale test of the same formalism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a reformulation of the classical Liouville equation for a probabilistic point particle in terms of a real 'classical wave function' q=sqrt(w), its Fourier transform phi, and a set of non-commuting 'quantum observables' that are statistical properties of the probability distribution. It claims that for a general potential this yields a genuine quantum system, and that for the harmonic/free-particle case the reduced subsystem is exactly standard quantum mechanics, with the same Hamiltonian, wave packets, density matrix, and energy spectrum. For the Coulomb potential, the paper introduces SO(4) generators, defines a reduced 'hydrogen subsystem' by two constraints D_Q psi=0 and C_Q psi=psi (Eqs. (219)-(220)), and derives the spectrum omega=-kappa^2/(2n^2) and n^2 degeneracy. It also sketches a realization of double-slit interference and argues that the classical particle can reproduce the hydrogen atom including position and momentum observables.

Significance. If fully established, the central claim would be significant: it would show that a classical Liouville probability distribution contains closed subsystems whose observables and dynamics are indistinguishable from non-relativistic quantum mechanics, without invoking Bell-inequality-violating correlations. The harmonic-oscillator/free-particle part is a genuine and clean result: the direct-product ansatz (57), the reduced density matrix (89)-(92), the Gaussian pure-state condition (84), and the discrete oscillator spectrum (97) are explicit and mathematically sound. The paper also deserves credit for being transparent about the conditional nature of the double-slit realization and for explicitly acknowledging that the hydrogen construction is incomplete. However, the Coulomb/hydrogen part is the crucial advertised extension, and it is not established. The energy spectrum is inserted by hand through the eigenvalue of C_Q, and the alleged completeness of the map to the quantum electron rests on an unproved existence assertion. As it stands, the paper demonstrates a quantum embedding for the harmonic oscillator and free particle, but only sketches a plausible SO(4)-based framework for t

major comments (3)
  1. [Section X, Eqs. (219)-(220), (236)-(241)] Non-emptiness of the constrained hydrogen subsystem is not established. The subsystem is defined by D_Q psi=0 and C_Q psi=psi, and the spectrum (226) follows by assuming simultaneous eigenfunctions of H, D_Q, C_Q, L^2 and L_3. But the paper never proves that non-zero normalizable solutions satisfying these constraints and the selection rule phi^*(z,s)=phi(z,-s) exist. Eq. (236) simply postulates a basis psi_{nlmk}(sigma,zeta) f_{nk}(epsilon) with constraints (237)-(238); no explicit function is given even for the n=1 state. If this constrained subspace is empty or contains only the trivial solution, the derived hydrogen spectrum is vacuous. An explicit construction, or an existence argument, is required before the hydrogen claim can be evaluated.
  2. [Section X, after Eq. (247)] The completeness assertion is not justified. The paper states that 'from the completeness of the basis psi_{nlmk}' one can construct an operator for every observable A_{nlm,n'l'm'}, but completeness of an orthonormal basis of L^2 does not imply that every finite-dimensional matrix in the (nlm) subspace is representable by a differential operator in (sigma,zeta, partial_sigma, partial_zeta) that commutes with D_Q and C_Q and satisfies the k-independence condition (247). The promised phase-space operators for quantum position and momentum in the Coulomb potential are never constructed; the sentence after Eq. (249) explicitly concedes this. Since the claim that the subsystem 'describes all features' of the quantum electron includes these observables, the map between the classical subsystem and the hydrogen atom is not shown to be complete.
  3. [Section X, Eqs. (220), (225)-(227), (251)-(252)] The hydrogen energy scale is imposed, not derived. C_Q is defined in Eq. (216) and contains H explicitly; imposing the eigenvalue gamma=1 in Eq. (220) directly yields omega=-kappa^2/(2n^2) in Eq. (226). The paper itself notes in Eqs. (251)-(252) that replacing the eigenvalue by gamma gives omega=-gamma kappa^2/(2n^2). Thus the value gamma=1 is a free parameter of the construction, and the Bohr spectrum is a fitted input rather than an emergent prediction of the Liouville dynamics. The SO(4) structure and n^2 degeneracy are genuine consequences of the algebra, but the specific energy levels require an additional dynamical principle selecting gamma=1. This weakens the central claim that the hydrogen spectrum 'emerges from classical statistics.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (14)] The notation H=H^(p)-H^(m)+H^(int) is confusing because H^(m) is later called the Hamiltonian of the mirror particle; for a reader it is not clear until Eq. (45) that the mirror Hamiltonian appears with a minus sign by construction. A one-line clarification would help.
  2. [Eq. (221) and surrounding text] The identification of D_Q with J_+^2-J_-^2 is stated only indirectly; writing the relation explicitly would make the constraint (219) easier to follow.
  3. [Section X, Eq. (236)] The product ansatz psi_{nlmk}(sigma,zeta) f_{nk}(epsilon) is an additional structural assumption that is not derived from the two constraints. If this factorized form is not general, the subsequent completeness discussion may miss valid states.
  4. [Section V, 'Double-slit experiment'] The argument that a classical probability distribution exists because one can invert the Fourier transform of a quantum solution is logically sound, but it is worth emphasizing even more clearly that the constructed q(z,v) may be highly oscillatory and not resemble a smooth classical initial condition. The paper does this qualitatively but a quantitative measure of 'fine-tuning' would strengthen the discussion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Hydrogen spectrum is imposed by the C_Q eigenvalue; n² structure genuine but energy scale fitted.

  1. self definitional [Section X, Eqs. (215)-(226) and (251)-(252)]
    "Let us define two statistical observables represented by the operators ˆDQ = ˆBk ˆLk , (215) and ˆCQ =− 2H/κ²(ˆL2 + ˆB2 + 1) . (216) ... The reduced quantum subsystem is defined by imposing two constraints ˆDQψ= 0, (219) and ˆCQψ=ψ . (220) ... The constraint (220) has an important consequence for the allowed eigenvalues of H ... implying − 2ωn²/κ² = 1. This results in ω=− κ²/(2n²) ."

    The energy spectrum (226) is arithmetically forced by the chosen eigenvalue 1 in (220). Since C_Q is proportional to H/(L²+B²+1), imposing C_Qψ=ψ with the SO(4) Casimir value n²-1 directly fixes Hψ = -κ²/(2n²)ψ. The paper itself allows replacing the eigenvalue by any γ, giving ω = -γκ²/(2n²) (eqs. 251-252), so γ=1 is an input selected to reproduce the hydrogen Rydberg scale, not a consequence of the Liouville dynamics. The n² dependence and n² degeneracy are genuine SO(4) results, but the energy scale that makes the spectrum 'the hydrogen atom' is fitted by the constraint. The paper also leaves unanswered 'what singles out the constraints (219),(220)'.

full rationale

The harmonic-oscillator and free-particle sections are self-contained embeddings: the reduced quantum system is obtained from the Liouville equation by the product ansatz (57) and the standard Schrödinger Hamiltonian, and the spectrum E_n=(n+1/2)ω is that of the constructed Hamiltonian, not a separate prediction. The main circularity is in the Coulomb/hydrogen construction: the claimed derivation of the hydrogen spectrum (226) follows directly from the imposed constraint C_Qψ=ψ with eigenvalue 1, and the paper admits any γ would give the same structure with a rescaled spectrum. Thus the absolute energy scale is a fitted input, while the n² degeneracy and SO(4) structure are genuine consequences of the classical Runge-Lenz algebra. The unsupported completeness claim after (247) is a gap rather than a circularity: basis completeness does not by itself guarantee that every (nlm)-matrix is representable by a phase-space differential operator satisfying the constraints, and the promised basis ψ_{nlmk} is not constructed. Self-citations to earlier papers are not load-bearing because the required formalism is re-derived in Sections II and IV. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the hydrogen prediction is not independent of its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on a small set of input choices: the Liouville starting point, the square-root wave function, the choice of 'quantum' observables, the pure-state condition, and — for hydrogen — two constraints imposed by hand. The constraint eigenvalue γ=1 is a free parameter that sets the energy scale of the 'predicted' hydrogen spectrum. The mirror particle and quantum observables are invented entities with no independent evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • Constraint eigenvalue γ = 1 = 1
    The quantum constraint (eq. 220) is imposed with eigenvalue 1; this sets the energy scale of the resulting spectrum to the hydrogen value E_n = -κ²/(2n²). Choosing any other γ rescales the spectrum (eq. 252), so the numerical match to hydrogen comes from this input, not from the dynamics.
  • Choice of quantum position/momentum operators = x = (z+s/2), p = -i∂_x (free-particle version)
    The paper acknowledges the choice in eq. (42) is not unique (Section IV), and for the Coulomb potential the position/momentum operators are 'defined by their matrix values in the (nlm) basis' without an explicit phase-space expression. This is a modeling choice, not a derived observable.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The single-particle state is described by a probability distribution w(z,v) satisfying the Liouville equation (1).
    Starting point of the paper; this is standard classical statistical mechanics but treating a single particle's probability distribution as fundamental is an assumption.
  • standard math Existence of a real classical wave function q = √w with arbitrary sign; w = q² (eq. 6).
    Mathematically valid for nonnegative w; sign ambiguity does not affect w.
  • domain assumption The identification z=(x+y)/2, s=x-y and the direct-product form φ(x,y)=ψ(x)ψ*(y) for pure states (eq. 57).
    This is not valid for all solutions; it defines the reduced subsystem. The paper shows it corresponds to a constraint on the classical wave packet (eq. 84).
  • ad hoc to paper The quantum constraint C_Q ψ = ψ (eq. 220) and D_Q ψ = 0 (eq. 219) define the hydrogen subsystem.
    These constraints are chosen to select a subsystem with the hydrogen spectrum; they are not derived from the Liouville dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Completeness of the basis ψ_{nlmk}(σ,ζ) and existence of an operator for every quantum observable (Section X).
    Stated without proof; the explicit construction is deferred. The claim that the map between the quantum electron and the classical subsystem is complete relies on this.
  • domain assumption Boundary conditions for walls: q(z_b,v) = q̃(z_b)δ(v), and the assumption that boundary physics preserves unitarity of the subsystem.
    Needed for the double-slit realization; the author acknowledges this may require fine-tuning (Section V).
invented entities (2)
  • Mirror particle
    purpose: A time-reversed partner degree of freedom (coordinate y) that together with the particle (x) decomposes the Hamiltonian (eqs. 13-16).
    Mathematical artifact of the coordinate transformation; not independently observable. The paper says it is not an independently propagating degree of freedom.
  • Quantum observables (position x, momentum p) as statistical observables
    purpose: Statistical observables that do not take fixed values for a given phase-space point, represented by non-commuting operators.
    Defined by the author's construction; their physical status is the central subject, not an externally verified entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2D42GHQF

@misc{pith2026260713937,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2D42GHQF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13937}
}
read the original abstract

The classical observables of position and momentum are not well adapted to particles in a microphysical situation where typical probability distributions are characterized by a substantial dispersion. We propose the use of more robust quantum observables for probabilistic classical particles. The quantum observables are statistical observables which do not take fixed values for a given classical position and momentum. Solutions of the Liouville equation are discussed in the quantum formalism for classical statistics. Statistical observables are represented by non-commuting operators. No classical correlation function is defined for these observables and Bell's inequalities do not apply. We demonstrate for a general potential how a quantum system emerges from classical statistics. For the particular cases of a harmonic potential and a Coulomb potential we investigate subsystems which describe all features of a quantum particle. This covers the discrete energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom and quantum harmonic oscillator. We discuss the interference for the double-slit experiment. Conserved statistical observables may also be relevant for the probabilistic dynamics of dust or planets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 35 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Wetterich, Quantum particles from classical probabil- ities in phase space, arXiv:1003.0772 [quant-ph] (2010)

    C. Wetterich, Quantum particles from classical probabil- ities in phase space, arXiv:1003.0772 [quant-ph] (2010)

    arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    This property ex- tends to an arbitrary value of the vector⃗ cwhich obtains from (0,0, c3) by a rotation

    The direction is singled out by the direction for which the angular mo- mentum takes the sharp value zero. This property ex- tends to an arbitrary value of the vector⃗ cwhich obtains from (0,0, c3) by a rotation. We can focus our discussion on this type of wave function. More general wave func- tions, as⃗ c= (0, c2, c3) with realc 3 and purely imaginary c...

  3. [3]

    quantum con- straint

    These observables may be classical or statistical ob- servables. The algebra (153) generates a group of transformations acting on a complex wave functionψ. The infinitesimal transformations read δψ=iα i ˆAiψ ,(155) with infinitesimal parametersα i. Consider now real rep- resentations of the transformation group. In this case the transformation (155) does ...

  4. [4]

    Wetterich, Quantum particles from coarse grained classical probabilities in phase space, arXiv:1003.3351 [quant-ph] (2010)

    C. Wetterich, Quantum particles from coarse grained classical probabilities in phase space, arXiv:1003.3351 [quant-ph] (2010)

    arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Wetterich, Quantum formalism for classical statis- tics, Annals of Physics393, 1 (2018), arXiv:1706.01772 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich, Quantum formalism for classical statis- tics, Annals of Physics393, 1 (2018), arXiv:1706.01772 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian systems and transfor- mation in hilbert space, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences17, 315 (1931)

    1931

  7. [7]

    J. v. Neumann, Zur operatorenmethode in der klassischen mechanik, Annals of Mathematics33, 587 (1932)

    1932

  8. [8]

    Mauro, On koopman–von neumann waves, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics A17, 1301 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0105112 [quant-ph]

    D. Mauro, On koopman–von neumann waves, Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics A17, 1301 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0105112 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2002

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Gozzi and D

    E. Gozzi and D. Mauro, On koopman–von neumann waves ii, International Journal of Modern Physics A19, 1475 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0306029 [quant-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  2. [10]

    D. I. Bondar, R. Cabrera, R. R. Lompay, M. Y. Ivanov, and H. A. Rabitz, Operational dynamic modeling tran- scending quantum and classical mechanics, Physical Re- view Letters109, 190403 (2012), arXiv:1107.5139 [quant- ph]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Piasecki, Introduction to Koopman-von Neumann Me- chanics, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2112.05619 (2021)

    D. Piasecki, Introduction to Koopman-von Neumann Me- chanics, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2112.05619 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gozzi and D

    E. Gozzi and D. Mauro, Minimal coupling in koop- man–von neumann theory, Annals of Physics296, 152 (2002)

    2002

  5. [13]

    Klein, From koopman–von neumann theory to quan- tum theory, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foun- dations5, 219 (2018), arXiv:1705.07427 [math.DS]

    U. Klein, From koopman–von neumann theory to quan- tum theory, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foun- dations5, 219 (2018), arXiv:1705.07427 [math.DS]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Mauroy, I

    A. Mauroy, I. Mezi´ c, and Y. Susuki, eds.,The Koopman Operator in Systems and Control: Concepts, Methodolo- gies, and Applications, Lecture Notes in Control and In- formation Sciences, Vol. 484 (Springer, Cham, 2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Arbabi and I

    H. Arbabi and I. Mezi´ c, Ergodic theory, dynamic mode decomposition and computation of spectral properties of the koopman operator, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems16, 2096 (2017), arXiv:1611.06664 [math.DS]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Korda, M

    M. Korda, M. Putinar, and I. Mezi´ c, Data-driven spec- tral analysis of the koopman operator, arXiv:1710.06532 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Giannakis, Delay-coordinate maps, coherence, and ap- proximate spectra of evolution operators, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2007.02195 (2020)

    D. Giannakis, Delay-coordinate maps, coherence, and ap- proximate spectra of evolution operators, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2007.02195 (2020)

    2007 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Chru´ sci´ nski, Koopman’s approach to dissipation, Re- ports on Mathematical Physics57, 319 (2006)

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski, Koopman’s approach to dissipation, Re- ports on Mathematical Physics57, 319 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    Mezi´ c, On numerical approximations of the koopman operator, Mathematics10, 1180 (2022), arXiv:2009.05883 [math.DS]

    I. Mezi´ c, On numerical approximations of the koopman operator, Mathematics10, 1180 (2022), arXiv:2009.05883 [math.DS]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Darling and L

    K. Darling and L. M. Widrow, Linear operator theory of phase mixing, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society533, 79 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Gay-Balmaz and C

    F. Gay-Balmaz and C. Tronci, From quantum hydrody- namics to koopman wavefunctions i, inGeometric Sci- ence of Information, edited by F. Nielsen and F. Bar- baresco (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021) pp. 302–310, arXiv:2104.13185

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gozzi, M

    E. Gozzi, M. Reuter, and W. D. Thacker, Hidden brs invariance in classical mechanics. ii, Phys. Rev. D40, 3363 (1989)

    1989

  15. [23]

    Kofler and i

    J. Kofler and i. c. v. Brukner, Classical world arising out of quantum physics under the restriction of coarse- grained measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 180403 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Krishnan V, T

    M. Krishnan V, T. Biswas, and S. Ghosh, Coarse- graining of measurement and quantum-to-classical tran- sition in the bipartite scenario, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1703.00502 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gallego, Coarse-graining and the quantum-to- classical transition, International Journal of Modern Physics B36, 2230001 (2022)

    M. Gallego, Coarse-graining and the quantum-to- classical transition, International Journal of Modern Physics B36, 2230001 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Bibak, C

    F. Bibak, C. Cepollaro, N. Medina S´ anchez, B. Daki´ c, and ˇC. Brukner, The classical limit of quantum mechan- ics through coarse-grained measurements, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2503.15642 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Berges, Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1503.02907 [hep-ph] (2015)

    J. Berges, Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1503.02907 [hep-ph] (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    H. E. Kandrup, Phase mixing in time-independent hamil- tonian systems, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society301, 960 (1998)

    1998

  21. [29]

    V. I. Man’ko and G. Marmo, Alternative commutation relations, star products and tomography, Physica Scripta 60, 111 (1999), quant-ph/9903021

    1999 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Nikoli´ c, Classical mechanics without determin- ism, Foundations of Physics Letters19, 553 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0505143 [quant-ph]

    H. Nikoli´ c, Classical mechanics without determin- ism, Foundations of Physics Letters19, 553 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0505143 [quant-ph]. 27

    2006 arXiv

  23. [31]

    I. V. Volovich, Randomness in classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics41, 516 (2011), arXiv:0910.5391 [quant-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    X. D. Arsiwalla, D. Chester, and L. H. Kauffman, On the operator origins of classical and quantum wave func- tions, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 11, 193 (2024), arXiv:2211.01838 [math-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gozzi, Hidden brs invariance in classical mechanics, Phys

    E. Gozzi, Hidden brs invariance in classical mechanics, Phys. Lett. B201, 525 (1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    Wetterich, Time evolution of non-equilibrium effec- tive action, Physical Review Letters78, 3598 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612206 [hep-th]

    C. Wetterich, Time evolution of non-equilibrium effec- tive action, Physical Review Letters78, 3598 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612206 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Wetterich, Non-equilibrium time evolution in quan- tum field theory, Physical Review E56, 2687 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9703006 [hep-th]

    C. Wetterich, Non-equilibrium time evolution in quan- tum field theory, Physical Review E56, 2687 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9703006 [hep-th]

    1997 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nikoli´ c, Classical mechanics as nonlinear quantum me- chanics, arXiv:quant-ph/0707.2319 (2007)

    H. Nikoli´ c, Classical mechanics as nonlinear quantum me- chanics, arXiv:quant-ph/0707.2319 (2007)

    2007 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Wetterich, Quantum correlations in classical statis- tics, inDecoherence and Entropy in Complex Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol

    C. Wetterich, Quantum correlations in classical statis- tics, inDecoherence and Entropy in Complex Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 633, edited by H.-T. Elze (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004) pp. 180–195, arXiv:quant-ph/0212031 [quant-ph]

    2004 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Wetterich, Information transport in classical statis- tical systems, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1611.04820 [cond- mat.stat-mech] (2016)

    C. Wetterich, Information transport in classical statis- tical systems, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1611.04820 [cond- mat.stat-mech] (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Wetterich, Quantum field theory for classical fields, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.05061 (2026)

    C. Wetterich, Quantum field theory for classical fields, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.05061 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. S. Bell, On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika1, 195 (1964)

    1964

  33. [41]

    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theo- ries, Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 880 (1969)

    1969

  34. [42]

    Wetterich,The Probabilistic World(Springer Nature, Heidelberg, 2025) arXiv:2011.02867 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich,The Probabilistic World(Springer Nature, Heidelberg, 2025) arXiv:2011.02867 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Wetterich, The probabilistic world II : Quantum mechanics from classical statistics, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.06379 (2024)

    C. Wetterich, The probabilistic world II : Quantum mechanics from classical statistics, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.06379 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    I. S. Barnes, Semiclassical wavepacket propagation in a hydrogen atom, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals6, 531 (1995), complex Systems in Computational Physics

    1995

  37. [45]

    Wetterich, Probabilistic observables, conditional cor- relations, and quantum physics, Annalen der Physik522, 467 (2010), arXiv:0810.0985 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich, Probabilistic observables, conditional cor- relations, and quantum physics, Annalen der Physik522, 467 (2010), arXiv:0810.0985 [quant-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Wetterich, Emergence of quantum mechanics from classical statistics, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 174, 012008 (2009), arXiv:0811.0927 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich, Emergence of quantum mechanics from classical statistics, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 174, 012008 (2009), arXiv:0811.0927 [quant-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Wetterich, Classical probabilistic realisation of quan- tum double-slit interference (2026), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2607.11580 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich, Classical probabilistic realisation of quan- tum double-slit interference (2026), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2607.11580 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Wetterich, Quantum mechanics for classical trans- port equations (2026), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2605.15969 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich, Quantum mechanics for classical trans- port equations (2026), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2605.15969 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Wetterich, Fermions as generalized ising models, Nu- clear Physics B917, 241 (2017), arXiv:1612.06695 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    C. Wetterich, Fermions as generalized ising models, Nu- clear Physics B917, 241 (2017), arXiv:1612.06695 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Wetterich, Fermion picture for cellular automata (2022), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2203.14081 [nlin.CG]

    C. Wetterich, Fermion picture for cellular automata (2022), arXiv preprint, arXiv:2203.14081 [nlin.CG]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Elze, The dirac equation, mass and arithmetic by permutations of automaton states, Entropy27, 395 (2025), arXiv:2504.06883 [quant-ph]

    H.-T. Elze, The dirac equation, mass and arithmetic by permutations of automaton states, Entropy27, 395 (2025), arXiv:2504.06883 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Wetterich, Complex wave functions, CPT and quantum field theory for classical generalized Ising models, Nuclear Physics B1022, 117204 (2026), arXiv:2505.24392 [quant-ph]

    C. Wetterich, Complex wave functions, CPT and quantum field theory for classical generalized Ising models, Nuclear Physics B1022, 117204 (2026), arXiv:2505.24392 [quant-ph]

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.