REVIEW 1 cited by
The Impact of Realistic Foreground and Instrument Models on 21cm Epoch of Reionization Experiments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Impact of Realistic Foreground and Instrument Models on 21cm Epoch of Reionization Experiments
read the original abstract
Predictions for the ability of 21-cm interferometric experiments to discriminate Epoch of Reionization (EoR) signal models are typically limited by the simplicity of data models, whereby foreground signals and characteristics of the instrument are often simplified or neglected.To move towards more realistic scenarios, we explore the effects of applying more realistic foreground and instrument models to the 21cm signal, and the ability to estimate astrophysical parameters with these additional complexities. We use a highly-optimized version of \textsc{21cmFAST}, integrated into \textsc{21cmMC}, to generate lightcones of the brightness temperature fluctuation for Bayesian parameter estimation. We include a statistical point-source foreground model and an instrument model based on the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) scaled in observation time to have an effective sensitivity similar to the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA). We also extend the current likelihood prescription to account for the presence of beam convolution and foregrounds, the 2-Dimensional Power Spectrum (PS), and the correlation of PS modes. We use frequency bands between 150 and 180 MHz to constrain the ionizing efficiency ($\zeta$), the minimum virial temperature of halos ($T_{\mathrm{vir}}$), the soft X-ray emissivity per unit Star Formation Rate (SFR) ($L_X/SFR$ ), and the X-ray energy threshold ($E_0$). We find that the inclusion of realistic foregrounds and instrumental components biases the parameter constraints due to unaccounted for cross-power between the EoR signal, foregrounds and thermal noise. This causes estimates of $\zeta$ to be biased by up to $5\sigma$ but the estimates of $T_{vir}$, L$_X$/SFR and E$_0$ remain unaffected and are all within $1\sigma$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Impact of numerical stability in Bayesian noise wave calibration on global 21-cm experiments
Near-collinearity of noise-source and load design-matrix columns makes REACH’s five-parameter Bayesian calibration non-reproducible; a four-parameter Chebyshev fit with hot-load T_NS(ν) recovery and spike masking stab...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.