Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CrowdHub: Extending crowdsourcing platforms for the controlled evaluation of tasks designs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.02800 v2 pith:2G7T2W5F submitted 2019-09-06 cs.HC

CrowdHub: Extending crowdsourcing platforms for the controlled evaluation of tasks designs

classification cs.HC
keywords crowdhubcollectedcrowdsourcingdesignsevaluationexperimentalplatformsprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present CrowdHub, a tool for running systematic evaluations of task designs on top of crowdsourcing platforms. The goal is to support the evaluation process, avoiding potential experimental biases that, according to our empirical studies, can amount to 38% loss in the utility of the collected dataset in uncontrolled settings. Using CrowdHub, researchers can map their experimental design and automate the complex process of managing task execution over time while controlling for returning workers and crowd demographics, thus reducing bias, increasing utility of collected data, and making more efficient use of a limited pool of subjects.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.