REVIEW 1 cited by
Boosted Top Tagging through Flavour-violating interactions at the LHC
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper describes a method for detecting a rare top quark decay into a charm quark and a Higgs boson (H), which decays further into b quarks, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and introduces a tagging algorithm to identify boosted tops using large-R jets containing b- and c-tagged elements. We consider the associated production of the top quark with a W-boson and identify different observables to discriminate the signal from the Standard Model (SM) background events. Although our model with improved jet substructure methods outperforms existing approaches to tag such rare decay tops, the improvement in the New Physics reach in terms of $t \to cH$ branching ratio is marginal, even at the high luminosity run of LHC, compared to the existing limits from the LHC 13 TeV data. Although the result seems negative from the point of view of BSM reach, it is significant enough to motivate further studies in the search for the rare top decays at future colliders with higher energy and luminosity. Additionally, the paper utilizes SHAP, a Game Theory-based method, to analyze the contribution of each observable to the classification of events, offering valuable insights into the classifier. The approach presented in this paper is robust in scope and can be effectively implemented for similar probes of physics beyond the SM.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Step Toward Interpretability: Smearing the Likelihood
Smearing the likelihood over an energy metric reveals the physical scales used by a jet classifier, and the needed smearing radius follows a power-law scaling with dataset size.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.