REVIEW 4 cited by
Evidence for Emergent Dark Energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We introduce a generalised form of an emergent dark energy model with one degree of freedom for the dark energy sector that has the flexibility to include both $\Lambda$CDM model as well as the Phenomenologically Emergent Dark Energy (PEDE) model proposed by Li & Shafieloo (2019) as two of its special limits. The free parameter for the dark energy sector, namely $\Delta$, has the value of $0$ for the case of the $\Lambda$ and $1$ for the case of PEDE. Fitting the introduced parametric form to Planck CMB data and most recent $H_0$ results from local observations of Cepheids and Supernovae, we show that the $\Delta=0$ associated with the $\Lambda$CDM model would fall out of 4$\sigma$ confidence limits of the derived posterior of the $\Delta$ parameter. Moreover, $H_0$ tensions will be alleviated with emergent dark energy model and this model can satisfy the combination of Planck CMB data and local $H_0$ observations with $\Delta{\rm{DIC}}\,=\,-2.88$ compared with $\LCDM$ model.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations
The viability of minimally and non-minimally coupled quintessence models is robust across CPL, JBP, BA, and EXP parameterizations, with all four reproducing the models' predicted observables accurately.
-
Do Observations Prefer Thawing Quintessence?
A Bayesian reanalysis with DESI, Planck, and supernova data shows that the reported preference for thawing quintessence is a prior-volume artifact that disappears under less data-informed priors.
-
No preference for generalized emergent dark energy from current cosmological data
GEDE dark energy is observationally indistinguishable from ΛCDM once supernova data are included, with no phantom crossing and no resolution of the H0 and S8 tensions.
-
Hubble Tension and the G-step Model: Re-examination of Recent Constraints on Modified Local Physics
The paper argues that the G-step model remains a viable solution to the Hubble tension by widening error bars, adopting a weaker luminosity-gravity scaling, and reinterpreting Earth history and distance-ladder data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.