Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Modeling the Impact of Moderate External UV Irradiation on Disk Chemistry

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Moderate external ultraviolet, 10-100 times the galactic average, redraws the outer chemistry of planet-forming disks while leaving the inner 25 au effectively unchanged.

desk verdict A useful first systematic look at disk chemistry under moderate external UV; the outer-disk effects are probably real, but the UV penetration treatment needs a sensitivity test before the quantitative predictions are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06156 v1 pith:2IQBYZ7Y submitted 2025-01-10 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

Rachel E. Gross , L. Ilsedore Cleeves This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords protoplanetarydisksastrochemistryexternalUVirradiationinterstellarradiationfieldchemicalmodelingdiskstructureionizationfrontmolecularlinediagnostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what a modestly elevated ultraviolet background, 10 to 100 times the galactic average and typical of the outskirts of a young cluster like Orion, does to the chemistry of a planet-forming disk. Using time-dependent gas-grain models of T Tauri disks with three outer radii and a fixed mass, the authors find that the external UV creates an outer ionization front that raises the abundances and column densities of C and C+ while suppressing N2H+, CS, and HCN, with CO and HCO+ barely changing. The effect depends strongly on disk structure: a compact, dense 50 au disk shields its chemistry, whereas a more extended 200 au disk lets the UV penetrate and reprocess the cold outer reservoir. The inner 25 au remains chemically indistinguishable from an isolated disk, suggesting that even in clusters the planet-forming zone can be studied using nearby quiescent systems. Synthetic spectra suggest that C and the C/N2H+ and C/CS ratios are usable diagnostics of external UV exposure.

What carries the argument

The outer ionization front is the central mechanism: the boundary in the outer disk where external FUV photons, attenuated to each point by an optical depth averaged over 150 lines of sight across 4π steradians, become strong enough to drive photodissociation and photodesorption faster than freeze-out and recombination. This averaged extinction treatment converts the isotropic ISRF into local photo-rates within the gas-grain chemical network, and it is what couples disk structure (outer radius and density) to the species response curves.

What would settle it

Map the radial and vertical distribution of C I 1-0, N2H+ 3-2, and CS 6-5 emission in a moderately irradiated (G0 ~ 10-100) disk at a cluster edge using a submillimeter interferometer. The model predicts C brightens while N2H+ and CS fade beyond the outer tens of au in an extended disk and stay flat in a compact disk; an observation showing no such structural dependence, or the same trends in all disks, would contradict the ionization-front picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that moderate external UV irradiation (G0 = 10-100) is not a scaled-down version of the extreme Orion-center case: it produces a distinct outer ionization front that reconfigures the cold disk chemistry rather than simply eroding it. Photodissociation and photodesorption of CO in the outer, low-density regions release carbon, boosting C and C+, while N2H+ is destroyed both by the released CO and by increased electron recombination, and CS and HCN are depleted; the CN/HCN column density ratio rises as HCN is photodissociated. CO itself keeps a nearly constant column density despite a changing midplane abundance, and a secondary CO snowline appears at the outer edge of the 200 au model from UV-driven photodesorption. The same physical models show that the inner disk within roughly 25 au is optically thick to the external field, so its ionization is governed by the star's own UV and X-rays; consequently, inner-disk chemistry should resemble that of isolated disks. The magnitude of every effect is set by the disk's density structure, so compact disks are nearly immune while extended disks are strongly altered.

Load-bearing premise

The models assume the external UV arrives isotropically and is attenuated by a direction-averaged optical depth, whereas real cluster radiation comes from specific massive stars, so the true depth and shape of the ionization front could differ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observers can use the C/N2H+ and C/CS line flux ratios as a gauge of external UV exposure, because C brightens while N2H+ and CS fade as G0 rises.
  • N2H+ loses reliability as a CO-snowline tracer under moderate external UV, since its column-density peak shifts inward by 10-20 au as electron recombination suppresses the outer edge.
  • Inner-disk (<25 au) chemistry in cluster disks should match that of isolated disks like those in Taurus and Lupus, so nearby quiescent systems can serve as proxies for planet-forming chemistry in clusters.
  • CO column density is a poor UV diagnostic; only its emitting height and midplane abundance respond, so CO intensity alone will not reveal external irradiation.
  • Compact, dense disks (like those seen near the ONC center) are the most resistant to external UV, meaning observed chemical differences in those disks likely come from other environmental factors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the isotropic assumption is relaxed to a single illuminating source, the outer ionization front would likely sit deeper on the side facing the massive stars and shallower on the far side, producing azimuthally asymmetric species distributions that the current models cannot capture.
  • The result that the inner 25 au is buffered suggests the volatile inventory feeding planet formation is set by the host star rather than the birth environment; extending the models to include radial drift of photodesorbed material could link the altered outer reservoir to inner-disk composition.
  • A quick observational test would be to compare the C/N2H+ ratio in a sample of cluster-edge disks against the predicted monotonic rise with G0.
  • The prediction that HCO+ is insensitive to moderate UV means its brightness in externally irradiated disks cannot by itself indicate environmental irradiation, so surveys relying on HCO+ detections may be selecting disks whose chemistry is set internally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a systematic grid of 2D gas-grain chemical models of a 0.01 M_sun T Tauri disk (outer radii 50, 100, and 200 au) exposed to external interstellar radiation fields of G0 = 1, 10, 50, and 100. The external UV is treated as isotropic and attenuated by a 3D-averaged optical depth following Cleeves (2016). The central result is that moderate external UV produces an outer ionization front that significantly changes the abundances, column densities, and predicted line emission of C+, C, N2H+, CS, and HCN, while leaving the inner ~25 au essentially unchanged. The authors explicitly list the main simplifications (isotropic constant ISRF, no radial drift, no vibrationally excited H2, no accretion heating) and post-process a subset of species with LIME to suggest observational diagnostics, including C and the C/N2H+ and C/CS ratios.

Significance. The paper targets a genuinely understudied regime: G0 ~ 10-100, which is argued to be the most common disk-harboring environment. The model construction uses established codes and reaction networks, the G0 values and disk radii are inputs rather than fitted to the computed chemistry, and the predictions are falsifiable through disk-integrated line ratios and resolved line profiles. The explicit statement of limitations is a strength. The main risk is the Section 2.3 treatment of external UV penetration, which determines where the ionization front sits and therefore which species respond; if the averaging operation or the isotropy assumption changes the effective penetration depth, the quantitative rankings and diagnostic ratios would shift, even though the qualitative inner/outer dichotomy is likely robust.

major comments (2)
  1. [2.3] The external UV penetration treatment is the load-bearing boundary condition for the entire study. The text says a 3D-averaged optical depth is estimated from 150 rays and that 'this optical depth is then applied to compute the extincted ISRF spectrum,' but it does not state whether the code evaluates exp(-<tau>) or the angular average <exp(-tau)>. In a flared disk these differ substantially, and for the intended cluster application the field is anisotropic rather than isotropic. Because C+ production, CO photodissociation/photodesorption, N2H+ destruction, and the CS/HCN responses all trace the UV penetration depth, the species rankings and the proposed diagnostic ratios inherit this uncertainty. Please report the exact averaging used and provide a sensitivity test (for example, a direction-resolved rerun of the 200 au/100 G0 model) to show that the qualitative and quantitative conclusions are robust to the choice.
  2. [3.3, Table 3] The integrated fluxes in Table 3 do not track the reported total particle numbers in several rows. For CS at 50 au, the total particle number drops by roughly a factor of 5 from 1 G0 to 100 G0 while the integrated flux remains essentially constant (4.3 to 4.5 mJy km/s). For C2H at 200 au, the particle number rises from 4.1e38 to 5.5e38 while the flux is non-monotonic (2.9, 5.3, 3.3, 3.7 mJy km/s). Please check the LIME outputs or explain the optical-depth/excitation effects that create these plateaus; as presented, the table weakens the observational claims derived from the same spectra.
minor comments (4)
  1. [3.1.2, 3.1.3] The text says the CS column at 175 au shows 'almost an order of magnitude decrease' while giving a ratio of ~2.8, and the C column at the edge is 'an order of magnitude higher' with a ratio of ~3; these descriptions should be reconciled with the quoted numbers.
  2. [Figure 10] The caption states that C2H and HCN spectra include hyperfine components; please clarify whether CN also includes hyperfine structure, and if not, why not.
  3. [3.1 (near Figure 3)] The phrase 'gas columm density' contains a typo.
  4. [2.3, reproducibility] Releasing the chemical model outputs or input files would improve reproducibility; the current text refers to prior codes for details but does not provide enough information to rerun the exact 150-ray averaging.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chemical responses are emergent outputs of a forward model with externally fixed G0 and disk structure.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward chemical model: the external UV field strength G0 (1, 10, 50, 100) and disk outer radii (50, 100, 200 au) are prescribed inputs, and the abundances, column densities, and line fluxes are computed through a time-dependent gas-grain chemical network with tabulated photo-rates and initial abundances (Table 2). No species response is used to set any model parameter or rate, so the central claims about C+, N2H+, C, CS, HCN, HCO+, and CO are not fitted to the predicted quantities. The self-citations (Cleeves et al. 2014, 2016b; Anderson et al. 2021; Cleeves 2016) document the provenance of the chemical network, photo-desorption yields, and the 3D-averaged optical depth method; these are external modeling tools with stated assumptions, not results derived from this paper's target outcomes. The isotropic and angle-averaged treatment of the ISRF is a physical approximation that affects where the ionization front sits, but it is not circular: it sets the boundary condition for UV penetration, and the chemical rankings are outputs that could in principle be falsified by direction-resolved reruns or by observations. Thus there is no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-chain circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. It uses an existing chemical network with fixed physical inputs. The free parameters listed are chosen model inputs or assumed yields, not fitted to the output species abundances. The axioms are the recognized domain assumptions that determine how far the external UV penetrates and how the chemistry responds.

free parameters (5)
  • External ISRF strength G0 = 1, 10, 50, 100
    Four fixed UV field strengths chosen to represent isolated and moderately irradiated cluster edge environments; this is the independent variable of the study, not fitted to the output chemistry.
  • Disk outer radius = 50, 100, 200 au
    Three disk sizes at fixed total gas mass 0.01 Msun; chosen to explore how density structure controls UV penetration, affecting the central result on shielding.
  • Default photodesorption yield = 10^-3 molecules/photon
    Assumed for species without measured yields; directly sets the efficiency of CO ice desorption in the outer disk, which drives the secondary CO snowline and C/N2H+ behavior.
  • Dust opacity model parameters = 1% dust-to-gas, 90% mass in 1 mm grains, small grains to 1 micron, scale height 10 au at 100 au
    Grain size distribution and settling set the UV opacity that attenuates the ISRF; the penetration depth of external UV is central to the outer ionization front.
  • Stellar X-ray luminosity = 1e30 erg/s
    Fixed to a representative T Tauri value; sets the inner disk ionization budget and the comparison point for external UV dominance.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rate-equation gas-grain chemical network with 644 species and 5944 processes captures disk chemistry.
    Standard model from Fogel et al. (2011) and later updates; all abundance predictions depend on this network. Invoked throughout Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption ISRF is isotropic and constant in time.
    Section 2.3 states the ISRF is not time-evolving and is isotropic; real cluster UV is anisotropic and time-variable, which could change how deeply external radiation penetrates.
  • domain assumption Dust is passively heated; no accretion heating.
    Section 2.1 uses TORUS with passive irradiation only; accretion heating would raise midplane temperatures and shift freeze-out and desorption balance.
  • domain assumption No radial drift of solids and no vibrationally excited H2 chemistry.
    Section 3.1.1 flags missing radial drift; Section 3.1.5 flags missing vibrationally excited H2. Both processes could affect CO and HCN abundances in irradiated disks.
  • domain assumption Initial chemical abundances reflect a typical molecular cloud.
    Table 2 sets the starting composition; the 1 Myr evolution reaches pseudo steady state, but some memory of initial conditions may remain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling the Impact of Moderate External UV Irradiation on Disk Chemistry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2IQBYZ7Y

@misc{pith2026250106156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling the Impact of Moderate External UV Irradiation on Disk Chemistry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2IQBYZ7Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06156}
}
abstract

The chemistry within a protoplanetary disk is greatly affected by external radiation from the local stellar environment. Previous work has focused on extreme radiation fields, representative of the center of something like the Orion Nebula Cluster. However, even in such environments, many disks exist at the edges of a cluster where the lower stellar density leads to radiation fields weaker by orders of magnitude compared to the center. We present new chemical models of a T-Tauri disk in the presence of a moderately increased interstellar radiation field (ISRF). Such an environment has a background UV strength of 10 to 100 times higher than the galactic average ISRF. Moderate radiation fields are among the most prevalent disk-harboring environments and have interesting implications for the chemistry of the outer disk radii. We find that the external UV radiation creates an outer ionization front that impacts the cold disk chemistry to varying degrees, depending on outer disk structure. Certain molecules like C$^+$, N$_2$H$^+$, C, and CS are more strongly impacted by the ISRF in their abundance, column density, and observable emission. Other abundant species like HCO$^+$ and CO are less affected by the external UV flux in the outer disk under such moderate UV conditions. Further, we demonstrate that the chemistry occurring in the inner tens of au is relatively unchanged, which suggests that even in moderately externally irradiated disks, the inner disk chemistry may be more similar to isolated disks like those in, e.g., the Taurus and Lupus star-forming regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06156 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gas density and temperature as a function of height and radius in the disk models. Top row: Gas density for the 50 au, 100 au, and 200 au models. Bottom row: Gas temperature for the three models. The more extended disk is warmer due to the overall lower density. can change the local external radiation field to vary on short timescales; (Winter et al. 2019a,b) however, this is beyond the scope of the present work. We… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the ISRF to UV from the central star as a function of radius and height, note the log scale. White contours indicate where they are equal. As the G0 increases, the ISRF increasingly dominates over the central star, moving the line inwards [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Right: The gas temperature profile at the midplane for each of the three disk physical models. Left: The total gas column density for all three disk models. dependent data provided in the van Dishoeck database1 (e.g., van Dishoeck et al. 2006; van Hemert & van Dishoeck 2008; Heays et al. 2017). The combined stel￾lar and external UV fields are also considered to esti￾mate the gas temperature (based on models fit to t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Abundances with respect to hydrogen for a sample of neutral gas-phase tracers for the 200 au disk model. From top to bottom: CO, CS, and atomic C. From left to right, columns show models of increasing ISRF strength: 1 G0, 10 G0, 50 G0, and 100 G0. the outermost radii. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Column densities for CO, CS, C, and C2H for three disk models. The top shows the results for the 50 au model, middle for the 100 au model, and bottom for the 200 au model. For each panel, the faintest line corresponds to the model with a 1 G0 ISRF field and the darkest…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Abundances with respect to hydrogen for HCN and CN. From left to right, columns show models of increasing ISRF strength: 1 G0, 10 G0, 50 G0, and 100 G0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Column Density for the CN/HCN ratio for each of the G0 models. Note that as the external irradiation increases so does the ratio. Aikawa et al. 2021; Long et al. 2024). It is one of few species to be reliably detected in irradiated disks due to its bright emission line…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 2D contour abundances with respect to hydrogen for a sample of neutral gas-phase tracers. Top row is HCO+: middle row is N2H +: and bottom row is C+ for the 200 au disk model. The first column is 1G0, second is 10G0, third is 50G0, and last column is 100G0. The white c…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Column densities for HCO+, N2H +, and C+ for three disk models at all four G0 values as indicated in the legend. a factor of 5 lower, demonstrating the effects of the UV irradiation. Even the increase from 1 G0 to 10 G0 shows a decrease in the column density outside of…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: LIME radiative transfer models for select lines of CS, C, HCO+, and N2H + for the 200 au (purple) and 50 au (orange) disk models at varying G0 values. On average, the more extended 200 au disk case shows more affect in the flux from an enhanced external UV field. Note…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 2D contour plots of CO, CS, and C abundances with respect to H2 for the 100 au disk at varying external UV fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: 2D contour plots of CO, CS, and C abundances w.r.t H2 for the 50 au disk at varying external UV fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: 2D contour plots of C2H, HCN, and CN abundances with respect to H2 for the 100 au disk at varying external UV fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: 2D contour plots of C2H, HCN, and CN abundances w.r.t H2 for the 50 au disk at varying external UV fields. B. ION ABUNDANCES FOR 100 AU AND 50 AU DISK MODELS Figures 15 and 16 present the abundances for the ions N2H+, HCO+, and C+ for the 100 and 50 au disk models, re…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: 2D contour plots of HCO+, N2H +, and C+ abundances with respect to H2 for the 100 au disk at varying external UV fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: 2D contour plots of HCO+, N2H +, and C+ abundances with respect to H2 for the 50 au disk at varying external UV fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. JWST Edge-on Disk Ice (JEDIce): Vibrationally hot, rotationally cold H$_2$ in the outer disk of Oph 163131 non-thermally excited by UV and cosmic rays

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Outer-disk H2 in Oph 163131 is v-hot and J-cold from combined UV and cosmic-ray excitation plus collisions, implying an effective CR ionization rate of order 10^{-15} s^{-1}.

  2. The Impact of External Radiation on the Inner Disk Chemistry of Planet Formation

    astro-ph.EP 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    External UV radiation up to 10^4 G0 barely changes the inner-disk chemistry of a typical planet-forming disk, but at 10^6 G0 the disk warms, snowlines move inward, and the midplane chemistry resets to atoms and simple...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Adams, F. C. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 47, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830 2010

  2. [2]

    C., Hollenbach, D., Laughlin, G., & Gorti, U

    Adams, F. C., Hollenbach, D., Laughlin, G., & Gorti, U. 2004, ApJ, 611, 360, doi: 10.1086/421989

    doi:10.1086/421989 2004

  3. [3]

    2021, ApJS, 257, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143c

    Aikawa, Y., Cataldi, G., Yamato, Y., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143c

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac143c 2021

  4. [4]

    E., Blake, G

    Anderson, D. E., Blake, G. A., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd9c1

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd9c1 2021

  5. [5]

    K., Eisner, J., et al

    Bally, J., Mann, R. K., Eisner, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/69

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/69 2015

  6. [6]

    Bergin, E., Calvet, N., D’Alessio, P., & Herczeg, G. J. 2003, ApJL, 591, L159, doi: 10.1086/377148

    doi:10.1086/377148 2003

  7. [7]

    A., Du, F., Cleeves, L

    Bergin, E. A., Du, F., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 101, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/101

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/101 2016

  8. [8]

    B., ¨Oberg, K

    Bergner, J. B., ¨Oberg, K. I., Guzm´ an, V. V., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac143a 2021

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    J., & Bergin, E

    Bethell, T. J., & Bergin, E. A. 2011a, ApJ, 739, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/78 —. 2011b, ApJ, 740, 7, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/7 18 Gross et al

    doi

  2. [10]

    S., Law, C

    Booth, A. S., Law, C. J., Temmink, M., Leemker, M., & Mac ´ ıas, E. 2023, A&A, 678, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346974

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    D., Alarc´ on, F., Bergin, E

    Bosman, A. D., Alarc´ on, F., Bergin, E. A., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1435

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    D., & Eisner, J

    Boyden, R. D., & Eisner, J. A. 2020, ApJ, 894, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab86b7 —. 2023, ApJ, 947, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaf77

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Brinch, C., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2010, A&A, 523, A25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015333

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    2013, A&A, 559, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321171

    Bruderer, S. 2013, A&A, 559, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321171

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    F., Doty, S

    Bruderer, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Doty, S. D., & Herczeg, G. J. 2012, A&A, 541, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118218

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    Cleeves, L. I. 2016, ApJL, 816, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L21

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    I., Bergin, E

    Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., Alexander, C. M. O. ., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 1590, doi: 10.1126/science.1258055

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    I., Bergin, E

    Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., & Harries, T. J. 2015a, ApJ, 807, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/2

    doi

  11. [19]

    I., Bergin, E

    Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., O’D. Alexander, C. M., et al. 2016a, ApJ, 819, 13, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/13

    doi

  12. [20]

    I., Bergin, E

    Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., Qi, C., Adams, F. C., & ¨Oberg, K. I. 2015b, ApJ, 799, 204, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/204

    doi

  13. [21]

    I., ¨Oberg, K

    Cleeves, L. I., ¨Oberg, K. I., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2016b, ApJ, 832, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/110 D ´ ıaz-Berr ´ ıos, J. K., Guzm´ an, V. V., Walsh, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4603

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    A., Arce, H

    Eisner, J. A., Arce, H. G., Ballering, N. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac3e2

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Hughes, A

    Factor, S. M., Hughes, A. M., Flaherty, K. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 233, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6c2c

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    Fatuzzo, M., & Adams, F. C. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1361, doi: 10.1086/527469

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    2011, ApJ, 726, 29, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/29

    Semenov, D. 2011, ApJ, 726, 29, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/29

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    2009, ApJ, 690, 1539, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1539

    Gorti, U., & Hollenbach, D. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1539, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1539

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    2004, MNRAS, 350, 565, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07668.x

    Kurosawa, R. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 565, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07668.x

    2004

  20. [28]

    J., Facchini, S., Clarke, C

    Haworth, T. J., Facchini, S., Clarke, C. J., & Cleeves, L. I. 2017a, MNRAS, 468, L108, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx037 —. 2017b, MNRAS, 468, L108, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx037

    doi

  21. [29]

    J., Facchini, S., Clarke, C

    Haworth, T. J., Facchini, S., Clarke, C. J., & Mohanty, S. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5460, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty168

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    N., Bosman, A

    Heays, A. N., Bosman, A. D., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2017, A&A, 602, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628742

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    1998, ApJ, 499, 758

    Johnstone, D., Hollenbach, D., & Bally, J. 1998, ApJ, 499, 758

    1998

  24. [32]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.13997, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.13997

    Keyte, L., Kama, M., Chuang, K.-J., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.13997, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.13997

    2023 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    A., Levison, H

    Kretke, K. A., Levison, H. F., Buie, M. W., & Morbidelli, A. 2012, AJ, 143, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/4/91

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    J., & Lada, E

    Lada, C. J., & Lada, E. A. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 57, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844

    2003 arXiv

  27. [35]

    J., Alarc´ on, F., Cleeves, L

    Law, C. J., Alarc´ on, F., Cleeves, L. I.,¨Oberg, K. I., & Paneque-Carre˜ no, T. 2023, ApJL, 959, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e06

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Crystian, S., Teague, R., et al

    Law, C. J., Crystian, S., Teague, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6c02

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    1996, A&A, 311, 690-707

    Lee, H.-H., Herbst, E., Pineau des Forets, G., Roueff, E., & Le Bourlot, J. 1996, A&A, 311, 690-707. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...311..690L

    1996

  30. [38]

    E., Cleeves, L

    Long, D. E., Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.18657, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.18657

    2024 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lynden-Bell, D., & Pringle, J. E. 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603

    1974

  32. [40]

    K., Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., et al

    Mann, R. K., Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/82

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    Miotello, A., Robberto, M., Potenza, M. A. C., & Ricci, L. 2012, ApJ, 757, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/78 ¨Oberg, K. I., van Broekhuizen, F., Fraser, H. J., et al. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 621, L33 Paneque-Carre˜ no, T., Miotello, A., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2...

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    Parker, R. J. 2020, Royal Society Open Science, 7, 201271, doi: 10.1098/rsos.201271

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    Goodwin, S. P. 2021, ApJ, 913, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4cc

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    I., Wilner, D

    Qi, C., ¨Oberg, K. I., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2013, Science, 341, 630, doi: 10.1126/science.1239560

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    I., Espaillat, C

    Qi, C., ¨Oberg, K. I., Espaillat, C. C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab35d3 Sch¨ oier, F. L., van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., &

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    Black, J. H. 2005, A&A, 432, 369, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041729

    2005 doi

  39. [47]

    A., Cleeves, L

    Seifert, R. A., Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., & Li, Z.-Y. 2021a, ApJ, 912, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf09a Modeling disk chemistry in moderate external UV fields 19

    doi

  40. [48]

    A., Ilsedore

    Seifert, R. A., Ilsedore. Cleeves, L., Adams, F. C., & Li, Z.-Y. 2021b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2103.10971. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10971

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. 1985, ApJ, 291, 722, doi: 10.1086/163111

    1985 doi

  42. [50]

    Trapman, L., Zhang, K., van’t Hoff, M. L. R., Hogerheijde, M. R., & Bergin, E. A. 2022, ApJL, 926, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4f47 van Dishoeck, E. F., Jonkheid, B., & van Hemert, M. C. 2006, Faraday Discussions, 133, 231, doi: 10.1039/b517564j van Hemert, M. C., & van Disho...

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    F., Doty, S

    Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Doty, S. D., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, A&A, 495, 881, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810846

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    J., & Nomura, H

    Walsh, C., Millar, T. J., & Nomura, H. 2013, ApJL, 766, L23, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/766/2/L23

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    J., & Aikawa, Y

    Walsh, C., Nomura, H., Millar, T. J., & Aikawa, Y. 2012, ApJ, 747, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/114

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    P., Mann, R

    Williams, J. P., Mann, R. K., Di Francesco, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 120, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/120

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    J., Clarke, C

    Winter, A. J., Clarke, C. J., Rosotti, G., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2700, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty984

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Clarke, C

    Winter, A. J., Clarke, C. J., & Rosotti, G. P. 2019a, MNRAS, 485, 1489, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz473

    doi

  49. [57]

    2019b, MNRAS, 490, 5478, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2545 20 Gross et al

    Alexander, R. 2019b, MNRAS, 490, 5478, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2545 20 Gross et al. APPENDIX A. NEUTRAL ABUNDANCES FOR 100 AU AND 50 AU DISK MODELS Figures 11, 12, 13, and 14 present the 2D abundance distribution of the neutral species CO, CS, C, C 2H, CN, and HCN for the 100 an...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.