Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Design and evaluation of AI copilots -- case studies of retail copilot templates

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.09512 v1 pith:2JBM5SOX submitted 2024-06-17 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords copilotevaluationdesignbuildingcaseretailsectiontemplates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Building a successful AI copilot requires a systematic approach. This paper is divided into two sections, covering the design and evaluation of a copilot respectively. A case study of developing copilot templates for the retail domain by Microsoft is used to illustrate the role and importance of each aspect. The first section explores the key technical components of a copilot's architecture, including the LLM, plugins for knowledge retrieval and actions, orchestration, system prompts, and responsible AI guardrails. The second section discusses testing and evaluation as a principled way to promote desired outcomes and manage unintended consequences when using AI in a business context. We discuss how to measure and improve its quality and safety, through the lens of an end-to-end human-AI decision loop framework. By providing insights into the anatomy of a copilot and the critical aspects of testing and evaluation, this paper provides concrete evidence of how good design and evaluation practices are essential for building effective, human-centered AI assistants.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling and Optimizing User Preferences in AI Copilots: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI copilot preference optimization is organized into a pre-, mid-, and post-interaction taxonomy, with a unified definition of AI copilots.

Pith tools