Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Microscopic Origin of Spin Splitting in Altermagnetic CrSb Thin Films

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that in CrSb thin films the momentum-dependent spin splitting characteristic of altermagnetism is governed by the survival of long-range, inter-unit-cell, coplanar Cr–Sb hopping, with Sb–Sb hopping secondary, rather…

desk verdict A clean Wannier ablation for one slab, an overstated universal claim, and a plausible mechanism worth testing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08741 v1 pith:2KL7H5AT submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Dai Mingyang , Song Hongquan , Kang Zhuo , Xu Yuanji , Tian Fuyang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismCrSbthinfilmsspinsplittingsurfaceorientationWanniertight-bindinghoppingpathwaysspin-groupsymmetryfirst-principlescalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks why altermagnetic spin splitting—the momentum-dependent band splitting into opposite spins in a zero-net-magnetization magnetic phase—depends so strongly on which surface terminates CrSb, and it answers with a hopping-based microscopic mechanism. First-principles calculations on ultrathin slabs show that the $(2\bar{1}\bar{1}0)$ and $(11\bar{2}\bar{4})$ faces retain pronounced momentum-dependent spin splitting, while the $(0001)$ and $(10\bar{1}0)$ faces become nearly spin-degenerate, even though all slabs satisfy the spin-group symmetries of altermagnetism. By switching hopping channels on and off in a Wannier tight-binding Hamiltonian, the authors show that in the thin-film limit the splitting requires long-range inter-unit-cell coplanar Cr–Sb hopping, with Sb–Sb hopping as an additional contribution; retaining only intra-unit-cell terms or the bulk-relevant Cr–Cr third-neighbor hopping leaves the bands degenerate. The preservation or suppression of these hopping pathways by the surface geometry explains the orientation dependence. This gives surface engineering a concrete target: maintain or restore coplanar Cr–Sb connectivity to keep the splitting.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Wannier tight-binding Hamiltonian of a slab, truncated so that only selected classes of hopping terms are retained while the altermagnetic spin-group symmetry is held fixed. This which-hoppings-can-you-delete construction isolates the microscopic channels that generate spin splitting: long-range inter-unit-cell coplanar Cr–Sb hopping is the dominant carrier, Sb–Sb inter-unit-cell hopping is secondary, and short-range intra-unit-cell or third-neighbor Cr–Cr terms are not enough. A companion vacuum-spacing sweep tunes the slabs continuously from the three-dimensional bulk limit toward the isolated two-dimensional film, showing that the relevant inter-slab and inter-unit-cell couplings die out over a length scale comparable to the Cr–Sb hopping range.

What would settle it

Compute the Wannier-interpolated long-range Cr–Sb hopping amplitudes in the $(0001)$ and $(10\bar{1}0)$ slabs: if these matrix elements are as large as in the $(2\bar{1}\bar{1}0)$ slab while the bands are spin-degenerate, the claim that suppression of this hopping causes the degeneracy is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that dimensional reduction changes the microscopic origin of altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb. In bulk CrSb the splitting had been attributed to third-nearest-neighbor Cr–Cr hopping, but a truncated Wannier Hamiltonian of the $(2\bar{1}\bar{1}0)$ slab that includes that channel produces no significant splitting; the splitting appears only when inter-unit-cell Cr–Sb hopping between neighboring unit cells is restored, and Sb–Sb inter-unit-cell hopping adds a smaller correction. The authors generalize this by showing that the deciding geometric condition is whether Cr and Sb atoms form coplanar layers parallel to the surface: the $(11\bar{2}\bar{4})$ surface, which preserves such coplanar paths, keeps the splitting, while the $(0001)$ surface, where Cr and Sb sit at different depths, loses it. Because all slabs keep altermagnetic-compatible spin-group symmetry, the mechanism must be energetic rather than purely symmetry-based.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that in the non-splitting slabs the long-range coplanar Cr–Sb hopping is actually suppressed by the surface geometry; if those matrix elements remain comparable to the splitting-preserving surfaces while the bands stay degenerate, the proposed mechanism would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Surface orientation, not just spin-group symmetry, determines whether altermagnetic spin splitting survives in CrSb films; $(0001)$ and $(10\bar{1}0)$ terminations should show nearly spin-degenerate bands, while $(2\bar{1}\bar{1}0)$ and $(11\bar{2}\bar{4})$ terminations retain it.
  • The microscopic design rule for low-dimensional CrSb is to preserve coplanar Cr–Sb connectivity; surfaces or interfaces that place Cr and Sb in the same plane parallel to the film keep the splitting, and those that separate them by depth suppress it.
  • Thin-film altermagnetism in CrSb is not captured by bulk models centered on Cr–Cr third-neighbor hopping; calculations of films should include long-range Cr–Sb and Sb–Sb inter-unit-cell channels.
  • For a $(0001)$ film, reducing vacuum spacing (or, equivalently, re-introducing inter-film coupling) can partially restore spin splitting, indicating that the suppression is a coupling-range effect rather than a magnetic-moment collapse.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the geometric coplanarity criterion is general, then intentional engineering—capping layers, epitaxial strain, or substrate selection that restores Cr–Sb connectivity on a $(0001)$ surface—could recover spin splitting on otherwise degenerate faces.
  • The mechanism implies defect sensitivity specific to films: Sb-site substitution or Sb vacancies should degrade the spin splitting in thin films more strongly than in bulk, because the long-range Cr–Sb channels become load-bearing.
  • The same reasoning might extend to other NiAs-type altermagnets or to altermagnets whose ligands mediate inter-unit-cell hopping, making surface-dependent spin splitting predictable from the crystal structure alone.
  • A direct test would be thickness-resolved photoemission on $(2\bar{1}\bar{1}0)$ and $(0001)$ films: the splitting should disappear on $(0001)$ below a thickness scale set by the Cr–Sb hopping range, while $(2\bar{1}\bar{1}0)$ should keep it down to the monolayer limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript investigates the microscopic origin of surface-dependent altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb thin films using DFT and Wannier tight-binding analysis. The authors find that (2-1-10) and (11-2-4) slabs retain pronounced spin splitting while (0001) and (10-10) slabs show nearly spin-degenerate bands, despite all slabs preserving altermagnetic spin-group symmetry. Through a Wannier hopping ablation for the (2-1-10) slab, they argue that intra-unit-cell hopping alone is insufficient and that long-range inter-unit-cell Cr-Sb hopping is the dominant mechanism, with Sb-Sb hopping contributing additionally. The paper concludes that dimensional reduction fundamentally changes the microscopic origin of altermagnetic splitting relative to bulk CrSb.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the paper provides a useful design principle for engineering altermagnetic spin splitting in thin films through surface orientation, a topic of active experimental and theoretical interest. The Wannier ablation in Fig. 3 is a clean and instructive decomposition for the (2-1-10) slab, and the inclusion of two additional slab orientations as validation is a strength. However, the universal claim that thin films 'require' Cr-Sb hopping is not actually supported by the reported ablation, and the extension to other surfaces is based on geometric inference rather than direct Wannier evidence. These issues undermine the strongest conclusions in the abstract and summary, so the manuscript needs substantial revision before it can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 3(b)] The abstract and summary claim that altermagnetic spin splitting in thin films 'requires long-range inter-unit-cell coplanar Cr-Sb hopping,' but Fig. 3(b) shows that including only inter-unit-cell Sb-Sb hopping is sufficient to induce momentum-dependent spin splitting. The ablation therefore establishes only that some long-range inter-unit-cell hopping is indispensable and that Cr-Sb is the dominant contributor, not that Cr-Sb is required. The central claim should be reworded to avoid this logical contradiction, or an additional ablation should be provided that isolates the necessity of Cr-Sb specifically.
  2. [Hopping analysis of the (2-1-10) slab, Figs. 2(e), 2(c), 2(d)] The paper attributes the absence of splitting in the (0001) and (10-10) slabs to suppression of long-range Cr-Sb hopping, but no Wannier fits are reported for those slabs. The only evidence is the geometric argument that Cr and Sb lie at different depths and the qualitatively described enhancement of Cr-Cr_perp hopping in Fig. 2(e). To support the universal mechanism, the authors should report the actual Wannier hopping parameters for the (0001) and (10-10) slabs and demonstrate directly that the long-range Cr-Sb matrix elements are suppressed relative to the (2-1-10) case.
  3. [Comparison with experiments in the Introduction] The calculations use ultrathin slabs with a 15 Å vacuum, whereas the cited ARPES experiments observe sizable splitting in CrSb (0001) and (10-10) films with thicknesses of 10-30 nm. The manuscript does not address how the proposed mechanism scales with thickness, which leaves the practical relevance of the central claim unclear. The authors should either restrict the claim to the ultrathin limit or include a thickness-convergence study connecting to the experimentally relevant regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Computational methods] The manuscript states that VASP was used but does not specify the exchange-correlation functional, any Hubbard U parameter, plane-wave cutoff, k-point sampling, or the number of atomic layers in each slab; these details should be provided in the text or supplement.
  2. [Figs. 2(c)-(f)] Figures 2(c)-(f) are described as schematic illustrations, and the text refers to hopping amplitudes 'decreasing rapidly' or 'increasing significantly' without reporting numerical values; please include a quantitative plot or table of the fitted Wannier hopping parameters.
  3. [Typographical issues] There are several typographical errors, including 'Reimerset al.' (should be 'Reimers et al.'), 'measurment' (should be 'measurement'), and 'V ASP' (should be 'VASP').
  4. [Spin-group statement] The assertion that all three slab models preserve the altermagnetic spin-group symmetry is not accompanied by the explicit spin group or magnetic space group of each slab; specifying these groups would strengthen the symmetry argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Wannier ablation is a post-hoc interpretive decomposition, not a fitted prediction, and the paper's main weakness is overstatement rather than circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: independent DFT band structures for bulk CrSb and slabs; construction of Wannier tight-binding Hamiltonians fitted to those DFT bands; selective retention of hopping terms; and attribution of spin splitting to inter-unit-cell Cr–Sb hopping. The Wannier Hamiltonian is indeed fitted to the same DFT bands it is used to interpret, so the agreement in Fig. 3(c) is a consistency check of the fit rather than an out-of-sample prediction. However, the paper does not rename a fitted parameter as a prediction: the ablation tests which subset of the already-fitted Hamiltonian reproduces the spin splitting, which is a legitimate interpretive decomposition. The additional (1-212) and (11-2-4) slabs are computed directly with DFT, not generated by the fitted model, so they serve as further first-principles data points rather than model predictions. The inference that (0001) and (10-10) slabs lack splitting because long-range Cr–Sb pathways are suppressed is based on geometry and the Cr–Cr_perp hopping enhancement, not on directly reported Wannier matrix elements for those surfaces; this is an evidentiary gap, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation is present: reference [40] is cited only to contrast bulk Cr–Cr third-neighbor hopping with the thin-film Cr–Sb mechanism. The principal weakness is that the abstract's wording 'requires long-range inter-unit-cell coplanar Cr–Sb hopping' is stronger than what Fig. 3(b) shows, since adding only Sb–Sb inter-unit-cell hopping is already sufficient to induce spin splitting; that tension is an internal-consistency or correctness issue, not a circularity that can be demonstrated by equation identity or fitted-parameter renaming. On the circularity scale, the analysis is self-contained and no step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on DFT electronic structure and a Wannier decomposition. No free parameters are tuned to force the result; the hopping parameters are derived from the DFT fits. The main assumptions are the adequacy of the DFT and Wannier descriptions of CrSb, the preservation of altermagnetic symmetry in the slabs, and the equivalence between the slab model and experimental films.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The DFT calculations (VASP) correctly describe the electronic structure and magnetic state of CrSb slabs, including the spin splitting.
    The paper does not state the exchange-correlation functional or any Hubbard U correction; the accuracy of the computed splitting magnitudes is assumed. (Methods, references [34-36]; Fig. 1.)
  • domain assumption The three slab models preserve the same altermagnetic spin-group symmetry as bulk CrSb.
    The paper states this but does not show the spin-group analysis; it relies on references [37,38]. (Paragraph after Fig. 1.)
  • domain assumption The Wannier90 tight-binding Hamiltonians with Cr-3d and Sb-5p orbitals faithfully represent the DFT bands relevant for the spin splitting.
    The hopping parameters are fitted to the same DFT band structure; the truncation test assumes the omitted terms are not essential. (Paragraph beginning 'To elucidate the microscopic origin...' in the Fig. 2 section.)
  • domain assumption The periodic slab model with 15 Å vacuum and unspecified thickness represents an isolated thin film relevant to experiments.
    The slab thicknesses are not given, and the vacuum spacing is chosen; the connection to 10-30 nm experimental films is assumed. (Slab construction paragraph in the Fig. 1 section.)

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microscopic Origin of Spin Splitting in Altermagnetic CrSb Thin Films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KL7H5AT

@misc{pith2026260808741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microscopic Origin of Spin Splitting in Altermagnetic CrSb Thin Films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KL7H5AT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08741}
}
abstract

Altermagnets have recently emerged as promising materials for spintronic applications owing to their momentum-dependent spin splitting. Among them, metallic CrSb is particularly attractive owing to its giant spin splitting and high N\'eel temperature. However, the microscopic origin of the distinct spin-splitting behaviors in bulk and thin-film CrSb remains unresolved. Here, we systematically investigate the electronic structures of CrSb slabs with different surface orientations using first-principles calculations. Although all considered slabs preserve spin-group symmetries compatible with altermagnetism, they exhibit markedly different electronic structures: the (2$\bar{1}\bar{1}$0) slab retains pronounced altermagnetic spin splitting, whereas the (0001) and (10$\bar{1}$0) slabs display nearly spin-degenerate bands. We demonstrate that dimensional reduction fundamentally changes the microscopic origin of altermagnetic spin splitting. Unlike bulk CrSb, altermagnetic spin splitting in thin films requires long-range inter-unit-cell coplanar Cr--Sb hopping, while Sb--Sb hopping provides an additional contribution. The preservation or suppression of these hopping pathways explains the strong surface dependence of the spin splitting. Our findings establish a microscopic mechanism for understanding altermagnetism in reduced dimensions and provide a general principle for engineering spin splitting in low-dimensional altermagnetic materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08741 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure and magnetic configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a),(b) Electronic structures of the CrSb (0001) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a),(b) Schematic illustrations of the CrSb with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Zhang, W

    X.-P. Zhang, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, X. Fan, X. Wang, and Y. Yao, Theory of anisotropic magnetoresistance in altermagnets and its applications, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 266706 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    J. Song, C. Mu, S. Zhu, W. Wu, Y. Long, J. Luo, and Z. Li, Perfect compensation of the magnetic sublattices in altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 014412 (2026)

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat Rev Mater10, 473 (2025)

    2025

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromag- nets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Z.-F. Gao, S. Qu, B. Zeng, Y. Liu, J.-R. Wen, H. Sun, P.- J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, AI-accelerated discovery of alter- magnetic materials, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwaf066 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    X. Wan, S. Mandal, Y. Guo, and K. Haule, High- throughput search for metallic altermagnets by embed- ded dynamical mean field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 106501 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Sufyan, B

    A. Sufyan, B. Marfoua, J. A. Larsson, E. van Loon, and R. Armiento, High-throughput quantification of alter- magnetic band splitting, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 044407 (2026)

    2026

  5. [13]

    Q. Cui, C. Liu, A. Delin, and K. Wang, Data-driven discovery of unconventional antiferromagnets (2026), arXiv:2606.00409 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    W.-T. Guo, J. Xu, X. Liu, H. Wang, J. Zhao, and H. Zhang, High-throughput discovery and strain engi- neering of altermagnetic monolayers, Phys. Rev. B114, 014415 (2026)

    2026

  7. [15]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperatured- wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys.‌21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, 6 X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperatu...

    2025

  9. [17]

    Takagi, R

    R. Takagi, R. Hirakida, Y. Settai, R. Oiwa, H. Tak- agi, A. Kitaori, K. Yamauchi, H. Inoue, J.-i. Yamaura, D. Nishio-Hamane, S. Itoh, S. Aji, H. Saito, T. Nakajima, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, and S. Seki, Spontaneous hall ef- fect induced by collinear antiferromagnetic order at room...

    2025

  10. [18]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y. Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Electrical 180°switching of N´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Sci. Adv.10, eadn0479 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    A. I. Snow, Neutron diffraction investigation of the atomic magnetic moment orientation in the antiferro- magnetic compound CrSb, Phys. Rev.85, 365 (1952)

    1952

  15. [23]

    V. P. Kravchuk, K. V. Yershov, J. I. Facio, Y. Guo, O. Janson, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, and J. van den Brink, Chiral magnetic excitations and domain textures ofg- wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, 144421 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Takei, D

    W. Takei, D. E. Cox, and G. Shirane, Magnetic structures in the MnSb-CrSb system, Phys. Rev.129, 2008 (1963)

    1963

  17. [25]

    Soumyanarayanan, N

    A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C. Panagopoulos, Emergent phenomena induced by spin–orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature 539, 509 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermag...

    2024

  19. [27]

    S. Liao, X. Li, X. Chen, Z. Yu, J. Yao, R. Xu, J. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Y. Wang, D. Feng, and J. Jiang, Direct Observation of Large Altermagnetic Splitting in CrSb (100) Thin Film, Chin. Phys. Lett.‌42, 067503 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Santhosh, P

    S. Santhosh, P. Corbae, W. J. Y´ anez-Parre˜ no, S. Ghosh, C. J. Jensen, A. V. Fedorov, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, J. A. Borchers, A. J. Grutter, T. R. Charlton, S. Is- lam, D. Golovanova, Y. Zhao, A. Tauraso, A. Richardella, B. Yan, K. A. Mkhoyan, C. J. Palmstrøm, Y. Ou, and N. Sam...

    2025

  21. [29]

    Lin, Z.-X

    W. Lin, Z.-X. Shen, X. Zhang, C.-K. Li, Q. Ren, S. Wang, H. Li, L. Han, X. Lu, W. Niu, S. Zhang, S. Song, M. Zeng, Y. Liu, Z. Sun, Z. Liu, M. Ye, S. Qiao, G. Bian, C. Liu, Y. Xu, L. He, and L. Miao, Tailoring altermagnetic spin splitting via strain-induced symmetry reconstruct...

    2026

  22. [30]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the al- termagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Marfoua, M

    B. Marfoua, M. Amirabbasi, and M. Ekholm, Altermag- netism of ultrathin CrSb slabs, Phys. Rev. B113, 214439 (2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    S. Sorn, C. Singh, L. Plucinski, G. Bihlmayer, Y. Mokrousov, and W. Wulfhekel, Projected altermag- netism by symmetry reduction at surfaces and in thin films (2026), arXiv:2606.18964 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zeng, M.-Y

    M. Zeng, M.-Y. Zhu, Y.-P. Zhu, X.-R. Liu, X.-M. Ma, Y.- J. Hao, P. Liu, G. Qu, Y. Yang, Z. Jiang, K. Yamagami, M. Arita, X. Zhang, T.-H. Shao, Y. Dai, K. Shimada, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, Observation of spin splitting in room-temperature metallic antiferro-...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  27. [35]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  28. [36]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    Smolyanyuk, L

    A. Smolyanyuk, L. ˇSmejkal, and I. I. Mazin, A tool to check whether a symmetry-compensated collinear mag- netic material is antiferro- or altermagnetic, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 30 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Pon- wei...

    2020

  32. [40]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Three- dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, ...

    2025

  33. [41]

    Mandal, A

    A. Mandal, A. Das, and B. R. K. Nanda, Deterministic role of chemical bonding in the formation of altermag- netism: Reflection from the correlated electron system NiS, Phys. Rev. B112, 014420 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.