Geometric percolation of spins and spin-dipoles in Ashkin-Teller model

Aikya Banerjee; P. K. Mohanty; Priyajit Jana

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Geometric percolation of spins and spin-dipoles in Ashkin-Teller model

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin and spin-dipole percolation in the Ashkin-Teller model happens on the Baxter line, with fractal dimensions fixed by a single universal ratio $w = 5/12$.

desk verdict A solid Monte Carlo study of percolation in the Ashkin-Teller model with a plausible but under-tested conjecture that w=5/12 is constant along the Baxter line—worth refereeing, but the claim needs to be narrowed to the tested interval and the Z4 endpoint handled explicitly. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11644 v1 pith:2KRTWA23 submitted 2024-11-18 cond-mat.stat-mech

Aikya Banerjee , Priyajit Jana , P. K. Mohanty This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82B2082B2782B43 PACS 05.50.+q64.60.ah05.70.Jk

keywords Ashkin-Tellermodelgeometricpercolationspin-dipoleclustersBaxterlinefractaldimensionsuperuniversalityeight-vertexMonteCarlofinite-sizescaling

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether geometric clusters of spins and of spin-dipoles in the two-layer Ashkin-Teller model percolate at the same temperature as the model's magnetic and electric transitions, and what universality class that percolation belongs to. It argues that both types of clusters do become macroscopic exactly on the Baxter line, the self-dual critical line where magnetic and electric orders set in, and that the fractal dimension of the critical spanning cluster is $D_{m,e}=d-\frac{5}{12}\frac{\beta_{m,e}}{\nu}$ for both sectors. Since $\beta_{m,e}$ and $\nu$ along the Baxter line are known exactly from the model's eight-vertex solution, this one relation determines all percolation exponents and their variation with the four-spin coupling $\lambda$. The paper also finds that the Binder cumulant as a function of $\xi_2/L$ is invariant along the whole line, matching Ising spin percolation for magnetic clusters and defining a new superuniversal class for electric clusters. If correct, percolation measurements could be used to read off the universality class of the underlying phase transition.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the identity $D_{m,e}=d-w\,\beta_{m,e}/\nu$ with the universal constant $w=\beta^P/\beta=5/12$, carried over from Ising geometric percolation, where it arises from the tricritical $q=1$ Potts connection. This identity is the bridge between the exactly known order-parameter exponents on the Baxter line and the geometric exponents of percolating clusters; together with the standard scaling relations $D=d-\beta^P/\nu$, $2\beta^P+\gamma^P=d\nu$, $\tau=2+\beta^P/(\beta^P+\gamma^P)$, and $\sigma^{-1}=\beta^P+\gamma^P$, it fixes every percolation exponent. The second key probe is the Binder cumulant as a function of the second-moment correlation length ratio $\xi_2/L$, which the paper uses as an RG-invariant fingerprint to identify superuniversality classes.

What would settle it

Measure the fractal dimension $D_e$ of the largest electric cluster directly at a Baxter-line point outside the tested window, for example $\lambda=0.3$, and compare the slope with $2-(5/12)\beta_e/\nu$ evaluated with the exact $\beta_e/\nu$ from Eq. (11); a statistically significant deviation would falsify the universal-$w$ conjecture, and the approach to $\lambda=\ln 3/4$ is especially decisive because the paper predicts a different $w$ exactly at that point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (23): along the Baxter line the fractal dimension $D_{m,e}$ of the largest critical cluster of spins (magnetic percolation) or of spin-dipoles (electric percolation) is $D_{m,e}=d-w\,\beta_{m,e}/\nu$ with $w=5/12$, the same constant that governs geometric percolation in the ordinary Ising model. Combined with the exact Baxter-line exponents $\nu=2(\mu-\pi)/(4\mu-3\pi)$, $\cos\mu=e^{2\lambda}\sinh(2\lambda)$, $\beta_m=\nu/8$, and $\beta_e=(2\nu-1)/4$, the identity yields $\beta^P_m=5\nu/96$, $\beta^P_e=5(2\nu-1)/48$, and the corresponding $\gamma^P$ from the scaling relations, so every percolation exponent varies with $\lambda$ in a definite predicted way. Monte Carlo finite-size scaling along the Baxter line for $\lambda=-0.2,\dots,0.2$ confirms that $\nu$ is unchanged, that the measured $\beta^P/\nu$ and $\gamma^P/\nu$ match the prediction, and that the fractal dimensions are $D_m\simeq 1.948$ for all $\lambda$ and $D_e$ between about $1.87$ and $1.926$, consistent with the formula. The paper further claims that the percolation Binder cumulant plotted against $\xi_2/L$ is a superuniversal function: identical to the Ising spin-percolation function for magnetic percolation (the $Z_2^P$ class) and a new function for electric percolation (the $Z_2^{2P}$ class), with the $Z_4$-symmetric endpoint $\lambda=\ln 3/4$ forming a separate $Z_4^P$ class where $w=1$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole set of predictions rests on the assumption that the factor $w=5/12$ stays exactly the same at every point of the Baxter line, a value taken from the decoupled Ising limit with no analytic derivation; the paper checks it numerically for $\lambda$ between $-0.2$ and $0.2$, but if $w$ drifts outside that range or at the $Z_4$ endpoint, the predicted exponents would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Because $w=5/12$ is unchanged along the Baxter line, the percolation order-parameter exponents are always $\beta^P_{m,e}=(5/12)\beta_{m,e}$, so geometric percolation directly reports the underlying magnetic or electric $\beta$ through a fixed proportionality factor.
Magnetic percolation obeys weak universality: $\beta_m/\nu=1/8$ is fixed, so the fractal dimension $D_m=187/96\simeq 1.948$ is the same for every $\lambda$ on the Baxter line, exactly as in Ising spin percolation.
Electric percolation is genuinely non-universal: $\beta_e/\nu$ varies with $\lambda$, making $D_e$ vary from about $1.87$ at $\lambda=-0.2$ to about $1.93$ at $\lambda=0.2$, yet its Binder-cumulant scaling function is invariant along the line, defining the new $Z_2^{2P}$ superuniversality class.
At the $Z_4$ point $\lambda=\ln 3/4$, spin and dipole clusters coincide and percolation belongs to the four-state Potts percolation class with $w=1$, so the endpoint prediction differs from the rest of the line.
The correlation-length exponent $\nu$ of percolation equals the thermal $\nu$ of the underlying transition, so percolation introduces no new diverging length scale along the Baxter line.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the equality $w=\beta^P/\beta=5/12$ is exact, the same prediction should hold at Baxter-line points outside the simulated window; measuring $D_e$ at, say, $\lambda=0.3$ would separate a genuine universal constant from a numerical coincidence within $[-0.2,0.2]$.
The paper's picture implies that superuniversality of a scaling function and non-universality of fractal dimensions can coexist: the electric percolation Binder function is invariant while $D_e$ varies, a split that may also appear in other models with marginal lines, such as disordered or multi-layer Ising systems.
Treating the $Z_4$ endpoint as a separate class with $w=1$ suggests a discontinuity as $\lambda\to\ln 3/4$: extrapolating the $w=5/12$ electric formula gives $D_e\to 379/192\simeq 1.974$, whereas the $Z_4$ value is $31/16=1.9375$, so how the two regimes connect is a sharp test of the decomposition.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this one. The genuinely new piece is the extension of Stella-Vanderzande's w=5/12 relation for Ising geometric percolation to the Ashkin-Teller critical line, together with the first Monte Carlo characterization of magnetic and electric (spin-dipole) percolation there. The data look real: large samples (10^7), FSS on Binder cumulants, order parameter, susceptibility, plus independent checks on cluster exponents tau, sigma and scaling relations. The Binder-cumulant collapse against xi_2/L along the line is a nice result, and the identification of a Z2^2P superuniversality class for electric percolation is a legitimate new contribution. The authors are also honest that the exponents are conjectured, not derived.

The main weakness is the scope of the claim. The paper says w remains 5/12 along the Baxter line, but at the Z4 endpoint, as the paper itself shows, w=1 for the q=4 Potts percolation. So invariance can at most hold on an open interval excluding lambda*. That is not necessarily fatal—they explicitly put Z4 in a separate class—but they do not address how w gets from 5/12 to 1 as lambda approaches lambda*. The simulations stop at lambda=0.2, only 0.075 below lambda*, and the w estimates come from FSS fits with uncertainties around 0.05–0.06. The electric w values (0.412 to 0.422) are consistent with 5/12 within noise, but the window is too short to rule out a crossover. Also, D_m and D_e are listed without error bars, and the data-collapse quality is judged visually. So the correct conclusion is that w is approximately 5/12 for |lambda| <= 0.2, not "the full Baxter line." I also note the 5/12 itself is imported from tricritical q=1 Potts; no analytic argument connects that to the AT line, so the whole relation rests on a numerical extrapolation.

Bottom line: this deserves referee time. A competent referee should ask for error bars on D, a few points closer to lambda*, and a wording change that separates the tested interval from the endpoint. The central message—percolation exponents are tied to order-parameter exponents by a universal constant along this line—is plausible and well supported in the region studied.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies geometric percolation of spin clusters and spin-dipole clusters in the isotropic two-dimensional Ashkin-Teller model. It reports Monte Carlo evidence that both percolation transitions occur along the Baxter line, with critical exponents that vary with the interlayer coupling λ. The central conjecture is Eq. (23): D_{m,e}=d-(5/12)β_{m,e}/ν, with w=5/12 inherited from the known Ising geometric-percolation result. Using finite-size scaling of Binder cumulants, order parameters, susceptibilities, and cluster-size distributions for λ∈{-0.2,-0.1,0,0.1,0.2}, the authors estimate percolation exponents, verify scaling relations, and report D_m≈1.948 for all λ and D_e varying from about 1.87 to 1.926, consistent with the conjecture. They also find that Binder cumulants as functions of ξ2/L collapse onto superuniversal curves, identifying Z2P and Z2^2P superuniversality classes, with the Z4 endpoint treated as a separate Z4P class.

Significance. If correct, Eq. (23) is a nontrivial extension of the Stella-Vanderzande relation to a critical line with continuously varying exponents, and it would determine all percolation exponents exactly from the known eight-vertex-model thermal exponents. The paper's strengths are its extensive Monte Carlo sampling, the multiple independent routes to the exponents (static FSS, dynamic scaling, cluster-size distributions), and the consistency checks against exact 8V predictions. The main caveat is that the constant w is conjectural, and the paper itself shows in Section III that w changes at the Z4 endpoint; therefore the central claim needs a clear scope restriction or an additional argument. The superuniversality observation is interesting and would be a useful addition to the correlated-percolation literature if the collapse quality is quantified.

major comments (2)

[Sec. II F, Eq. (23); Sec. III, Eq. (28)] Equation (23) is stated for the Baxter line without qualification, but Section III, Eq. (28) and the surrounding discussion assert that at the Z4 point, λ=ln3/4, the percolation fractal dimension is D4=d−β4/ν4, i.e. w=1, not 5/12. This point lies on the Baxter line, so the invariance w=5/12 cannot hold on the full line; it can hold at most on the open interval λ<λ*. The numerical evidence in Tables I and II covers only [-0.2,0.2] and excludes the endpoint. The authors should explicitly restrict the conjecture and Eq. (26) to the open interval λ<λ*, or provide an RG/continuity argument explaining why the Z4 endpoint is a separate enhanced-symmetry point whose different w does not invalidate the open-interval claim.
[Tables I-II and Fig. 7] The direct measurements that test Eq. (23) are the fractal dimensions D_m and D_e from Fig. 7, but D_e (and D_m) are reported without error bars in Tables I and II, and the w column is not an independent check: w=βP/β uses the same FSS estimates of βP whose agreement with Eq. (26) is the point at issue. With the stated uncertainties of order 0.05–0.06 on βP, the w values 0.412–0.422 are all compatible with 5/12≈0.4167, but they also do not exclude a slow drift; λ=0.2 is only about 0.075 below λ*, so a crossover toward the Z4 value remains numerically possible. Please give error bars for D_e (and preferably D_m), and either add data closer to λ* (for example λ=0.25 or 0.27) or state explicitly that the verification is limited to the interval studied.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. II B and II C] In the last paragraph of Sec. II B, ϕP_e is described as the order parameter for the 'magnetic' percolation transition; this should be 'electric'. In Sec. II C, the text mentions the 'largest eclectic cluster s^τ_max'; this should be 'electric cluster s^α_max'.
[Eq. (14) vs Eq. (28)] Equation (14) lists ν4=4/3 for the Z4 (four-state Potts) point, but Eq. (28) uses ν=2/3, and the hyperscaling relation 2β4+γ4=dν4 gives ν4=2/3. This internal inconsistency should be corrected; the value 2/3 is the one used later.
[Supplemental Material, Eq. (4)] The Supplemental Material writes D_{m,e}=d−wβ_{m,e}/γ_{m,e}; this should be β_{m,e}/ν as in the main text, Eq. (23). The expression for γP_e also needs explicit parentheses to show that it is (5+38ν)/24.
[Sec. II F, Fig. 7 caption and text] The text says 'In Fig. 7 (a), (b) we plot ϕm and ϕm as a function of L'; the second symbol should be ϕe. The figure itself is informative, but the notation errors make it harder to read.
[Sec. IV, Figs. 10 and 11] The superuniversal collapses are presented only visually. Adding a quantitative collapse criterion, or representative error bars on the Binder cumulants, would make the claim of a λ-independent scaling function more robust.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the central D = d - (5/12)β/ν relation is an explicit conjecture tested against independent Monte Carlo estimates; the self-citations are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an explicit conjecture, not a derived first-principles result. Section II-F states: 'We conjecture that w remains invariant along the Baxter line and it must be w = 5/12 (which is the value for λ = 0)', and Eq. (23) is introduced with 'We conjecture that the same holds for magnetic and electric percolation, D_{m,e} = d - w β_{m,e}/ν; w = 5/12'. The percolation exponents in Eq. (26) follow from this conjecture combined with the exact eight-vertex exponents in Eq. (11). They are then compared with, not fitted to, the Monte Carlo FSS estimates in Tables I and II. The measured ratios w = β^P/β (0.415-0.422 for magnetic and 0.412-0.422 for electric) are outputs of independent measurements of β^P and exact β, not parameters used to generate the prediction. The fractal dimension D is measured directly from s_max ~ L^D, and the identity D = d - β^P/ν (Eq. (25)) is a standard scaling relation, so the comparison to D = d - (5/12)β/ν is substantive. The paper explicitly flags the conjectural status: 'These results are based on the conjecture that the fractal dimension of spanning clusters at criticality is given by Eq. (23) and ν remains invariant.' It also discloses the exception at the Z4 endpoint (w = 1, Eq. (28)), which is a scope/correctness concern rather than circularity. The self-citations — Ref. [15] (Mukherjee and Mohanty) for the superuniversality hypothesis and Ref. [41] for an application — provide background; the percolation-specific Binder-cumulant collapses in Figs. 10-12 are computed in this paper and do not reduce to those works. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument is justified solely by a self-citation. Overall, the paper is self-contained against the exact Baxter-line exponents and its measured percolation quantities; only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation prevents a fully clean bill.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central prediction is anchored in the exact 8V exponents and the Ising w=5/12 conjecture. The only new parameter is w, assumed constant along the Baxter line. No new objects (particles, forces) are introduced.

free parameters (1)

w = 5/12 (assumed invariant; not fitted to AT data in this paper)
Carried over from Ising geometric percolation (Stella-Vanderzande) as a conjecture for the AT model. The central claim requires it to be exactly 5/12 for all lambda along the Baxter line.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption AT model maps exactly to the eight-vertex model, giving critical exponents nu, beta_m, beta_e, gamma_m, gamma_e (Eq. 11)
Cited from Baxter and Wu-Lin; used to compute predicted percolation exponents in Eq. (26).
domain assumption The correlation length exponent nu is unchanged for percolation observables; the percolation transition occurs at the same Tc as the magnetic/electric transition
Standard for correlated percolation; verified numerically via Binder crossings and 1/nu collapse.
domain assumption Stella-Vanderzande conjecture for Ising geometric percolation: fractal dimension D = d - (5/12) beta/nu with w = 5/12
Prior result (Ref. 21) used as the seed for the AT conjecture; assumed to extend along the Baxter line.
standard math Standard scaling relations (hyper-scaling, cluster scaling relations)
Used to derive gamma_P from nu and beta_P, and to relate cluster exponents tau and sigma.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric percolation of spins and spin-dipoles in Ashkin-Teller model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2KRTWA23

@misc{pith2026241111644,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric percolation of spins and spin-dipoles in Ashkin-Teller model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2KRTWA23}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11644}
}

abstract

Ashkin-Teller model is a two-layer lattice model where spins in each layer interact ferromagnetically with strength $J$, and the spin-dipoles (product of spins) interact with neighbors with strength $\lambda.$ The model exhibits simultaneous magnetic and electric transitions along a self-dual line on the $\lambda$-$J$ plane with continuously varying critical exponents. In this article, we investigate the percolation of geometric clusters of spins and spin-dipoles denoted respectively as magnetic and electric clusters. We find that the largest cluster in both cases becomes macroscopic in size and spans the lattice when interaction exceeds a critical threshold given by the same self-dual line where magnetic and electric transitions occur. The fractal dimension of the critical spanning clusters is related to order parameter exponent $\beta_{m,e}$ as $D_{m,e}=d-\frac{5}{12}\frac{\beta_{m,e}}\nu,$ where $d=2$ is the spatial dimension and $\nu$ is the correlation length exponent. This relation determines all other percolation exponents and their variation wrt $\lambda.$ We show that for magnetic Percolation, the Binder cumulant, as a function of $\xi_2/L$ with $\xi_2$ being the second-moment correlation length, remains invariant all along the critical line and matches with that of the spin-percolation in the usual Ising model. The function also remains invariant for the electric percolation, forming a new superuniversality class of percolation transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11644 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (Color online) Typical steady state configurations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (Color online) (a) & (b) reflects power-law decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (19 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Data collapse obtained for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) For a large system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Estimation of fractal dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Critical exponents estimated from simulations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. (Color online) Critical percolation at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. (Color online) All along the Baxter line, Binder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. (Color online) Comparison of the superuniversal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Binder cumulant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png]

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Plot of Binder cumulant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Dynamical exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: In a similar way, as in Fig. 3 here we estimate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Data collapse obtained for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: In a similar way as in Fig. 5 we plot the collapsed plots for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: Data collapse obtained with different system sizes for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: In a similar way as in Fig. 7 we plot the collapsed plots for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: Data collapse obtained with different system sizes for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10: In a similar way as in Fig. 9 we plot the collapsed plots for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11: Data collapse obtained with different sizes (L) from cluster (magnetization) size distribution for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12: Similar plot as Fig. 11 for polarization cluster size distribution at (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Non-reciprocal interactions preserve the universality class of Potts model
cond-mat.stat-mech 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

Directed, non-reciprocal couplings in the q-state Potts model are claimed to leave equilibrium critical exponents unchanged, while selfish non-equilibrium dynamics yield varying exponents yet a super-universal Binder ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Stauffer, Physics Reports 54, 1 (1979)

D. Stauffer, Physics Reports 54, 1 (1979)

work page 1979
[2]

Clusters are formed by joining the neighboring sites with parallel spins

is the critical temperature as- sociated with the ferromagnet-to-paramagnet transition in the Ising model. Clusters are formed by joining the neighboring sites with parallel spins. Using standard per- colation techniques, one can, in practice, estimate the critical exponents. The critical behavior in the FK clus- ters belongs to the Ising universality cla...

work page
[3]

Stauffer and A

D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation 13 Theory, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, 1992)

work page 1992
[4]

Sahimi, Applications Of Percolation Theory , 1st ed

M. Sahimi, Applications Of Percolation Theory , 1st ed. (CRC Press, 1994)

work page 1994
[5]

S. R. Broadbent and J. M. Hammersley, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 53, 629 (1957)

work page 1957
[6]

J. W. Essam, Reports on Progress in Physics 43, 833 (1980)

work page 1980
[7]

A. A. Saberi, Physics Reports 578, 1 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Kesten, Percolation Theory for Mathematicians , 2nd ed

H. Kesten, Percolation Theory for Mathematicians , 2nd ed. (Birkh¨ auser Boston, MA,USA, 1982)

work page 1982

Show all 45 references

[9]

Grimmett, Percolation, 2nd ed

G. Grimmett, Percolation, 2nd ed. (Springer Berlin, Hei- delberg,Germany, 2013)

2013
[10]

M. F. Thorpe and J. C. Phillips, eds., Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Electronic and Molecular Net- works, 1st ed. (Springer, New York, USA, 2006)

2006
[11]

Zierenberg, N

J. Zierenberg, N. Fricke, M. Marenz, F. P. Spitzner, V. Blavatska, and W. Janke, Phys. Rev. E 96, 062125 (2017)

2017
[12]

Fortunato, Phys

S. Fortunato, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054107 (2002)

2002
[13]

A. A. Saberi and H. Dashti-Naserabadi, Europhysics Let- ters 92, 67005 (2011)

2011
[14]

M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4104 (2000)

2000
[15]

Mukherjee and P

I. Mukherjee and P. K. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174417 (2023)

2023
[16]

H. E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transition and Crit- ical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, New York, 1971)

1971
[17]

Grassberger, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 19, 1681 (1986)

P. Grassberger, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 19, 1681 (1986)

1986
[18]

(1) by the following scaling re- lations [1, 16]

(2) These exponents are not independent; they relate to the cluster-exponents in Eq. (1) by the following scaling re- lations [1, 16]. τ = 2 + β β +γ ; σ = 1 β +γ ; D =d− β ν, (3) where d = 2 is the dimension of the system. The two sets of exponents reflect distinct aspects of...
[19]

Ashkin and E

J. Ashkin and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 64, 178 (1943)

1943
[20]

Onsager, Physical Review 65, 117 (1944)

L. Onsager, Physical Review 65, 117 (1944)

1944
[21]

that fractal dimension DP of the geometric clusters of Ising model can not be determined solely in terms 9 FIG. 8. Critical exponents estimated from simulations (points) along with functions (line) predicted in Eq. (26). of the Ising exponents (4), there is an additional fac- ...
[22]

Weinrib, Phys

A. Weinrib, Phys. Rev. B 29, 387 (1984)

1984
[23]

C. M. Fortuin and P. W. Kasteleyn, Physica 57, 536 (1972)

1972
[24]

F. Y. Wu and K. Y. Lin, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 7, L181 (1974)

1974
[25]

A. L. Stella and C. Vanderzande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1067 (1989)

1989
[26]

Coniglio and W

A. Coniglio and W. Klein, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General 13, 2775 (1980)

1980
[27]

Coniglio, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, 9039–9053 (2001)

A. Coniglio, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, 9039–9053 (2001)

2001
[28]

Suzuki, Progress of Theoretical Physics 51, 1992 (1974), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/51/6/1992/5276871/51-6-1992.pdf

M. Suzuki, Progress of Theoretical Physics 51, 1992 (1974), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/51/6/1992/5276871/51-6-1992.pdf

1974
[29]

R. J. Baxter, Annals of Physics 70, 323 (1972)

1972
[30]

L. P. Kadanoff and A. C. Brown, Annals of Physics 121, 318 (1979)

1979
[31]

Bonati, A

C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 232002 (2019)

2019
[32]

I. G. Enting, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 8, L35 (1975)

1975
[33]

Fan and F

C. Fan and F. Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 2, 723 (1970)

1970
[34]

L. P. Kadanoff and F. J. Wegner, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3989 (1971)

1971
[35]

Domany and E

E. Domany and E. K. Riedel, Phys. Rev. B 19, 5817 (1979)

1979
[36]

Hoshen and R

J. Hoshen and R. Kopelman, Phys. Rev. B 14, 3438 (1976)

1976
[37]

F. Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982)

1982
[38]

Krˇ cm´ ar and L.ˇSamaj, Phys

R. Krˇ cm´ ar and L.ˇSamaj, Phys. Rev. E 97, 012108 (2018)

2018
[39]

Binder, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 43, 119 (1981)

K. Binder, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 43, 119 (1981)

1981
[40]

Janke and A

W. Janke and A. M. J. Schakel, Nuclear Physics B 700, 385 (1995)

1995
[41]

Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

1996
[42]

Binder, Phys

K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 693 (1981)

1981
[43]

Supplemental Materaial (Here we report on estimation of percolation critical exponents for different points on Baxter line in Ashkin teller model)
[45]

S. K. Saha, A. Banerjee, and P. K. Mohanty, Soft Matter xx, xx (2024). Supplemental Material: Geometric percolation of spins and spin-dipoles in Ashkin Teller model Aikya Banerjee, Priyajit Jana and P. K. Mohanty ∗ Department of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science E...

2024 arXiv
[48]

(6) Here, the superscript P stands for exponents related to the percolation transition, and in the last step, we use the scaling relation, γP =dνP−βP. Indeed, geometric percolation transition of spins in the Ising model forms a new universality class where ϕ =⟨smax⟩/L2 plays t...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Stauffer, Physics Reports 54, 1 (1979)

D. Stauffer, Physics Reports 54, 1 (1979)

work page 1979

[2] [2]

Clusters are formed by joining the neighboring sites with parallel spins

is the critical temperature as- sociated with the ferromagnet-to-paramagnet transition in the Ising model. Clusters are formed by joining the neighboring sites with parallel spins. Using standard per- colation techniques, one can, in practice, estimate the critical exponents. The critical behavior in the FK clus- ters belongs to the Ising universality cla...

work page

[3] [3]

Stauffer and A

D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation 13 Theory, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, 1992)

work page 1992

[4] [4]

Sahimi, Applications Of Percolation Theory , 1st ed

M. Sahimi, Applications Of Percolation Theory , 1st ed. (CRC Press, 1994)

work page 1994

[5] [5]

S. R. Broadbent and J. M. Hammersley, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 53, 629 (1957)

work page 1957

[6] [6]

J. W. Essam, Reports on Progress in Physics 43, 833 (1980)

work page 1980

[7] [7]

A. A. Saberi, Physics Reports 578, 1 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Kesten, Percolation Theory for Mathematicians , 2nd ed

H. Kesten, Percolation Theory for Mathematicians , 2nd ed. (Birkh¨ auser Boston, MA,USA, 1982)

work page 1982