Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 284 references

Active-galaxy neutrinos are born in the black-hole corona, not the jet.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:49 UTC pith:2KS4GS3M

load-bearing objection The corona blueprint is worth engaging, but the headline 'linear' relation is contradicted by the paper's own fitted slopes, so the central claim doesn't hold as stated. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27658 v1 pith:2KS4GS3M submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.HE

On the Blueprint of Active Galaxies Producing Neutrinos

Chen Li , Francis Halzen This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords active galactic nucleineutrino astronomycoronaphotopion productiondiffuse neutrino fluxmultimessenger astrophysicsX-ray emission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that high-energy neutrinos from active galaxies are produced in the dense X-ray-emitting corona within about ten gravitational radii of the supermassive black hole, not in the relativistic jet. Protons accelerated near the black hole interact with 0.1-1 keV X-rays through the Δ resonance, producing tens-of-TeV neutrinos while the same X-rays absorb the accompanying gamma rays. Multimessenger fits to six neutrino-associated active galaxies prefer compact emission regions and yield a neutrino flux that scales with the X-ray flux. The paper concludes that roughly 650-800 such gamma-ray-obscured galaxies could account for the diffuse extragalactic neutrino flux, making obscured nuclei the likely main reservoirs of cosmic neutrinos rather than gamma-ray-bright jets.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, it establishes that multimessenger data from six active galaxies can be described by a single blueprint: protons accelerated in the corona undergo photopion production on the corona's X-ray photons, with neutrino flux proportional to the X-ray flux and inversely proportional to the corona radius. Adding proton-proton interactions does not improve the fits, indicating that the pγ channel dominates. The pγ channel naturally produces a spectral feature near 30 TeV through the Δ resonance and naturally hides the accompanying gamma rays via γγ absorption. The authors interpret the preference for small fitted radii as evidence that neutrino production occurs in the compac

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the photopion reaction p + γ → Δ → n + π⁺ (with subsequent pion decay to neutrinos) on 0.1-1 keV X-rays, combined with the opacity balance τ_γγ ≈ 10³ τ_pγ, so that any target thick enough to produce neutrinos also absorbs the pionic gamma rays. The load-bearing relation is τ_pγ ≈ 70 (R/R_S)⁻¹ (E_X/1 keV)⁻¹ (L_X/L_Edd), making the neutrino luminosity L_ν = τ_pγ L_p directly proportional to the X-ray luminosity and inversely proportional to the corona radius. The paper implements this in a multimessenger simulation code, modeling the corona as a homogeneous sphere with uniform proton density and magnetic field and an escape time R/c.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing simplification is that the corona is a uniform, isotropic sphere of radius R with a single escape time R/c; if the real corona is clumpy, elongated, or magnetically structured, the compact radii and the X-ray-neutrino scaling extracted from the fits could shift.

What would settle it

A clean falsifier would be a high-significance neutrino association with a jetted source whose gamma-ray and X-ray emissions are demonstrably produced in the jet, with no bright X-ray corona present, or an X-ray reverberation measurement showing that a neutrino-emitting source's coronal emission region is far larger than ~10 R_S. A more direct test: measure the X-ray-neutrino flux correlation across ~20 X-ray-bright active galaxies using stacked neutrino data; a slope far from unity or large scatter would contradict the proposed linear relation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Future neutrino source searches should prioritize X-ray-bright, gamma-ray-obscured active galaxies over gamma-ray-bright jets.
  • The lack of gamma-ray counterparts to many astrophysical neutrinos becomes a natural prediction, since the X-ray target absorbs pionic gamma rays.
  • The ~30 TeV feature in the diffuse neutrino spectrum is tied to the Δ resonance with 0.1-1 keV target photons, providing a testable spectral fingerprint.
  • A population of ~650-800 X-ray-bright active galaxies can explain the diffuse neutrino flux, implying a resolvable source count for next-generation neutrino telescopes.
  • Adding proton-proton interactions does not significantly alter predictions, simplifying models and yielding a universal neutrino spectrum shaped by X-ray-targeted pγ interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The paper's scaling argument hints at a direct link between coronal neutrino sources and ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray acceleration; if the same compact region accelerates protons to ~0.6 PeV, the Hillas condition for EeV protons may require larger structures, such as clusters and superclusters, which the authors mention only briefly.
  • Editorial inference: The claimed X-ray-neutrino flux correlation could become a practical ranking tool for future neutrino source searches; a systematic stacking test across a larger sample of X-ray-selected active galaxies would be a natural extension.
  • Editorial inference: Because the model's neutrino flux scales as R⁻¹, an independent measurement of coronal size via X-ray reverberation mapping or gravitational microlensing could strongly constrain the compact-radius requirement, a cross-check the paper does not perform.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that high-energy neutrinos from active galaxies are produced in the compact, X-ray-emitting corona near the supermassive black hole, via p-gamma interactions on ~0.1-1 keV X-rays, and that the accompanying pionic gamma rays are absorbed in the same region. It fits a simplified homogeneous spherical corona model with the AM3 code to six IceCube-associated AGN (NGC 1068, TXS 0506+056, NGC 4151, CGCG 420-015, Circinus, NGC 7469), treating X-ray and gamma-ray observations as upper limits. From the best-fit models it claims a 'linear' F_X-F_nu relation, a preference for radii within ~10 gravitational radii, and uses the averaged source fluxes to estimate that ~650-800 such sources can account for the diffuse extragalactic neutrino flux.

Significance. If the corona model is correct, it would move the dominant neutrino-production site from jets to the accretion-disk corona and connect the diffuse neutrino flux to a specific, X-ray-bright AGN population. The paper has notable strengths: the AM3-based pipeline is publicly available, the Latin hypercube grids are large (10.5M and 83.9M simulations), and the use of multiwavelength upper limits for six sources is a serious attempt at multimessenger consistency. However, the principal empirical claim, a linear F_X-F_nu proportionality, is not supported by the paper's own fitted slopes in Eqs. (19)-(26), which range from 1.32 to 2.28, and the correlation is derived from model outputs that were already filtered against the neutrino and X-ray data. As it stands, the paper demonstrates a property of its best-fit models, not an independently observed correlation. The diffuse-flux extrapolation is interesting but rests on marginal source identifications and on strong absorption assumptions.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.1, Eqs. (19)-(26)] The abstract and Section 5.1 describe a 'linear' F_X-F_nu relation, and the abstract claims 'neutrino flux linearly proportional to the X-ray flux.' A linear proportionality requires a log-log slope of 1.0. The fits quoted in Eqs. (19)-(26) give slopes between 1.32 and 2.28, with large differences between the per-best-fit and per-source methods (e.g., run A, 0.3-10 keV: 1.58 vs. 2.25). No uncertainties are given, so it is unclear whether any of these slopes is consistent with unity. This is not a wording issue: the proportionality is a headline result and motivates the 'blueprint' and the diffuse-flux normalization. The authors should either correct the claim to a superlinear power law or demonstrate, with uncertainties, that the data actually require a slope consistent with 1.
  2. [Section 4.4 and Fig. 7] The F_X-F_nu correlation is computed from the best-fit AM3 models, not from measured X-ray fluxes. In Eq. (14) all photon observations enter only as one-sided upper limits, and the F_X values plotted in Fig. 7 are model outputs (the intrinsic coronal luminosity before absorption, as stated in Section 5.1). Because the same simulations were filtered against the observed neutrino fluxes and X-ray upper limits, the apparent correlation is partially a product of the selection procedure rather than an independent measurement. The paper should reframe this as a model-inferred relation and, ideally, cross-check it against direct X-ray measurements (e.g., NuSTAR for NGC 1068) instead of upper limits alone.
  3. [Section 4.4, Eq. (17)] For NGC 1068, the X-ray upper limit is increased by a factor of 100 based on the assumption that 99% of X-rays below 100 keV are absorbed by Compton-thick material. This is an order-of-magnitude relaxation of the main electromagnetic constraint on the anchor source. If the absorption is less extreme, many of the accepted fits would violate the observed X-ray flux. Since NGC 1068 is the highest-significance source and is used to fix the compact corona parameters, this assumption can directly bias the fitted radii, the F_X-F_nu relation, and the resulting N_AGN estimate. A sensitivity study or a more observationally grounded treatment of the X-ray absorption is needed.
  4. [Section 3 and Figs. 4-5] Four of the six sources (NGC 4151, CGCG 420-015, Circinus, NGC 7469) are only 'emerging' from IceCube analyses, with local significances below or near 3 sigma, as the paper itself notes. They are nevertheless averaged on an equal footing with NGC 1068 in the F_X-F_nu fits and in the diffuse-flux normalization. In addition, for CGCG 420-015 the best run-A fit has Delta=0.34, far above the Delta<=0.05 threshold used for the other sources, yet it is treated as satisfactory in Fig. 3. The derived N_AGN~650-800 and the 'blueprint' claim depend on representative averaging over these marginal sources. The authors should show how the results change when marginal sources are removed or down-weighted, and should not call the Delta=0.34 fit satisfactory without a quantitative justification.
  5. [Section 4.1] The conclusion that neutrino production occurs within ~10 gravitational radii is conditioned on the assumed homogeneous, isotropic spherical corona with t_esc=R/c and uniform proton density and magnetic field. The fitted quantity R is the radius of this idealized sphere, and the paper itself acknowledges in Section 5.1 that more realistic geometries would likely increase the effective volume. Because the F_X-F_nu relation and the N_AGN estimate are derived from fits in this idealized geometry, the compact-radius claim is only as strong as this simplification. The authors should discuss systematic uncertainties from geometry and escape-time assumptions, or test at least one alternative geometry (e.g., lamppost or clumpy corona).
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] There are several typographical errors: 'rational' should be 'rationale' in the Introduction; 'Thompson' should be 'Thomson' in Eq. (17); 'CGCG 420-025' appears in Section 4.4 and should be 'CGCG 420-015'; 'Section 2.4' in Section 5.1 should be 'Section 4.4'.
  2. [Figs. 4-5] Figure axis labels are cramped and some are cut off (e.g., L_gamma label in run A is truncated as 'L'). The captions also say '1 best fits' for sources with a single fit; this should be '1 best fit'.
  3. [Section 5.1, Eq. (18)] The motivation for comparing fluxes rather than luminosities to 'remove the bias that sources at larger distances have reduced fluxes' is somewhat unclear; the luminosity distance already enters both F and L. Consider clarifying that the concern is about distance-dependent selection effects or averaging.
  4. [References] The in-text citation to E. Kun et al. (2024) for the same correlation would benefit from a precise statement of what that work found, since the current sentence only says they 'argued for a correlation with higher energy values of the X-ray flux'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The abstract's 'linearly proportional' F_X–F_nu claim is an in-sample summary of AM3 fits selected to match the neutrino data, not an independent empirical relation; the compact-corona and diffuse-flux conclusions are otherwise self-contained fits.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.4 (Eqs. 13–15) and Sec. 5.1 (Eqs. 18–26, Fig. 7)]
    "Here, Δ = 0 and small values of Δ indicate good fits to the data. For the results shown in Section 5, we list fits with Δ≤0.05... In summary, we test the linear relation between the values of Lν, LX and Lp in our model... There is a linear correlation between FX and Fν, with a slope that favors the FX axis."

    The Fν values in the Fig. 7 regression are not independent measurements: they are simulation outputs Sν selected by Eq. 13 to match the observed neutrino bounds (Δ≤0.05), while the FX values are model outputs filtered only against upper limits, with the NGC 1068 X-ray limit inflated by 100. The claimed 'neutrino flux linearly proportional to the X-ray flux' is therefore an in-sample summary of accepted AM3 realizations, partly restating the model's Eq. 9 (Lν=τpγLp with τpγ∝LX/R), not an empirical correlation measured from data. The slopes are not forced to 1 (Eqs. 19–26 give 1.32–2.28), so the circularity is partial, but the abstract presents this model-output relation as a data-supported characteristic.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is largely self-contained in structure: Section 2 builds the corona opacity from standard definitions, and the AM3 fits in Sections 4–5 use external multimessenger data. The preference for R ≲ 10 R_S is a genuine fit output (subject to the assumed spherical homogeneous geometry, a limitation the authors acknowledge), and the N_AGN ~ 650–800 diffuse-flux estimate is a direct rescaling against IceCube's measured diffuse flux. The main circularity concern is the F_X–F_nu relation: because the accepted models were filtered to match the observed neutrino flux (Eq. 13) and only loose/inflated X-ray upper limits (Eq. 14, including the factor-100 inflation for NGC 1068), the regression in Fig. 7 measures a property of the fitted model family rather than an independent empirical correlation. This is a fitted-input-called-prediction issue and is partial, not tautological, since the slopes vary and are not fixed to unity. Self-citations to Khatee Zathul et al. (2025, 2026) include coauthor Halzen, but they are not load-bearing because the Δ-resonance kinematics is re-derived in Eqs. 1–3; the cited work is corroborative. Overall, the central blueprint claim is supported by fits rather than by an independent external test, giving a moderate circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

10 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The paper's central claim rests instead on ten fitted parameters (nine model parameters plus the 100x absorption factor) and on strong simplifications about corona geometry, injection spectra, and the interpretation of photon data as upper limits. The N_AGN estimate additionally assumes the six sources are representative of the whole population.

free parameters (10)
  • B (coronal magnetic field) = 1e3-1e9 G; low values favored
    Magnetic field strength in the corona; constrained by X-ray and gamma-ray upper limits.
  • R (corona radius) = 1e12-1e15 cm; low values preferred
    Corona radius; directly drives the claim of production within ~10 R_S.
  • Lp (proton injection luminosity) = 1e42-1e51 erg/s
    Normalized to reproduce the observed neutrino flux.
  • Ep,min (minimum proton energy) = 1e12-1e15 eV
    Lower cutoff of proton injection spectrum.
  • Ep,max/Ep,min = 1-1e3
    Width of the proton injection energy range.
  • alpha_p (proton spectral index) = 1.5-6
    Slope of the injected proton power law.
  • Le (electron injection luminosity) = 1e37-1e44 erg/s
    Sets the synchrotron and IC X-ray output of the corona.
  • L_gamma (disk photon luminosity) = 1e37-1e44 erg/s
    Planck seed photon luminosity for inverse Compton emission.
  • n_p (proton density, run B) = 1e-1-1e12 cm^-3
    Target density for pp interactions; run B only.
  • X-ray absorption factor for NGC 1068 = 100 (99% absorbed)
    Ad hoc factor multiplying the NGC 1068 X-ray upper limit by 100; loosens the constraint from X-ray data.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Corona is a homogeneous, isotropic sphere with uniform proton density and magnetic field, with global escape time t_esc = R/c.
    Introduced in Sec. 4.1 as the model geometry; if wrong, inferred R and L_X are biased.
  • domain assumption Proton injection follows a power law with exponential cutoff (Eq. 10); electrons follow a Maxwell-Juttner distribution (Eq. 11); the disk emits a Planck spectrum (Eq. 12).
    These spectral shapes set the mapping from fitted luminosities to observable fluxes.
  • domain assumption The AM3 code correctly implements all radiation and interaction processes used.
    All simulation results depend on the fidelity of AM3; cited to Klinger et al. 2024, not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption Photon observations of all sources can be treated as one-sided upper limits, and NGC 1068 transmits only ~1% of <100 keV X-rays.
    Sec. 4.4: if coronal X-rays contributed substantially to the observed flux, the filter would reject many fits rather than accept them.
  • domain assumption The six selected sources are representative of the extragalactic neutrino-source population, with a uniform distribution in luminosity distance.
    Sec. 5.2: required for the N_AGN ~650-800 estimate of the diffuse-flux contribution.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 17500 in / 11564 out tokens · 110487 ms · 2026-08-01T03:49:58.760533+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Based on the observation of the active galaxies NGC 1068 and TXS 0506+056, and on additional evidence for the sources NGC 4151, CGCG 420-015, NGC 7469, and the Circinus Galaxy emerging from IceCube data, we make the case for the production of high-energy neutrinos within a few gravitational radii of supermassive black holes surrounded by a dense plasma radiating X-rays. X-rays represents the target for the production of neutrinos by protons accelerated near the black hole; they also absorb the gamma rays from the decay of neutral pions produced in the same interactions. Neutrinos with energies of tens of TeV and above originate in photoproduction interactions with X-rays of $0.1 \sim 1$\,keV energy on the $\Delta$ resonance, $p + \gamma \rightarrow \Delta \rightarrow n + \pi^+$. Our analysis of the multimessenger data points to gamma-ray-obscured sources with a characteristic neutrino flux linearly proportional to the X-ray flux originating within $\sim 10$ gravitational radii of the black holes, with lower values preferred. We speculate on such sources producing the diffuse flux of neutrinos and cosmic rays of extragalactic origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27658 by Chen Li, Francis Halzen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The core of an active galaxy combines the ingredients to produce neutrinos, with protons accelerated by the black hole and/or the accretion disk and a target (corona) with a large optical depth in both gamma rays and hydrogen that converts them into neutrinos. approximation. The interaction length is determined by the density of target photons nγ and the interaction cross section σpγ 3 . The opacity of the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Detailed results for one of the best fits to NGC 1068 data from run A (pγ only) with ∆ ≤ 0.05. NGC 1068 is a Compton-thick galaxy with a column density of NH = 1025 cm−2 (A. Marinucci et al. 2015) that absorbs X-rays, reducing the observed flux relative to the flux in the core. It has a total cross section σtot(Eγ) and consists of two parts: σtot(Eγ) = σKN(Eγ) + σabs(Eγ), (16) where Eγ is the energy of the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simplified results for one of the best fits for each of the six neutrino sources from run A (pγ only). All sources are characterized with a ∆ ≤ 0.05, except CGCG 420-015, for which ∆ = 0.34. or absorption of γ-rays. The X-ray flux at the core of NGC 1068 is consistent with our estimates and with the value directly observed by the NuSTAR experiment (A. Marinucci et al. 2015) during a temporary decrease of t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Best fit parameters for the six sources from run A (pγ only). The fits are filtered as before. A maximum number of 1, 000 best fits are shown for each source [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Best fit parameters (∆ ≤ 0.05) for the six sources from run B (pγ and pp). A maximum number of 1, 000 best fits are shown for each source. For each source, the parameters describing the best fits tend to cluster, and there are apparent correlations between the parameters: • For high values of R, B is reduced to avoid overproduction of X-rays. • Also for higher Lp values, B must be reduced because otherwise… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Min R − LX dependence for the best fits to the NGC 1068 multimessenger data for (a) run A and (b) run B. The observations of NGC 1068 show a preference for lower R values in simulations. To further investigate this, we gradually increase the minimum R value and refit the data. The resulting values of the X-ray luminosity LX are plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fν and Fp dependence on FX for the best fits to the sources for (a) run A and (b) run B. The fits are filtered as before. A maximum number of 1, 000 best fits are shown for each source. The bottom two plots show the correlation between the X-ray fluxes in low and high X-ray energy ranges for our modeling of the corona [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fitting the extragalactic diffuse neutrino flux with the best fits. The fits are filtered as before. A maximum number of 1, 000 best fits are shown for each source. We conclude that the top sources in the IceCube neutrino sky are active galaxies with a dense core emitting X-rays. We do not think that it matters much whether they are jetted or not. They may have jets, and these may even emit gamma rays caus… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

284 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Delta Resonance in the Neutrino Sky

    Khatee Zathul, Arifa and Fang, Ke and Halzen, Francis and Hooper, Dan. The Delta Resonance in the Neutrino Sky. 2026. arXiv:2606.00249

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Testagrossa, Federico and Fiorillo, Damiano F. G. and Comisso, Luca and Peretti, Enrico and Petropoulou, Maria and Sironi, Lorenzo. Neutrinos and Gamma Rays from Seyfert Galaxies Constrain the Properties of Coronal Turbulence. Astrophys. J. 2026. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae63c3. arXiv:2603.18214

    arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    and Marcowith, Alexandre and Amato, Elena and Kalyashova, Maria E

    Bykov, Andrei M. and Marcowith, Alexandre and Amato, Elena and Kalyashova, Maria E. and Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik and Waxman, Eli. High-Energy Particles and Radiation in Star-Forming Regions. Space Sci. Rev. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00663-0. arXiv:2003.11534

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [5]

    Kovalev, Y. Y. and others. A hidden ultra-relativistic spine in the jet of a neutrino-associated blazar. 2026. arXiv:2606.27430

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [6]

    High-energy neutrino emission from the Seyfert galaxy NGC 7469

    Sommani, Giacomo and Franckowiak, Anna and Lincetto, Massimiliano and Dettmar, Ralf-J. High-energy neutrino emission from the Seyfert galaxy NGC 7469. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2025. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3053/1/012025

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3053/1/012025 2025

  6. [7]

    XXXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics

    Celli, S. XXXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics. 2026

    2026

  7. [8]

    Aartsen, M. G. and others. Search for steady point-like sources in the astrophysical muon neutrino flux with 8 years of IceCube data. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6680-0. arXiv:1811.07979

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [9]

    Aartsen, M. G. and others. Time-Integrated Neutrino Source Searches with 10 Years of IceCube Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.051103. arXiv:1910.08488

    arXiv 2020

  9. [10]

    Self-Consistent Modelling of Neutrino Production in Turbulent Black Hole Coronae

    Le Bihan, S \'e bastien and Lemoine, Martin and Rieger, Frank. Self-Consistent Modelling of Neutrino Production in Turbulent Black Hole Coronae. 2026. arXiv:2603.27749

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [11]

    and Oikonomou, F

    Padovani, P. and Oikonomou, F. and Petropoulou, M. and Giommi, P. and Resconi, E. TXS 0506+056, the first cosmic neutrino source, is not a BL Lac. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz011. arXiv:1901.06998

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [12]

    Upstream neutrino production and delayed jet emission in the blazar GB6 J1542+6129

    Kun, Emma and Bartos, Imre and Hadi, Breshna and G. Upstream neutrino production and delayed jet emission in the blazar GB6 J1542+6129. 2026. arXiv:2605.00785

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [13]

    and Franckowiak, Anna and Ricci, Claudio

    Kun, Emma and del Palacio, Santiago and Bartos, Imre and Halzen, Francis and Becker Tjus, Julia and Biermann, Peter L. and Franckowiak, Anna and Ricci, Claudio. A Seyfert galaxy as a hidden counterpart to a neutrino-associated blazar. 2025. arXiv:2512.24178

    arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    and others

    Abbasi, R. and others. Evidence for Neutrino Emission from X-Ray Bright Seyfert Galaxies in the Southern Hemisphere Using Enhanced Starting Track Events with IceCube. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2026. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4aac. arXiv:2602.10208

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [16]

    Could the Neutrino Emission of TXS 0506+056 Come from the Accretion Flow of the Supermassive Black Hole?

    Yang, Qi-Rui and Liu, Ruo-Yu and Wang, Xiang-Yu. Could the Neutrino Emission of TXS 0506+056 Come from the Accretion Flow of the Supermassive Black Hole?. Astrophys. J. 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaea4. arXiv:2411.17632

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [17]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Modelling the coincident observation of a high-energy neutrino and a bright blazar flare. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1 , archivePrefix =. 1807.04275 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [18]

    Neutrino Emissions from Tidal Disruption Remnants

    Hayasaki, Kimitake and Yamazaki, Ryo. Neutrino Emissions from Tidal Disruption Remnants. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab44ca. arXiv:1908.10882

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [19]

    , keywords =

    The Broadband Spectrum of 3C 120 Observed by BeppoSAX. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/320064 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0011543 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [20]

    , keywords =

    3C 273 with NuSTAR: Unveiling the Active Galactic Nucleus. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/14 , archivePrefix =. 1506.06182 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [21]

    The Blazar Sequence and Its Physical Understanding

    Prandini, Elisa and Ghisellini, Gabriele. The Blazar Sequence and Its Physical Understanding. Galaxies. 2022. doi:10.3390/galaxies10010035. arXiv:2202.07490

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [23]

    Investigating the interplay between the coronal properties and the hard X-ray variability of active galactic nuclei with NuSTAR

    Serafinelli, Roberto and others. Investigating the interplay between the coronal properties and the hard X-ray variability of active galactic nuclei with NuSTAR. Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450777. arXiv:2407.06769

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [24]

    , keywords =

    Study of X-ray variability and coronae of Seyfert galaxies using NuSTAR. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz275 , archivePrefix =. 1901.07594 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  22. [25]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Changing-look active galactic nuclei. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4 , archivePrefix =. 2211.05132 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [26]

    High-energy neutrinos and gamma rays from the AGN-driven wind in NGC 1068

    Inoue, Susumu and Cerruti, Matteo and Murase, Kohta and Liu, Ruo-Yu. High-energy neutrinos and gamma rays from the AGN-driven wind in NGC 1068. PoS. 2021. doi:10.22323/1.395.1013

    work page doi:10.22323/1.395.1013 2021

  24. [27]

    Disentangling the Hadronic Components in NGC 1068

    Ajello, Marco and Murase, Kohta and McDaniel, Alex. Disentangling the Hadronic Components in NGC 1068. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf296. arXiv:2307.02333

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [29]

    Interplay between accelerated protons, x rays and neutrinos in the corona of NGC 1068: Constraints from kinetic plasma simulations , volume=

    Mbarek, Rostom and Philippov, Alexander and Chernoglazov, Alexander and Levinson, Amir and Mushotzky, Richard , year=. Interplay between accelerated protons, x rays and neutrinos in the corona of NGC 1068: Constraints from kinetic plasma simulations , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l101306 , number=

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l101306

  26. [30]

    Fiorillo, Damiano F. G. and Petropoulou, Maria and Comisso, Luca and Peretti, Enrico and Sironi, Lorenzo , year=. TeV Neutrinos and Hard X-Rays from Relativistic Reconnection in the Corona of NGC 1068 , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad192b , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad192b 2041

  27. [31]

    2024 , eprint=

    A magnetized strongly turbulent corona as the source of neutrinos from NGC 1068 , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  28. [32]

    Leptohadronic single-zone models for the electromagnetic and neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056 , volume=

    Cerruti, M and Zech, A and Boisson, C and Emery, G and Inoue, S and Lenain, J-P , year=. Leptohadronic single-zone models for the electromagnetic and neutrino emission of TXS 0506+056 , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly210 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly210

  29. [33]

    and Murase, K

    Keivani, A. and Murase, K. and Petropoulou, M. and Fox, D. B. and Cenko, S. B. and Chaty, S. and Coleiro, A. and DeLaunay, J. J. and Dimitrakoudis, S. and Evans, P. A. and Kennea, J. A. and Marshall, F. E. and Mastichiadis, A. and Osborne, J. P. and Santander, M. and Tohuvavohu, A. and Turley, C. F. , year=. A Multimessenger Picture of the Flaring Blazar ...

  30. [34]

    Lepto-hadronic γ-Ray and Neutrino Emission from the Jet of TXS 0506+056 , volume=

    Sahakyan, Narek , year=. Lepto-hadronic γ-Ray and Neutrino Emission from the Jet of TXS 0506+056 , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadade , number=

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadade

  31. [35]

    Jet Cloud–Star Interaction as an Interpretation of Neutrino Outburst from the Blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=

    Wang, Kai and Liu, Ruo-Yu and Li, Zhuo and Wang, Xiang-Yu and Dai, Zi-Gao , year=. Jet Cloud–Star Interaction as an Interpretation of Neutrino Outburst from the Blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=. Universe , publisher=. doi:10.3390/universe9010001 , number=

    doi:10.3390/universe9010001

  32. [36]

    Cascading Constraints from Neutrino-emitting Blazars: The Case of TXS 0506+056 , volume=

    Reimer, Anita and Böttcher, Markus and Buson, Sara , year=. Cascading Constraints from Neutrino-emitting Blazars: The Case of TXS 0506+056 , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bff , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bff

  33. [37]

    TXS 0506+056, the first cosmic neutrino source, is not a BL Lac , volume=

    Padovani, P and Oikonomou, F and Petropoulou, M and Giommi, P and Resconi, E , year=. TXS 0506+056, the first cosmic neutrino source, is not a BL Lac , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz011 , number=

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz011

  34. [38]

    A Two-zone Model for Blazar Emission: Implications for TXS 0506+056 and the Neutrino Event IceCube-170922A , volume=

    Xue, Rui and Liu, Ruo-Yu and Petropoulou, Maria and Oikonomou, Foteini and Wang, Ze-Rui and Wang, Kai and Wang, Xiang-Yu , year=. A Two-zone Model for Blazar Emission: Implications for TXS 0506+056 and the Neutrino Event IceCube-170922A , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b44 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4b44

  35. [39]

    2019 , eprint=

    Multi-messenger interpretation of the neutrinos from TXS 0506+056 , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  36. [40]

    Theodore and Petropoulou, Maria and Murase, Kohta and Oikonomou, Foteini , year=

    Zhang, B. Theodore and Petropoulou, Maria and Murase, Kohta and Oikonomou, Foteini , year=. A Neutral Beam Model for High-energy Neutrino Emission from the Blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab659a , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab659a

  37. [41]

    A self-consistent leptonic–hadronic interpretation of the electromagnetic and neutrino emissions from blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=

    Cao, Gang and Yang, Chuyuan and Yang, Jianping and Wang, Jiancheng , year=. A self-consistent leptonic–hadronic interpretation of the electromagnetic and neutrino emissions from blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan , publisher=. doi:10.1093/pasj/psz142 , number=

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psz142

  38. [42]

    and Nagataki, Shigehiro , year=

    Sahu, Sarira and López Fortín, Carlos E. and Nagataki, Shigehiro , year=. Photohadronic Model for the Neutrino and Gamma-Ray Emission from TXS 0506+056 , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9ab7 , number=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9ab7

  39. [43]

    Jin, Weidong and Sharpe, RileyAnne and Capasso, Massimo and Ong, Rene and Sadeh, Iftach and Kaaret, Philip and Benbow, Wystan and Mukherjee, Reshmi and Prado, Raul and Lundy, Matthew and Patel, Sameer and Moriarty, Patrick and Maier, Gernot and Furniss, Amy and Ragan, Ken and Williams, David A. and Buckley, James and Fortson, Lucy and Quinn, John and Hold...

  40. [44]

    Acciari, V. A. and Aniello, T. and Ansoldi, S. and Antonelli, L. A. and Arbet Engels, A. and Artero, M. and Asano, K. and Baack, D. and Babić, A. and Baquero, A. and Barres de Almeida, U. and Barrio, J. A. and Batković, I. and Becerra González, J. and Bednarek, W. and Bernardini, E. and Bernardos, M. and Berti, A. and Besenrieder, J. and Bhattacharyya, W....

    2017

  41. [45]

    Implications of multiwavelength spectrum on cosmic-ray acceleration in blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=

    Das, Saikat and Gupta, Nayantara and Razzaque, Soebur , year=. Implications of multiwavelength spectrum on cosmic-ray acceleration in blazar TXS 0506+056 , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244653 , journal=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244653

  42. [46]

    2024 , eprint=

    A Unified Model for Multi-epoch Neutrino Events and Broadband Spectral Energy Distribution of TXS 0506+056 , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  43. [47]

    Megan Urry and Paolo Padovani , title =

    C. Megan Urry and Paolo Padovani , title =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , abstract =. 1995 , month =. doi:10.1086/133630 , url =

    doi:10.1086/133630 1995

  44. [48]

    Pinpointing Extragalactic Neutrino Sources in Light of Recent IceCube Observations

    Ahlers, Markus and Halzen, Francis. Pinpointing Extragalactic Neutrino Sources in Light of Recent IceCube Observations. Phys. Rev. D. 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043005. arXiv:1406.2160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [49]

    2024 , eprint=

    Search for neutrino emission from hard X-ray AGN with IceCube , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  46. [50]

    2024 , eprint=

    IceCube Search for Neutrino Emission from X-ray Bright Seyfert Galaxies , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  47. [51]

    García-Burillo et al

    S. García-Burillo et al. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L12 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/l12 2016

  48. [52]

    Thermal imaging of dust hiding the black hole in NGC 1068

    Rosas, Violeta Gamez and others. Thermal imaging of dust hiding the black hole in NGC 1068. Nature. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04311-7. arXiv:2112.13694

    arXiv 2022

  49. [53]

    and Halzen, Francis and Mező, György , year=

    Kun, Emma and Bartos, Imre and Tjus, Julia Becker and Biermann, Peter L. and Halzen, Francis and Mező, György , year=. Cosmic Neutrinos from Temporarily Gamma-suppressed Blazars , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf1ec , number=

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf1ec 2041

  50. [54]

    and Krizmanic, John F

    Anchordoqui, Luis A. and Krizmanic, John F. and Stecker, Floyd W. High-Energy Neutrinos from NGC 1068. PoS. 2021. doi:10.22323/1.395.0993. arXiv:2102.12409

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [56]

    High-energy Neutrinos from Magnetized Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei and Prospects for Identification of Seyfert Galaxies and Quasars in Neutrino Telescopes

    Kheirandish, Ali and Murase, Kohta and Kimura, Shigeo S. High-energy Neutrinos from Magnetized Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei and Prospects for Identification of Seyfert Galaxies and Quasars in Neutrino Telescopes. Astrophys. J. 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77. arXiv:2102.04475

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [58]

    and others

    Abbasi, R. and others. Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068. Science. 2022. doi:10.1126/science.abg3395. arXiv:2211.09972

    arXiv 2022

  53. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05492 , year=

    Neutrinos from interactions between the relativistic jet and large-scale structures of BL Lac objects investigated through their gamma-ray spectrum , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05492 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [60]

    EPJ Web of Conferences , volume=

    Charmed Galaxies , author=. EPJ Web of Conferences , volume=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  55. [61]

    High-Energy Neutrinos from Blazar Flares and Implications of TXS 0506+056

    Oikonomou, Foteini and Murase, Kohta and Petropoulou, Maria. High-Energy Neutrinos from Blazar Flares and Implications of TXS 0506+056. EPJ Web Conf. 2019. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921003006. arXiv:1903.02006

    arXiv 2019

  56. [62]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    On the Neutrino Flares from the Direction of TXS 0506+ 056 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  57. [63]

    Stathopoulos, S. I. and Petropoulou, M. and Vasilopoulos, G. and Mastichiadis, A. LeHaMoC: A versatile time-dependent lepto-hadronic modeling code for high-energy astrophysical sources. Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347277. arXiv:2308.06174

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [64]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A magnetized strongly turbulent corona as the source of neutrinos from NGC 1068. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.01678 , archivePrefix =. 2407.01678 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01678

  59. [66]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Interplay between accelerated Protons, X-rays and Neutrinos in the Corona of NGC 1068: Constraints from Kinetic Plasma Simulations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.15222 , archivePrefix =. 2310.15222 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.15222

  60. [69]

    Observational appearance

    Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. , year = 1973, month = jan, volume =

    1973

  61. [70]

    Observational appearance

    Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. , author=. Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 24, p. 337-355 , volume=

  62. [71]

    Probing superheavy dark matter through lunar radio observations of ultrahigh-energy neutrinos

    Das, Saikat and Carpio, Jose Alonso and Murase, Kohta. Probing superheavy dark matter through lunar radio observations of ultrahigh-energy neutrinos. 2024. arXiv:2405.06382

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07086 , year=

    IceCube: Neutrinos from Active Galaxies , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07086 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [73]

    Becker Tjus and B

    J. Becker Tjus and B. Eichmann and F. Halzen and A. Kheirandish and S. High-energy neutrinos from radio galaxies , journal =. doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.123005 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.123005

  65. [74]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06867 , year=

    A correlation between hard X-rays and neutrinos in radio-loud and radio-quiet AGN , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06867 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [75]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Neutrino Cadence of TXS 0506+ 056 Consistent with Supermassive Binary Origin , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  67. [76]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol

    Diffuse fluxes of cosmic high-energy neutrinos , author=. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 228, Mar. 15, 1979, p. 919-927. , volume=

    1979

  68. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00694 , year=

    IceCube and High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00694 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [78]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The TeV Diffuse Cosmic Neutrino Spectrum and the Nature of Astrophysical Neutrino Sources , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  70. [79]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Dynamical evidence from the sub-parsec counter-rotating disc for a close binary of supermassive black holes in NGC 1068 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  71. [80]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Hidden cores of active galactic nuclei as the origin of medium-energy neutrinos: critical tests with the MeV gamma-ray connection , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  72. [81]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    High-energy neutrinos from active galactic nuclei , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  73. [82]

    Cosmological parameters , author=

    Planck 2018 results-VI. Cosmological parameters , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2018

  74. [83]

    The astrophysical journal , volume=

    Revealing the high-redshift star formation rate with gamma-ray bursts , author=. The astrophysical journal , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  75. [84]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09332 , year=

    Revealing the Production Mechanism of High-Energy Neutrinos from NGC 1068 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09332 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [85]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume=

    NuSTAR catches the unveiling nucleus of NGC 1068 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  77. [86]

    , keywords =

    ALMA Resolves the Torus of NGC 1068: Continuum and Molecular Line Emission. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L12 , archivePrefix =. 1604.00205 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  78. [87]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A multimessenger picture of the flaring blazar TXS 0506+ 056: Implications for high-energy neutrino emission and cosmic-ray acceleration , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  79. [88]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The blazar TXS 0506+ 056 associated with a high-energy neutrino: insights into extragalactic jets and cosmic-ray acceleration , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  80. [89]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Lyman -emitting galaxies in the epoch of reionization , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

Showing first 80 references.