REVIEW 2 cited by
Detection and Measurement of Syntactic Templates in Generated Text
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent work on evaluating the diversity of text generated by LLMs has focused on word-level features. Here we offer an analysis of syntactic features to characterize general repetition in models, beyond frequent n-grams. Specifically, we define syntactic templates and show that models tend to produce templated text in downstream tasks at a higher rate than what is found in human-reference texts. We find that most (76%) templates in model-generated text can be found in pre-training data (compared to only 35% of human-authored text), and are not overwritten during fine-tuning processes such as RLHF. This connection to the pre-training data allows us to analyze syntactic templates in models where we do not have the pre-training data. We also find that templates as features are able to differentiate between models, tasks, and domains, and are useful for qualitatively evaluating common model constructions. Finally, we demonstrate the use of templates as a useful tool for analyzing style memorization of training data in LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generating Diverse Q&A Benchmarks for RAG Evaluation with DataMorgana
DataMorgana, a configurable LLM-based generator, produces synthetic Q&A benchmarks with higher lexical, syntactic, and semantic diversity than several existing methods.
-
A Penalty Goes a Long Way: Measuring Lexical Diversity in Synthetic Texts Under Prompt-Influenced Length Variations
PATTR adds a target-length penalty to the Type-Token Ratio, producing a lexical diversity score with tunable, reduced short-text bias for LLM synthetic data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.