Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Krylov Complexity and $c$-function along RG Flows

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The acceleration of Krylov spread complexity is directly tied to the covariant c-function along holographic RG flows, with the correlation reversing sign for flows that change dimension.

desk verdict Clean holographic comparison of spread-complexity acceleration with covariant c-functions; conditional on an unproven dictionary, but honest and with new explicit relations. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02715 v1 pith:2NVO5NIX submitted 2026-08-03 hep-th

Carlos Nunez , Dibakar Roychowdhury This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords KrylovcomplexityspreadholographicRGflowcovariantc-functionproperradialmomentumLanczoscoefficientsDp-branestwistedcompactification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the acceleration of Krylov spread complexity—the second time derivative of how far a state has spread along its Krylov chain—is a geometric diagnostic that is directly tied to the holographic covariant c-function, the standard geometric count of effective degrees of freedom along a renormalization-group flow. Using the proposal that the growth rate of spread complexity equals the proper radial momentum of an infalling massive probe in the dual geometry, the authors normalize that acceleration to a quantity U that is local in the redshift and radial metric functions. They find simple algebraic relations in every class of flows considered: an inverse power law for fixed-dimensional domain walls, a universal product relation for Dp-branes, and co-monotonicity for flows across dimensions induced by twisted compactification. The paper argues that the reversal of the correlation across dimensions is the signature of a reorganization, rather than a mere reduction, of the degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

The central object is U(t) = (2/m)√A(r_UV) C̈_K(t), the normalized second time derivative of Krylov spread complexity; for a radial metric this equals the local combination A'(r)/(A(r)^{3/2} B(r)^{1/2}). The comparison quantity is the covariant c-function of Ref. [34], built from the extrinsic curvature of a spacelike slice and given by eq. (2.17). The argument is carried by the dictionary of Ref. [5], which equates the growth rate of spread complexity with the proper radial momentum of an infalling probe, together with the radial geodesic equations that turn U into a purely geometric expression. The energy condition a''(r) < 0 of Ref. [36] then simultaneously yields monotonicity of c_cov and of U in the fixed-dimensional cases.

What would settle it

For a chosen flow, for example the GPPZ domain wall, compute the survival amplitude's moments from the spectral density of the dual field theory and reconstruct the Lanczos coefficients; then verify whether the resulting spread complexity and its second derivative reproduce U = A'(r)/$A^{{3/2}}$(r) exactly along the radial geodesic. Any short-time discrepancy between the reconstructed and the proper-momentum-computed complexity would falsify the dictionary on which all the relations depend.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the covariant c-function c_cov, defined through the extrinsic curvature of a spacelike slice of the holographic background, obeys a direct algebraic or parametric relation with the normalized Krylov acceleration U. In fixed-dimensional Lorentz-invariant domain walls, c_cov = 1/(G_N $U^{{d-1}}$), so the same energy condition that makes c_cov decrease toward the infrared makes U increase along the falling trajectory. For the Dp-brane family, c_cov $U^{8}$ = Υ(p), with the exponent eight universal while the normalization carries the brane dimension, the Yang–Mills coupling and the number of colors. For two flows across dimensions—a twisted compactification from four to two dimensions and wrapped M5-branes from six to four dimensions—c_cov and U are co-monotonic rather than anti-correlated. The authors interpret this reversal as evidence that U distinguishes the depletion of degrees of freedom from their reorganization into lower-dimensional sectors.

Load-bearing premise

The whole comparison rests on taking the equality between the growth rate of spread complexity and the proper radial momentum of the falling probe, which was proven only for a class of AdS3/CFT2 locally excited states, to be valid for all holographic RG flows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For Lorentz-invariant domain-wall flows, decreasing effective degrees of freedom are accompanied by an increasing acceleration of the Krylov spread along the falling trajectory.
  • Across the Dp-brane family, c_cov U^8 = Υ(p) is a radial constant, so the exponent is universal while the normalization encodes the brane dimension, the Yang–Mills coupling and the number of colors.
  • In the twisted compactification from four to two dimensions, c_cov and U obey the conservation law Q + U = 4 with Q ∝ c_cov^{1/3}, so both grow together toward the infrared.
  • In the wrapped-M5 flow from six to four dimensions, c_cov and U are co-monotonic, with explicit ultraviolet and infrared expansions showing the same increase, indicating the reorganization of degrees of freedom.
  • The short-time expansion of the spread complexity relates the first Lanczos coefficient to the value of U at the release point, connecting the geometric relations to microscopic spectral data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the proper-momentum dictionary is trusted beyond its proven AdS3/CFT2 setting, the same comparison could serve as a quick diagnostic for other families of flows: a sign change in the c_cov–U correlation would flag a flow that reorganizes rather than merely depletes its degrees of freedom.
  • The co-monotonic reversal suggests a block-Lanczos picture in which compactification splits the spectrum into zero modes and Kaluza–Klein towers, so co-monotonicity could arise from probability transfer between coupled Krylov blocks even when each block individually behaves like a fixed-dimensional flow.
  • A testable extension would be to compute the first few Lanczos coefficients from the short-time expansion of the complexity in these backgrounds and compare them with direct spectral calculations in the dual field theory, checking whether the combinations selected by c_cov are universal at large N.
  • The results raise the possibility of a general theorem: an energy condition on the bulk, monotonicity of the covariant central function, and a consistent one-dimensional truncation of the probe dynamics may together fix the sign of the correlation between the radial derivative of the central function and the divergence of the Krylov probability current.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Krylov spread complexity along holographic RG flows, following the proposal of Caputa et al. that the growth rate of spread complexity is the proper radial momentum of an infalling massive probe. It defines a normalized acceleration U(t) = (2/m) sqrt(A(r_UV)) \ddot{C}_K(t) and compares it with the covariant holographic c-function c_cov of Ref. [34]. The paper derives explicit relations for Lorentz-invariant domain-wall flows (c_cov = 1/(G_N U^{d-1})), for the Dp-brane family (c_cov U^8 = constant), and for two flows across dimensions (compactified Klebanov-Witten and wrapped M5), where c_cov and U are found to be co-monotonic. The authors interpret the fixed-dimension anti-correlation as depletion of degrees of freedom and the across-dimension co-monotonicity as reorganization of degrees of freedom. The paper explicitly flags that the proper-momentum/spread-complexity dictionary is established only for a class of AdS3/CFT2 states and that its use in more general backgrounds is an extension.

Significance. If the dictionary holds, the paper provides a simple and elegant geometric link between the acceleration of Krylov spread and a holographic central function, with explicit monotonicity statements and universal exponents. The metric manipulations are internally consistent, the paper is transparent about validity windows (Dp-branes, singular endpoints, internal-angle choices), and Appendix A gives short-time Lanczos formulas that could serve as falsifiable checks. The central physical claim, however, is conditional on an unproven extension of the proper-momentum dictionary, and the across-dimensional interpretation would require an independent boundary-side calculation of an IR central charge. As a set of algebraic relations among geometric quantities, the paper is sound; as a statement about boundary Krylov complexity, it is not yet established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (2.10)-(2.11); Sec. 6] The equality dC_K/dt = proper radial momentum is imported from Ref. [5], where it was derived for a class of AdS3/CFT2 locally excited states. The present paper applies it to ten- and eleven-dimensional, non-conformal, and across-dimensional flows and explicitly labels this a physically motivated extension. Because every relation in Sections 3-5 is an algebraic consequence of U = A'/sqrt(A^3 B), if this dictionary fails then U is merely a combination of metric functions and none of the statements about boundary Krylov complexity follow. The conditional nature is acknowledged, but the central claim is not yet supported. I would ask for at least one independent boundary-side consistency check, for example using Eqs. (A.3)-(A.4) to compute b_1^2 and the combination 2 b_2^2 - 4 b_1^2 - (a_1-a_0)^2 from a known spectral function or an explicit CFT calculation, and comparing with the bulk U and its derivative. Without such a check, the paper's headline result remains conditional.
  2. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.7)-(5.8), (5.21)-(5.26)] The claim that co-monotonicity of c_cov and U in across-dimensional flows reflects reorganization rather than depletion is interpretive and is not backed by a field-theoretic computation. The quantity c_cov is computed from the higher-dimensional covariant formula (2.17) with the UV spacetime dimension held fixed (d=4 for the compactified Klebanov-Witten flow, d=6 for the wrapped-M5 flow), so its monotonic increase is a property of a geometric functional in the higher-dimensional description, not a direct measure of the number of degrees of freedom in the IR CFT. To make the 'reversal' substantive, the authors should compare c_cov(IR) with an independent IR central charge (e.g., the Brown-Henneaux central charge for the AdS3 IR or the a-central charge for the four-dimensional SCFT) and show that the co-monotonic relation tracks that physical quantity. Without such a comparison, the interpretation is not forced by the calculations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.7)] The Newton constant should appear in the denominator: from Eq. (3.5), d c_cov/dr = (1-d) 2^{d-1} a''/(G_N^{(d+1)} (a')^d). As written with G_N in the numerator, the expression is dimensionally inconsistent, although the sign conclusion is unaffected.
  2. [Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.23)] The UV expansion of U(z) should tend to the AdS7 value 2, but the displayed factor 3 U_0 2^{1/3} with U_0 = 2^{4/3}/3 evaluates to 2^{5/3}, not 2. The exponent appears to have the wrong sign; the correct UV limit is 3 U_0 2^{-1/3}.
  3. [Sec. 5.1, text after Eq. (5.14)] The final relations depend on the chosen stationary internal angles (theta_0, psi_0) = (0,0). The paper states that other choices change the value of \tilde{\Delta}(r, theta_0, psi_0), but it does not check whether the co-monotonicity and the parametric relation (5.22) are robust to the other allowed stationary points.
  4. [Figs. 1, 3-5] The figure captions refer to U(t) as the 'second derivative of complexity'. By Eq. (1.3), U is the normalized second derivative, so the captions should say 'normalized acceleration of spread complexity' to avoid confusion.
  5. [Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (5.29)-(5.30)] The 'conservation law' Q + U = 4 is a simple algebraic rewriting of Eq. (5.8) and should be presented as such, rather than as an independent dynamical constraint.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the U–ccov relations are derived algebraic identities, not fitted predictions; the only self-citations are the published covariant c-function [34] and a 'to appear' convention reference, neither of which is load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: (i) assume the external proper-momentum dictionary of Ref. [5] for the spread-complexity rate, giving equations (2.11)-(2.13) in which U is a local combination of metric functions; (ii) adopt the covariant c-function formula (2.17) from Ref. [34], a published paper co-authored by Nunez; (iii) substitute the relevant background metrics into both formulas. The advertised relations ccov = 1/(G U^{d-1}), ccov U^8 = Υ(p), and ccov = (b/G)(4-U)^{-3} then follow as algebraic identities between two quantities computed from the same A(r), B(r) functions. This is a mathematical derivation rather than a circular reduction: neither quantity is fitted to the other, no target relation is assumed in the inputs, and the relations would not survive if the metric functions were varied independently. The paper also explicitly flags that the proper-momentum dictionary is established sharply only for AdS3/CFT2 states in Ref. [5] and is being extended to non-conformal higher-dimensional flows; this is a stated validity limitation, not a circular step. The only self-citation with any load is the c-function definition from [34], but it is a parameter-free published formula and the complexity side is independently defined, so this is a minor non-load-bearing self-citation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own work. The Appendix A relation between b1^2 and U(0) is likewise a rewrite of the short-time definition of spread complexity, but it is not used as an independent confirmation of the main claims. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained once the two quoted proposals are accepted; the residual concern is one of external validity, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central relations are purely geometric given the bulk metric, but the connection to boundary Krylov complexity rests on an unproved prescription and on a self-cited c-function definition. No new particles, forces or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Internal angle values (theta0, psi0) in the wrapped-M5 example = (0, 0)
    Chosen because it solves the stationarity conditions for the internal angles; the authors note that other stationary choices change Delta~ and hence U, so the quantitative ccov-U relation is point dependent.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The rate of Krylov spread complexity equals the proper radial momentum of an infalling massive bulk probe.
    Established in Ref. [5] for a class of AdS3/CFT2 states and assumed here for all holographic RG flows; the paper itself labels this a physically motivated extension.
  • domain assumption The covariant c-function formula (2.17) adopted from Ref. [34] is a valid measure of effective degrees of freedom along RG flows.
    The formula is quoted without derivation, and Ref. [34] shares an author with the present paper; no independent benchmark is supplied.
  • domain assumption A radial geodesic with all other coordinates held constant is a consistent truncation of the probe dynamics.
    The paper verifies this only for the specific examples and for representative internal angles; in general, internal coordinates may couple to the radial motion, as acknowledged around eq. (5.13).
  • domain assumption The weak energy condition and positive scalar kinetic metric hold for the fixed-dimension domain-wall flows.
    Used to establish a''(r) < 0, which drives both the monotonic decrease of ccov and the monotonic increase of U in Section 3.
  • domain assumption The supergravity backgrounds remain trustworthy along the relevant radial interval.
    For Dp-branes, the dilaton and Ricci curvature diverge outside a finite window, as the paper states in its word of caution; for GPPZ, the singular infrared endpoint is excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Krylov Complexity and $c$-function along RG Flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NVO5NIX

@misc{pith2026260802715,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Krylov Complexity and $c$-function along RG Flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NVO5NIX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02715}
}
abstract

We investigate Krylov spread complexity along holographic renormalisation-group flows using the proposal that its growth rate is captured by the proper radial momentum of an in-falling massive probe. We focus on the second time derivative of the complexity ${U}$, which is determined locally by the redshift and radial metric functions of the dual geometry. For Lorentz-invariant domain-wall flows preserving the spacetime dimension, we derive a new relation between ${U}$ and the covariant central charge $c_{\text{cov}}$. The decrease of the covariant central function towards the infrared is accompanied by a monotonic increase of the complexity acceleration. For the top-down Dp-brane family, we obtain a universal relation. We then examine flows across dimensions, including a twisted compactification from four to two dimensions and from six to four dimensions. In these examples $c_{\rm cov}$ and ${U }$ are co-monotonic, in sharp contrast with the inverse correlation characteristic of fixed-dimensional flows. We argue that this reversal reflects the reorganisation, rather than simple depletion, of degrees of freedom into lower-dimensional sectors under compactification. Our results identify complexity acceleration as a sensitive geometric diagnostic connecting information spreading, holographic central functions and RG evolution.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [34]

    Covariant unification of holographic c-functions

    N. Jokela, J. Kastikainen, C. Nunez, J. M. Pen ´ ın and H. Ruotsalainen,Covariant unification of holographic c-functions,2605.18942

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [5]

    Caputa, B

    P. Caputa, B. Chen, R. W. McDonald, J. Sim´ on and B. Strittmatter,Spread Complexity Rate as Proper Momentum,2410.23334

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Nandy, A

    P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Mart ´ ınez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky and A. del Campo,Quantum dynamics in Krylov space: Methods and applications,Phys. Rept.1125-1128(2025) 1 [2405.09628]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [2]

    Baiguera, V

    S. Baiguera, V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, S. Chapman, J. Haferkamp, M. P. Heller et al.,Quantum complexity in gravity, quantum field theory, and quantum information science,2503.10753

    arXiv

  5. [3]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Krylov Complexity,2507.06286

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    M¨ uck,Krylov complexity has it all,2605.28681

    W. M¨ uck,Krylov complexity has it all,2605.28681

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    J. L. F. Barbon, J. Martin-Garcia and M. Sasieta,A Generalized Momentum/Complexity Correspondence,JHEP04(2021) 250 [2012.02603]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    J. L. F. Barbon, J. Martin-Garcia and M. Sasieta,Proof of a Momentum/Complexity Correspondence, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 101901 [2006.06607]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 91 references
  1. [8]

    Fan,Momentum-Krylov complexity correspondence,2411.04492

    Z.-Y. Fan,Momentum-Krylov complexity correspondence,2411.04492. – 22 –

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    He,Revisit the relationship between spread complexity rate and radial momentum,2411.19172

    P.-Z. He,Revisit the relationship between spread complexity rate and radial momentum,2411.19172

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Li and J

    Z. Li and J. Tian,The holography of spread complexity. A story of observers,JHEP07(2026) 187 [2506.13481]

    2026 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Fatemiabhari, H

    A. Fatemiabhari, H. Nastase, C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov complexity in confining gauge theories,2511.22717

  5. [12]

    Fatemiabhari, H

    A. Fatemiabhari, H. Nastase, C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov Complexity for Conformal Quiver Gauge Theories,2512.14812

  6. [13]

    Fatemiabhari and C

    A. Fatemiabhari and C. Nunez,Krylov Complexity, Confinement and Universality,2602.17757

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    Fatemiabhari, C

    A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez and R. T. Santamaria,Complexity and Operator Growth in Holographic 6d SCFTs,2603.10106

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Nastase, C

    H. Nastase, C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov Complexity for Charged, Composite and Extended Probes,2604.07432

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Chatzis, M

    D. Chatzis, M. Hammond, C. Nunez, A. V. Ramallo and R. T. Santamaria,Holographic Spread Complexity from Branes and Strings,2607.00074

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov complexity for Yang-Baxter deformed supergravity backgrounds, 2601.06555

    D. Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov complexity for Yang-Baxter deformed supergravity backgrounds, 2601.06555

  11. [18]

    Zoakos,Holographic Krylov complexity in the Coulomb branch ofN= 4 SYM,JHEP06(2026) 066 [2603.15435]

    D. Zoakos,Holographic Krylov complexity in the Coulomb branch ofN= 4 SYM,JHEP06(2026) 066 [2603.15435]

    2026 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Roychowdhury,Krylov complexity for Lin-Maldacena geometries and their holographic duals,JHEP 05(2026) 197 [2604.16977]

    D. Roychowdhury,Krylov complexity for Lin-Maldacena geometries and their holographic duals,JHEP 05(2026) 197 [2604.16977]

    2026 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Roychowdhury,Krylov state complexity for BMN matrix model,2605.10786

    D. Roychowdhury,Krylov state complexity for BMN matrix model,2605.10786

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    Roychowdhury,Krylov Complexity for Plane Wave Matrix Model,2605.26055

    D. Roychowdhury,Krylov Complexity for Plane Wave Matrix Model,2605.26055

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Alfinito and M

    E. Alfinito and M. Beccaria,Krylov Correlators insl(2,R)Models: Exact Results and Holographic Complexity,2605.17550

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Bitaghsir Fadafan and M

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan and M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar,Holographic Krylov Complexity with Lifshitz Scaling and Hyperscaling Violation,2606.31724

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    E. L. Graef, J. Murugan, H. Nastase and H. J. R. Van Zyl,On the Universality of Probe Complexity in N= 4SYM,2606.21662

    arXiv

  18. [25]

    Roychowdhury,Krylov complexity and spectral density of BMN matrix model,2607.24632

    D. Roychowdhury,Krylov complexity and spectral density of BMN matrix model,2607.24632

    arXiv

  19. [26]

    Qu,Lanczos meets orthogonal polynomials,JHEP05(2026) 225 [2512.15857]

    L.-C. Qu,Lanczos meets orthogonal polynomials,JHEP05(2026) 225 [2512.15857]

    2026

  20. [27]

    Alfinito and M

    E. Alfinito and M. Beccaria,Krylov Complexity in Supersymmetric Large-NQuantum Mechanics, 2603.16291

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    Baume, A

    F. Baume, A. C ¸ avu¸ so˘ glu, V. Chakrabhavi and J. J. Heckman,Controlled Chaos in 4D SCFTs, 2606.23785

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Anabal´ on, D

    A. Anabal´ on, D. Astefanesei, J. Oliva, G. Ortega and J. Urbina,Phase transitions and black hole stability in gaugedN= 8 supergravity,JHEP03(2026) 017 [2512.05088]

    2026

  23. [30]

    Anabal´ on, H

    A. Anabal´ on, H. Nastase, C. Nunez, M. Oyarzo and R. Stuardo,Moduli space ofN= 4 super Yang-Mills from AdS/CFT,JHEP05(2026) 251 [2603.18141]

    2026

  24. [31]

    Elander and M

    D. Elander and M. Piai,Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography,2607.22497. – 23 –

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Anabal´ on, S

    A. Anabal´ on, S. Maurelli, M. Oyarzo and M. Trigiante,Supersymmetric Moduli Space and Vacua with Vector Fields inD= 4GaugedN= 8Supergravity,2607.24477

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Li and J

    Z. Li and J. Tian,Comments on holographic spread complexity,2607.18024

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nunez, J

    C. Nunez, J. F. Pedraza and J. G. Subils,To appear,2608.xxxx

  28. [36]

    D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner,Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 363 [hep-th/9904017]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Alvarez and C

    E. Alvarez and C. Gomez,Geometric holography, the renormalization group and the c theorem,Nucl. Phys. B541(1999) 441 [hep-th/9807226]

    1999 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Sahakian,Holography, a covariant c function, and the geometry of the renormalization group,Phys

    V. Sahakian,Holography, a covariant c function, and the geometry of the renormalization group,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 126011 [hep-th/9910099]

    2000 arXiv

  31. [39]

    N. T. Macpherson, C. N´ u˜ nez, L. A. Pando Zayas, V. G. J. Rodgers and C. A. Whiting,Type IIB supergravity solutions with AdS 5 from Abelian and non-Abelian T dualities,JHEP02(2015) 040 [1410.2650]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Y. Bea, J. D. Edelstein, G. Itsios, K. S. Kooner, C. Nunez, D. Schofield et al.,Compactifications of the Klebanov-Witten CFT and new AdS 3 backgrounds,JHEP05(2015) 062 [1503.07527]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Merrikin, C

    P. Merrikin, C. N´ u˜ nez and R. Stuardo,Compactification of 6d N=(1,0) quivers, 4d SCFTs and their holographic dual Massive IIA backgrounds,Nucl. Phys. B996(2023) 116356 [2210.02458]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C´ aceres, R

    E. C´ aceres, R. Castillo V´ asquez, K. Landsteiner and I. Salazar Landea,Holographic a-functions and Boomerang RG flows,JHEP02(2024) 019 [2310.15983]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Susskind,Why do Things Fall?,1802.01198

    L. Susskind,Why do Things Fall?,1802.01198

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Susskind,Complexity and Newton ’s Laws,Front

    L. Susskind,Complexity and Newton ’s Laws,Front. in Phys.8(2020) 262 [1904.12819]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    D. S. Ageev and I. Y. Aref’eva,When things stop falling, chaos is suppressed,JHEP01(2019) 100 [1806.05574]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Pilch and N

    K. Pilch and N. P. Warner,N=2 supersymmetric RG flows and the IIB dilaton,Nucl. Phys. B594 (2001) 209 [hep-th/0004063]

    2001 arXiv

  39. [47]

    R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler,Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 95 [hep-th/9503121]

    1995 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Girardello, M

    L. Girardello, M. Petrini, M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni,The Supergravity dual of N=1 superYang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B569(2000) 451 [hep-th/9909047]

    2000 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Petrini, H

    M. Petrini, H. Samtleben, S. Schmidt and K. Skenderis,The 10d Uplift of the GPPZ Solution,JHEP07 (2018) 026 [1805.01919]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bobev, F

    N. Bobev, F. F. Gautason, B. E. Niehoff and J. van Muiden,Uplifting GPPZ: a ten-dimensional dual of N= 1 ∗,JHEP10(2018) 058 [1805.03623]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Pilch and N

    K. Pilch and N. P. Warner,N=1 supersymmetric renormalization group flows from IIB supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2002) 627 [hep-th/0006066]

    2002 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Consistent Type IIB Reductions to Maximal 5D Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 065004 [1506.01385]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. S. Gubser,Dilaton driven confinement,hep-th/9902155. – 24 –

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Kehagias and K

    A. Kehagias and K. Sfetsos,On Running couplings in gauge theories from type IIB supergravity,Phys. Lett. B454(1999) 270 [hep-th/9902125]

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    D. Z. Freedman, C. Nunez, M. Schnabl and K. Skenderis,Fake supergravity and domain wall stability, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 104027 [hep-th/0312055]

    2004 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Itzhaki, J

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 046004 [hep-th/9802042]

    1998 arXiv

  49. [57]

    H. J. Boonstra, K. Skenderis and P. K. Townsend,The domain wall / QFT correspondence,JHEP01 (1999) 003 [hep-th/9807137]

    1999 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Buchel and J

    A. Buchel and J. T. Liu,Gauged supergravity from type IIB string theory on Y**p,q manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B771(2007) 93 [hep-th/0608002]

    2007 arXiv

  51. [59]

    J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 126007 [0707.2315]

    2007 arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. P. Gauntlett, S. Kim, O. Varela and D. Waldram,Consistent supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein truncations with massive modes,JHEP04(2009) 102 [0901.0676]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Donos and J

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett,Flowing from AdS 5 to AdS3 with T 1,1,JHEP08(2014) 006 [1404.7133]

    2014 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Donos, J

    A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett and N. Kim,AdS Solutions Through Transgression,JHEP09(2008) 021 [0807.4375]

    2008 arXiv

  55. [63]

    J. P. Gauntlett, O. A. P. Mac Conamhna, T. Mateos and D. Waldram,Supersymmetric AdS(3) solutions of type IIB supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 171601 [hep-th/0606221]

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822 [hep-th/0007018]

    2001 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Maldacena,The Gravity duals of N=2 superconformal field theories,JHEP10(2012) 189 [0904.4466]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    H. Lin, O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena,Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries,JHEP10(2004) 025 [hep-th/0409174]

    2004 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Aharony, L

    O. Aharony, L. Berdichevsky and M. Berkooz,4d N=2 superconformal linear quivers with type IIA duals,JHEP08(2012) 131 [1206.5916]

    2012 arXiv

  61. [69]

    R. A. Reid-Edwards and B. Stefanski, jr.,On Type IIA geometries dual to N = 2 SCFTs,Nucl. Phys. B 849(2011) 549 [1011.0216]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Lozano and C

    Y. Lozano and C. N´ u˜ nez,Field theory aspects of non-Abelian T-duality andN=2 linear quivers,JHEP 05(2016) 107 [1603.04440]

    2016 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Nunez, D

    C. Nunez, D. Roychowdhury, S. Speziali and S. Zacarias,Holographic aspects of four dimensionalN= 2 SCFTs and their marginal deformations,Nucl. Phys. B943(2019) 114617 [1901.02888]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    N´ u˜ nez, D

    C. N´ u˜ nez, D. Roychowdhury and D. C. Thompson,Integrability and non-integrability inN= 2SCFTs and their holographic backgrounds,JHEP07(2018) 044 [1804.08621]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Nunez, I

    C. Nunez, I. Papadimitriou and M. Piai,Walking Dynamics from String Duals,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25 (2010) 2837 [0812.3655]

    2010 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Oyarzo and R. Stuardo,Confinement in (1 + 1) dimensions: a holographic perspective from I-branes,JHEP09(2023) 201 [2307.04783]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Nunez, M

    C. Nunez, M. Oyarzo and R. Stuardo,Confinement and D5-branes,JHEP03(2024) 080 [2311.17998]. – 25 –

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gursoy, C

    U. Gursoy, C. Nunez and M. Schvellinger,RG flows from spin(7), CY 4 fold and HK manifolds to AdS, Penrose limits and pp waves,JHEP06(2002) 015 [hep-th/0203124]

    2002 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Nunez, I

    C. Nunez, I. Y. Park, M. Schvellinger and T. A. Tran,Supergravity duals of gauge theories from F(4) gauged supergravity in six-dimensions,JHEP04(2001) 025 [hep-th/0103080]

    2001 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Legramandi and C

    A. Legramandi and C. Nunez,Electrostatic description of five-dimensional SCFTs,Nucl. Phys. B974 (2022) 115630 [2104.11240]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Caputa, G

    P. Caputa, G. Di Giulio and T. Q. Loc,Growth of block-diagonal operators and symmetry-resolved Krylov complexity,Phys. Rev. Res.7(2025) 043055 [2507.02033]

    2025

  72. [80]

    Caputa, G

    P. Caputa, G. Di Giulio and T. Q. Loc,Symmetry-Resolved Spread Complexity,2509.12992

  73. [81]

    Craps, O

    B. Craps, O. Evnin and G. Pascuzzi,Multiseed Krylov Complexity,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 050402 [2409.15666]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Anabalon and S

    A. Anabalon and S. F. Ross,Supersymmetric solitons and a degeneracy of solutions in AdS/CFT, JHEP07(2021) 015 [2104.14572]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Anabal´ on, H

    A. Anabal´ on, H. Nastase and M. Oyarzo,Supersymmetric AdS Solitons and the interconnection of different vacua ofN= 4Super Yang-Mills,2402.18482

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Chatzis, A

    D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez and P. Weck,SCFT deformations via uplifted solitons, 2406.01685

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Chatzis, A

    D. Chatzis, A. Fatemiabhari, C. Nunez and P. Weck,Conformal to confining SQFTs from holography, 2405.05563

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Chatzis, M

    D. Chatzis, M. Hammond, G. Itsios, C. Nunez and D. Zoakos,Supersymmetric AdS Solitons, Coulomb Branch Flows and Twisted Compactifications,2511.18128

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    Fatemiabhari and C

    A. Fatemiabhari and C. Nunez,From conformal to confining field theories using holography,JHEP03 (2024) 160 [2401.04158]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Erdmenger, S.-K

    J. Erdmenger, S.-K. Jian and Z.-Y. Xian,Universal chaotic dynamics from Krylov space,JHEP08 (2023) 176 [2303.12151]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Huh, H.-S

    K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong and J. F. Pedraza,Spread complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling,JHEP05 (2024) 137 [2312.12593]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan and Q. Wu,Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 046007 [2202.06957]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Caputa, J

    P. Caputa, J. M. Magan and D. Patramanis,Geometry of Krylov complexity,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 013041 [2109.03824]. – 26 –

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.