Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Chaos Engineering in the Wild: Findings from GitHub

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13654 v1 pith:2O7KHAGE submitted 2025-05-19 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords chaosengineeringdevelopmentmeshtoolsactivityaddressadoption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Chaos engineering aims to improve the resilience of software systems by intentionally injecting faults to identify and address system weaknesses that cause outages in production environments. Although many tools for chaos engineering exist, their practical adoption is not yet explored. This study examines 971 GitHub repositories that incorporate 10 popular chaos engineering tools to identify patterns and trends in their use. The analysis reveals that Toxiproxy and Chaos Mesh are the most frequently used, showing consistent growth since 2016 and reflecting increasing adoption in cloud-native development. The release of new chaos engineering tools peaked in 2018, followed by a shift toward refinement and integration, with Chaos Mesh and LitmusChaos leading in ongoing development activity. Software development is the most frequent application (58.0%), followed by unclassified purposes (16.2%), teaching (10.3%), learning (9.9%), and research (5.7%). Development-focused repositories tend to have higher activity, particularly for Toxiproxy and Chaos Mesh, highlighting their industrial relevance. Fault injection scenarios mainly address network disruptions (40.9%) and instance termination (32.7%), while application-level faults remain underrepresented (3.0%), highlighting for future exploration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Resilience Evaluation of Kubernetes in Cloud-Edge Environments via Failure Injection

    cs.DC 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under network delay and partition faults, cloud-edge Kubernetes deployments show tighter response-time distributions than cloud-only deployments, while cloud deployments stay more stable under bandwidth throttling and...

Pith tools