Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Temperature-induced measurement sensitivity enhancement via imaginary weak values

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Thermal noise can be turned into a resource: for a mixed Gaussian probe, post-selection on an imaginary weak value makes the quantum Fisher information grow linearly with temperature and can beat the standard strategy.

desk verdict Interesting mixed-probe post-selected QFI calculation, but the claimed advantage over the standard strategy rests on an unproven and likely wrong benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04048 v1 pith:2OJZHJKN submitted 2025-09-04 quant-ph

Lorena Ballesteros Ferraz , Alexandre Matzkin , Alok Kumar Pan This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81P5081P15
keywords weakmeasurementvaluesimaginaryquantumFisherinformationpost-selectionthermalnoiseGaussianstatesmetrology
topics The Measurement Problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the technical noise that makes a probe state mixed can be turned into a metrological resource in weak-measurement settings. It models the probe as a Gaussian wave packet whose initial momentum is drawn from a Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution at temperature T, so the mixedness of the probe is controlled by T. In the weak-coupling regime, the post-selected meter's quantum Fisher information is shown to be ℏ²|Aw|²/σ² + 2α(Im Aw)²/σ², with α = 2 m k_B T σ², so it rises linearly with temperature; for a pure probe, post-selection gives no such advantage once the success probability is counted. The same temperature that normally degrades the standard strategy can therefore sharpen parameter estimation after post-selection on an imaginary weak value. The paper also derives the signal-to-noise ratio to all orders in the coupling and shows it increases with T up to an optimal temperature, and it argues the Fisher information becomes unbounded in an idealized infinite-temperature limit.

What carries the argument

The central object is the imaginary weak value Aw = ⟨f|A|i⟩/⟨f|i⟩ — the ratio of the post-selected transition amplitude of A to the post-selection amplitude, which can be complex and lie outside A's eigenvalue range. It is generated by a weak coupling θ A⊗P followed by projection onto the post-selected system state |f⟩. The second ingredient is the thermal-mixed Gaussian probe: a fixed-width Gaussian wave packet whose initial momentum is drawn from a Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution at temperature T, giving a density operator whose purity decreases with T. The QFI is obtained through the Wigner function of the post-selected state, the Bures-distance formula for Gaussian states, and the symmetr

What would settle it

A controlled experiment with a fixed-width Gaussian beam, a random momentum spread produced by a thermal diffuser, and a post-selected imaginary weak value: measure the estimation variance of a small phase θ as T increases. If the Cramér–Rao bound δθ ≥ 1/√(N I_F) does not tighten linearly with T in the weak-coupling regime, Eq. (43) is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a regime in which preparation noise helps rather than hurts. For the thermal-mixed Gaussian probe of Eqs. (8)–(9), the quantum Fisher information of the post-selected meter state in the weak-coupling regime is Eq. (43): I_F^mixed = (ℏ²|Aw|² + 2α(Im Aw)²)/σ², with α = 2 m k_B T σ², so the QFI grows linearly with T and the growth is controlled by the imaginary part of the weak value Aw = ⟨f|A|i⟩/⟨f|i⟩. With the post-selection probability included, the ratio to the pure-probe post-selected case is R_post = 1 + 4 m k_B T (Im⟨f|A|i⟩)²σ²/(ℏ²|Aw|²|⟨f|i⟩|²), which exceeds one for T > 0. The standard non-post-selected strategy's QFI decreases with T, so post-selection on a mixed

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on keeping the probe's position spread σ fixed while temperature only broadens its momentum distribution; a genuinely thermal state, whose position variance also grows with T, need not show the same enhancement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equation (43) predicts that for a fixed-width Gaussian probe, each unit increase in temperature adds 4 m k_B (Im Aw)² to the quantum Fisher information of the post-selected meter, so the estimation error bound δθ ≥ 1/√(N I_F) tightens as the probe is warmed.
  • Including the post-selection probability, the ratio R_post = 1 + 4 m k_B T (Im⟨f|A|i⟩)²σ²/(ℏ²|Aw|²|⟨f|i⟩|²) exceeds one for any T > 0, so the post-selected mixed protocol genuinely outperforms the pure-probe post-selected case.
  • The SNR behaves differently: in the weak regime it rises with T as sqrt(1 + 4 m k_B T σ²)/σ, but the all-order expression shows a peak followed by decline, so the paper identifies an optimal operating temperature for signal-based sensing rather than a monotonic gain.
  • For a pure probe, the QFI result I = ℏ²|Aw|²/σ² combined with the post-selection probability gives no metrological advantage, confirming the known no-go; the temperature advantage exists only for mixed probes.
  • In the infinite-temperature model of Appendix B, the post-selected Fisher information diverges (leading term 4p_max²/3), implying unbounded estimation precision in that idealized limit; the paper acknowledges this relies on unphysical resources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The effect is likely not special to heat: any symmetric momentum-noise source with variance 2 m k_B T σ² should reproduce Eq. (43), so an engineered diffuser or random-kick preparation could test the prediction at fixed σ without a real thermal bath.
  • Because only Im(Aw) enters the temperature-dependent term, the same linear growth should vanish for a real weak value and be maximised for a purely imaginary one; this gives a clean experimental dial the paper does not fully foreground.
  • A genuine thermal equilibrium state of a harmonic oscillator also broadens in position with T, so the practical gain may be bounded in equilibrium settings; the fixed-σ preparation is a non-equilibrium route to the effect.
  • The Appendix-B divergence suggests the resource is unbounded momentum support rather than temperature per se; connecting Eq. (43) to other continuous-variable QFI bounds could show how much of this survives with finite energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a Gaussian meter prepared in a temperature-controlled mixed state (Eqs. 8-9) and a two-level system. It analyzes the signal-to-noise ratio after post-selection for arbitrary coupling (Eq. 23) and the quantum Fisher information (QFI) of the post-selected meter in the weak-coupling regime (Eq. 43). The central claims are that increasing the temperature can increase both the SNR and the post-selected QFI, and that for a mixed initial probe the post-selected QFI can surpass the standard non-post-selected strategy once the post-selection probability is accounted for. The paper further claims in the abstract that the QFI might diverge with temperature, based on a truncated-identity model in Appendix B.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, it would challenge the existing consensus that post-selection cannot improve Fisher information in the presence of technical noise. The paper contains useful technical pieces: an all-order SNR expression, a careful weak-regime QFI calculation for a Gaussian mixed state, and a detailed appendix (Appendix A) giving the covariance-matrix components. The SNR enhancement in the weak regime is a legitimate and non-trivial observation, and the T-dependence of the post-selected QFI itself is a well-defined result. However, the headline claim of surpassing the standard strategy rests on an incorrect and inconsistent benchmark; the probability-weighted comparison fails in the paper's own example. Because this is the principal advertised result, the significance as a metrological-advantage claim is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.A, Eqs. (38)-(43)] The standard (no-post-selection) QFI benchmark is inconsistent. Equation (40), I_F^pure(\rho') = ℏ²⟨A²⟩_i/σ², is computed for the full system-probe state |ψ'⟩ defined in Eq. (38). For the mixed probe, the paper asserts that without post-selection the QFI is ℏ²⟨A⟩²_i/σ² at low T and decreases to zero as T grows. This is not the full-state QFI: as T→0, ρ_d(T) tends to the pure Gaussian meter, so the full-state QFI must tend to Eq. (40), i.e. ℏ²/σ², not ℏ²⟨A⟩²_i/σ². If instead ρ' is meant to be the probe state after tracing out the system, then the pure-state benchmark should also be the traced-out QFI, which is ℏ²⟨A⟩²_i/σ² and, in the model of Eqs. (8)-(9), is independent of T (the position variance is fixed at σ²). In neither reading does the asserted 'decreases to zero with temperature' benchmark follow from the model. This is load-bearing because the claimed advantage of post-selection
  2. [Sec. IV.A and Sec. III.C, illustrative example] For the paper's own example (|i⟩=cosφ|0⟩+i sinφ|1⟩, A=σ_x, |f⟩=|0⟩), one has P=cos²φ, Aw=i tanφ, and ⟨A⟩_i=0. The probability-weighted post-selected QFI from Eq. (43) is P I_F^mixed = sin²φ (ℏ² + 4m k_B T σ²)/σ². The full-state standard QFI is at least ℏ²/σ² (and increases with T in this model), so the ratio is sin²φ < 1 for φ<π/2. Thus the abstract claim that the post-selected QFI 'can surpass that of the standard strategy' is not supported by the paper's own equations when the post-selection probability is included. The comparison in Eq. (44) does not actually include the post-selection probability; it is the ratio of two post-selected-state QFIs.
  3. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B1)-(B5)] The claimed unbounded QFI in the high-temperature limit is obtained by replacing the thermal state with a truncated identity operator and then taking p_max→∞. The authors themselves note in Sec. IV.B that this behavior may be an artifact of requesting unphysical resources. As stated, this is not a physical prediction of the finite-temperature model of Eqs. (8)-(9); it is a property of a different, singular limiting state. The abstract's wording 'might diverge and grow unboundedly with temperature' should be substantially qualified, especially because the finite-T QFI in Eq. (43) is linear in T and does not diverge for finite T. This is a major issue only insofar as it is used as a headline conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (42)] The linear term ℏθx Re[Aw]/σ² appears to have an inconsistent coefficient relative to the covariance-matrix elements and the mean shifts computed in Appendix A. Please re-check the Wigner-function expansion and its agreement with Eq. (36).
  2. [Sec. IV.A, text after Eq. (43)] The sentence 'Since A²=A ensures ⟨A⟩_i ≤ 1' is inconsistent with the earlier assumption A²=I used in Eq. (17). Please clarify which operator algebra is assumed for the system observable.
  3. [Eqs. (23)-(24)] The notation in the denominator of Eq. (23) is hard to parse, e.g. 'eθ2ω′'. Please reformat to make the exponential and pre-factors explicit.
  4. [Sec. IV.A, Eq. (44)] The phrase 'Taking into account the post-selection probability' is misleading: Eq. (44) is the ratio of the mixed-state and pure-state post-selected QFIs, neither weighted by P. The post-selection probability is not present in this ratio. Please clarify how P enters the analytical comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QFI and SNR results are derived from the defined thermal Gaussian probe via standard Gaussian-state formalism; the main weakness is an unsupported (likely incorrect) comparison benchmark, which is a correctness concern, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities are derived by direct calculation rather than by fitting or by importing a conclusion through self-citation. Equation (43), I_mixed_F(ρ_ps^d) = [ℏ²|A_w|² + 2α(Im A_w)²]/σ², follows from the explicitly computed Wigner function (42) via the standard Gaussian-state Bures-distance formula (36); the temperature dependence enters only through the model's momentum variance α = 2m k_B T σ². No parameter is fitted to the target result, and no prior work by the same authors is used as a load-bearing premise; the self-citations in the introduction (e.g., Refs. [19,23,27,43,47]) are contextual and do not force the derivation. The pure-state no-advantage result is derived in Eqs. (40)-(41) with the post-selection probability included through P|A_w|² = |⟨f|A|i⟩|², independently matching external results. The mixed-state superiority claim does rest on an asserted comparison in Sec. IV.A: 'for a mixed state at low temperature it becomes I_mixed_F(ρ′) = ℏ²⟨Â⟩²_i/σ², and decreases to zero as the temperature increases.' This benchmark is not derived and appears inconsistent with the model's own Gaussian structure, but that is an unsupported or erroneous comparison, not a circular reduction: the paper does not define the post-selected QFI in terms of that benchmark or fit it to the target outcome. Appendix B's unbounded QFI is explicitly acknowledged as an artifact of the infinite-momentum idealization ('this behavior may be seen as an artifact of requesting unphysical ressources as the relevant quantities go to infinity'), so it is an idealized limit rather than a disguised restatement of the desired conclusion. No step in the derivation chain is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The axioms are standard quantum measurement theory plus the chosen thermal preparation-noise model. The only ad hoc element is the idealized infinite-temperature state in Appendix B, which is explicitly used to illustrate the divergence. There are no fitted free parameters: T, σ, m, θ, and the weak value are inputs chosen for the examples.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The initial probe state is a product of a fixed Gaussian spatial profile (width σ) and a Maxwell-Boltzmann momentum distribution at temperature T (Eqs. 6-9).
    This is the central noise model. The position variance σ² is independent of T, and the momentum spread grows with T. A different thermal model (e.g., a harmonic-oscillator thermal state) would produce different quantitative results.
  • domain assumption The technical noise is white, zero mean, and finite variance, and the system-probe initial state is a product state (Sec. II).
    This restricts the analysis to a specific class of preparation noise. Correlated or non-Gaussian noise could alter the conclusions.
  • domain assumption The weak measurement validity condition θ Im(A_w) √(2ω') ≪ 1 holds for the analytical QFI and SNR results (Sec. III.C).
    Eq. (25) and Eq. (43) are first-order in θ; the condition is stated in the text. The numerical section relaxes this, but the analytical claims are conditional on it.
  • ad hoc to paper In the infinite-temperature limit, the initial ancilla state can be approximated by the identity operator truncated to a finite momentum range [-p_max, p_max] (Appendix B).
    This is an unphysical idealization used to show unbounded Fisher information. The authors acknowledge it may be an artifact of requesting unphysical resources. The Gaussian thermal state at large T does not converge to the identity operator in a normalized sense.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Temperature-induced measurement sensitivity enhancement via imaginary weak values." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2OJZHJKN

@misc{pith2026250904048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Temperature-induced measurement sensitivity enhancement via imaginary weak values},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2OJZHJKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04048}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the potential of weak measurement and post-selection to enhance measurement sensitivity when the initial probe state is mixed. In our framework, the mixedness of the probe's density operator is controlled by temperature. We focus on two key quantities: the signal-to-noise ratio and the quantum Fisher information of the final probe state, evaluated after post-selection is applied on the system. Our analysis employs a rigorous, all-order coupling treatment of measurement, demonstrating that the signal-to-noise ratio can be enhanced in certain scenarios by increasing the temperature. However, this enhancement is fundamentally constrained by the validity conditions of the weak measurement regime. Regarding the quantum Fisher information, we find that for a pure probe state, incorporating post-selection does not improve precision beyond the standard (non-post-selected) strategy when the post-selection probability is accounted for. In contrast, when the initial probe state is mixed, the quantum Fisher information for the probe state after post-selection in the system can surpass that of the standard strategy. Notably, we show that the quantum Fisher information might diverge and grow unboundedly with temperature, illustrating a scenario where thermal noise can, counterintuitively, enhance metrological precision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04048 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The signal-to-noise ratio (Eq. 23) is plotted as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Quantum Fisher information (QFI) as a function of the temperature of the initial ancilla’s mixed state, taking into account the post-selection probability. The results are shown for three different values of interaction strength θ and four different weak values, Aw. The quantum Fisher information increases with the imaginary part of the weak value only in the weak measurement regime, provided the post-selection prob… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (26) Setting T = 0 yields the signal-to-noise ratio for the pure probe state

    Substituting the expression forω, the explicit form of S′ p can be written as (S′ p)mixed w = √ N |⟨f |i⟩| θ ℑ(Aw)√1 + 4mKBT σ2 σ . (26) Setting T = 0 yields the signal-to-noise ratio for the pure probe state. From Eq. 26, we observe that for a fixed large value of σ, the SNR can be enhanced by increas- ing the temperature T, provided the condition for th...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100.Physical review letters, 60(14):1351, 1988

    Yakir Aharonov, David Z Albert, and Lev Vaidman. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100.Physical review letters, 60(14):1351, 1988

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    weak measurement

    IM Duck, Paul M Stevenson, and EC George Sudarshan. The sense in which a" weak measurement" of a spin-1/2 particle’s spin component yields a value 100. Physical Review D, 40(6):2112, 1989

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    Complete description of a quantum system at a given time.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 24(10):2315, 1991

    Yakir Aharonov and Lev Vaidman. Complete description of a quantum system at a given time.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 24(10):2315, 1991

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    Sequential weak measurement

    Graeme Mitchison, Richard Jozsa, and Sandu Popescu. Sequential weak measurement. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 76(6):062105, 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Pre-and post-selection, weak values and contextuality

    Jeff Tollaksen. Pre-and post-selection, weak values and contextuality. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40(30):9033, 2007

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Complex weak values in quantum mea- surement

    Richard Jozsa. Complex weak values in quantum mea- surement. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 76(4):044103, 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value

    Justin Dressel and Andrew N Jordan. Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(1):012107, 2012

    work page 2012

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Measuring small longitudinal phase shifts: weak measurements or standard interferometry? Physical review letters, 105(1):010405, 2010

    Nicolas Brunner and Christoph Simon. Measuring small longitudinal phase shifts: weak measurements or standard interferometry? Physical review letters, 105(1):010405, 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak value.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 81(4):044102, 2010

    Tamás Geszti. Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak value.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 81(4):044102, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Modular values and weak values of quantum observables

    Yaron Kedem and Lev Vaidman. Modular values and weak values of quantum observables. Physical review letters, 105(23):230401, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Quantum mea- surements with preselection and postselection.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 84(5):052111, 2011

    Xuanmin Zhu, Yuxiang Zhang, Shengshi Pang, Chang Qiao, Quanhui Liu, and Shengjun Wu. Quantum mea- surements with preselection and postselection.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 84(5):052111, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Limits on amplifi- cation by aharonov-albert-vaidman weak measurement

    Tatsuhiko Koike and Saki Tanaka. Limits on amplifi- cation by aharonov-albert-vaidman weak measurement. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 84(6):062106, 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Variance control in weak-value measurement pointers

    AD Parks and JE Gray. Variance control in weak-value measurement pointers. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 84(1):012116, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    Opti- mal probe wave function of weak-value amplification

    Yuki Susa, Yutaka Shikano, and Akio Hosoya. Opti- mal probe wave function of weak-value amplification. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(5):052110, 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Full counting statistics of weak- value measurement

    Antonio Di Lorenzo. Full counting statistics of weak- value measurement. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(3):032106, 2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    Weak values are universalinvonneumannmeasurements

    Justin Dressel and Andrew N Jordan. Weak values are universalinvonneumannmeasurements. Physicalreview letters, 109(23):230402, 2012

    2012

  10. [18]

    Revisiting hardy’s paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entangle- ment and weak values.Physics Letters A, 301(3-4):130– 138, 2002

    Yakir Aharonov, Alonso Botero, Sandu Popescu, Benni Reznik, and Jeff Tollaksen. Revisiting hardy’s paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entangle- ment and weak values.Physics Letters A, 301(3-4):130– 138, 2002

    2002

  11. [19]

    Practical measurement of joint weak values and their connection to the annihilation operator

    JS Lundeen and KJ Resch. Practical measurement of joint weak values and their connection to the annihilation operator. Physics Letters A, 334(5-6):337–344, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Weak values in nonideal spin measurements: An exact treatment beyond the asymp- totic regime

    AK Pan and A Matzkin. Weak values in nonideal spin measurements: An exact treatment beyond the asymp- totic regime. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(2):022122, 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Evaluationofweakmeasurementstoallorders

    Kouji Nakamura, Atsushi Nishizawa, and Masa-Katsu Fujimoto. Evaluationofweakmeasurementstoallorders. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(1):012113, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Weak measurements be- yond the aharonov-albert-vaidman formalism

    Shengjun Wu and Yang Li. Weak measurements be- yond the aharonov-albert-vaidman formalism. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83(5):052106, 2011

    2011

  15. [23]

    Weak-value amplification in a shot-noise- limited interferometer

    Atsushi Nishizawa, Kouji Nakamura, and Masa-Katsu Fujimoto. Weak-value amplification in a shot-noise- limited interferometer. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(6):062108, 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Three-box paradox and ’cheshire cat grin’: the case of spin-1 atoms

    AK Pan and A Matzkin. Three-box paradox and ’cheshire cat grin’: the case of spin-1 atoms. J. Phys. A : Math. Theor., 46:315307, 2013

    2013

  17. [25]

    Role of weak values in strong measurements

    F De Zela. Role of weak values in strong measurements. Physical Review A, 105(4):042202, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Quantum to classical transitions via weak measurements and post-selection

    Eliahu Cohen and Yakir Aharonov. Quantum to classical transitions via weak measurements and post-selection. In Quantam Structural Studies: Classical Emergence from the Quantum Level, pages 401–425. World Scientific, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Quantum weak values and logic: an uneasy couple

    Bengt EY Svensson. Quantum weak values and logic: an uneasy couple. Foundations of Physics, 47(3):430–452, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    Geometrical interpretation of the argu- ment of weak values of general observables in n-level quantum systems

    Lorena Ballesteros Ferraz, Dominique L Lambert, and Yves Caudano. Geometrical interpretation of the argu- ment of weak values of general observables in n-level quantum systems. Quantum Science and Technology, 7(4):045028, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Interference experiment, anomalous weak value, and leggett-garg test of macrorealism.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 102:032206, 11 2020

    AK Pan. Interference experiment, anomalous weak value, and leggett-garg test of macrorealism.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 102:032206, 11 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    weak value

    NWM Ritchie, J Greg Story, and Randall G Hulet. Re- alization of a measurement of a “weak value”.Physical review letters, 66(9):1107, 1991

    1991

  23. [31]

    Measurement of quantum weak val- ues of photon polarization

    GJ Pryde, JL O’Brien, AG White, TC Ralph, and HM Wiseman. Measurement of quantum weak val- ues of photon polarization. Physical review letters, 94(22):220405, 2005

    2005

  24. [32]

    Experimental demonstration of a method to realize weak measure- ment of the arrival time of a single photon

    Qin Wang, Fang-Wen Sun, Yong-Sheng Zhang, Yun- Feng Huang, and Guang-Can Guo. Experimental demonstration of a method to realize weak measure- ment of the arrival time of a single photon. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 73(2):023814, 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    Observation of the spin hall effect of light via weak measurements

    Onur Hosten and Paul Kwiat. Observation of the spin hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science, 319(5864):787–790, 2008

    2008

  26. [34]

    Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of hardy’s paradox

    JeffSLundeenandAephraimMSteinberg. Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of hardy’s paradox. Physical review letters, 102(2):020404, 2009

    2009

  27. [35]

    Direct observation of hardy’s para- doxbyjointweakmeasurementwithanentangledphoton pair

    Kazuhiro Yokota, Takashi Yamamoto, Masato Koashi, and Nobuyuki Imoto. Direct observation of hardy’s para- doxbyjointweakmeasurementwithanentangledphoton pair. New Journal of Physics, 11(3):033011, 2009

    2009

  28. [36]

    Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak values

    David J Starling, P Ben Dixon, Andrew N Jordan, and John C Howell. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak values. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 80(4):041803, 2009

    2009

  29. [37]

    Observing the average trajecto- riesofsinglephotonsinatwo-slitinterferometer

    Sacha Kocsis, Boris Braverman, Sylvain Ravets, Mar- tin J Stevens, Richard P Mirin, L Krister Shalm, and Aephraim M Steinberg. Observing the average trajecto- riesofsinglephotonsinatwo-slitinterferometer. Science, 332(6034):1170–1173, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction.Nature, 474(7350):188–191, 2011

    Jeff S Lundeen, Brandon Sutherland, Aabid Patel, Corey Stewart, and Charles Bamber. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction.Nature, 474(7350):188–191, 2011

    2011

  31. [39]

    Charge sensing amplification via weak values measure- ment

    Oded Zilberberg, Alessandro Romito, and Yuval Gefen. Charge sensing amplification via weak values measure- ment. Physical review letters, 106(8):080405, 2011

    2011

  32. [40]

    Protecting entanglement from decoherence us- ing weak measurement and quantum measurement rever- sal

    Yong-Su Kim, Jong-Chan Lee, Osung Kwon, and Yoon- Ho Kim. Protecting entanglement from decoherence us- ing weak measurement and quantum measurement rever- sal. Nature Physics, 8(2):117–120, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    Continuous phase amplification with a sagnac interferometer

    David J Starling, P Ben Dixon, Nathan S Williams, An- drew N Jordan, and John C Howell. Continuous phase amplification with a sagnac interferometer. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 82(1):011802, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    High-precisionweakmea- surementsensingwithadaptabilityinsensitivity

    Yifan Wang, Junfan Zhu, Jiguo Wu, Rongchun Ge, FuhuaGao, andZhiyouZhang. High-precisionweakmea- surementsensingwithadaptabilityinsensitivity. Applied Physics Letters, 124(13), 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Specific detection of glu- cose by an optical weak measurement sensor.Biomedical Optics Express, 12(8):5128–5138, 2021

    Yang Xu, Lixuan Shi, Tian Guan, Cuixia Guo, Suyi Zhong, Chongqi Zhou, Hailong Zhang, Zhangyan Li, Xin- hui Xing, Yanhong Ji, et al. Specific detection of glu- cose by an optical weak measurement sensor.Biomedical Optics Express, 12(8):5128–5138, 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    Unambiguous joint detec- tion of spatially separated properties of a single photon in the two arms of an interferometer.Communications Physics, 6:203, 2023

    Surya Nahan Sahoo, Chakraborti Sanchari, Som Kan- jilal, Saumya Ranjan Behera, Dipankar Home, Alex Matzkin, and Urbasi Sinha. Unambiguous joint detec- tion of spatially separated properties of a single photon in the two arms of an interferometer.Communications Physics, 6:203, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Weak-measurement elements of reality

    Lev Vaidman. Weak-measurement elements of reality. Foundations of Physics, 26(7):895–906, 1996

    1996

  38. [46]

    Weak val- ues and the leggett-garg inequality in solid-state qubits

    Nathan S Williams and Andrew N Jordan. Weak val- ues and the leggett-garg inequality in solid-state qubits. Physical review letters, 100(2):026804, 2008

    2008

  39. [47]

    Pedagogical review of quantum measurement theory with an emphasis on weak measure- ments

    Bengt EY Svensson. Pedagogical review of quantum measurement theory with an emphasis on weak measure- ments. Quanta, 2(1):18–49, 2013

    2013

  40. [48]

    Weak values and quantum properties

    Alex Matzkin. Weak values and quantum properties. Foundations of Physics, 49:298–346, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Test of weak measurement on a two-or three-qubit computer

    Todd A Brun, Lajos Diósi, and Walter T Strunz. Test of weak measurement on a two-or three-qubit computer. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 77(3):032101, 2008

    2008

  42. [50]

    Con- textual values of observables in quantum measurements

    Justin Dressel, S Agarwal, and Andrew N Jordan. Con- textual values of observables in quantum measurements. Physical review letters, 104(24):240401, 2010

    2010

  43. [51]

    Using technical noise to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of measurements via imaginary weak values

    Yaron Kedem. Using technical noise to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of measurements via imaginary weak values. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 85(6):060102, 2012

    2012

  44. [52]

    Phase estima- tion with weak measurement using a white light source

    Xiao-Ye Xu, Yaron Kedem, Kai Sun, Lev Vaidman, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo. Phase estima- tion with weak measurement using a white light source. Physical review letters, 111(3):033604, 2013

    2013

  45. [53]

    Uncertainty limits for quantum metrology obtained from the statistics of weak measure- ments

    Holger F Hofmann. Uncertainty limits for quantum metrology obtained from the statistics of weak measure- ments. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83(2):022106, 2011

    2011

  46. [54]

    Estimation of a quantum interaction parameter using weak measurements: Theory and experiment.PhysicalReviewA—Atomic,Molecular, and Optical Physics, 86(4):040102, 2012

    Holger F Hofmann, Michael E Goggin, Marcelo P Almeida, and Marco Barbieri. Estimation of a quantum interaction parameter using weak measurements: Theory and experiment.PhysicalReviewA—Atomic,Molecular, and Optical Physics, 86(4):040102, 2012

    2012

  47. [55]

    Amplification limit of weak measurements: a variational approach

    Shengshi Pang, Todd A Brun, Shengjun Wu, and Zeng- Bing Chen. Amplification limit of weak measurements: a variational approach. Physical Review A, 90(1):012108, 2014

    2014

  48. [56]

    Weak values and weak coupling maximizing the output of weak measurements

    Antonio Di Lorenzo. Weak values and weak coupling maximizing the output of weak measurements. Annals of Physics, 345:178–189, 2014

    2014

  49. [57]

    Information ampli- fication via postselection: A parameter-estimation per- spective

    Saki Tanaka and Naoki Yamamoto. Information ampli- fication via postselection: A parameter-estimation per- spective. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 88(4):042116, 2013

    2013

  50. [58]

    When amplifica- tion with weak values fails to suppress technical noise

    George C Knee and Erik M Gauger. When amplifica- tion with weak values fails to suppress technical noise. Physical Review X, 4(1):011032, 2014

    2014

  51. [59]

    Weak value am- plification is suboptimal for estimation and detection

    Christopher Ferrie and Joshua Combes. Weak value am- plification is suboptimal for estimation and detection. Physical review letters, 112(4):040406, 2014

    2014

  52. [60]

    Quantum detection and estimation theory

    Carl W Helstrom. Quantum detection and estimation theory. Journal of Statistical Physics, 1:231–252, 1969

    1969

  53. [61]

    Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum fisher information.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 87(3):032324, 2013

    Géza Tóth and Dénes Petz. Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum fisher information.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 87(3):032324, 2013

    2013

  54. [62]

    Quantum parameter estimation using general single-mode gaussian states

    Olivier Pinel, Pu Jian, Nicolas Treps, Claude Fabre, and Daniel Braun. Quantum parameter estimation using general single-mode gaussian states. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 88(4):040102, 2013. 12

    2013

  55. [63]

    Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states.Physical Review Letters, 72(22):3439, 1994

    Samuel L Braunstein and Carlton M Caves. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states.Physical Review Letters, 72(22):3439, 1994

    1994

  56. [64]

    Un- bounded quantum fisher information in two-path inter- ferometry with finite photon number.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46(3):035302, 2012

    YR Zhang, GR Jin, JP Cao, WM Liu, and H Fan. Un- bounded quantum fisher information in two-path inter- ferometry with finite photon number.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46(3):035302, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.