Precision Beta Decay as a Probe of New Physics
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Precision beta-decay experiments can probe new physics beyond the Standard Model.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Precision beta-decay experiments have the potential sensitivity to probe new physics.
What carries the argument
Measurements of beta-decay observables such as rates, spectra, and correlation coefficients to detect deviations from Standard Model predictions.
If this is right
- Experiments can constrain or detect new scalar and tensor weak interactions.
- Precision data provide limits on beyond-Standard-Model contributions at energy scales complementary to colliders.
- Improved measurements in selected nuclei and the neutron can tighten bounds on specific new physics parameters.
- Future upgrades in detector technology and statistics will expand the searchable parameter space.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Combining beta-decay results with other low-energy probes could strengthen overall constraints on new interactions.
- Focus on particular isotopes with favorable nuclear structure may optimize experimental sensitivity.
- The approach could extend to searches for time-reversal violation or other discrete symmetries in the same systems.
Load-bearing premise
Deviations from Standard Model expectations in beta decay can be cleanly attributed to new physics rather than unaccounted experimental or theoretical effects.
What would settle it
Demonstration that all beta-decay observables remain consistent with the Standard Model even after reaching the precision levels discussed in the workshops.
read the original abstract
The document presents a summary of discussions at recent workshops at the Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions at Amherst, MA, and at the European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas at Trento, Italy, on the potential sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments towards new physics.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This manuscript is a summary of discussions from workshops at the Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions and at ECT* in Trento concerning the potential sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to new physics beyond the Standard Model.
Significance. As a workshop summary, the document provides a high-level overview of experimental prospects in nuclear beta decay for constraining BSM physics; its value lies in collating community perspectives rather than in new derivations or data.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract and title are consistent with the summary nature of the document, but the manuscript would benefit from a brief statement on the selection criteria for the topics discussed at the workshops.
- Consider adding a short section or table listing the specific observables (e.g., correlation coefficients, lifetimes) highlighted in the discussions for improved clarity.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a workshop summary and for the recommendation to accept. We appreciate the recognition that its primary value lies in collating community perspectives on the sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to BSM physics rather than presenting new derivations or data.
Circularity Check
Workshop summary document with no derivations or quantitative claims
full rationale
The paper is explicitly a summary of workshop discussions at Amherst and Trento on the sensitivity of precision beta-decay experiments to new physics. No equations, derivations, parameter fits, or predictions are advanced whose validity depends on internal reduction to inputs. The central claim is presented as the outcome of external discussions rather than a self-contained technical result. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing way. This is a standard non-finding for summary documents.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. E. Peskin, Annalen der Physik 528, 20 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[2]
M. Gonzalez-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and N. Sever- ijns, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 104, 165 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[3]
Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model
V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins, and M. Gonzalez-Alonso, Nucl. Phys. B830, 95 (2010), arXiv:0908.1754 [hep-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[4]
T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. D. Cohen, A. Fil- ipuzzi, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, M. L. Graesser, R. Gupta, and H.-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 85, 054512 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[5]
V. Cirigliano, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, and M. L. Graesser, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 46 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[6]
V. Cirigliano, S. Gardner, and B. R. Holstein, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 71, 93 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[7]
S. Alioli, V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, and E. Mereghetti, JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS (2017), 10.1007/JHEP05(2017)086
-
[8]
Charged Current Universality and the MSSM
S. Bauman, J. Erler, and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D87, 035012 (2013), arXiv:1204.0035 [hep-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
- [9]
-
[10]
C.-Y. Seng, M. Gorchtein, H. H. Patel, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241804 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[11]
A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 093006 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[12]
S. Aoki et al., arXiv:1902.08191 [hep-lat] (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08191
-
[13]
C. Y. Seng, M. Gorchtein, and M. J. Ramsey- Musolf, arXiv:1812.03352 [nucl-th] (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03352v2
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
- [14]
-
[15]
Gorchtein, arXiv:1812.04229v2 [nucl-th] (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04229v2
M. Gorchtein, arXiv:1812.04229v2 [nucl-th] (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04229v2
-
[16]
Beta Decay as a Probe of New Physics
Workshop on “Beta Decay as a Probe of New Physics” at Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions, Nov. 1- 3, 2018; https://www.physics.umass.edu/acfi/seminars- 10 and-workshops/beta-decay-as-a-probe-of-new-physics
work page 2018
-
[17]
Precise Beta Decay Calculations for Searches for New Physics
Workshop on “Precise Beta Decay Calculations for Searches for New Physics” at European Centre for Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas (Trento, Italy), Apr. 8-12, 2019; https://indico.ectstar.eu/event/42/timetable/#20190408
work page 2019
-
[18]
P. Navr´ atil, B. R. Barrett, and W. E. Ormand, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2542 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[19]
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of weak transitions in $A\,$=$\,$6--10 nuclei
S. Pastore, A. Baroni, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, S. C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C97, 022501 (2018), arXiv:1709.03592 [nucl-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[20]
D. Poˇ cani´ c, R. Alarcon, L. Alonzi, S. Baessler, S. Bal- ascuta, J. Bowman, M. Bychkov, J. Byrne, J. Calarco, V. Cianciolo, C. Crawford, E. Frlez, M. Gericke, G. Greene, R. Grzywacz, V. Gudkov, F. Hersman, A. Klein, J. Martin, S. Page, A. Palladino, S. Penttila, K. Rykaczewski, W. Wilburn, A. Young, and G. Young, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Phys...
work page 2009
-
[21]
D. Dubbers, H. Abele, S. Baeler, B. Mrkisch, M. Schu- mann, T. Soldner, and O. Zimmer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 596, 238 (2008)
work page 2008
- [22]
-
[23]
Schmidt, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)
C. Schmidt, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)
work page 2018
- [24]
-
[25]
R. Gupta, Y.-C. Jang, B. Yoon, H.-W. Lin, V. Cirigliano, and T. Bhattacharya ([Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME) Collaboration]), Phys. Rev. D 98, 034503 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[26]
O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Severijns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 142302 (2009)
work page 2009
- [27]
-
[28]
M. Gonzlez-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and N. Sever- ijns, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 104, 165 (2019)
work page 2019
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
-
[33]
D. M. Asner, R. F. Bradley, L. de Viveiros, P. J. Doe, J. L. Fernandes, M. Fertl, E. C. Finn, J. A. Formag- gio, D. Furse, A. M. Jones, J. N. Kofron, B. H. LaRoque, M. Leber, E. L. McBride, M. L. Miller, P. Mohanmurthy, B. Monreal, N. S. Oblath, R. G. H. Robertson, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, D. Rysewyk, M. G. Sternberg, J. R. Tedeschi, T. Th¨ ummler, B. A...
work page 2015
- [34]
-
[35]
F. E. Wietfeldt and G. L. Greene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1173 (2011)
work page 2011
- [36]
-
[37]
A. P. Serebrov, V. E. Varlamov, A. G. Kharitonov, A. K. Fomin, Y. N. Pokotilovski, P. Geltenbort, I. A. Krasnoschekova, M. S. Lasakov, R. R. Taldaev, A. V. Vassiljev, and O. M. Zherebtsov, Phys. Rev. C 78, 035505 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[38]
R. W. Pattie, N. B. Callahan, C. Cude-Woods, E. R. Adamek, L. J. Broussard, S. M. Clayton, S. A. Currie, E. B. Dees, X. Ding, E. M. Engel, D. E. Fellers, W. Fox, P. Geltenbort, K. P. Hickerson, M. A. Hoffbauer, A. T. Holley, A. Komives, C.-Y. Liu, S. W. T. MacDonald, M. Makela, C. L. Morris, J. D. Ortiz, J. Ramsey, D. J. Salvat, A. Saunders, S. J. Seestrom...
work page 2018
-
[39]
A. T. Yue, M. S. Dewey, D. M. Gilliam, G. L. Greene, A. B. Laptev, J. S. Nico, W. M. Snow, and F. E. Wiet- feldt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 222501 (2013)
work page 2013
- [40]
-
[41]
V. F. Ezhov, A. Z. Andreev, G. Ban, B. A. Barazov, P. Geltenbort, A. G. Gushkov, V. A. Knyzakov, N. A. Kovrizhnykh, G. B. Krygin, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, and V. L. Ryabov, JETP Letters 107, 671 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[42]
B. A. Bazarov, V. F. Ezhov, N. A. Kovrizhnykh, V. L. Ryabov, A. Z. Andreev, A. G. Glushkov, V. A. Knyazkov, and G. B. Krygin, TECHNICAL PHYSICS LETTERS 42, 663 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[43]
W. Heil, M. Beck, et al., The τSPECT Experiment (2019)
work page 2019
- [44]
-
[45]
K. Leung and O. Zimmer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 611, 181 (2009), particle Physics with Slow Neutrons
work page 2009
- [46]
-
[47]
A. P. Serebrov, E. A. Kolomensky, A. K. Fomin, I. A. Krasnoshchekova, A. V. Vassiljev, D. M. Prudnikov, I. V. Shoka, A. V. Chechkin, M. E. Chaikovskiy, V. E. Varlamov, S. N. Ivanov, A. N. Pirozhkov, P. Gel- tenbort, O. Zimmer, T. Jenke, M. Van der Grinten, and M. Tucker, PHYSICAL REVIEW C 97 (2018), 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.055503
-
[48]
Hooegerheid, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)
S. Hooegerheid, Proceedings of the Particle Physics with Slow Neutrons Conference, PPNS 2018 (2019)
work page 2018
- [49]
-
[50]
N. Nagakura, K. Hirota, S. Ieki, T. Ino, Y. Iwashita, 11 M. Kitaguchi, R. Kitahara, K. Mishima, A. Morishita, H. Oide, H. Otono, R. Sakakibara, Y. Seki, T. Shima, H. M. Shimizu, T. Sugino, N. Sumi, H. Sumino, K. Take- tani, G. Tanaka, T. Tomita, T. Yamada, S. Yamashita, M. Yokohashi, , and T. Yoshioka, Proc. of Sci., The 26th International Nuclear Physics...
work page 2017
-
[51]
Z. Tang, M. Blatnik, L. J. Broussard, J. H. Choi, S. M. Clayton, C. Cude-Woods, S. Currie, D. E. Fellers, E. M. Fries, P. Geltenbort, F. Gonzalez, K. P. Hickerson, T. M. Ito, C.-Y. Liu, S. W. T. MacDonald, M. Makela, C. L. Morris, C. M. O’Shaughnessy, R. W. Pattie, B. Plaster, D. J. Salvat, A. Saunders, Z. Wang, A. R. Young, and B. A. Zeck, Phys. Rev. Let...
work page 2018
-
[52]
J. R. Green, J. W. Negele, A. V. Pochinsky, S. N. Syrit- syn, M. Engelhardt, and S. Krieg, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114509 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[53]
C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, P. Dimopoulos, R. Frezzotti, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, C. Kallido- nis, B. Kostrzewa, G. Koutsou, M. Mangin-Brinet, A. Va- quero Avil` es-Casco, and U. Wenger, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[54]
C. C. Chang, A. N. Nicholson, E. Rinaldi, E. Berkowitz, N. Garron, D. A. Brantley, H. Monge-Camacho, C. J. Monahan, C. Bouchard, M. A. Clark, B. Jo´ o, T. Kurth, K. Orginos, P. Vranas, and A. Walker-Loud, Nature558, 91 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[55]
I. S. Towner and J. C. Hardy, Phys. Rev. C 82, 065501 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[56]
Gl¨ uck, Nuclear Physics A628, 493 (1998)
F. Gl¨ uck, Nuclear Physics A628, 493 (1998)
work page 1998
-
[57]
B. R. Holstein, Reviews of Modern Physics 46, 789 (1974)
work page 1974
-
[58]
K. Minamisono, T. Nagatomo, K. Matsuta, C. D. P. Levy, Y. Tagishi, M. Ogura, M. Yamaguchi, H. Ota, J. A. Behr, K. P. Jackson, A. Ozawa, M. Fukuda, T. Sumikama, H. Fujiwara, T. Iwakoshi, R. Matsumiya, M. Mihara, A. Chiba, Y. Hashizume, T. Yasuno, and T. Minamisono, Phys. Rev. C 84, 055501 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[59]
F. P. Calaprice, Phys. Rev. C 12, 2016 (1975)
work page 2016
- [60]
-
[61]
H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, Physics Reports 621, 165 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[62]
R. J. Furnstahl, D. R. Phillips, and S. Wesolowski, Jour- nal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics42, 034028 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[63]
S. Wesolowski, R. J. Furnstahl, J. A. Melendez, and D. R. Phillips, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46, 045102 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[64]
P. Gysbers, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, P. Navr´ atil, T. Papenbrock, S. Quaglioni, A. Schwenk, S. R. Stroberg, and K. A. Wendt, Nature Physics 15, 428 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[65]
B. R. Barrett, P. Navr´ atil, and J. P. Vary, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 69, 131 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[66]
S. R. Stroberg, A. Calci, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, S. K. Bogner, R. Roth, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 032502 (2017)
work page 2017
- [67]
-
[68]
S. Bacca and S. Pastore, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 41, 123002 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[69]
C. Ji, S. Bacca, N. Barnea, O. J. Hernandez, and N. N. Dinur, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 45, 093002 (2018)
work page 2018
- [70]
-
[71]
P. N. D. M. E. P. Collaboration, T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S. D. Cohen, R. Gupta, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon, Physical Review D 94, 054508 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[72]
A. Glick-Magid, Y. Mishnayot, I. Mukul, M. Hass, S. Vaintraub, G. Ron, and D. Gazit, Physics Letters B 767, 285 (2017)
work page 2017
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.