Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.06382 v1 pith:2PX7FFA3 submitted 2025-02-10 cs.HC

Comparing Pass-Through Quality of Mixed Reality Devices: A User Experience Study During Real-World Tasks

Francesco Vona , Julia Schorlemmer , Michael Stern , Navid Ashrafi , Maurizio Vergari , Tanja Kojic , Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons This is my paper
classification cs.HC
keywords pass-throughqualityappledevicesheadsetmetaparticipantsquest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In extended reality, pass-through enables users to view their real-world surroundings via cameras on the headset, displaying live video inside the device. This study compared the pass-through quality of three devices: Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, and Varjo XR3. Thirtyone participants performed two tasks, reading a text and solving a puzzle, while using each headset with the pass-through feature activated. Participants then rated their experiences, focusing on workload and cybersickness. Results showed that the Apple Vision Pro outperformed the Meta Quest 3 and Varjo XR3, receiving the highest ratings for pass-through quality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.