pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27137 · v1 · pith:2Q7MOCDQnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ✦ hep-ph

Hard-Region Fermion Self-Energy and Fermion--Photon Vertex in Thermal QED through Two Loops

Ali Hataei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 03:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords thermal QEDfermion self-energyhard-region contributionssoft-momentum expansionWard-Takahashi identityfermion damping rateeffective Lagrangiangauge sector decomposition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hard-region self-energy corrections in thermal QED produce no finite contribution to the fermion damping rate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the hard-region pieces of the fermion self-energy and the off-shell fermion-photon vertex in massless thermal QED, working at one-loop next-to-leading power and two-loop leading power in the soft-momentum expansion while including zero-temperature counterterms. It decomposes the loop integrals into independent statistical and gauge sectors at the integrand level, verifies the Ward-Takahashi identity and axial transversality sector by sector, and uses chiral invariance plus hermiticity to derive selection rules that restrict which powers can appear. The fully longitudinal gauge sector is shown to vanish at leading power and to reappear at next-to-leading power while still obeying the symmetry constraints. These calculations establish that the hard-region self-energy corrections do not generate any finite piece in the fermion damping rate and supply the hard input required for mass shifts, inclusive rates, and the next-to-leading-order fermionic effective Lagrangian.

Core claim

In massless thermal QED in a general covariant gauge, the hard-region fermion self-energy at two-loop leading power and one-loop next-to-leading power, together with the corresponding off-shell vertex, are evaluated after renormalization. Symmetries force a selection rule that a contribution at power r is allowed only when r + N + 1 is even. The amplitudes factor into independent statistical and gauge sectors; the Ward-Takahashi identity holds sector by sector, and the fully longitudinal gauge sector vanishes at leading power while satisfying all constraints when it reappears at next-to-leading power. The resulting hard self-energy corrections yield no finite contribution to the fermion damp

What carries the argument

Decomposition of amplitudes into independent statistical and gauge sectors at the integrand level, allowing sector-by-sector verification of the Ward-Takahashi identity and axial transversality.

If this is right

  • The hard-region self-energy supplies input for thermal mass shifts without adding a finite damping-rate term.
  • Inclusive rate calculations in thermal QED can incorporate these hard contributions directly.
  • The sector decomposition and selection rules simplify construction of the next-to-leading-order fermionic effective Lagrangian.
  • The vanishing of the fully longitudinal sector at leading power reduces the number of independent structures that must be computed at two loops.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sector decomposition may reduce computational effort when extending the calculation to three loops or to thermal QCD.
  • The selection rule on powers could be used to cross-check higher-order results in any theory with similar chiral and gauge symmetries.
  • Matching these hard-region results to soft effective theories could yield a consistent two-loop thermal effective action for fermions.

Load-bearing premise

The decomposition of the amplitudes into independent statistical and gauge sectors at the integrand level, together with the claim that the fully longitudinal gauge sector vanishes at leading power while satisfying all symmetry constraints when it reappears at next-to-leading power.

What would settle it

An explicit integration of the two-loop hard self-energy that produces a nonzero imaginary part contributing to the damping rate at finite temperature would contradict the central result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27137 by Ali Hataei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the free r/a propagators, where Lorentz indices on gauge-boson lines are suppressed. Throughout the appendices, a cross on an internal fermion or photon line denotes the insertion of these propagators. The ordinary QED Feynman rules [58] are used for each r/a assignment. Each Feynman diagram is replaced by the sum over its allowed r/a contributions. We denote virtual corrections by Σ(l;r) and Γ µν···… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The cutting-open procedure for one contribution to the rainbow self-energy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: One-Loop Feynman diagram and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Feynman diagram and r/a assignments of one-loop fermion–photon vertex. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: From left to right: cross-photon and bubble diagrams. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Distinct topologies contributing to the vertex diagram at two-loop order. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Counterterm insertions, from left to right: vertex insertion, fermion-line insertion, and photon-line insertion. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Counterterm insertions in the one-loop fermion–photon vertex: a representative vertex insertion, the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In massless thermal QED in a general covariant $R_\xi$ gauge, we compute hard-region contributions to the fermion self-energy and the off-shell fermion--photon vertex at one-loop next-to-leading power and two-loop leading power in the soft-momentum expansion. The zero-temperature counterterms are also included to renormalize these hard amplitudes. Chiral invariance restricts the off-shell two-fermion--$N$-photon vertex to vector ($\gamma_\mu$) and axial-vector ($\gamma_\mu\gamma_5$) Dirac structures. The vector part is constrained by the Ward--Takahashi identity (WTI), while the axial part is transverse to the photon momentum. The symmetries and hermiticity of the theory impose definite constraints -- including reality, momentum reversal, and fermion-leg exchange properties -- which lead to selection rules in the soft expansion: a contribution at power $r$ can be nonzero only when $r+N+1$ is even, with $N=0$ for the self-energy. At the integrand level, we decompose the amplitudes into independent statistical and gauge sectors, and verify the WTI and axial transversality sector by sector. Notably, the gauge-dependent sectors split into mixed metric--longitudinal and fully longitudinal sectors at two loops. The latter vanishes at leading power and reappears at next-to-leading power while satisfying the constraints. We show that these hard-region self-energy corrections do not generate a finite contribution to the fermion damping rate. These results provide hard-region input for mass shifts and inclusive rates, as well as for the construction of the next-to-leading-order fermionic effective Lagrangian.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes hard-region contributions to the fermion self-energy and off-shell fermion-photon vertex in massless thermal QED in a general covariant R_ξ gauge. It evaluates one-loop next-to-leading power and two-loop leading power terms in the soft-momentum expansion, includes zero-temperature counterterms for renormalization, and enforces chiral invariance, the Ward-Takahashi identity, axial transversality, and symmetry selection rules (r + N + 1 even) at the integrand level. Amplitudes are decomposed into independent statistical and gauge sectors (with further splitting into mixed metric-longitudinal and fully longitudinal sectors at two loops); the authors verify the identities sector by sector and conclude that the hard-region self-energy corrections yield no finite contribution to the fermion damping rate.

Significance. If the explicit two-loop results and integrand-level verifications hold, the work supplies necessary hard-region input for fermion mass shifts, inclusive rates, and the construction of the next-to-leading-order fermionic effective Lagrangian in thermal QED. The systematic enforcement of all listed symmetries and the demonstration that the fully longitudinal sector vanishes at leading power while reappearing consistently at NLO constitute a technical strength that increases the reliability of the damping-rate conclusion.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'the paragraph on sector decomposition and WTI verification'; adding an explicit subsection label or equation numbers for the vanishing of the fully longitudinal sector would improve traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation to accept the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct perturbative calculation with no circular reductions

full rationale

The manuscript executes an explicit two-loop hard-region computation in thermal QED via standard Feynman rules and thermal propagators. All load-bearing steps—sector decomposition at the integrand level, enforcement of WTI and axial transversality, application of symmetry selection rules (r + N + 1 even), and the conclusion of vanishing finite damping-rate contribution—are obtained by direct integration and zero-temperature renormalization rather than by fitting parameters, self-defining quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard perturbative QED in thermal field theory; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard Feynman rules and thermal propagators for massless QED in R_xi gauge
    Invoked throughout the loop computations described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Chiral invariance restricts the vertex to vector and axial-vector structures
    Stated explicitly as restricting the off-shell two-fermion-N-photon vertex.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5826 in / 1414 out tokens · 44416 ms · 2026-06-26T03:51:49.104776+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The relations forR 2 andR 4 are valid only up toO(ϵ 2)

    Radial, Angular, and Collinear Integrals The relevant radial integrals used in this work are R1 ≡ Z p 1 p NB(p) = π2T 2 6 h 1 +ϵ 24 lnA−2−2γ E + 2ℓT i +O(ϵ 2), R2 ≡ − Z p 1 p NF (p) = 1 2 R1 − π2T 2 6 ln(2)ϵ+O(ϵ 2), R3 ≡ Z p 1 p3 NB(p) = 1 4ϵ + 1 2 ℓT + ϵ 8 π2 −4γ 2 E + 4ℓ2 T −8γ 1 +O(ϵ 2), R4 ≡ Z p 1 p3 NF (p) =R 3 + ln 2 h 1 +ϵ 2ℓT + ln 2 i +O(ϵ 2), R5 ...

  2. [2]

    19 The last line vanishes iff(p 0, p) is even inp 0

    Difference-Propagator and KMS Identities The difference propagators satisfy the following relations 6 [29, 31] Z +∞ −∞ dp0 2π ∆(n) d (P)f(p 0, p) = (−i)n+1 (n−1)! Z +∞ −∞ dp0 2π ∆d(P) n 2p0 h −1 2p0 ∂ ∂p0 in−1h −f(p0, p) 2p0 io ,(A12a) Z P ∆d(P)f(p 0, ⃗ p) = Z ⃗ p f(p, ⃗ p)−f(−p, ⃗ p) 2p .(A12b) 6 The first line is obtained using the residue theorem [29, ...

  3. [3]

    Spectral Function and Fermion Self-Energy We start with the fermionic spectral function defined in position space byρ F (x, y) = {ψ(x), ¯ψ(y)} T , with Fourier transformρ F (Q). The most general Dirac decomposition gives ρF (Q) =S1+Pγ 5 +V µ γµ +A µ γµγ5 + 1 2 T µν σµν.(B9) 20 Chiral invariance impliesS=P=T µν = 0, yielding ρF (Q) =V µ(Q)γ µ +A µ(Q)γ µγ5....

  4. [4]

    , xN)ψ(z)A µ1(x1)· · ·A µN (xN),(B19) whereΓ µ1···µN (y, z;x 1,

    Two-Fermion–N-Photon Vertices We consider the part of the 1PI effective action containing two fermion fields andNexternal photon insertions, Γ[ψ, ¯ψ, A]⊃ X N≥1 (−1)N N! Z d4y d4z d4x1 · · ·d4xN ¯ψ(y)Γ µ1···µN (y, z;x 1, . . . , xN)ψ(z)A µ1(x1)· · ·A µN (xN),(B19) whereΓ µ1···µN (y, z;x 1, . . . , xN) is the two-fermion–N-photon vertex function in position...

  5. [5]

    3, are drawn using the propagator conven- tions of Fig

    Self-Energy Corrections Ther/aassignments for the one-loop fermion self-energy, shown in Fig. 3, are drawn using the propagator conven- tions of Fig. 1. Together with Eq. (2) and the ordinary QED Feynman rules, they give −iΣ(1) m (Q) =e 2 Z P Sm h ∆s(P Q)∆A(P) + ˜∆s(P)∆ R(P Q) i , −iΣ(1) ξ (Q) =ie 2(1−ξ) Z P Sξ h ∆s(P Q)∆(2) A (P) + ˜∆(2) s (P)∆ R(P Q) i ...

  6. [6]

    4a), the corresponding r/a assignments illustrated in Fig

    Vertex Corrections For the one-loop vertex (Fig. 4a), the corresponding r/a assignments illustrated in Fig. 4b yield the following contributions, respectively −ieΓ µ(1) m (Q2, Q1) =−ie 3 Z P Vm h ∆s(P Q1)∆A(P)∆ A(P Q2) + ˜∆s(P)∆ R(P Q1)∆R(P Q2) +∆ s(P Q2)∆R(P Q1)∆A(P) i −ieΓ µ(1) ξ (Q2, Q1) =e 3(1−ξ) Z P Vξ × h ∆s(P Q1)∆(2) A (P)∆ A(P Q2) + ˜∆(2) s (P)∆ R...

  7. [7]

    The Rainbow Self-Energy All allowedr/aassignments are shown in Fig. 5. Using the notation above, the sum ofr/aassignments gives −iΣ(2) Rij(Q) =e 4 Z P Z L ˆξij SRij n ˜∆(i) s (P)∆ (2) R (P Q) h ∆s(P LQ)∆(j) A (L) + ˜∆(j) s (L)∆R(P LQ) i +∆ s(P Q) ˜∆(j) s (L)∆(i) A (P) h ∆A(P LQ)∆A(P Q) +∆ R(P LQ)∆R(P Q) i +∆ s(P Q)∆s(P LQ)∆(i) A (P) h ∆(j) R (L)∆A(P Q) +∆...

  8. [8]

    The Cross-Photon and Bubble Topologies For the cross-photon and bubble topologies (see Fig. 6), we obtain the final results as −iΣ (2) Cij(Q) =e 4 Z P Z L ˆξij × ∆(j) d (L)∆(i) d (P)N B(L)NB(P)∆ R(P Q)∆R(P LQ)∆R(LQ)SCij +∆ d(L)∆d(P)N F (L)NF (P) n ∆(i) A (P−Q)∆ (j) A (L−Q)∆ A(P+L−Q)S Cij(asbs) +∆ R(L−P+Q) h ∆(i) A (P−Q)∆ (j) R (L−P)S Cij(ascs) +∆ (j) A (P...

  9. [9]

    Self-Energy The corresponding one-loop diagrams, containing the vertex counterterm and the counterterm insertions on the internal fermion and photon lines, are shown in Fig. 8. Using ther/arepresentations of the counterterm lines in Eq. (9), together with the freer/apropagators in Eq. (2), one obtains −iΣ (1) Vm,CT = 2e2δ(1) 2 Z P h ∆s(P)∆ A(P−Q)S m(as) +...

  10. [10]

    Vertex The one-loop diagrams containing the counterterm insertions are shown in Fig. 9, yielding the contributions −ieΓ µ(1) Vm,CT (Q2, Q1) =−3ie δ (1) 2 Γ µ(1) m (Q2, Q1),−ieΓ µ Vξ,CT (Q2, Q1) =−3ie δ (1) 2 Γ µ(1) ξ (Q2, Q1), −ieΓ µ(1) fIm ,CT (Q2, Q1) =e 3δ(1) 2 Z P n (P+Q 1)2∆(2) R (P Q1)∆R(P Q2) ˜∆s(P)V m +P 2∆(2) s (P)∆ A(P+Q 2 −Q 1)∆A(P−Q 1)Vm(av) +...

  11. [11]

    Two-Loop Self-Energy Results −iΣ (2;LP) m =− ie4 4 Z P Z L ∆d(L)∆d(P) × n NB(L)NB(P) h D2 − /L L.P P.Q − Q2 /P (P.Q)3 + /Q (P.Q)2 + 2DQ 2 /L L.Q(P.Q)2 i +N F (L)N ′ F (P) h D2 /P p0P.Q i +N F (L)NF (P) h D2 − /L l02L.Q + γ0 l0L.Q − q0 /L l0(L.Q)2 − /P L.P L.Q + Q2 /L (L.Q)3 +D − 2Q2 /L L.Q(P.Q)2 − 4Q2 /P (P.Q)3 − 8/L L.P P.Q − 8 /P L.Q L.P(P.Q) 2 + 8 /Q (...

  12. [12]

    One-Loop NLP Vertex −ie h V µρ(1;NLP) m i γρ = ie3D 4 Z P ∆d(P) × NF (P) n /P h K 4P µ 2(K.P) 2P.Q1P.Q2 − K 2K µ 2(K.P) 2P.Q1 + K 2K µ 2(K.P) 2P.Q2 − K 2P µQ2 1 2(K.P) 2(P.Q1)2 − K 2P µQ2 2 2(K.P) 2(P.Q2)2 + K µQ2 1 2K.P(P.Q 1)2 + K µQ2 2 2K.P(P.Q 2)2 + P µQ4 1 2K.P(P.Q 1)3 − P µQ4 2 2K.P(P.Q 2)3 i +γ µ h K 2 2K.P P.Q1 − K 2 2K.P P.Q2 − Q2 1 2(P.Q1)2 − Q2...

  13. [13]

    Two-Loop LP Vertex −ie h V µρ(2;LP) m,NB NB i γρ =− ie5 4 Z P Z L ∆d(P)∆ d(L)NB(L)NB(P) × D2 /P h − P µQ12 (P.Q1)3P.Q2 − P µQ12 2(P.Q1)2(P.Q2)2 − P µQ22 2(P.Q1)2(P.Q2)2 − P µQ22 P.Q1(P.Q2)3 + Qµ 1 2(P.Q1)2P.Q2 + Qµ 1 2P.Q1(P.Q2)2 + Qµ 2 2(P.Q1)2P.Q2 + Qµ 2 2P.Q1(P.Q2)2 i − P µ /L L.P P.Q1P.Q2 + P µ /Q1 2(P.Q1)2P.Q2 + P µ /Q1 2P.Q1(P.Q2)2 + P µ /Q2 2(P.Q1)...

  14. [14]

    V. V. Klimov, Sov. Phys. JETP55, 199 (1982)

    1982

  15. [15]

    H. A. Weldon, Phys. Rev. D26, 2789 (1982)

    1982

  16. [16]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 1338 (1990)

    1990

  17. [17]

    Arnold, G

    P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Journal of High Energy Physics2002, 030–030 (2002)

    2002

  18. [18]

    Arnold, G

    P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Journal of High Energy Physics2001, 057 (2001)

    2001

  19. [19]

    B¨ odeker, G

    D. B¨ odeker, G. D. Moore, and K. Rummukainen, Phys. Rev. D61, 056003 (2000)

    2000

  20. [20]

    Blaizot, E

    J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, and A. Rebhan, Physics Letters B470, 181–188 (1999)

    1999

  21. [21]

    M. G. Mustafa, The European Physical Journal Special Topics232, 1369–1457 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Hard Thermal Loop—Theory and applications,

    N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.140, 104136 (2025), arXiv:2404.08734 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Graf and F

    P. Graf and F. D. Steffen, Phys. Rev. D83, 075011 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nuclear Physics B337, 569 (1990)

    1990

  25. [25]

    Frenkel and J

    J. Frenkel and J. Taylor, Nuclear Physics B334, 199 (1990)

    1990

  26. [26]

    Taylor and S

    J. Taylor and S. Wong, Nuclear Physics B346, 115 (1990)

    1990

  27. [27]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nuclear Physics B339, 310 (1990)

    1990

  28. [28]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D45, R1827 (1992)

    1992

  29. [29]

    Blaizot and E

    J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, Physics Reports359, 355–528 (2002)

    2002

  30. [30]

    Mottola and Z

    E. Mottola and Z. Sz´ ep, Physical Review D81, 10.1103/physrevd.81.025014 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.025014 2010

  31. [31]

    M. E. Carrington, Physical Review D75, 10.1103/physrevd.75.045019 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.045019 2007

  32. [32]

    Mirza and M

    A. Mirza and M. E. Carrington, Physical Review D87, 10.1103/physrevd.87.065008 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.065008 2013

  33. [33]

    Kobes, G

    R. Kobes, G. Kunstatter, and K. Mak, Phys. Rev. D45, 4632 (1992)

    1992

  34. [34]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D46, 1829 (1992)

    1992

  35. [35]

    M. E. Carrington, A. Gynther, and D. Pickering, Phys. Rev. D78, 045018 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    Haque, and B

    Sumit, N. Haque, and B. K. Patra, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep05(2023)171 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)171 2023

  37. [37]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D42, 2156 (1990)

    1990

  38. [38]

    Schulz, Nuclear Physics B413, 353 (1994)

    H. Schulz, Nuclear Physics B413, 353 (1994)

    1994

  39. [39]

    M. L. Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  40. [40]

    Carignano, C

    S. Carignano, C. Manuel, and J. Soto, Physics Letters B780, 308–312 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    Manuel, J

    C. Manuel, J. Soto, and S. Stetina, Phys. Rev. D94, 025017 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Gorda, R

    T. Gorda, R. Paatelainen, S. S¨ appi, and K. Sepp¨ anen, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep08(2023)021 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)021 2023

  43. [43]

    Carignano, M

    S. Carignano, M. E. Carrington, and J. Soto, Physics Letters B801, 135193 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Gorda, A

    T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. ¨Osterman, R. Paatelainen, S. S¨ appi, P. Schicho, K. Sepp¨ anen, and A. Vuorinen, Phys. Rev. D 107, 036012 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Ekstedt, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep06(2023)135 (2023)

    A. Ekstedt, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep06(2023)135 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)135 2023

  46. [46]

    Ayala and A

    A. Ayala and A. Bashir, Physical Review D64, 10.1103/physrevd.64.025015 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.025015 2001

  47. [47]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Math- ematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  48. [48]

    J. S. Ball and T.-W. Chiu, Phys. Rev. D22, 2542 (1980)

    1980

  49. [49]

    Kizilers¨ u, M

    A. Kizilers¨ u, M. Reenders, and M. Pennington, Physical Review D52, 1242–1259 (1995)

    1995

  50. [50]

    Kızılers¨ u and M

    A. Kızılers¨ u and M. R. Pennington, Physical Review D79, 10.1103/physrevd.79.125020 (2009)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.125020 2009

  51. [51]

    Fueki, H

    Y. Fueki, H. Nakkagawa, H. Yokota, and K. Yoshida, Progress of Theoretical Physics107, 759–784 (2002)

    2002

  52. [52]

    M. E. Carrington, H. Defu, and M. H. Thoma, Physical Review D58, 10.1103/physrevd.58.085025 (1998)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.085025 1998

  53. [53]

    D. F. Hou and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. D55, 4450 (1997)

    1997

  54. [54]

    D. F. Hou, M. E. Carrington, R. Kobes, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. D61, 085013 (2000). 36

    2000

  55. [55]

    Braaten and A

    E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Physical Review D51, 6990–7006 (1995)

    1995

  56. [56]

    Jantzen, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 10.1007/jhep12(2011)076 (2011)

    B. Jantzen, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 10.1007/jhep12(2011)076 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2011)076 2011

  57. [57]

    Schulz, Nuclear Physics B413, 353–395 (1994)

    H. Schulz, Nuclear Physics B413, 353–395 (1994)

    1994

  58. [58]

    L. V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  59. [59]

    Landsman and C

    N. Landsman and C. van Weert, Physics Reports145, 141 (1987)

    1987

  60. [60]

    M. A. van Eijck, R. Kobes, and C. G. van Weert, Physical Review D50, 4097–4109 (1994)

    1994

  61. [61]

    Carrington, H

    M. Carrington, H. Defu, and M. Thoma, The European Physical Journal C7, 347–354 (1999)

    1999

  62. [62]

    Carrington, T

    M. Carrington, T. Fugleberg, D. Irvine, and D. Pickering, The European Physical Journal C50, 711–727 (2007)

    2007

  63. [63]

    Ghiglieri, A

    J. Ghiglieri, A. Kurkela, M. Strickland, and A. Vuorinen, Physics Reports880, 1–73 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    Caron-Huot, JHEP2009(04), 004

    S. Caron-Huot, JHEP2009(04), 004

  65. [65]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B44, 189 (1972)

    1972

  66. [66]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison, Commun. Math. Phys.52, 11 (1977)

    1977

  67. [67]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. , 109357 (2024), arXiv:2312.14089 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.256, 107478 (2020), arXiv:2001.04407 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.207, 432 (2016), arXiv:1601.01167 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. B¨ ohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun.64, 345 (1991)

    1991

  71. [71]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

    1995

  72. [72]

    Blaizot and U

    J.-P. Blaizot and U. Reinosa, Nuclear Physics A764, 393–422 (2006)

    2006

  73. [73]

    Espinosa, Physical Review D71, 10.1103/physrevd.71.065009 (2005)

    O. Espinosa, Physical Review D71, 10.1103/physrevd.71.065009 (2005)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.065009 2005

  74. [74]

    Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  75. [75]

    J. F. Donoghue and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D28, 340 (1983)

    1983

  76. [76]

    Ahmed and S

    K. Ahmed and S. Saleem, Phys. Rev. D35, 4020 (1987)

    1987

  77. [77]

    Ahmed and S

    K. Ahmed and S. Saleem, Phys. Rev. D35, 1861 (1987)

    1987

  78. [78]

    J. F. Donoghue, B. R. Holstein, and R. W. Robinett, Annals Phys.164, 233 (1985), [Erratum: Annals Phys. 172, 483 (1986)]

    1985

  79. [79]

    Bonciani, P

    R. Bonciani, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, Nuclear Physics B702, 359–363 (2004)

    2004

  80. [80]

    Bonciani, P

    R. Bonciani, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, Nuclear Physics B676, 399–452 (2004)

    2004

Showing first 80 references.