Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 109 references

Derivation and application of sheath boundary conditions for drift-kinetic simulations in a linear plasma device based on a gyromoment approach

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Physical sheath boundary conditions raise outflow and lower density in linear-device simulations.

desk verdict A clean, parameter-free derivation of sheath BCs for a gyromoment drift-kinetic model, but the simulations used to test it run at a collisionality that violates the very ordering the derivation relies on. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12205 v1 pith:2QJ2ZDS6 submitted 2026-08-12 physics.plasm-ph math-phmath.MP

Jacob Emil Mencke , Thomas Stucker , Paolo Ricci This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phmath-phmath.MP PACS 52.40.Kh52.65.-y
keywords sheathboundaryconditionsdrift-kineticgyromomentsHermite-LaguerreexpansioncollisionalpresheathlinearplasmadeviceoutflowBohmcondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives boundary conditions for a drift-kinetic plasma model at the entrance to the collisional presheath, the thin layer just outside the Debye sheath where collisions still matter and the bulk plasma equations hold. Starting from a Hermite-Laguerre gyromoment expansion of the ion distribution, the authors close the moment hierarchy by assuming the ions there form a local Maxwellian, and require the reduced parallel equations to have a nontrivial solution. That gives a parallel outflow speed $U_\parallel = \pm 1.10\sqrt{T_e}\sqrt{1 + 1.37\,\tau_i T_i/T_e}$, plus fixed gradient (Neumann) conditions for density, temperatures, potential, and all gyromoments. In simulations of a linear plasma device, these physical conditions produce a significantly larger outflow to the walls and a significantly smaller density throughout the device than the ad hoc Bohm plus homogeneous Neumann conditions used previously, while leaving the turbulence essentially unchanged.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gyromoment representation of the ion distribution, $N_i^{pj}(\mathbf{R},t)$, obtained by projecting onto Hermite polynomials in parallel velocity and Laguerre polynomials in magnetic moment. The argument is carried by the high-collisionality closure: setting the Dougherty collision operator to zero (Eq. 4) makes all gyromoments those of a local Maxwellian, so the moment hierarchy collapses to five fluid-like equations whose parallel gradients form a matrix $M$ (Eq. 10). The boundary conditions are obtained by demanding $\det M = 0$ and reading off the null vector, which yields the Dirichlet condition on $U_\parallel$ and inhomogeneous Neumann conditions on every other field.

What would settle it

Run a kinetic simulation that resolves the Debye sheath for the same linear-device parameters (or measure the parallel ion flow in a dense, cold linear device) and compare the flow at the collisional presheath entrance with $U_\parallel = \pm 1.10\sqrt{T_e}\sqrt{1 + 1.37\,\tau_i T_i/T_e}$ against the Bohm value $\sqrt{T_e + \tau_i T_i}$; if the measured flow follows the Bohm value, the new boundary conditions are not the right description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is a set of boundary conditions that replace the commonly used ad hoc prescriptions for a gyromoment drift-kinetic model in a linear device with perpendicular magnetic-field incidence on the wall. The conditions are derived, not assumed: treating the sheath as steady and parallel-dominated, the electrons as a cut-off Maxwellian, and the ions as highly collisional reduces the first gyromoment equations to a linear system $M\mathbf{X} = 0$ for the parallel gradients of $\phi$, $N_e$, $T_e$, $U_\parallel$, and $T_i$. Requiring a non-trivial solution forces the outflow speed to $U_\parallel = \pm 1.10 \sqrt{T_e}\sqrt{1 + 1.37\,\tau_i T_i/T_e}$, and the null-space solution fixes the gradients of all fields and the parallel current. When implemented with a first-order forward finite-difference scheme, these physical boundary conditions cause a larger drop in density at the sheath entrance and a larger plasma outflow than the previous ad hoc Bohm/homogeneous Neumann conditions, giving a lower steady-state density everywhere in the device while preserving ambipolar outflows and leaving the Kelvin-Helmholtz-driven turbulence unchanged.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that at the collisional presheath entrance the ion distribution is collision-dominated enough to be a local Maxwellian, so that setting the Dougherty collision operator to zero closes the moment hierarchy; the simulations that use the new boundary conditions actually move the ion distribution farther from a bi-Maxwellian, so that assumption is strained exactly where it is needed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The new boundary conditions are implementable at the same numerical resolution: the simulations converge with $(P,J)=(2,1)$ gyromoments, matching the resolution needed for the ad hoc conditions.
  • Plasma density in the whole device is lower under the physical conditions because the density gradient at the sheath entrance is set by the outflow condition rather than by a zero-gradient assumption.
  • The outflows of ions and electrons stay ambipolar at the sheath entrance, with $\phi/T_e$ adjusting to match the larger ion outflow.
  • The odd-$p$ gyromoments grow under the physical conditions, so the ion distribution deviates more from a bi-Maxwellian near the wall even though the bulk remains well described by few moments.
  • Turbulence statistics are not changed by the boundary condition: the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability drive remains the same.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The determinant-vanishing route should extend to oblique field incidence; the magnetic presheath would introduce an additional scale and likely make the outflow coefficient angle-dependent, but the same linear-system structure should survive.
  • Because the physical boundary conditions push the distribution away from a bi-Maxwellian, the assumed closure may underestimate the number of gyromoments needed near the wall; a version with more moments or a non-Maxwellian closure could shift the numerical value 1.10.
  • A direct experimental check is possible in dense, cold linear devices: measuring the parallel ion flow near the wall and the density drop at the sheath entrance would distinguish the new outflow law from the Bohm law.
  • The same style of boundary conditions could be adapted to detached divertor conditions in tokamaks, where the plasma near the target is also collision-dominated, replacing logical-sheath conditions with a collisional-presheath-based prescription.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper derives sheath boundary conditions for a drift-kinetic gyromoment model at the collisional presheath entrance, assuming perpendicular incidence of the magnetic field to the wall. The ions are described by Hermite-Laguerre gyromoments, and the boundary conditions are obtained by assuming high collisionality (setting the Dougherty collision operator to zero, C=0, i.e., a local Maxwellian), reducing the stationary parallel equations to a 5x5 linear system whose determinant condition yields U|| = ±1.10 sqrt(Te) sqrt(1+1.37 tau_i Ti/Te), along with inhomogeneous Neumann conditions for the gradients and a corresponding expression for J||. The authors implement these conditions in a LAPD-like linear-device simulation using a fourth-order finite-difference scheme and compare them with the previously used ad hoc Bohm plus homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. They report that the new 'physical' BCs produce a larger plasma outflow to the wall, a lower density throughout the device, lower fluctuation levels, fast convergence with the number of retained moments, and satisfaction of ambipolarity, while the turbulence properties remain essentially unchanged.

Significance. The analytical derivation is explicit and parameter-free: the coefficients 1.10 and 1.37 emerge from a determinant condition rather than from a fit, and the comparison with ad hoc BCs is internally consistent. If the ordering assumptions are satisfied, the result provides a useful, analytically grounded alternative to ad hoc Bohm BCs for gyromoment drift-kinetic codes, and it isolates the effect of the previously neglected Ne U||e grad|| Te term. However, the numerical application is compromised by a mismatch between the assumed collisionality ordering and the simulation parameters (the ion mean free path is about 33R), so the quantitative claims about the LAPD-like device are not convincingly established. The manuscript would also be strengthened by an independent comparison with a kinetic or particle-in-cell boundary-layer solution, although such validation is not strictly required for the derivation itself.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III (assumption 5, Eq. (4)) and Sec. V (parameters nu0=0.03, tau_i=0.5, Lz=36R)] The derivation closes the ion moment hierarchy by imposing C^pj_ii=0, which presumes the high-collisionality ordering lambda_D << lambda_||i << R. Under the code's stated normalization (time in units of R/c_s0 and collision frequencies in units of c_s0/R), the ion mean free path is lambda_||i/R = v_thi/(nu_ii R) ~ sqrt(2 tau_i)/nu0 ~ 33 at Ti ~ 1. This violates the condition lambda_||i << R by two orders of magnitude, so the simulated plasma is essentially collisionless on the device scale and the simulations do not realize the collisional-presheath limit used to derive Eq. (11). Fig. 5 is direct evidence that the physical BCs increase the odd-p gyromoments, which, according to Eq. (23), are driven by parallel derivatives of even-p moments and are not relaxed by collisions. The larger outflow and density drop in Figs. 2 and 3 may therefore be an artifact of enforcing a local-Maxwellian boundary condition in a regime where it is not self-consistent, rather than a genuine collisional-presheath effect. The authors should either repeat the simulations with parameters satisfying lambda_||i << R (e.g., a significantly larger nu0), or state the normalization of nu0 and demonstrate explicitly that the ordering holds; absent that, the central application claim is not supported.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (17)-(19)] The numerical implementation applies the derived boundary conditions at the wall (z=0), whereas the derivation in Sec. III is explicitly for the collisional presheath entrance, located roughly an ion mean free path from the wall. With the present parameters, lambda_||i ~ 33R and the parallel grid spacing is Delta z = 0.56R, so the presheath entrance is far from the computational boundary and is not resolved. The manuscript should clarify whether the simulation boundary represents the wall or the presheath entrance; if the latter, the ghost-cell procedure must account for the unresolved presheath layer, and if the former, the derivation must be extended to justify applying the asymptotic conditions directly at the wall.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. V] The parameters tau_i and nu0 are used without definitions; please define tau_i = Ti0/Te0 and state the normalization of nu0 (for instance, nu0 = nu_ii R/c_s0). This is needed to check the ordering discussed in the major comments.
  2. [Eq. (1c)] The notation 'mu.t' contains a typo; it should read 'mu, t'.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The statement that 'the even-p moments become more biMaxwellian and the odd-p moments increases in magnitude when using inhomogeneous BC' is difficult to parse and appears to contradict the text, which states that the distribution is closer to a bi-Maxwellian with the ad hoc BCs. Please rephrase.
  4. [Sec. V] The convergence claim with (P,J)=(2,1) is supported by Fig. 2 for the density, but the text should also provide a quantitative metric for the convergence of the higher-order gyromoments or explicitly state that the density is the convergence criterion.
  5. [Sec. IV] The scheme is described both as a 'first order forward finite-difference scheme' and as 'first-order upwind'; please unify the terminology.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the boundary-condition coefficients follow from a determinant condition and are applied in simulations, not fitted to the simulated outflow.

full rationale

The boundary-condition derivation is self-contained with respect to the paper's main claim. Eq. (11) is obtained by setting det M = 0 in the linear system (9)-(10) built from the quasineutral fluid/moment equations and the cutoff-Maxwellian electron law; the coefficients 1.10 and 1.37 are algebraic outputs of that determinant condition, not parameters fitted to the simulation data. The gradient relations (12) are the corresponding null-space solution, and the gyromoment relations (13) are the explicit projection of the assumed local Maxwellian (5), which the paper transparently labels as the high-collisionality closure. The comparison with the ad hoc Bohm/Neumann BCs (15) is therefore a genuine comparison of two distinct boundary models. The reliance on Refs. 22, 28-30 for the gyromoment hierarchy and Dougherty projection is a normal use of the authors' prior parameter-free model derivations; the cited property N^{10}_i = 0 is effectively a centering convention of the Hermite basis, so it is not load-bearing circular evidence. The skeptical concern that nu_0 = 0.03 gives lambda_{||i}/R ~ 33, violating the lambda_{||i} << R ordering assumed in Sec. III, is a validity/correctness issue about applying the collisional closure, not a circularity: the derivation would still follow from its stated assumptions. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted target or to the simulation result it is used to explain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to produce the central coefficients 1.10 and 1.37; they come from a determinant condition using Braginskii coefficients. The derivation relies on the modeling assumptions listed; the most fragile are the cutoff-Maxwellian electron model and the collisional Maxwellian closure for ions. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The electrostatic drift-kinetic gyromoment model of Ref. 22 (Eqs. 2a-2q) is valid for the bulk plasma.
    The boundary conditions are derived from these equations; an error or inapplicability of the model propagates into the boundary conditions.
  • domain assumption The magnetic field is perpendicular to the wall, so no magnetic presheath exists and only the collisional and Debye sheaths matter.
    This removes gyro-orbit wall-intersection physics and lets the authors place boundary conditions at the collisional presheath entrance.
  • domain assumption Near the wall the plasma is collisional with lambda_D << lambda_i << R, with a steady-state sheath, parallel gradients dominant, negligible parallel heat-flux gradient, and negligible electron inertia (Sec. III assumptions 1-6).
    These ordering assumptions justify the reduced set of gradient equations leading to the determinant condition Eq. (11).
  • domain assumption Electrons are described by a cutoff Maxwellian with U||e = sqrt(Te/mi) exp((Lambda-phi)/Te) (Eq. 3).
    This standard sheath model fixes the electron outflow and enters the M-matrix through c_phi and c_Te; if electron kinetics matter, the coefficients change.
  • domain assumption At high collisionality the Dougherty collision operator projection vanishes, giving the recursive Maxwellian closure Eq. (4) and setting odd-p gyromoments to zero at the boundary.
    This closure converts the infinite moment hierarchy into a finite set of boundary conditions; Fig. 5 suggests the simulated distribution is not exactly in this closure.
  • domain assumption The parallel current is small enough that U||e ~ U|| (Eq. 8b).
    This replacement is used to rewrite the electron temperature equation; near ambipolar outflow it is consistent, but in general it neglects J||/Ne.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Derivation and application of sheath boundary conditions for drift-kinetic simulations in a linear plasma device based on a gyromoment approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2QJ2ZDS6

@misc{pith2026260812205,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Derivation and application of sheath boundary conditions for drift-kinetic simulations in a linear plasma device based on a gyromoment approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2QJ2ZDS6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12205}
}
read the original abstract

Boundary conditions for a drift-kinetic model at the collisional presheath entrance with perpendicular incidence of the magnetic field to the wall are derived and numerically implemented. The drift-kinetic model for the plasma is based on the expansion of the ion distribution function on a Hermite-Laguerre basis, and the evolution of the resulting gyromoments. A linear-plasma-device geometry is considered. Comparison with simpler simulations with previously used ad hoc boundary conditions is presented. For the new set of boundary conditions, a significant increase of the plasma outflow to the wall is observed, leading to a significantly smaller plasma density in the whole volume of the device.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12205 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Temporal and azimuthal average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Temporally and azimuthally averaged density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temporally averaged density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temporally and azimuthally averaged left-hand side [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The spatial maximum of the deviation between the gyro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Pfister, H

    Gekelman, W. and Pfister, H. and Lucky, Z. and Bamber, J. and Leneman, D. and Maggs, J. , journal=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  2. [2]

    Moment-Based Approach to the Flux-Tube linear Gyrokinetic Model

    Moment-Based Approach to the Flux-Tube linear Gyrokinetic Model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05799 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [3]

    and Ricci, P

    Jorge, R. and Ricci, P. and Brunner, S. and Gamba, S. and Konovets, V. and Loureiro, N. F. and Perrone, L. M. and Teixeira, N. , date-modified =. Linear theory of electron-plasma waves at arbitrary collisionality , volume =. Journal of Plasma Physics , number =

  4. [4]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Energy dynamics in a simulation of LAPD turbulence , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  5. [5]

    Physics of plasmas , volume=

    Radially sheared azimuthal flows and turbulent transport in a cylindrical plasma , author=. Physics of plasmas , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  6. [6]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Analysis of plasma instabilities and verification of the BOUT code for the Large Plasma Device , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  7. [7]

    and Dorr, M

    Dorf, M. and Dorr, M. , journal =

  8. [8]

    Hakim, A. H. and Mandell, N. R. and Bernard, T. N. and Francisquez, M. and Hammett, G. W. and Shi, E. L. , journal =. Continuum electromagnetic gyrokinetic simulations of turbulence in the tokamak scrape-off layer and laboratory devices , volume =

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Chang, C. S. and Ku, S. and Loarte, A. and Parail, V. and Koechl, F. and Romanelli, M. and Maingi, R. and Ahn, J.-W. and Gray, T. and Hughes, J. and others , journal =

  2. [10]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Plasma confinement and transport , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  3. [11]

    Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. , publisher =. Table of integrals, series, and products , year =

  4. [12]

    and Sigmar, D

    Helander, P. and Sigmar, D. J. , publisher =. Collisional transport in magnetized plasmas , volume =

  5. [13]

    and Ulbl, P

    Michels, D. and Ulbl, P. and Zholobenko, W. and Body, T. and Stegmeir, A. and Eich, T. and Griener, M. and Conway, G. D. and Jenko, F. and ASDEX Upgrade Team , journal =

  6. [14]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Two-dimensional modelling of blob dynamics in tokamak edge plasmas , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  7. [15]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Intermittent turbulence and turbulent structures in a linear magnetized plasma , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  8. [16]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    On the nature of blob propagation and generation in the large plasma device: Global GRILLIX studies , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  9. [17]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    A suitable boundary condition for bounded plasma simulation without sheath resolution , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  10. [18]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Parallel flows and turbulence in a linear plasma machine , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  11. [19]

    2010 , publisher=

    Low-frequency turbulence in a linear magnetized plasma , author=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  12. [20]

    EPJ Web of Conferences , volume=

    Helicon wave-generated plasmas for negative ion beams for fusion , author=. EPJ Web of Conferences , volume=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  13. [21]

    , journal =

    Chodura, R. , journal =. Kinetic effects in the scrape off layer , volume =

  14. [22]

    The Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Plasma--wall transition in an oblique magnetic field , author=. The Physics of Fluids , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  15. [23]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Boundary conditions for plasma fluid models at the magnetic presheath entrance , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  16. [24]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Local gyrokinetic collisional theory of the ion-temperature gradient mode , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  17. [25]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Gyrokinetic simulations of plasma turbulence in a Z-pinch using a moment-based approach and advanced collision operators , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  18. [26]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Three-dimensional two-fluid Braginskii simulations of the large plasma device , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  19. [27]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Gyrokinetic treatment of a grazing angle magnetic presheath , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  20. [28]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , pages=

    Gyrokinetic continuum simulation of turbulence in a straight open-field-line plasma , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , pages=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  21. [29]

    and Told, D

    Pan, Q. and Told, D. and Shi, E. and Hammett, G. W. and Jenko, F. , doi =. Physics of Plasmas , number =. 2018 , bdsk-url-1 =

    2018

  22. [30]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Numerical implementation of the improved Sugama collision operator using a moment approach , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  23. [31]

    Frei, B. J. and Ball, J. and Hoffmann, A. C. D. and Jorge, R. and Ricci, P. and Stenger, L. , date-modified =. Development of advanced linearized gyrokinetic collision operators using a moment approach , volume =. Journal of Plasma Physics , number =

  24. [32]

    and Body, T

    Ulbl, P. and Body, T. and Zholobenko, W. and Stegmeir, A. and Pfennig, J. and Jenko, F. , journal=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [33]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Beyond the Oberbeck--Boussinesq and long wavelength approximation , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  26. [34]

    Held, Markus and Wiesenberger, Matthias and Kendl, Alexander , journal=. Pad. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  27. [35]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Long-wavelength closures for collisional and neutral interaction terms in gyro-fluid models , author=. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  28. [36]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Effects of plasma resistivity in FELTOR simulations of three-dimensional full-F gyro-fluid turbulence , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  29. [37]

    The Physics of fluids , volume=

    Nonlinear gyrokinetic equations , author=. The Physics of fluids , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  30. [38]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Full-F gyrofluid model , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  31. [39]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Second order guiding-center Vlasov--Maxwell equations , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  32. [40]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    The HelCat basic plasma science device , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  33. [41]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    A drift-kinetic analytical model for scrape-off layer plasma dynamics at arbitrary collisionality , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  34. [42]

    and Frei, B

    Jorge, R. and Frei, B. J. and Ricci, P. , date-added =. Nonlinear gyrokinetic. Journal of Plasma Physics , number =

  35. [43]

    and Lapillonne, X

    Goerler, T. and Lapillonne, X. and Brunner, S. and Dannert, T. and Jenko, F. and Merz, F. and Told, D. , journal =

  36. [44]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    Large scale dynamics in flux driven gyrokinetic turbulence , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  37. [45]

    Dougherty, J. P. , journal =. Model

  38. [46]

    2016 , publisher=

    The upgraded large plasma device, a machine for studying frontier basic plasma physics , author=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  39. [47]

    The Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Kinetic theory of the plasma sheath transition in a weakly ionized plasma , author=. The Physics of Fluids , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

    1981

  40. [48]

    Baalrud, S. D. and Scheiner, B. and Yee, B. and Hopkins, M. and Barnat, E. , journal=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  41. [49]

    Churchill, R. M. and Canik, J. M. and Chang, C. S. and Hager, R. and Leonard, A. W. and Maingi, R. and Nazikian, R. and Stotler, D. P. , journal=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  42. [50]

    , journal=

    Arakawa, A. , journal=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  43. [51]

    38th Conference on Plasma Physics , volume=

    Impact of the Boussinesq approximation in tokamak scrape-off layer turbulence , author=. 38th Conference on Plasma Physics , volume=

  44. [52]

    and Ricci, P

    Paruta, P. and Ricci, P. and Riva, F. and Wersal, C. and Beadle, C. and Frei, B. , journal =

  45. [53]

    Frei, B. J. and Jorge, R. and Ricci, P. , doi =. A gyrokinetic model for the plasma periphery of tokamak devices , volume =. Journal of Plasma Physics , number =. 2020 , bdsk-url-1 =

    2020

  46. [54]

    and Halpern, F

    Mosetto, A. and Halpern, F. D. and Jolliet, S. and Loizu, J. and Ricci, P. , journal =. Finite ion temperature effects on scrape-off layer turbulence , volume =

  47. [55]

    and Ricci, P

    Giacomin, M. and Ricci, P. and Coroado, A. and Fourestey, G. and Galassi, D. and Lanti, E. and Mancini, D. and Richart, N. and Stenger, L. N. and Varini, N. , journal =. The GBS code for the self-consistent simulation of plasma turbulence and kinetic neutral dynamics in the to...

  48. [56]

    and Drake, J

    Zeiler, A. and Drake, J. F. and Rogers, B. , journal =. Nonlinear reduced Braginskii equations with ion thermal dynamics in toroidal plasma , volume =

  49. [57]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    The Bohm--Chodura plasma sheath criterion , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  50. [58]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Development of a radio-frequency ion beam source for fast-ion studies on the large plasma device , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  51. [59]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Measurements of interactions between waves and energetic ions in basic plasma experiments , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  52. [60]

    Brizard, A. J. and Hahm, T. S. , doi =. Reviews of Modern Physics , number =. 2007 , bdsk-url-1 =

    2007

  53. [61]

    De Oliveira, D. S. and Body, T. A. and Galassi, D. and Theiler, C. and Laribi, E. and Tamain, P. and Stegmeir, A. and Giacomin, M. and Zholobenko, W. and Ricci, P. and others , date-modified =. Nuclear Fusion , pages =

  54. [62]

    and Coster, D

    Stegmeir, A. and Coster, D. and Ross, A. and Maj, O. and Lackner, K. and Poli, E. , journal =

  55. [63]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Modeling of plasma turbulence and transport in the Large Plasma Device , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  56. [64]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Full-F turbulent simulation in a linear plasma device using a gyro-moment approach , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  57. [65]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Moment-based approach to the flux-tube linear gyrokinetic model , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

  58. [66]

    Hammett, G. W. and Perkins, F. W. , date-added =. Fluid moment models for

  59. [67]

    Beer, M. A. and Hammett, G. W. , journal =. Toroidal gyrofluid equations for simulations of tokamak turbulence , volume =

  60. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01016 , year=

    Dimits shift and impact of collisions using a gyrokinetic moment-based approach , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01016 , year=

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Mandell, N. R. and Dorland, W. and Landreman, M. , journal =. Laguerre--. 2018 , pages =

    2018

  62. [70]

    and Dorland, W

    Mandell, N. and Dorland, W. and Abel, I. and Gaur, R. and Kim, P. and Martin, M. and Qian, T. , journal =

  63. [71]

    and Told, D

    Pan, Q. and Told, D. and Jenko, F. , doi =. Physics of Plasmas , number =. 2016 , bdsk-url-1 =

    2016

  64. [72]

    Journal of computational physics , volume=

    Hyperviscosity-based stabilization for radial basis function-finite difference (RBF-FD) discretizations of advection--diffusion equations , author=. Journal of computational physics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  65. [73]

    The Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Kelvin—helmholtz instability in a fully ionized plasma in a magnetic field , author=. The Physics of Fluids , volume=. 1965 , publisher=

    1965

  66. [74]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Finite ion temperature effects on scrape-off layer turbulence , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  67. [75]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    A first-principles self-consistent model of plasma turbulence and kinetic neutral dynamics in the tokamak scrape-off layer , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  68. [76]

    Adams and Steven Benson and Jed Brown and Peter Brune and Kris Buschelman and Emil M

    Satish Balay and Shrirang Abhyankar and Mark F. Adams and Steven Benson and Jed Brown and Peter Brune and Kris Buschelman and Emil M. Constantinescu and Lisandro Dalcin and Alp Dener and Victor Eijkhout and Jacob Faibussowitsch and William D. Gropp and V\'

  69. [77]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Variational principles of guiding centre motion , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  70. [78]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Spectral transition of multiscale turbulence in the tokamak pedestal , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  71. [79]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Local conservation laws for the Maxwell-Vlasov and collisionless kinetic guiding-center theories , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  72. [80]

    The Physics of fluids , volume=

    The electric dipole of a guiding center and the plasma momentum density , author=. The Physics of fluids , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  73. [81]

    1974 , publisher=

    Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables , author=. 1974 , publisher=

    1974

  74. [82]

    2003 , publisher=

    Plasma confinement , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  75. [83]

    Physics of plasmas , volume=

    Electron temperature gradient driven turbulence , author=. Physics of plasmas , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  76. [84]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Consistency in drift-ordered fluid equations , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  77. [85]

    2019 , publisher=

    Felix Parra , title =. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  78. [86]

    Reviews of plasma physics , volume=

    Transport processes in a plasma , author=. Reviews of plasma physics , volume=

  79. [87]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Drift-ordered fluid vorticity equation with energy consistency , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  80. [88]

    , title =

    Frigo, Matteo and Johnson, Steven G. , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE , year = 2005, volume = 93, number = 2, pages =

    2005

  81. [89]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Extended drift-kinetic full-f turbulent simulation of a linear plasma device using the gyro-moment approach , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  82. [90]

    Numerical Recipes in Fortran, The Art of Scientific Computing , author=

  83. [91]

    Journal of Atmospheric Sciences , volume=

    On the elimination of aliasing in finite-difference schemes by filtering high-wavenumber components , author=. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences , volume=

  84. [92]

    Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics , volume=

    Gyroaveraged equations for both the gyrokinetic and drift-kinetic regimes , author=. Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  85. [93]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Gyrokinetic equations for strong-gradient regions , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  86. [94]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Fully electromagnetic nonlinear gyrokinetic equations for tokamak edge turbulence , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  87. [95]

    Contributions to Plasma Physics , volume=

    General gyrokinetic equations for edge plasmas , author=. Contributions to Plasma Physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  88. [96]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.13123 , year=

    Comprehensive full-f drift-kinetic and delta-f gyrokinetic simulations of a linear plasma device based on the gyro-moment approach , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.13123 , year=

  89. [97]

    Physical Review , volume=

    The effect of space charge and initial velocities on the potential distribution and thermionic current between parallel plane electrodes , author=. Physical Review , volume=. 1923 , publisher=

    1923

  90. [98]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , volume=

    The plasma--sheath boundary region , author=. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  91. [99]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A fast low-to-high confinement mode bifurcation dynamics in the boundary-plasma gyrokinetic code XGC1 , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  92. [100]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Particle-in-cell methods in edge plasma physics: the PICLS code , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  93. [101]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    A tutorial on some basic aspects of divertor physics , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  94. [102]

    Physics of plasmas , volume=

    Theory of the collisional presheath in an oblique magnetic field , author=. Physics of plasmas , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  95. [103]

    and Davis, W.M

    Zweben, S.J. and Davis, W.M. and Kaye, S.M. and Myra, J.R. and Bell, R.E. and LeBlanc, B.P. and Maqueda, R.J. and Munsat, T. and Sabbagh, S.A. and Sechrest, Y. and Stotler, D.P. and the NSTX Team , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/...

    2015 doi

  96. [104]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Nespoli, F and Furno, I and Labit, B and Ricci, P and Avino, F and Halpern, F D and Musil, F and Riva, F , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aa6276 , url =

    2017 doi

  97. [105]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , abstract =

    K -U Riemann , title =. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , abstract =. 1991 , month =. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/24/4/001 , url =

    1991 doi

  98. [106]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=

    Dependence on ion temperature of shallow-angle magnetic presheaths with adiabatic electrons , author=. Journal of Plasma Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  99. [107]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=

    Existence of subsonic plasma sheaths , author=. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  100. [108]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Février, O and Theiler, C and Harrison, J R and Tsui, C K and Verhaegh, K and Wüthrich, C and Boedo, J A and De Oliveira, H and Duval, B P and Labit, B and Lipschultz, B and Maurizio, R and Reimerdes, H and the TCV Team and the EUROfusion MST1 Team , title =. Plasma Physics an...

    2020 doi

  101. [109]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A drift ordered short mean free path description for magnetized plasma allowing strong spatial anisotropy , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.