REVIEW 2 cited by
Monte Carlo Implementation of Gaussian Process Models for Bayesian Regression and Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Gaussian processes are a natural way of defining prior distributions over functions of one or more input variables. In a simple nonparametric regression problem, where such a function gives the mean of a Gaussian distribution for an observed response, a Gaussian process model can easily be implemented using matrix computations that are feasible for datasets of up to about a thousand cases. Hyperparameters that define the covariance function of the Gaussian process can be sampled using Markov chain methods. Regression models where the noise has a t distribution and logistic or probit models for classification applications can be implemented by sampling as well for latent values underlying the observations. Software is now available that implements these methods using covariance functions with hierarchical parameterizations. Models defined in this way can discover high-level properties of the data, such as which inputs are relevant to predicting the response.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Discrepancy Modeling with Intermediate Variables: A New Framework for Robust Gaussian Process Calibration
New framework for robust GP calibration that leverages intermediate variables, S-GaSP discretization, and space-filling designs for joint emulator-discrepancy modeling, demonstrated on nuclear physics binding energies.
-
Semantic-Aware Gaussian Process Calibration with Structured Layerwise Kernels for Deep Neural Networks
SAL-GP couples layerwise GPs with an additive kernel to calibrate classifier confidence, but experimental evidence is mixed, with one variant often no better than a single-layer GP.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.