Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.00859 v1 pith:2RLCYHDW submitted 2016-08-02 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords temporalactionrecognitionsegmentgoodnetworkpracticescontribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Deep convolutional networks have achieved great success for visual recognition in still images. However, for action recognition in videos, the advantage over traditional methods is not so evident. This paper aims to discover the principles to design effective ConvNet architectures for action recognition in videos and learn these models given limited training samples. Our first contribution is temporal segment network (TSN), a novel framework for video-based action recognition. which is based on the idea of long-range temporal structure modeling. It combines a sparse temporal sampling strategy and video-level supervision to enable efficient and effective learning using the whole action video. The other contribution is our study on a series of good practices in learning ConvNets on video data with the help of temporal segment network. Our approach obtains the state-the-of-art performance on the datasets of HMDB51 ( $ 69.4\% $) and UCF101 ($ 94.2\% $). We also visualize the learned ConvNet models, which qualitatively demonstrates the effectiveness of temporal segment network and the proposed good practices.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POVQA: Preference-Optimized Video Question Answering with Rationales for Data Efficiency

    cs.CV 2025-10 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    POVQA reports large F1 gains on a new 239-example video QA dataset after rationale-based fine-tuning, but its own keyframe-only ablation matches the full pooling pipeline, and fine-tuning hurts zero-shot TVQA accuracy.

Pith tools