Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1212.2447 v1 pith:2RSORDB7 submitted 2012-10-19 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords modelbayesianbounddataexpertshierarchicallikelihoodlocal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Hierarchical Mixture of Experts (HME) is a well-known tree-based model for regression and classification, based on soft probabilistic splits. In its original formulation it was trained by maximum likelihood, and is therefore prone to over-fitting. Furthermore the maximum likelihood framework offers no natural metric for optimizing the complexity and structure of the tree. Previous attempts to provide a Bayesian treatment of the HME model have relied either on ad-hoc local Gaussian approximations or have dealt with related models representing the joint distribution of both input and output variables. In this paper we describe a fully Bayesian treatment of the HME model based on variational inference. By combining local and global variational methods we obtain a rigourous lower bound on the marginal probability of the data under the model. This bound is optimized during the training phase, and its resulting value can be used for model order selection. We present results using this approach for a data set describing robot arm kinematics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Basis Transformers for Multi-Task Tabular Regression

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Basis transformers beat fine-tuned LLMs on 34 multi-task tabular regression datasets while using five times fewer parameters and no data preprocessing.

Pith tools